Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - AUDIO: Sen. Syverson explains SGOP concerns
Posted in:
* 12:49 pm - There hasn’t been much talk about this extremely important segment of the criminal complaint filed against Gov. Blagojevich. The NY bobbleheads never broached it with Blagojevich, and it was barely mentioned yesterday during the trial, but it strikes directly at the governor’s state of mind…
ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that his decision about the open Senate seat will be based on three criteria in the following order of importance: “our legal situation, our personal situation, my political situation. This decision, like every other one, needs to be based upon on that. Legal. Personal. Political.”
Every decision, not just the US Senate decision, but every decision he confronted, the governor said, had to be based on his own legal, personal and political situations, in that order.
If that doesn’t show a willingness, even an eagerness to abuse his powers, nothing does. And if it doesn’t show how easily he veered into lawlessness, I’m not sure what planet you’re from.
He also said this about the US Senate seat…
According to ROD BLAGOJEVICH, “the immediate challenge [is] how do we take some of the financial pressure off of our family.”
And this…
ROD BLAGOJEVICH stated that he is “struggling” financially and does “not want to be Governor for the next two years.”
* Take everything Blagojeivch is caught saying on those FBI surveillance tapes, run it through that “legal, personal, political” filter, add in those two other quotes about struggling and wanting out of his job, mix vigorously and this is a slam-dunk case.
* Anyway, the trial resumes at 1 o’clock. Comments on the morning live-blog post are now closed, so all comments on the trial go here.
* 1:12 pm - With a hat tip to a commenter, this is from the governor’s PR firm Twitter page…
Alert from The Publicity Agency: the gov is not making any public statements today and will be doing no media interviews whatsoever
* 1:13 pm - The trial is resuming now. We’ll have questions from both Dems and Repubs this time around.
* 1:16 pm - The Chief Justice said he may change the way questions are read to the witnesses. The Senate secretary may read them. No explanation why. The CJ has had trouble pronouncing names.
* From Illinois Issues…
[GOP Sen. Kirk Dillard] said he was particularly worried about why Rep. Constance Howard, a Chicago Democrat, was scratched from the list. She originally was scheduled to testify about the injury to the people that has happened since the governor’s arrest, including a dropped bond rating that makes it more expensive for the state to borrow.
Senate Minority Leader Christine Radogno said the evidence intended to demonstrate the governor’s mismanagement of the state “seems to be getting truncated at this point.” She added: “I think it’s not good for the public. The public is the one that’s been harmed by this … I think that it’s incumbent on us not only to give the governor a fair trial, but to let the public know that we have a good handle on the extent of this corruption.”
* 1:21 pm - Sen Hendon just asked whether JCAR is favoring the House over the Senate, pointing to a bill that passed the Senate on health care that didn’t clear the House. That bill was then essentially turned into an executive order that JCAR tried to block and which eventually wound up being blocked by a court. Hendon sponsored that Senate bill.
* 1:36 pm - JCAR witness excused. No news there except the Hendon questions, which he telegraphed earlier in the day.
Announcement that Rep. Lang will not be called as a witness. The executive ethics commission report is being distributed.
* 1:37 pm - Radogno again complains about the shortened witness list. Give the people an opportunity to see the full case against the governor. “Live witnesses really help” the case “come alive.” Not sure I agree with her, considering the witnesses to date.
Andrew Morriss is being called as a witness. He’ll also speak about JCAR, and is a law professor.
* 1:43 pm - From the Sun-Times…
Meanwhile, a small stir occurred this morning outside the governor’s Statehouse office when a staff member was seen carting out several bank boxes of documents. But Blagojevich spokesman Lucio Guerrero said the documents were part of a “routine” transfer of documents from Springfield to Chicago, not anything the governor wants to take with him should he be forced out of office this week.
“These were just documents coming back to Chicago,” Guerrero said. “I don’t know what was in it. But what wasn’t in it were the governor’s personal effects.”
The governor isn’t packing up anything from his state offices or the Executive Mansion in anticipation of being forced out, Guerrero said. “It would be presumptuous for the governor to start packing,” Guerrero said.
* 1:48 pm - President Cullerton just said that he was under the impression that the House prosecutor will finish calling witnesses for the entire trial today. Prosecutor: One more witness, Auditor General Holland. One hour for his testimony.
* 2:40 pm - OK, they’re back. Witness questions. The Secretary of the Senate will be reading the questions for now.
* Interesting question about whether the professor had ever seen such an example of gubernatorial overreach as the JCAR maneuver. He said he hadn’t.
Sen. Hendon asked if any other professors might disagree with his opinions, and he responded that none he knew of disagreed with him on this particular question. Zing.
* Witness is finished.
* Senate President Cullerton: House prosecutor will give a one-hour closing argument tomorrow at 10 o’clock.
*** Cullerton said the governor wants leave to appear tomorrow and give his own statement after the prosecutor’s closing statement. The governor will apparently act as his own attorney.
The governor will be allowed to speak for 90 minutes.
The Senate would have to vote to allow the governor to speak. Sens. Cullerton and Radogno have both said they will urge the chamber to allow the governor to give a closing argument. The prosecutor would then be allowed a 30 minute rebuttal. ***
* 2:58 pm - Auditor General Bill Holland is on the stand now. Kind of an anti-climax after that last announcement.
* 4:37 pm - OK, they’re back for questions of Bill Holland. Mike will handle most of the live-blogging in comments.
* 5:13 pm - Holland questions are finished. No redirect. No questions for the House prosecutor. The prosecutor is handing out the special investigative committee’s final report.
The prosecution rests.
Chief Justice Fitzgerald: No defense can be presented since the governor is not present.
Closing arguments tomorrow.
