Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: State commission says Illinois underfunds public universities by $1.4 billion. Capitol News Illinois

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

* ABC Chicago

The appellate court ruling came down as Mayor Brandon Johnson was speaking to the media at a news conference on an unrelated subject.

“I’ve said all along that the people of Chicago should determine how we should address the unhoused crisis in Chicago,” the mayor said in the moment, “and I made a commitment, not just as a candidate but as mayor of the city of Chicago, that I would do everything in my power to move us closer towards housing for all, because this has been a long time coming for the people of Chicago.”

The Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago released a statement on the decision, saying, ”We are disappointed in the outcome of this case, but felt it was important to challenge this misleading and manipulative referendum question. This massive tax increase would hurt homeowners, renters, union workers, and businesses throughout the neighborhoods. Even worse, a yes vote on this referendum is a vote to deliver huge blank checks to the City with no plan for how millions will be accountably spent. We have already ramped up our efforts to educate the public about the negative impacts of this tax increase.”

In a statement, Maxica Williams, chair of the End Homelessness Ballot Initiative Committee and board president of the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, said:
“Our longstanding coalition of policy advocates, service providers, labor unions, and homeless and formerly homeless people commend the judges of the First District Appellate Court for dismissing the real estate lobby’s effort to invalidate Ballot Question 1. We look forward to keeping up our efforts to reach hundreds of thousands of voters about their opportunity to vote yes for a fair and sustainable plan to fund housing, care for the homeless, and ask wealthy real estate corporations to pay their fair share.”

Governor Pritzker will be in Decatur at 10 am to celebrate Primient investments in Illinois. Click here to watch.

posted by Isabel Miller
Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 7:32 am

Comments

  1. The additional funding should be used for nothing but reducing tuition.

    Comment by Anyone Remember Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 8:18 am

  2. Link is one lucky corrupt pol.

    Comment by Loop Lady Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 8:28 am

  3. You should really read the report and understand why only reducing tuition would be mistake if one cares about equity and student success. But middle class voters always want subsidies for them and not better outcomes for those with higher needs.

    Comment by ArchPundit Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 8:59 am

  4. ==I would do everything in my power to move us closer towards housing for all==

    Unless you’re a migrant

    Comment by Demoralized Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 9:11 am

  5. @ Anyone Remember

    Check your math. The net effect would be no change.

    There are other ways to reduce the cost of education for students. For example, the room and board side, as well as student fees, represent areas where costs for students can be better managed and reduced effectively. Moody’s noted this recently.

    But offsetting gains from state revenue with tuition discounts, particularly at a one-to-one ratio as you suggest only makes sense if more students exist and will attend. Current demographic model contradict that approach as fewer children are in the future, particularly in non urban areas.

    Comment by H-W Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 9:11 am

  6. –Illinois’ recreational weed market is most expensive in the Midwest–

    I assure you, the cost is far higher in Indiana. Actual money is only a small part of the total cost for an individual.

    There’s a zero percent chance I will end up in prison for participating in the recreational cannabis market in Illinois.

    Comment by TheInvisibleMan Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 9:13 am

  7. == no plan for how millions will be accountably spent.==

    Conversely, the real estate industry has no plan to address homelessness. It never has. We have to try something. That’s why I’m voting yes.

    Comment by low level Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 9:56 am

  8. === Even worse, a yes vote on this referendum is a vote to deliver huge blank checks to the City with no plan for how millions will be accountably spent.===

    The city council has to vote on the plans. They can only do so if the voters approve.

    The point of the Building Owners and Managers Association of Chicago is silly. The vote itself doesn’t deliver a huge blank check, it just allows the city council to move forward. You know, representative democracy.

    Comment by 17% solution Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 11:43 am

  9. “A Catholic grade school in Cicero will remain open with operational support from Big Shoulders Fund, a Chicago-based nonprofit, and nearly half a million dollars donated by anonymous supporters…”

    This needs a fact check. I’ve read several times that such donations were impossible without generous tax incentives and that ending Invest in Kids handouts would spell doom for innocent children across the state. And possibly adorable kittens and puppies… I don’t remember.

    Comment by Skokie Man Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 12:34 pm

  10. - low level - Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 9:56 am:

    == no plan for how millions will be accountably spent.==

    Conversely, the real estate industry has no plan to address homelessness. It never has. We have to try something. That’s why I’m voting yes.

    If we were in any other city, I could perhaps agree with you. But we’re not. We’re in one where they have literally spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the current migrant crisis - again with no plan and no intention of ever having one. And as someone who has worked four jobs simultaneously and worked diligently to finally pay for the home we wanted in the city we want to live in, it’s disheartening to say the least to hear how we need to pay “our fair share.” I’ve been paying my fair share here for 20 plus years. I’m happy to help fund and work to solve the housing issue and homelessness problem we have here in Chicago. But I don’t know any business that says “I don’t know how much this problem is going to cost, and I have no plan to really figure it out, but if you just give me the money I’m sure it will all work out in the end.”

    Comment by Just a guy Thursday, Mar 7, 24 @ 3:51 pm

  11. === But I don’t know any business that says “I don’t know how much this problem is going to cost, and I have no plan to really figure it out, but if you just give me the money I’m sure it will all work out in the end.===

    Government is not a business. The voters only vote to approve the tax. The city council does the actual work of taxing and spending.

    === If we were in any other city, I could perhaps agree with you. But we’re not. We’re in one where they have literally spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the current migrant crisis.===

    As a city, this wasn’t a choice we made. But since they came here we are morally obligated to not have them starve and freeze to death.

    Comment by 17% solution Friday, Mar 8, 24 @ 6:44 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.