Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: It’s the last day of veto session. Here’s a breakdown on what’s happened so far from Capitol News Illinois

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* Here’s the rest of your morning roundup…

posted by Isabel Miller
Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 7:47 am

Comments

  1. Congratulations, Sydney!

    Comment by Dirty Red Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 7:59 am

  2. ==Push for Reparations in Chicago Gets New Life as Johnson Earmarks $500K for New Panel==

    If the City used a wealth tax to pay for reparations, it would likely be very popular with voters in all parts of the City.

    Comment by Amy Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 8:00 am

  3. Amy - it is always popular to tax other people.

    Comment by Just Me 2 Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 8:31 am

  4. The situation in Dolton is an open, ongoing crime spree. Law enforcement should step in the same way they would for a string of burglaries or a store being looted.

    Comment by vern Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 8:37 am

  5. The Mayor of Dolton has a protective detail. The idea that the Mayor of Dolton was a part-time job when I was a kid.
    One mayor was retired and even took a small pay cut when his social security went up. The next mayor also worked for the SoS office, along with being mayor.

    The town had another 4 thousand people back then.

    Also, how in the heck do you spend $3,700 to fly first class to Vegas? With even a small amount of planning you could likely do that for about half as much.

    Comment by OneMan Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 8:38 am

  6. ===it is always popular to tax other people.===

    … which is why the Fair Tax Flop was the pro fair tax folks selling it incorrectly, as folks like Floridans Griffin and Rauner eventually left, even after the Fair Tax failing.

    I’m not in favor of any “city income tax” thingy, but claiming the “wealthy” are persecuted is as preposterous as trolling the idea of a city wealth/income tax.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 8:40 am

  7. =which is why the Fair Tax Flop was the pro fair tax folks selling it incorrectly=

    And not helped by Frerichs’ support for extending the fair tax to retirement.

    Comment by Stuck in Celliniland Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:04 am

  8. Jason Benetti bolting the White Sox to do TV play by play for the Detroit Tigers. Ouch!

    Comment by Jose Abreu's next homerun Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:15 am

  9. From ICYMI: allow legislative staff to unionize

    I am somewhat curious. Are employers, including the states, allowed to decide whether or not workers can unionize? I thought this was a federal issue.

    I would assume the workers can vote for representation and collective bargaining except in the case of critical workers. Legislative aides and pages and workers ought to simply organize regardless of the vote of the members of the Senate or House.

    Comment by H-W Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:16 am

  10. Nice to see Mayor Johnson finally hired a IGA chief…. 7 months late. This should have been ready to go and a person chosen on Day 1.

    Comment by low level Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:18 am

  11. === Are employers, including the states, allowed to decide whether or not workers can unionize? I thought this was a federal issue. ===

    The applicable law is the Illinois Public Labor Relations Act. (5 ILCS 315). Federal, state and local governments are excluded from NLRB jurisdiction by statute or regulation.

    Comment by Hannibal Lecter Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:23 am

  12. Here is a website explaining it H-W:

    https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-pr
    otect/the-law/jurisdictional-standards#:~:text=The%20following
    %20employers%20are%20excluded,a
    nd%20wholly%2Downed%20government%20corporations.

    Comment by Hannibal Lecter Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:25 am

  13. ===Frerichs===

    “Who?”

    Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:30 am

  14. Thanks, Hannibal Lecter.

    Comment by H-W Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:34 am

  15. @ Hannibal Lecter:

    I read part of the legislative act including where it excludes legislative workers intentionally (5 ILCS 315/3.o paragraph 2).

    I also note that the act explicitly waives the sovereign immunity of the state. As I understand that, it implies these workers can sue for the right to organize.

    (5 ILCS 315/25) (from Ch. 48, par. 1625)
    Sec. 25. For purposes of this Act, the State of Illinois waives sovereign immunity.
    (Source: P.A. 83-1012.)

    So is it possible that if the legislature refuses to act on this proposal, these workers could organize with the assistance of ASCME or some other group, and petition the State Supreme Court to invalidate the clause that says they are not eligible?

    Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:48 am

  16. Sorry. Anonymous at 9:48 is me.

    Comment by H-W Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 9:49 am

  17. === So is it possible that if the legislature refuses to act on this proposal, these workers could organize with the assistance of ASCME or some other group, and petition the State Supreme Court to invalidate the clause that says they are not eligible? ===

    First, as a matter of procedure, you wouldn’t start with the State Supreme Court. With that aside, however, it is unclear whether a challenge in Court would be successful. I believe it would be a case of first impression since there are no cases to my knowledge that have been brought to the courts regarding jurisdictional issues of the ILRB since the passage of the Workers Rights Constitutional Amendment.

    Traditionally, these matters are handled by the Illinois Labor Relations Board, but as noted in the Act, employees of the General Assembly are excluded from the jurisdiction of the ILRB.

    Comment by Hannibal Lecter Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 10:13 am

  18. Mayor Biss. Are you still the good government person you always claimed to be? will you let a very tall stadium be built in a residential neighborhood with questionable financing which could endanger the jobs of many at that university as the debt financing did before resulting in the firing of over 200 people? are you ready for HUGE noise? the sellout of Daniel Biss will be the title of an article if you break the tie in favor of that stadium. Friends around it are very upset. Sellout or good government?

    Comment by Amalia Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 10:19 am

  19. ===be built in a residential neighborhood===

    That football stadium predates every living resident.

    Comment by Rich Miller Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 10:21 am

  20. =Friends around it are very upset.=

    A lot of parallels to the prior situation with the friends of Wrigleyville. Although in this instance the university isn’t asking for a handout and is willing to commit $100M to the city. You can fund a lot of progressive causes with that kind of cash. Not an easy call at all.

    Comment by Pundent Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 11:32 am

  21. =That football stadium predates every living resident.= not what they are building…an entire stadium as high as the highest point now, nor how they will use it, concerts and lots of activity in addition to football games. friends who live there are very concerned.

    Comment by Amalia Thursday, Nov 9, 23 @ 12:49 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Live coverage
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.