Senate adjourned until 9:45 am tomorrow.
posted by Rich Miller
Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 12:51 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - AUDIO: Sen. Syverson explains SGOP concerns
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Illinois has such a low rep right now on the national stage. The antics taking place by the repubs and Hendon are not doing much to dispell this apearance. TII
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 12:55 pm
…and does “not want to be Governor for the next two years.”
I sent this in a question to LKL on their live blog but it didn’t get on air.
Comment by Y2D Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:04 pm
In other news, has anybody seen RRB today outside the Ravenswood bunker? Perhaps he needs a day to recover from the jet lag (lol) before he makes his last stand.
Comment by Secret Square Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:07 pm
A good quote to run through that above filter…
ROD BLAGOJEVICH noted that the President-elect can ask Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and others for money for the organization. ROD BLAGOJEVICH states he will ask “[Blair Hull]” to help fund it as well. HARRIS said that funding the 501(c)(4) would be a lot easier for the President-elect than appointing ROD BLAGOJEVICH to a position. ROD BLAGOJEVICH said, “They could say ‘hey, we get [Valerie Jarrett]. Let’s help this guy have a 501(c)(4) issue advocacy organization. Let’s fund it to the level that he’s asked for and then we’ll get [Valerie Jarrett].’”
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:08 pm
And another…
During the conversation, ROD BLAGOJEVICH and HARRIS
discussed whether it would be possible to obtain a financial benefit for ROD BLAGOJEVICH’s wife in relation to the Senate seat. Specifically, ROD BLAGOJEVICH referred to his wife’s Series 7 license and asked “is there a play here, with these guys, withher” to work for a firm in Washington or New York at a significantly better salary than she is making now.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:08 pm
His PR guy’s Twitter makes it sound like he won’t be leaving the house:
“Alert from The Publicity Agency: the gov is not making any public statements today and will be doing no media interviews whatsoever”
Comment by Tim Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:08 pm
And this is why he chose to schedule interviews with national media talking heads who predictably focused on the who, and virtually nothing on the why.
Comment by The Doc Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:09 pm
Senate is back to order
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:12 pm
Business will be questions from both caucuses
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:14 pm
“Legal. Personal. Political.”
Following that political philosophy is not illegal.
Stating it out loud when the tapes are rolling apparently is.
Comment by Leroy Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:18 pm
Rich, can you make anything of that JCAR mumbo-jumbo?
Comment by Cynic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:25 pm
One of the best books ever written about congressional politics was Mayhew’s, “Congress: The Electoral Connection.” Every poli sci student who studies american politics has probably read it. The book starts on the premise that every decision made by a congressman is geared toward reelection.
That government actors are self interested and will abuse their power is the reason the federal government has checks and balances. You could fill a library with that idea.
So, how is Blago’s formulation any different? Do people believe that politicians are actually a bunch of Mother Theresa’s?
Comment by Greg Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:26 pm
Leroy - Now if you put those 3 words in the context of the conversation the illegality is apparent…wait, where have I heard that recently? Oh yeah, every talk show our missing gov could get himself on.
Comment by Belle Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:26 pm
Opps someone forgot to tell SenGOPS that StateWideTom had ByeByeBrent and Mulligan vote with Blagoof as part of their pay to plan MOU deal….That could hurt TugBoatAndy’s antiDem campaign theme
Comment by EmptySuitParade Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:26 pm
Let’s keep the drive-by comments out of this post, please. Keep the discussion elevated.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:34 pm
Essentially, questions are just re-affirming that the governor order the administrative rule change with JCAR and that such an action was a violation of state procedure.
“Without a state rule approved by the legislature, no agency can take action that impacts individuals not employed by that agency. Thus the family care program was in violation of state law.”
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:34 pm
It’s interesting to see the line of JCAR questioning coming from senators who serve on JCAR. Rutherford’s question (and the subsequent answer) was priceless — nearly 50% of the rules prohibited by JCAR since 1970-something have come in the past six years — Rod’s six years. That speaks to contempt for the rulemaking process.
Comment by dznuts Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:35 pm
He wants out of his job? Why doesn’t he just resign?
Comment by Levois Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:36 pm
Another witness is removed.
Sen Radogno is concerned with the reduction of witnesses. Wants to ensure a fair trial and witnesses help the public understand what is going on.
New Witness
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:37 pm
Is Radogno trying to drag this thing out into next week? Haven’t the Senators all been provided with more than enough material to make a very informed decision? What’s up? Is she pandering to her constituents because I’m not impressed.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:37 pm
Andrew Morris is next witness. Laws Professor at U of I and has a Ph. D in Economics. Expert on IL and Fed law
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:39 pm
Could the Repubs getting nervous because some of the Fox talking heads and IR bloggers are suddenly getting all worried about Rod’s due process rights?
Comment by Secret Square Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:41 pm
The GOP has to object to something, otherwise it really will look like a kangaroo court. So they picked the witness thing, on the theory that it’s minor enough that they can bloviate a bit.
That’s my thought, anyway. Could be very wrong.
Comment by Concerned Observer Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:45 pm
Morris is used to describe the importance of JCAR to ensuring the separation of powers.
Morris established that JCAR is constitutional and that by ignoring it RRB broke the constitution
Radogno wants a caucus to prepare questions
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:47 pm
Cullerton wants to know how many more caucuses. I more witness left recess till 2:20
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:48 pm
Mike - Is that 1 more witness for the day or one more witness left for the entire trial before deliberation begins?
Thanks
Comment by HoBoSkillet Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:50 pm
It’s the trial. Check my update.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:51 pm
oops - I just saw the update. Please disregard my question.
Thanks
Comment by HoBoSkillet Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:51 pm
I don’t know if the Repubs are getting nervous because of the concern in some of the media about Rod’s right to due process, but it seems to me that they need some more meat in the record if they want to look like they have an air tight case. I would guess there is some more pay-to-play coming?????? It’s a pretty thin soup thus far. Not totally lacking in substance, but a lot of water nonetheless.
