Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: Open thread

Isabel’s morning briefing

Posted in:

* ICYMI: Mayor Brandon Johnson’s homelessness plan appears headed to defeat. Sun-Times

* Related stories…

* Isabel’s top picks…

Governor Pritzker will give remarks at the Governor’s Conference on Travel & Tourism at 11 am. Click here to watch.

* Here’s something interesting from last night’s primary



* Here’s the rest…

posted by Isabel Miller
Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 7:50 am

Comments

  1. Thanks to Isabel for including the Sun Times story on the California Zephyr. It brought back a lot of good memories.
    I have taken it every time I have to go to San Francisco and enjoyed every trip.
    The article does a very good job of going over some of the highlights of the trip.

    Comment by Back to the Future Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 8:56 am

  2. This ought to be a signal to Mayor Johnson’s team that they need to sit back and reassess everything.

    Comment by low level Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:05 am

  3. ==signal to Mayor Johnson’s team that they need to sit back==

    I’m not sure how much more this Mayor can “sit back.” It doesn’t appear to me that he is capable of leaning forward on anything.

    Comment by Demoralized Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:17 am

  4. @low level my read based on how Mayor Johnson has responded to other failures of his administration (i.e. Brighton Park migrant camp, poor overall response to the migrant situation, pointing fingers at the state, etc.) is that he’ll double down and blame others. Perhaps say he was too busy driving his family to soccer practice to campaign in support of his own initiative.

    Comment by Charles Edward Cheese Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:23 am

  5. While I’m not saying Bring Chicago Home failed because of its “most of you are getting a tax break” gimmick, between this and the progressive tax amendment’s failure, can pols stop trying to fool people with this trick? “Rents will go up” was a message that made intuitive sense - all I saw from the other side was “eat the rich” and a refusal to substantively respond to most of the criticism.

    Comment by lake county democrat Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:27 am

  6. What’s this Shelby county thing? I admit I haven’t really been paying attention but read the subscribers article which definitely has me raising an eyebrow and saying “weeeeird” out loud. Did the county board do or not do something? County farm and dive team? Huh?

    Comment by Soy City Red Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:29 am

  7. -Rents will go up” was a message that made intuitive sense-

    Yep. Especially in Chicago(which is a union town) which makes it very difficult and expensive to build housing.

    Comment by Steve Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:32 am

  8. Maybe they should rethink the “First we get the money” idea and replace it with “Let’s create a plan”.

    Comment by EP1082 Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:36 am

  9. ==he’ll double down and blame others.==
    ==doesn’t appear to me that he is capable of leaning forward ==
    == all I saw from the other side was “eat the rich” ==

    Absolutely agree w all of these. Thank you for your comments. I didn’t vote for the mayor but I want him to succeed. If he fails it will be bad for everyone - including the state.

    Comment by low level Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:42 am

  10. Catch great Chicago band Dolly Varden’s California Zephyr:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2oGQktAvuY

    Comment by Steve Z Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:46 am

  11. I can’t help but think that a big chunk of the anti-referendum vote was people just thinking, “Hey, Johnson stinks, he’s pushing this, so therefore this must stink as well.”

    Comment by TJ Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 9:54 am

  12. =“I did not lose. Our democracy lost, when you take into consideration all they had to do to destroy me,” Flowers said =

    Very happy to see Flowers out of the state house. The level of hubris in her statement tells us all we needed to know about her. She wasn’t “destroyed, she lost an election. No one is entitled to their elected office.

    Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:17 am

  13. Watching the numbers on Bost versus Bailey, which stopped updating, I was surprised at how close it was.

    Comment by Gravitas Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:17 am

  14. After two major losses…the governor of Illinois and 12th district race for Congress…Bailey will give it a rest.

    Bailey needs a new hobby and it is not running for office. Bailey’s place is on his porch and not in Congress.

    Comment by Rudy’s teeth Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:19 am

  15. Looking at the Bring Chicago Home ballot language, I’m surprised the vote was as close as it was. Some voters figure it out in the booth, and what they saw was a blur of words that included “new transfer tax,” “increase 166.67%” and “increase 300%.”

    Combine that with the lack of trust in anything linked to Johnson and, yes, CTU, I actually have to hand it to the organizers for making a game of it.

    Comment by 102ish Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:19 am

  16. @TJ

    === I can’t help but think that a big chunk of the anti-referendum vote was people just thinking, “Hey, Johnson stinks, he’s pushing this, so therefore this must stink as well.” ===

    Yep. Credibility matters.

    Comment by W44 Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:21 am

  17. Guzman’s progressive victory came crashing up against MBJ’s apparent stunning failure with BCH. As for BCH, since it may fail even after the mail-in votes, like the failed Fair Tax, proponents need to move on to the doable and look for policies that can win.

    Comment by Grandson of Man Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:22 am

  18. I’m agnostic on BCH - I voted early for it when it had been ruled invalid and I thought it didn’t matter, which was probably not a smart thing to do - but the numbers didn’t really work on the whole “rents will go up” line. And it shouldn’t have any impact at all on buildings that haven’t been recently bought/sold.

    It strikes me as less of a prediction than a spoiler from landlords, like when the media kept talking about unquantified inflation and it turned out companies were just hiking prices to whatever they felt like and pocketing the profits. Rents have gone up and rents will continue to go up even though we’re not *making* them do it with BCH now.

    Comment by 48th Ward Heel Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:41 am

  19. I think it is a huge mistake to assume that most voters had a clue what BCH was.

    Even last night, WGN called it a “real estate tax on property” before giving more details.

    Comment by Stephanie Kollmann Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:56 am

  20. @Steve Z
    Thanks for the tune tip.

