Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: It’s Time To Bring Safer Rides To Illinois
Next Post: Pritzker defends using state troopers in Broadview (Updated x2)
Posted in:
* Subscribers know more. Crain’s…
The long-feared $771 million “fiscal cliff” facing Chicago’s transit agencies may not be as steep as expected. The Regional Transit Authority is poised to revise its 2026 budget shortfall to less than $300 million. […]
The lowered projection is only for 2026 and the fiscal cliff will creep back up to over $500 million if the Legislature doesn’t deliver a bailout that’s been under negotiation for over a year. Those advocating for a transit overhaul have not welcomed the dramatic reduction, saying it could give weary lawmakers up for re-election an easy excuse to kick the can down the road.
The RTA previously estimated the region’s three transit agencies — Metra, Pace and the Chicago Transit Authority — faced a collective $771 million fiscal cliff beginning next year when federal COVID-19 relief funding expires.
That number will be lowered to somewhere south of $300 million at a meeting tomorrow of the RTA committee created to tackle the crisis, according to sources familiar with the situation and to a report in Capitol Fax. The RTA is meeting with the transit boards today to finalize the estimate.
* The Regional Transit Authority…
At this early stage of the budget process, we can project an estimated budget gap of approximately $200 million for 2026 that will balloon back to the full cliff of about $790 million in 2027 and will grow each year. pic.twitter.com/0Ht61gkNON
— RTA Chicago (@RTA_Chicago) October 3, 2025
* House transit negotiator Rep. Kam Buckner…
Today’s RTA update takes a $770 million ‘fiscal cliff’ and revises it to ~$300 million.
That’s a huge swing. I’m glad cost controls and stronger receipts helped-but a shift that big, that fast, is exactly why we need guardrails, transparency, and real reform.
Let’s be clear: this cannot be read as a ‘nothing to see here’ moment or a reason for Springfield to stand down. We are moving forward this veto session with governance reform, consolidation of duplicative back-office work across CTA/Metra/Pace, independent financial oversight, public performance scorecards and a unified regional authority that replaces siloed alphabet-soup turf with one plan. Our principle stands: no revenue without reform.
We’ve been both deliberate and urgent at the same time-insisting on current, verified numbers before we legislate. While the RTA spent nearly a million dollars in April on an ad blitz to guilt and bully lawmakers into writing a check without reforms, the House in May did the opposite: we read the budget, read the room, and showed our work.
Speaker Welch has been clear: getting this right matters more than getting it over with.
Our working group put in the hours—all last year and extra innings all summer-and we’ll finish the job in veto session.
There are only two choices here, either keep kicking the can or we can build a stable, grown-up transit system that the economy can plan around and our state can grow around. We’re going to do the latter: long-term funding, hard guardrails, and receipts riders can see. Less drama. More delivery.
* House transit negotiator Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado…
Our legislative working group has engaged in a deliberate and thoughtful process for over a year now and has had to spend this summer digging deeper precisely because the RTA cannot be trusted to appropriately plan and communicate. This is one of the major reasons any funding must come with significant governance reform. As we head into veto session, the choice in front of us remains clear: We can continue to let the RTA cobble together patchwork solutions while delivering unreliable service, or we can bring sustainable long-term funding to the system and true governance reform. It’s a choice between kicking the can down the road and finding ourselves at another cliff a few short years from now, or solving the problem. I remain committed to solving the problem and delivering the transit system our constituents deserve in the upcoming veto session.
* Senate transit negotiator Sen. Ram Villivalam…
Solving for the fiscal cliff through cuts, fare increases, and a Band-Aid is not solving for it at all.
Now more than ever, I am committed to the robust reforms and transformational funding that are necessary for our residents to have a safe, reliable, accessible, and integrated public transit system that is world class for the next several decades.
With that in mind, the Illinois State Senate passed House Bill 3438. We look forward to working with the House and Governor’s office to come to a resolution that stabilizes the transit services our residents rely on to get to their school, job, and/or doctor.
As with any major public policy that impacts millions of people, kicking the can down the road should not be the option that is pursued.
* Labor, transit and environmental advocates…
Following the RTA Ad Hoc Committee on Transit Funding announcement claiming Illinois’ initial transit fiscal cliff has fallen to $202 million, Tim Drea, on behalf of the Labor Alliance for Public Transportation and Amy Rynell, on behalf of the Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition, are calling on lawmakers and the RTA to work together to address the dire need for transit funding and reform during the October veto session instead of kicking the can further down the road.
“While recent projections from the RTA may impact the timing of the fiscal cliff by a few months, the bottom line remains: transit cannot wait, and we need better, safer, more reliable service now. Transit riders and workers deserve better, and they’ve made it clear that they want the reforms and long-term solutions provided by dedicated revenue levels that were negotiated in the spring legislative session,” said Amy Rynell on behalf of the Illinois Clean Jobs Coalition. “RTA is applying a patchwork of short-term funding solutions, fare increases and slow-rolling much needed improvements to a system that drives so much of Illinois’ economy, and which so many Illinoisans rely on. While the RTA downplays the urgency and need for action, it’s time for the Illinois General Assembly to reverse transit’s downward spiral and finally take action to reform the RTA and invest $1.5 billion in transit.”