Comment by chiatty Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:51 pm
when impeached, is the governor entitled to unemployment benefits, cobra?
Comment by anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:53 pm
chiatty, if you cannot see the abuse of powers, then you’re blind.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:53 pm
Ellis is expediting this effort for fear that Andy Martin will prevail in the 7th Circuit, and be allowed to step in to defend the Governor’s office.
Right now; with no opposition, he is pitching a no-hitter, and he doesn’t want to face any more than the minimum, so that he can also get a perfect game.
Comment by Blago Sphere Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:54 pm
I believe when you are impeached you are NOT entitled to unemployment.
Comment by Juice Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:58 pm
He’s already been impeached.
I don’t think politicians get unemployment when they lose elections, so I doubt he’ll qualify.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 1:59 pm
so holland for an hour, then caucus for questions for an hour, then 30 minutes to an hour of questions answered
Then 60 minutes for closing statement?
still vote tomorrow? or maybe today?
Comment by John Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:00 pm
I would assume closing argument tomorrow.
Maybe a Friday vote. But perhaps Thursday.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:01 pm
if they finish today, why wait until friday to vote?
Can’t they do it at noon tomorrow? Or even 10 am?
Comment by John Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:06 pm
Ha. The gov isn’t packing anything at the Executive Mansion. You can say that again.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:10 pm
Well it’s not that simple, after the closing arguments the Senate must debate on the charges (just like a jury) and then they put the question into a vote. 2/3 voting in the affirmative for Blago to be ousted. (40 senators)
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:15 pm
Even though the Senate has all the information they need to make a decision and the republicans are looking a bit foolish asking for more time to caucus, I get their point. The media will only carry snippets of this proceeding and from the available audio and video. More witnesses = more mainstream news headlines and less ammunition for Blagohype.
Comment by Cougar Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:20 pm
I know you don’t like disagreement Rich, but at the risk of again irritating you, I haven’t seen the level of abuse of power that should result in his impeachment. This may be more of a function of the way the prosecutor is hamstrung because of the federal investigation than it is of Rod’s fitness for the office, but I think they could and should do a better job of proving the abuse of power. You call me blind, maybe I think you convicted him three years ago.
Comment by chiatty Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:20 pm
Can someone explain the step by step process that is followed once the Senated votes to remove Blago. Is his swipecard revoked? Do they change the locks? How long does he keep his security detail? Do the prevent him from coming into the Statehouse? Do they box up his personal affects? Anyone know?
Comment by Amy Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:21 pm
Put another way, I think there is going to be a lot of second-guessing on the fairness of this process if this is all the evidence that they’re going to impeach him on. Maybe Bill Holland, who has done a solid job for years on some of these issues, will hit it out of the park and take care of the potential problem.
Comment by chiatty Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:22 pm
I would bet the vote is on Thur, with a swearing in for Quinn on Fri.
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:24 pm
I think SenateGOPer just realize they might drag down some Ds with their questions. They did get Pumkin Head Jay into the record. It only took them three days. Perhaps they were going for another big score. Since the Senate case follows the House report one might have thought TugBoatAndy could have better questioned prepared. But then it is TUgBoatAndy at the helm.
I am sure they are saving up for a blistering closing arguement. Wait do they get to do that?
Whoa, TugBoat better see if that is in the rules.
Comment by 2ConfusedCrew Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:24 pm
Remember, the coach that led the Texas girls basketball team to a 100-0 victory was vilified by the press and subsequently fired..
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:26 pm
“Alert from The Publicity Agency: the gov is not making any public statements today and will be doing no media interviews whatsoever”
Wonder if it took The Publicity Agency that long to figure out gov. goofy screwed up on Maddow’s show yesterday. Her followup didn’t help him either.
Also wonder if the US Atty has requested tapes from all the media outlets that gave him face time.
Comment by sal-says Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:27 pm
According to legal experts, Quinn is made Governor immediately, no swearing in is necessary.
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:28 pm
Yes Sal, my read is that quote means the gov’s lawyers finally realized he had done one interview too many. Oops. That Maddow interview just made at least one of the counts in the indictment easier for gov to convict on.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:30 pm
what happened to the 30 minute caucus?
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:32 pm
Did the Bust of Elvis get packed up from his office yet?
It was the only “personal effect” in that office!
Comment by BIG R.PH. Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:33 pm
I think you are all trying to read too much into things as to motives, etc. This is politics…its just like a game of chess…let’s all just sit back and watch the king fall in check-mate!
Comment by Fed-up Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:34 pm
it’s no wonder nothing gets done in Springfield
Time means nothing to them.
Every caucus runs way long.
Comment by WCIL Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:34 pm
Question: If he is convicted eventually in criminal court, would he lose whatever benefits he has coming to him as a previous congressman?
Comment by Cooper Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:34 pm
Amy, the real amy here…
the NBC feed just showed DeLeo waving his finger at someone, looks like maybe Kotowski. anyone else see that? or know what
is up with DeLeo scolding someone?
Comment by Amy Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:34 pm
===I know you don’t like disagreement Rich===
Wrong. I don’t like knuckleheads.
===I think there is going to be a lot of second-guessing on the fairness of this process===
See above. The guy has a 7 percent approval rating in Illinois. The second-guessing, if any, will mostly come from the clueless NY/DC axis of bobbleheads.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:36 pm
======I don’t like knuckleheads=======
That makes two of us.
Comment by chiatty Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:38 pm
A routine transfer of documents to Chicago? Of course, Blago has been in office 6 years, but I don’t think that was ever routine before.
Comment by PPHS Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:43 pm
people, including the senate republicans, seem to be uner the misimpression that all evidence for the trial must be oraly introduced by a witness. The evidence need only be contained in the record to be considered. The Senate GOP may want a strategy other then appearing to support the Gov. It did not work well with the capital plan either.
