Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

Pritzker won’t tip hand on biz/union-backed bill opposed by some green groups

Posted in:

Illinois

* Press release…

A coalition of business, labor and agriculture groups have united behind legislation that would provide a regulatory framework to advance carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in Illinois, helping the state reach its clean energy goals while simultaneously promoting job creation and economic growth. The proposal (SB3311/HB569) is the result of months of negotiations with a diverse array of stakeholders and includes strong landowner protections, support for local first responders, and numerous safety and accountability provisions.

Sponsored by State Sen. Bill Cunningham, D-Chicago, and State Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea, the legislation builds upon existing federal incentives and regulations, recognizing the state’s distinctive geology provides a unique opportunity to work toward Illinois’ goal of reducing greenhouse gases while also increasing economic development. As other states compete for investments, Illinois must seize the opportunity to provide clear policies to allow for successful project development.

CCS captures carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions at the source, preventing their release into the atmosphere and storing them permanently deep underground. According to the Clean Air Task Force, CCS is a safe and proven technology that has been commercially applied to operations in the U.S. since the 1970s. International studies addressing the energy transition suggest that CCS is a necessary tool for rapid decarbonization, along with energy efficiency and electrification. […]

According to a study from the University of Illinois, CCS development and expansion has the potential to create 14,400 jobs, generating more than $3 billion more for the State’s economy over 10 years. This includes the creation of new employment opportunities in the construction industry as well as the operation of new CCS facilities.

“The economic impact of enacting this legislation will be seen for generations,” said Representative Hoffman, Assistant House Majority Leader. “Under this proposal, Illinois will remain competitive as industries look to utilize this technology and expand operations, growing jobs and ensuring Illinois meets its carbon reduction goals.”

“This bill presents a critical opportunity to further propel Illinois’ transition to a clean energy economy without leaving workers and families behind, creating thousands of jobs and instituting strong labor standards that ensure fair wages, safe working conditions and training to get the job done right,” said Joe Duffy, Executive Director of Climate Jobs Illinois.

“Illinois has committed to reducing carbon emissions by 26% by 2025 and set the goal of being at 0% carbon emissions by 2050. Establishing carbon capture technology in Illinois is vital to reaching these goals,” said State Rep. Kam Buckner, D-Chicago. “Changes must be made for Illinois to transition to a clean energy future. We don’t have time to delay.”

Climate Jobs Illinois is a union group.

* Some good context from Patrick Keck at the SJ-R…

Sierra Club of Illinois however says the legislation is too limited, focusing solely on sequestration, and is instead backing legislation that would regulate CO2 pipelines and prohibit the use of eminent domain.

Denzler contended pipeline regulation is a federal matter for the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, currently crafting updated rules following a 2020 pipeline burst in Satartia, Mississippi causing over 40 people hospitalizations and more than 200 evacuations.

The bill would clarify that the owner of the surface estate would also own the beneath pore space, but would still allow for easements of the property. Securing easements proved to be difficult for the now cancelled Navigator Heartland Greenway — only receiving 13.4% of easements to construct its pipeline.

Local municipalities would also be eligible for grant funding, calculated by 1 cent for every ton of carbon dioxide injected into a sequestration facility for each fiscal year. The money could be used to cover emergency response plan expenses along with the purchase of new equipment.

* The governor was asked about the proposal yesterday…

I have not read and seen the proposal that was made. I understand, you know, we’re going to be working through how, if we could, we would implement carbon capture in the state of Illinois. Is it going to be safe for people who are living in areas where carbon capture will be taking place? How would we implement it to make sure that in the construction of that then it would be safe? But you know, I started out with a degree of skepticism, you know, as I do on the things that I think, where there’s significant interests on both sides, and wondering how are we going to be able to meet the needs of both sides of this issue.

Discuss.

posted by Rich Miller
Thursday, Mar 14, 24 @ 1:20 pm

Comments

A small carbon dioxide pipeline breaking in MS sent 40 people to the hospital…. CO2 is heavier than air, hugs the ground and displaces oxygen, so if you are near a break you and every other thing that breathes could die from suffocation. Like wise, your car’s engine needs oxygen to run, so good luck trying to escape (unless you have an EV). We ought to be completely sure anything like this is safe before allowing it.

Comment by thrudasmog Thursday, Mar 14, 24 @ 4:59 pm
So it’s easier to create a multistate tailpipe than to electrify the boilers? Maybe my math is off, but that doesn’t seem to solve the unlined coal ash pit problem. Why don’t we just take whatever we were gunna spend on this pipeline to nowhere and plow it into new solar PV.

Comment by Biker Thursday, Mar 14, 24 @ 7:08 pm