“We’ve sat through numerous public hearings, forums, and conversations with transit workers and riders. Their ask is the same each time: fix and fund transit,” stated Illinois AFL-CIO President Tim Drea. “Transit workers are walking on eggshells not knowing if they’ll be issued a pink slip when they clock in for a day’s work. Working people, students, and seniors that rely on transit at all hours worry that their service will be cut. They fear that they’ll find themselves without a way to get to their job, school, or doctor’s appointments. What we are seeing today is a short-sighted attempt to plug a budget hole without a long-term solution. The people and taxpayers of Illinois deserve better; we cannot keep kicking the can down the road. Now is the time to fully fund and pass transit reforms.”
* Meanwhile, from the AP…
President Donald Trump’s administration will withhold $2.1 billion for Chicago infrastructure projects, the White House budget director said Friday, expanding funding fights that have targeted Democratic areas during the government shutdown.
The pause affects a long-awaited plan to extend the city’s Red Line train. The money was “put on hold to ensure funding is not flowing via race-based contracting,” budget director Russ Vought wrote on social media.
* More…
posted by Isabel Miller
Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 11:42 am
Previous Post: It’s Time To Bring Safer Rides To Illinois
Next Post: Pritzker defends using state troopers in Broadview (Updated x2)
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
“race-based contracting”
Does that mean a company that does not have a white man in charge? A company that employs non-white people?
Comment by BE Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 11:48 am
Always doom and gloom then oh never mind. Seriously I think this is a perfect reason to combine and streamline everything and to look at everything
On the other hand I assume CPS will ask for this money which is no doubt due to them. /S
Comment by DuPage Saint Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 11:53 am
Plugging the operations hole is merely giving the CTA the ability to limp along. Chicago is a globally-renowned city and the economic heart of IL and our transit is woefully under-funded and under-appreciated compared with sister cities and provinces across the world in developed countries. This is a chance to create a system with best practices that belongs in the 21st century. Even places closer to home like Hawaii and Montreal have rolled out automated rail lines in their cities. Montreal in particular used funding from a public sector pension fund and kept costs low using minimalist designs. Chicago deserves to catch up with our sister cities, that means an investment of public dollars for operations and improvements. And it means looking toward the future with Bus Rapid Transit lines, automated rail, and better land use around transit stops. The CTA shouldn’t only be seen as a jobs program, it’s primarily a way to move people around the city efficiently and safely, and that should be top of mind. The canceling of the red line extension can even be seen as an opportunity to refocus on improving the infrastructure of the existing rail lines and investing in BRT infrastructure.
Comment by Incandenza Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 11:56 am
Glad to see Kam on top of this. Also not surprised. Hope he’d consider heading any new public transit entity.
Comment by Original Rambler Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:08 pm
I don’t think there’s a need for a new transit entity. The RTA was created to be that entity 50 years ago. Just do the job better.
Also- haven’t seen the term “pink slip” in quite a while.
Comment by Friendly Bob Adams Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:26 pm
===Just do the job better.===
They haven’t done it better in decades. What makes you think they’ll do so now?
Simple solutions are usually neither.
Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:30 pm
No, the government should not cancel the contract.
Yes, we should take this opportunity to back out of the poorly thought out RLE. Increase automation and frequency of the Metra Electric, which is what the people who would ride the RLE actually prefer.
Comment by Jurist Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:33 pm
The Lockbox Amendment quietly rolls along, generating record revnues for transportation, just waiting for some brave souls to redirect some of its funding towards operating public transit. Strange that no one seems keen on touching this sacred cow.
Comment by City Zen Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:33 pm
===just waiting for some brave souls to redirect some of its funding towards operating public transit===
It’s been done in the last two budgets.
Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:37 pm
Good time to raise the fares at a time when you can blame it in Trump
Comment by hisgirlfriday Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 12:37 pm
the numbers are shockingly off. this is the kind of thing that makes people wonder exactly what is up in government, especially under control of so many of my Democrats. it’s not unexpected that they have a deficit….raising salaries and keeping fares the same is no way to run a railroad…but to flip around on the actual number is deeply weird and makes everyone wonder. take the opportunity to raise fares and make some sensible closures. right the ship.
Comment by Amalia Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 1:02 pm
–hisgirlfriday– has an excellent point. CTA 2026 budget is supposed to be out any day. Fares haven’t been raised since 2018. Raise them all to at least keep up with inflation since then and blame it on Trump is politics 101.
Mayor Johnson not doing at least the indexed for inflation property tax increase in his first budget and blaming it on the last Mayor is a major source of his 2026 budget problems. CTA / Metra shouldn’t repeat the mistake.
Comment by ChicagoBars Friday, Oct 3, 25 @ 1:25 pm