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:44 pm
chiatty - Don’t you consider attempting to buy unnecessary flu vaccine from outside the country (an illegal act) or importing prescription drugs from outside the country (another illegal act) grounds for impeachment? Forgetting all other issues, these two alone I have felt for a long time are grounds for impeachment.
Comment by tanstaafl Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:46 pm
Axis of bobbleheads…LOL
Comment by Shaggy Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:47 pm
Question to Morris: have u ever seen such disregard for legislative authority and procedure?
“I cannot think of another example besides the current one (RRB)”
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:47 pm
The packing boxes need to go to the campaign headquarters and the personal residence. Everyone knows Blago hasn’t been working out of the Chicago office much and the Springfield office even less.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:49 pm
I could wish this guy would give the “Why” to his opinions (since they *are* opinions) instead of just “yes” or “no”. It would be more enlightening.
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:49 pm
Gov to appear tomorrow!
Comment by Nearly Normal Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:51 pm
Holy cow - Blago has finally asked to show up for tomorrow?!?! Tomorrow is gonna be fireworks then.
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:51 pm
The Gov is comming tomorrow
Comment by WCIL Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:51 pm
What if the Gov decides to resign at the last minute. Does the Senate have the power or authority to give him a severnce package, or would they even think about something like that?
Comment by Cookie Monster Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:52 pm
WHAAAAATT? Blago’s now gonna show up? Was this his plan all along to go to NYC, try to get the American public to cry out for justice and then he would come in for closing arguments? Oh Lord, can there be any more drama from this guy? You know all of the National press will cover this one.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:52 pm
Governor is making an appearance tomorrow at 11 to speak for a half hour
Comment by Anonymous Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:52 pm
I hope they insist he testify. Way to go Christine.
They should say he can close only if he testifies.
(Nice move by the Gov.)
Comment by Pot calling kettle Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:53 pm
Holy moly. Think he will introduce the transcripts of his manic media tour?
Comment by I knew it before term one Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:53 pm
Gov will come here tomorrow and ask leave for him to fill an appearance. Gov would have 1:30 to argue his case and Prosecutor then has 30 min to rebut. Starts at 10.
Gov will be giving closing argument only
New witness.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:54 pm
No cross examination of the gov but a closing remark. Will he repeat all of the same talking points he used in NYC?
Comment by Nearly Normal Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:54 pm
He just wants to give a closing statement, and not face cross-examination? What about a chance to prove himself to his accusers? Pure publicity stunt if I ever saw one.
Comment by HoBoSkillet Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:54 pm
I hate to say I told you so……
Comment by Say WHAT? Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:54 pm
I cannot waaaait to hear him pontificate tomorrow in a “closing argument”. Who is he going to compare himself to this time? I think the only person he’s got left is Buddy Jesus. Or is he going to recite the entire Illiad? Oh dear god, it’s gonna be a zoo.
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:55 pm
===He just wants to give a closing statement, and not face cross-examination?===
OJ Redux.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:56 pm
William G Holland is new witness: he is the Auditor General for the state of IL since 1992.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:57 pm
Of course he’ll show up. He’s trying to prolong it as much as possible.
Comment by Concerned Observer Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:57 pm
Hey Chiatty, listen good to Bill Holland. He’s going to give you every reason you will ever need to help Blago “retire”.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:59 pm
I don’t know what the gov would have to say that would last one hour thirty minutes. How many times can one repeat the same talking points over and over.
This is going to be historical for sure, maybe hysterical as well.
If the gov thinks he is going to change any minds I think he will be disappointed.
Is there any pressure he can put on anyone in the Senate to vote No?
Comment by Nearly Normal Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 2:59 pm
Blago’s bringing his Frank Capra film to life.
Comment by Porcupine Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:00 pm
This is reminding me of a suspense novel, tomorrow is going to be an interesting day
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:00 pm
Whats the over/under that he resigns after his 1.5 hour “Rod is Great” speech?
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:00 pm
The Gov will obvious approach the podium and begin as follows: “I know the truth of things, and I have nothing to fear but the truth!”
TII
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:02 pm
The governor is known for press conferences after the General Assembly has adjourned. This post- evidentiary appearance is slightly different, but just as arrogant. He will oppose everything that has happened in the House impeachment and Senate trial, but give no specifics and just simply bat his eyes at the camera and personally attack those who have sought to have him removed from office.
The governor has suspended his law license while in office, as most public officials do. The Senate should resolve that he also be disbarred, for his contempt or ignorance in responding to the Constitutionally provided impeachment process.
Comment by Capitol View Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:04 pm
If he’s just giving a ‘closing argument’, and he is not testifying or being cross-examined, then he should not state new facts about the allegations. He should only be able to argue from the evidence adduced at the trial. But it will be difficult to keep him within those bounds, I suspect. Governor is getting the best of both worlds here.
Comment by Legaleagle Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:04 pm
Is it allowable under the rules to order the Sergeant at Arms to keep Rod in the chamber when all 59 Senators explain their vote to convict. That would be deserving.
Comment by Downstater Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:04 pm
So, if the Gov comes down and says his piece and the Senate votes him out, does he have to walk back to Chicago or will he be able to take the state plane??
Comment by smarty pants Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:06 pm
Is the gov going to do his own speaking, or will he bring his attorney to do the talking? If the gov, will he be under oath? Is an oath even necessary, since he took his official oath?
Comment by Cheswick Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:07 pm
Ok, I may be late to the party, but Blago was trying to organize INTERSTATE commerce for DRUGS? o.0 That is a pretty big violation of federal law, isn’t it??
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:08 pm
Scratch my questions. Just saw the update.
