Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Today’s quotable
Next Post: Today’s timeline: State employee headcount
Posted in:
* Sen. Peters…
State Senator Robert Peters’ law banning employers from requiring workers to attend meetings regarding political or religious matters was signed into law on Wednesday.
“Forcing employees to attend meetings about the employer’s political or religious views goes too far,” said Peters (D-Chicago). “There needs to be a balanced and impartial relationship between employers and employees.”
Peters’ law prohibits Illinois employers from requiring employees to attend employer-sponsored meetings where the primary purpose is to communicate the employer’s opinions on religious or political matters. Further, the legislation safeguards employees from adverse actions for refusing such employer-sponsored meetings.
The law does not explicitly exclude 501(c) organizations so as to not interfere with the work of advocacy groups or organizations seeking to communicate policy initiatives. The law also outlines exemptions for required diversity, equity and inclusion training and higher education employers speaking to employees about coursework and research.
“I want to thank the Illinois AFL-CIO labor organization for bringing these issues to my attention,” said Peters. “By banning such meetings, we safeguard employees from being forced to adhere to anti-union messaging and shield them from employers directly attempting to influence their beliefs.”
Senate Bill 3649 goes into effect Jan. 1.
* Illinois AFL-CIO…
Joined by AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler and Illinois AFL-CIO President Tim Drea, Gov. JB Pritzker signed the Illinois Worker Freedom of Speech Act into law Wednesday at the state federation’s convention. The new law makes Illinois the eighth state to bar employers from requiring workers to attend mandatory political and religious meetings at work, known as “captive audience” meetings that often take the form of anti-union rhetoric.
“People go to work to work, not to be indoctrinated. Now, workers will not have to choose between their livelihood and personal values when employers use mandatory meetings to advance their political and religious interests,” stated Illinois AFL-CIO President Tim Drea. “Today’s bill signing represents a new chapter for Illinois where all workers can feel safe at work and choose to walk away from unwanted political, religious or anti-union rhetoric without fear of retaliation. We are grateful to Governor Pritzker for standing with workers and demonstrating his commitment to workplace fairness.”
The legislation was the top priority for the Illinois AFL-CIO in the 2024 legislative session. New York, Connecticut, Minnesota, Maine, Oregon, Vermont and Washington have passed similar laws protecting workers’ freedom of speech. The laws protect workers from having to hear or read offensive or unwanted political and religious speech unrelated to job tasks or performance.
“I congratulate the Illinois AFL-CIO and its allies on this tremendous victory for working people,” said AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler. “This new law will ensure that workers are protected from being compelled to listen to their employers’ opinions on political or religious matters on the job. These coercive captive audience meetings have no place in workplaces. We commend the Illinois legislature for passing this bill and Governor Pritzker for signing this important protection into law.”
Although Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) strictly prohibits employers from interfering with the formation of a union, captive audience meetings have been called a “license to coerce” and “an anomaly in labor law, inconsistent with the [National Labor Relations] Act’s protection of employees’ free choice,” by National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo.
…Adding… Center Square…
Employer groups opposed the measure. Noah Finley with the National Federation of Independent Business told that same committee the measure is a violation of employers’ rights.
“It doesn’t ban employers from holding mandatory meetings, it bans them from holding them on specific topics and exercises content restriction on the employers’ speech,” Finley said. “In doing so it discriminates against speech that specifically protected by the U.S. Constitution.”
Unions say the meetings prohibit anti-union rhetoric during mandatory meetings. Employers groups say employees need to know how unionization could negatively impact the workplace relationship.
Alec Laird, senior vice president of the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, told the same committee in March similar measures have been blocked for superseding the National Labor Relations Act.
“Finally, Washington just passed its law this year,” Laird said. “It appears the NLRB’s own rulings in recent case law that the legislation is preempted by federal law and an unconstitutional restriction of free speech.”
Other groups listed as opponents were the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, Illinois Policy, the Illinois Hotel and Lodging Association and the Illinois Chamber of Commerce.
posted by Rich Miller
Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 1:19 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Today’s quotable
Next Post: Today’s timeline: State employee headcount
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
I am a-ok with a law banning literally any kind of work meeting. So this being a ban on an objectively awful type of work meeting is an extra positive.
Comment by TJ Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 1:31 pm
Senate Bill 3649 does it exclude staff in the big house. Or is that just policymaking….
Comment by KaneAtown Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 1:50 pm
“This proselytizing could have been an email.”
– MrJM
Comment by @misterjayem Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 2:02 pm
We didn’t go far enough here. Any employer who cannot prove that a meeting could not be an email should be fined and have their business license reconsidered. (snark).
Seriously though. Well done all who made this happen. Illinois is a pro-union state and anyone who wants to do business here should abide by our laws and respect the wishes and rights of workers. Bravo.
Comment by Succinctly Superfluous Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 2:18 pm
==Illinois is a pro-union state…should abide by our laws and respect the wishes and rights of workers=
Section 35. Exceptions
(6) political organization, a political party organization, a caucus organization, a candidate’s
political organization…
(7) General Assembly or a State or local legislative or regulatory body from requiring their employees to attend an employer-sponsored meeting…
Comment by 8657 Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 2:27 pm
Nothing says Democrat like censoring speech they don’t like or agree with. Right on brand for Illinois. What’s next? Outlawing parody as they are trying to do in Cali?
Comment by Captain Obvious Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 2:53 pm
=== Nothing says Democrat like censoring speech they don’t like or agree with.===
Oh the employer can make any kind of speech he wants. He just can’t force any employees to listen to it.
Comment by Da big bad wolf Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 3:05 pm
“ Nothing says Democrat like censoring speech they don’t like or agree with.”
It’s “obvious” to the rest of us that this isn’t banning employers’ speech. It’s not requiring the rest of us to listen to it.
Preach your religion and politics outside of work and I will choose to listen if I desire.
Comment by Proud Papa Bear Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 3:30 pm
“Nothing says Democrat like censoring speech they don’t like or agree with.”
If my party was behind book bans, the Don’t Say Gay bills and legislative efforts to prevent doctors from even discussing abortion with their patients, I’d maybe keep my mouth shut.
– MrJM
Comment by @misterjayem Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 3:41 pm
Does apply to required diversity training sessions? Climate change awareness? etc.
Comment by Just Asking Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 4:13 pm
=Does apply to required diversity training sessions?=
No, the prohibition against mandatory employee meetings do no apply in this instance.
Section 35. Exceptions. Nothing in this Act:
(4) prohibit an employer or its agent, representative, or designee from requiring its employees to attend any training intended to foster a civil and collaborative workplace or reduce or prevent workplace harassment or
discrimination…
Comment by 8657 Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 4:22 pm
I am sure lots of prospective companies scoping out new locations to expand to were waiting on this new law to announce they are selecting Illinois
Comment by Sue Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 5:41 pm
- I am sure lots of prospective companies scoping out new locations to expand to were waiting on this new law to announce they are selecting Illinois -
Yeah, I’m sure this issue is at the top of their list. Guess that’s it for old Illinois, we had a good run.
Comment by Excitable Boy Wednesday, Jul 31, 24 @ 9:20 pm