    Comment by Back to the Future Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:58 am

  21. Good on the Speaker for putting it up to take out Flowers. But the Senate President, why, just why with Toro? Weak.

    Comment by Amalia Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:59 am

  22. ===I think it is a huge mistake to assume that most voters had a clue what BCH was===

    It was also a mistake to believe that it would drive young progressives to the polls.

    Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 10:59 am

  23. Pritzker’s Fair Tax won 71% to 28% in Chicago proper. Yeah, it’s a different tax in a different time with a different guy in the White House, but “Chicago voters won’t tolerate more taxes [for some]” is not a sufficient answer.

    I expect the mayor’s office will blame the lower-court ruling for confusing voters, and will do no soul-searching.

    Comment by Garfield Ridge Guy Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 11:07 am

  24. ==It was also a mistake to believe that it would drive young progressives to the polls.==

    Maybe. There certainly were plenty of mistakes but under 45 turnout really was not that bad despite a lot of anger/apathy about the top of the ticket. I suspect BCH did get a lot of younger people to vote who would not have otherwise and that other candidates benefited.

    Comment by Stephanie Kollmann Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 11:15 am

  25. The only poll workers that I saw yesterday were promoting BCH. Obviously, their efforts failed.

    The referendum had loads of advertising as well. It was a tough sell in the inflationary economy.

    Comment by Gravitas Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 11:25 am

  26. =Bailey needs a new hobby and it is not running for office. Bailey’s place is on his porch and not in Congress.=

    Maybe he should farm. For once. Get in a tractor big guy.

    Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 11:46 am

  27. ==Bailey needs a new hobby and it is not running for office. Bailey’s place is on his porch and not in Congress.==

    =Maybe he should farm. For once. Get in a tractor big guy. =

    He could always become a southern Illinoisan version of Oberweis. Failed nobody in political circles that keeps losing elections but at least having the good decency to make some solid ice cream.

    Comment by TJ Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 12:12 pm

  28. ==Bailey needs a new hobby and it is not running for office. Bailey’s place is on his porch and not in Congress.==

    Not sure how soon, but I think he’ll make a run for Durbin’s seat in the US Senate. You know he wants it.

    Comment by Don't Bloc Me In Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 12:14 pm

  29. =You know he wants it.=

    Yes he does. After his time in the statehouse and his farm subsidies he just loves him that gubmint’ money.

    That or maybe he is just plain addicted to campaigning?

    = but at least having the good decency to make some solid ice cream.=

    Even if it were the world’s best ice cream I don’t think I could bring myself to try it. And I LOVE ice cream.

    Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 12:30 pm

  30. === Maybe he should farm. For once. Get in a tractor big guy. ===
    Exactly what I was thinking, doesn’t he have equipment to maintain and replace like combines and planters? Isn’t it almost planting season? Couldn’t he do some research with the extension at U of I to make sure he is doing best practices to maintain his soil and reduce expenditures on pesticides? I’m a city slicker but it seems farming is higher tech than it’s ever been (GPS directed pesticide application), and also a full time occupation if your farm is big enough.

    Comment by cermak_rd Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 12:58 pm

  31. Clearly the ongoing immigration and migrant crisis in Chicago must have tamped down support for the initiative to help the homeless. We can criticize campaign strategies, rightly, but the effect of the months of bad headlines has depressed enthusiasm for helping more

    Comment by Here Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 1:39 pm

  32. ==Not sure how soon, but I think he’ll make a run for Durbin’s seat in the US Senate. You know he wants it.==

    Raja will be darn glad to barely touch his war chest to win a seat to the senate if Bailey turns out to be the GOP nominee.

    Comment by TJ Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 2:23 pm

  33. ==Raja will be darn glad to barely touch his war chest to win a seat to the senate if Bailey turns out to be the GOP nominee.==

    He’s likely going to need that to get through the primary, which could include Rahm, Pritzker, Kwame, Mendoza, Budzinski, and others.

    Comment by supplied_demand Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 3:21 pm

  34. Too bad the Governor wasn’t able to step up along with the SOS and publicly state the transfer tax was ill advised. JB won’t take on the progressive wing even when he knows bad policy can adversely affect the State’s principal economic engine- the City of Chicago. JB needs to come down forcefully against the Mayor’s policies if he wants to preserve the City’s vitality -

    Comment by Sue Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 3:27 pm

  35. I can tell you that in our district (20th, which obviously was contested and had very high turnout), the BCH issue was also a very big one for my neighbors in Bucktown. We’ve recently moved into our home, and of course tried to meet our neighbors, fit in, find out some of the things folks do, etc. And in all of my conversations I had with them, the overwhelming sentiment wasn’t that we don’t want to fix or address homelessness - but that the lack of a plan, transparency on how the money would be overseen and managed, and concerns that there wasn’t specific language that restricted it only for that purpose made it a “No” vote for folks.
    If I want to go to my COO and tell her “I have a way to help us raise fix this huge problem we’ve been dealing with,” I can’t follow that up with “And I don’t have a plan yet, but if you give me $xxx dollars per year for the next few years I can make it go away.” Because it’s going to be a no. If you want the money - especially with the way the Mayor’s current reputation is within the City - you’re going to have to show the work as to why it’s needed and how it’s going to be used to do what you intend.

    Comment by Just a guy Wednesday, Mar 20, 24 @ 3:38 pm

  36. There are many of us here in Mary Flowers auburn gresham community that are not shedding any tears for her exit. 38 years and the community still looks a mess.

    Comment by EGIrvin Thursday, Mar 21, 24 @ 5:53 am

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
Next Post: Open thread


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.