Comment by Cheswick Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:08 pm
smarty pants - LOL
Comment by Say WHAT? Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:08 pm
How fun, I’ll be tuned in. Maybe the press - or at least Geraldo - will be outside the Capitol tomorrow to cover the enormous moment. I hope Blago makes an incredibly gracious exit cloaked in philosophical warning to his colleagues and enriches the people with a heroic, poetry laden resignation.
Comment by KeepSmiling Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:09 pm
Legal keep in mind anything he States in closing argument can be considered an admission. Better to let him ramble and step in the snare of his own discourse then to help shield him by trying to limit his ramblings.
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:10 pm
I’l love to compare a scorecard tomorrow with the one I made the other night of the Larry King Show. I didn’t want to watch it but spouse did so I kept score.
These topics were mentioned and # of times:
Phone calls/tapes: 12
Want to call/can’t call witnesses: 11
Did nothing wrong: 11
Trial not fair: 5
Fix is in: 5
Can’t comment: 5
Didn’t sell Obama’s seat: 5
Healthcare for children/families: 5
Mass Transit for Seniors: 2
Mammograms/cervical exams: 2
Canada prescriptions: 1
Help with foreclosures: 1
Note how much of the time was spent on himself and even though he’s “been elected twice by the people to represent the people and they should be the ones to decide”, I think what he said on the LKS speaks volumes about how much he really cares about the people of Illinois.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:10 pm
Saw a compilation of RRB’s talking points last night (CNN I think). Without repeating himself, this took all of about 90 seconds. I wonder what he will do for the next 88 minutes, 30 seconds?
Comment by tanstaafl Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:11 pm
tanstaafl - see my posting above yours. He could triple those points and that would take up most of the 90 minutes. The national press will all for sure be at this one.
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:13 pm
I think he will pull a Joe McCarthy and open his brief case, pull out a stack of papers and announce he has sworn affidavits detailing the infiltration of undercover Klingon agents throughout Illinois government and only he can root them out because only he can see them.
Comment by Phineas J. Whoopee Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:13 pm
Is there any chance that he might step aside at this time, so he could continue to get paid? If the Senate then voted to remove him, what then? Just wondering.
Comment by Crystal Clear Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:14 pm
He has been Governor since Jan. 2003. There has been at least some talk of impeachment before his first term was done. He was re-elected with the blessing and support of the Illinois Democratic Party. He was arrested by the federal government on Dec. 9, 2008, that was 51 days ago. Since then he has successfully appointed a new United States Senator and a new director for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. He has signed several bills into law in the past 51 days. He has flown to New York City and appeared on several nationally broadcast/cablecast television programs in the past three days. He is not in jail now, he is still the Governor. Call me delusional, but he will still be Governor at the end of the week, at the end of the month, and at the end of this year. No matter how many people say they want to see him out of office, he will not leave, and so far no one has forced him to leave. Remember the Twilight Zone episode I referenced a couple months back– he will send all his enemies, real and imagined, into the cornfield. And everyone who could do away with his administration will still be afraid of him.
Comment by Captain Flume Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:14 pm
I would request that he answer questions, and make him publicly refuse, either by declining to show up or when questions are actually put to him. If he does answer, he’ll fry himself.
To be nice, I would also invite him to submit a witness list now. If he declines, get him to confirm that in front of everyone when he shows up.
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:15 pm
Geez. Governor Drama Queen.
Comment by Ahem Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:16 pm
Here’s his closing — a poem from a 19th Century Brit, and included as the worst in a book of the worst poems ever in the English language:
A Tragedy by Theophile Marzials
Death!
Plop.
The barges down in the river flop.
Flop, plop,
Above, beneath.
From the slimy branches the grey drips drop…
To the oozy waters, that lounge and flop…
And my head shrieks - “Stop”
And my heart shrieks - “Die.”…
Ugh! yet I knew - I knew
If a woman is false can a friend by true?
It was only a lie from beginning to end–
My Devil - My “friend.”…
So what do I care,
And my head is empty as air -
I can do,
I can dare
(Plop, plop
The barges flop
Drip, drop.)
I can dare, I can dare!
And let myself all run away with my head
And stop.
Drop
Dead.
Plop, flop,
Plop.
Comment by I knew it before term one Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:17 pm
Flume, if he hadn’t been arrested, I might bite. But, now he’s toast.
He knows he’s gone. I am betting he says his piece and then resigns rather than become the ONLY illinois Gov to be removed.
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:18 pm
Looks like he’s keeping his publicist the dark about it..
http://twitter.com/PublicityAgency
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:19 pm
He’s going to get up, declare the entire process illegal and unconstituional, and refuse to relinquish the office. Get out the handcuffs and tasers; he is going to do something crazy.
Comment by Downstate Commissioner Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:19 pm
Yeah, if the last 6 years have taught us anything, its that he isn’t going to go quietly. I just wonder how many people he throws under the bus with him.
Also, seriously what is Hendon thinking? He is my Senator, and I will vote for anyone else but him during the next election. I bet he is one of the No votes.
Comment by he gone Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:22 pm
Do we think that the Governor will ask individuals, not expecting a responce, Senator Hendon, do you remember the job for Joe Blow, and how immportant it was for you? And Senator DeLeo, how about the deputy director position as CMS? What was her name anyway?
Comment by Just Me Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:22 pm
All this drama on Rod’s part is sucking away media attention from a lot of important activity on the part of President Obama, which normally would dominate the news. Which is exactly what Rod wants to do — after all, he still thinks he should have been president. I’m just surprised he didn’t try this LAST week.
Comment by Secret Square Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:22 pm
If the Governor should attempt to resign to save face before the formal impeachment vote, I would go forward with an impeachment vote anyway. As far as I am concerned, it’s too late for face-saving after the media circus. Let Blago be removed from office forcibly/constitutionally by impeachment rather than a last minute voluntary resignation. Impeachment entails a greater stigma of political disgrace than an 11th hour voluntary resignation.
Comment by Captain America Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:23 pm
The vote to convict should be taken tomorrow and not wait until Friday. Even if it takes until midnight, there are 13 million Illinoisans who need to wake up with a new governor that day.
Comment by Downstater Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:24 pm
Gov at the microphone: “You see, a long time ago there was a little teapot and….”
Comment by Cheswick Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:24 pm
I ask this only partly in jest: Is someone going to be able to make sure he isn’t armed? He’s clearly not dealing with a full deck.
Comment by Amuzing Myself Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:24 pm
Is Blago’s closing argument under oath?
and
I think he will resign at the end of his speech. I think it will be a conciliatory speech.
Comment by Phineas J. Whoopee Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:24 pm
CA-I believe the formal removal also bans him from ever running for elected office in IL again.
Comment by wizard Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:26 pm
Maybe Cullerton can short circuit the Gov. All he needs is a very pretty kitty to have in his lap while the Gov is speaking. Soon, the Gov will be so entranced with the said kitty, he will be unable to continue, and need to be taken away.
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:26 pm
Oh, look, a kitty!
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:28 pm
Wizard - there’s actually a separate vote that can be taken to formally bar him from ever running for office again. Assuming he is booted by the Senate, it does not automatically bar him from office.
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:29 pm
He will give a cromulent closing that will embiggen the senate and the people of Illinois.
Comment by Ghost Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:30 pm
Anon, there is a big difference between today and tomorrow. You can rest assured that personal offers for follow-up interviews beginning tomorrow are going out this evening to all the shows that he visited in the last few days. And maybe… maybe Oprah will get one too. Nah.
Comment by KeepSmiling Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:30 pm
Rich - Based on your experience, what do you suppose is the likelihood of RRB’s pre-conviction resignation?
Comment by This Guy Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:30 pm
Along with the over/under (If the Gov is going to resign tomorrow), what is a time estimate of how long the Gov is going to make the Senate wait?
I betting 30 minutes. And I think there is a 80% chance he is going to resign.
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:30 pm
A question was posed earlier that I think is a good one. If he’s voted out of office while he’s in Springfield, how does he get back to Chicago? Someone needs to keep an eye on that one.
BTW, can anyone name 20? How about 10?
Comment by Deep South Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:32 pm
I think the Gov will make a long speach about how the process was totally unfair. He will finish this speach with the words “I, therfore have resigned from the office of Governor as of 10:00 (more or less) this morning.”
By resigning, prior to a vote to convict, he will make the whole trial process moot. He will go down in history as impeached, but not convicted. Also, by resigning prior to a vote to convict, he stops the vote which could prevent him from ever holding public office in Illinois.
Comment by tanstaafl Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:32 pm
Holland importance: to testify about the charge against RRB that RRB circumvented state law (the IL State RX pharmacist bill) to import RX drugs from Canada.
RRB implemented the drug importation program (I Save Rx Program) without FDA approval, and by doing so RRB also broke federal law.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:33 pm
He could also call a lot of the senators and offer them something for their “no” vote. What has he got to lose?
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:33 pm
=== he stops the vote which could prevent him from ever holding public office in Illinois.===
You gotta wonder about whether that’s true or not. What’s to stop them from having that vote?
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:34 pm
Deep South…I am sure the citizens of Springfield will kick in to see he is sent back to Chicage!
Comment by WCIL Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:35 pm
===I ask this only partly in jest: Is someone going to be able to make sure he isn’t armed? He’s clearly not dealing with a full deck.===
Too much self-importance to pull a Budd Dwyer or go after others.
Comment by Tim Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:35 pm
I’d say Holland’s testimony is the sinker…no more witnesses necessary.
Comment by glued Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:35 pm
===He could also call a lot of the senators and offer them something for their “no” vote. ====
Any Senator who took that call would be in blatant violation of Senate rules and would be in very big trouble.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:35 pm
Rich, it is my understanding that vote is only taken once an official has been convicted by an impeachment tribunal.
Comment by tanstaafl Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:35 pm
In my interpretation of the laws, the Senate can only bar someone from never holding office again, if they are convicted of the impeachment charges.
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:36 pm
Deep South, good question about how will he get back home. He probably hasn’t thought that one out.
The Publicity Agency is just another number in Blago’s body count. They shoulda listened to Ed Genson and why he quit (my clients don’t have to do what I tell them to do but they do have to listen).
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:36 pm
True.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:36 pm
There’s nothing to stop them from having the vote… but there’s also nothing to stop Rod from filing a lawsuit claiming that vote was invalid, since there’s no legal precedent (at least in Illinois) for having an impeachment vote of any kind against an official who’s already resigned. (Nothing other than the lack of any attorney willing to take the case, of course.)
Comment by Secret Square Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:37 pm
Morris’ Office released an audit telling RRB that it I Save RX was an illegal program and RRB had press release same day stating the=at he would continue to implement the I Save Rx program.
Morris was disturbed by this because of RRB’s “blatant disregard for the law.”
The problem with the importation of drugs under the I save Rx program is medication goes straight from manufacturer to patient. The drugs pass through no regulatory hands.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:38 pm
But Rich, he’s a desperate man and desperate men take desperate actions. Since when has he acted rationally or cared about what laws he broke? I know it’s a long shot but so is the thought of him spewing for 90 minutes and then resigning. Who’s gonna give him a ride home?
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:38 pm
===Rich - Based on your experience, what do you suppose is the likelihood of RRB’s pre-conviction resignation?===
LOL. I try not to predict what this man does too often. One can ruin one’s reputation if one is wrong too many times.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:39 pm
With regards to the Gov making “phone calls” to other people. I would imagine at this point, he only is using an etch-a-shetch to communicate at home or at the office.
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:39 pm
DB-thanks, I was not aware of that and am glad to stand corrected. Still important to remove and call for the ban vote also.
Comment by wizard Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:39 pm
Well I am leaving for the day. Good Luck tomorrow to everyone as the Blago situation has made things more interesting.
Comment by David Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:39 pm
Ah I have a new love for auditors. Seriously. It’s all about the money. It’s the little people crunching the numbers who will eventually take you down. Now I’m sort of wishing I’d been a math and sciences major instead of English lit.
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:41 pm
Wizard, oh I completely agree. Assuming he doesn’t capitulate at the last second and resign, please, YES, make sure he can never hold office again…!
Comment by DB Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:42 pm
Blue Frog will be a rockin’ tomorrow!
Comment by Phineas J. Whoopee Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:43 pm
==== The Publicity Agency is just another number in Blago’s body count===
Collateral damage?
Comment by Say WHAT? Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:44 pm
Spoke too soon..
Twit:
Gov. urging supporters to contact Illinois state senators to urge them to allow him to bring witnesses to show he did nothing wrong
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:45 pm
Part of me hopes that he will go out with a final ‘blaze of glory’ befitting of all of the bizarre events that have transpired from his first term through his arrest.
Comment by Porter Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:46 pm
Please post your predictions for tomorrow on this thread . Let’s try to keep this one free for trial stuff. Thanks.
Fixed. Sorry.
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:47 pm
Holland is also testifying as to miss-use of the procurement process. Gov’s staff sat on 7 of 9 committees that issued the RFP.
The procurement program had problems with payment. CMS found that 35 of 39 state agencies were overbilled. Department of transportation for example was billed for $17 million when their actual expense were $1.2 million
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:47 pm
Holland: IPAM did not exist when it was awarded a $25,000,000 contract? They also misspent tens of thousands of dollars.
Comment by Say WHAT? Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:50 pm
I-PAM contract for $25 million. I-PAM did not come into existence until 2 weeks after the company was granted a contract. I-PAM was allowed to significantly alter its bid and a high ranking CMS official ate a meal with the President of I-PAM before the while the I-PAM was being was being considered.
As Such, RRB’s administration and CMS violated procurement laws as well as state financing laws.
Holland done. 30 hour break for caucus.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:52 pm
It is a safe bet that Blagoof’s calls to Senators discovered they did cut. Therefore they will not sstay bought
It is also a safe bet that Blagoof could not afford the round trip U-Haul rate so he fly down on the state and pay a one-way rate to haul his SPI junk (otherwise known as evidence to the guys on Dearborn) back to Ravenswood. Fumbles Harris and Slick Willie Quinlan get to keep the Nerf footballs. Giggles gets to keep the laughing gas.
The SpinSisters get to keep their freedom (so far)
Mr. Lucky’s fate is TBD
Comment by 2ConfusedCrew Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:52 pm
Rich-
Your link is messed up. Takes it to a dead page. Sort of appropriate I suppose!
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:54 pm
Did you mean a 30 minute break for caucus? I was away from my computer for a while.
Comment by Nearly Normal Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:57 pm
If he is not barred from running for public office again perhaps he will do one of 2 things:
1) Run against his father-in-law for Alderman in 2011;
2) Run against his sister-in-law for state representative.
It could all be part of a new reality t.v. show ala “Keeping up with the Blago-Mells…” Would at least give him employment for a season.
Any word on his MWRD appointment ? I still say he gives it to Patti.
Comment by Helm Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:58 pm
Blago will never resign. He loves being the “victim.” He is there until they throw him out.
Comment by TT Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 3:58 pm
That Twitter is say Blagoof urging ILans to call Senators..I can see Eddie Reed grabbing a big salami,hopping of bus and riding to SPI for one last paid protest
Man I’m gonna miss him and all those sad sack reporters pretending his “marches” are legit.
TTFN Eddie
Comment by 2ConfusedCrew Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:03 pm
Rich, your prediction thread isn’t opening.
Comment by Hair today, gone tomorrow Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:11 pm
Captain Flume -
RRB was re-elected in a 50% D / 40% R / 10% Green split - running against Republican some in Springfield called “Dances with Ryan” - in a Democratic landslide. In a normal year head to head with just an R, he might have lost. Don’t forget that.
Comment by We Can Hope Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:12 pm
All this poetry made me think of one of the greatest short poems about politics ever written.
Hilaire Belloc,’On the Death of a Politician:
Here richly, with ridiculous display,
The Politician’s corpse was laid away.
While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged
I wept : for I had longed to see him hanged.
Comment by walter sobchak Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:14 pm
Rodman:
What was that old quotation about a pro se litigant having a fool for a lawyer?
Comment by Honest Abe Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:14 pm
It is amazing that the Governor now wants to face the Senate without questions. We will get to see his great lawyer skills ( something we never saw any great skills as Governor).
One can only think how much he will get himself into trouble in the closing statement quoting poets and drawing false images of him being MLK jr like.
One only hopes that the US Attorney throws the book at this guy and he lives out his days in jail.
Comment by downstate demo Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:19 pm
This will likely be an excruciating 90 minute repeat of the same “The fix is in, woe is me, I’m the victim-cowboy-outsider, Dr. King once said…” stuff from the NY tour, followed by an attempt at “You can’t fire me because I quit.”
Not good enough. Do not accept the resignation. Vote. Stop letting this sociopath dictate.
Comment by Jim in Accounting Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:20 pm
If the Senate throws him out of office before he gets back on the state plane for Chicago; will he have to get another ride home?
Comment by downstate demo Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:22 pm
Governor’s resignation would have to be filed and accepted by SOS to be effective. His saying “I resign” is not enough to stop the process.
Comment by Legaleagle Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:36 pm
Good point. Will JW sign it? Here we go again… lol
Comment by Rich Miller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:39 pm
Blago is going to make the senate members look like fools. He is going to be late, berate them, try to temporarily resign and then ask that he be paid his salary and perks until the criminal trial is over. He is 10 times smarter and more coniving that all the senators put together! They should hold the vote at a definite time. If he is late, too bad. It will be over. He is incapable of being on time, so this may work.
Comment by Tom W. Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:40 pm
Back for questions
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:41 pm
Rich-
I think he can buy the signature for $2.00. Hey, if it worked for Burris it should work for Rod!
Comment by How Ironic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:42 pm
Holland: “RRB’s office was incompetent as well as deliberately defiant in its procurement policy.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:48 pm
Holland. “RRB’s administration and CMS violated legislature procedure as well as state financial laws.”
“Clearly the Governor acted with disregard to state and federal law and that action disregarded the efficient use of tax payer money.”
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:53 pm
“Incompetent and Defiant” pretty well sums up this administration…
Comment by Anonymous Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:54 pm
Does Ricky Hendon have a grudge against Holland?
Comment by Little Egypt Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:55 pm
I think he just likes to hear his name being used
Comment by WCIL Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:56 pm
CMS is no surprise - being a arm of the governor’s office…
Comment by Anonymous Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:56 pm
Can anyone help me out to try to understand Sen. Hendon? Is he totally a Blago drone or is something else going on here.
Comment by oldengrey Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:57 pm
Hendon’s about as disgraceful as gov. goofy.
How’s about impeaching & removing HIM ! ?
Comment by sal-says Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 4:57 pm
Some of the top losers of RRB’s procurement: Department of Labor, Transportation, Health and the Office of Lieutenant Gov. ( Many more, there were 34 of them)
Some top winners: Department of Human Services, EPA (there were 4 of them)
Last Question.
Comment by Mike Murray Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:00 pm
No questions about the Cellini connection to IPAM
Comment by Blago Sphere Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:01 pm
Will the “Fat Lady” please take the witness stand and prepare to sing? Thankyou!
Comment by A Citizen Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:17 pm
How many minutes will he be late?
Comment by Anon Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:19 pm
If he is late does that eliminate his right to give a closing statement?
Comment by bockrand Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:33 pm
What’s up with Hendon? His questions to Holland were slanted and deliberately provocative. Holland took his time formulating a response, and took a drink of water before answering. Did hendon think Holland would blow up? Nice try.
Comment by Always Astonished Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:39 pm
I can see him failing to show up, claiming he had car trouble, or plane trouble, or something, and that had he been allowed to argue his case, and present witnesses, etc. we would all know how innocent he is.
Comment by ChampaignDweller Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:54 pm
Yes, I am really having a hard time understanding Hendon, where is he coming from? Can anyone explain?
I really hope we can boot this clown out of office, unfortunately though I doubt it will happen.
Comment by Also Astonished Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 5:56 pm
I realize the Gov won last time with about 50% but he did win. And if the Repubs want the mansion in 2010, they just might vote not to convict. There’s a situation for you. I admit to not having heard the audios that were posted here from the Repub Senators. But given the political brinksmanship this state is infamous for, the move would not surprise me.
Comment by Captain Flume Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 6:07 pm
I took the governor’s suggestion to heart and called my Senator (Kimberly Lightford, in my case). They’re keeping a count, so it doesn’t hurt to put in the call.
Comment by Ann Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 6:09 pm
Hendon is a buffoon and should be made to pay at the ballot box but woe is us, we are talking about Chicago. We are the laughing stock of the nation and yet, we give this guy time to make a mockery of the office of govenor one more time? Remember, he said he did not want to be the man for 2 more years in a dead end job. Now, off with his head and let’s move on!
Comment by save a horse ride a harley Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 6:21 pm
I have DirecTV; any idea if any channel will be carrying this part live since he will be showing up? I would love to tivo closing arguments and the vote so that I can fast forward through the repetitive 1 hour and 29 minutes of RRB’s closing argument after the first minute.
Comment by 32nd Ward Roscoe Village Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 6:23 pm
Captain Flume -
My point is that people shouldn’t be that surprised he won re-election - it was a VERY Democratic year.
Comment by We Can Hope Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 6:47 pm
I’m glad to hear that the “efficiency charges” are being discussed again. It was great to hear Holland call them a slush fund. The agency I work for was really hurt by that scam, so I’m glad it is coming back into focus.
Comment by DuPage Dave Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 7:05 pm
DuPage Dave -
The Efficiency Initiative, in and of itself, was sufficient to warrant impeachment and conviction.
Comment by We Can Hope Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 7:36 pm
From Greg:
One of the best books ever written about congressional politics was Mayhew’s, “Congress: The Electoral Connection.” Every poli sci student who studies american politics has probably read it. The book starts on the premise that every decision made by a congressman is geared toward reelection.
That government actors are self interested and will abuse their power is the reason the federal government has checks and balances. You could fill a library with that idea.
So, how is Blago’s formulation any different? Do people believe that politicians are actually a bunch of Mother Theresa’s?==
Greg, politicians want to be re-elected? People are self-interested? Tell me more.
How shallow, though. Did you think you found the Da Vinci Code with the Mayhew book (that must be the other book in your library)?
Keep roaming the stacks. See if you can find examples selflessness, decency, service, honor or the common good in politics. To get started, try Civil War or Civil Rights.
And if you want an understanding of the separation of powers, start with the Federalist Papers (secret; the authors also wrote the Constitution) and not the 100,000th grad student combining pop psychology with government.
Dude, Blago is different. He’s unique. He’s the only governor ever dumb and vulgar enough to invite impeachment in Illinois. That says a lot.
What’s with you and him and Mother Teresa? Let her RIP.
Blago’s not typical, despite what the cynics say. That’s why he’s the first governor to be impeached and If you want insight to Blago, I’d suggest “Elmer Gantry” you might find other volumes that speak
Politicians want to be re-elected? People act out of self-interest? Undoubtel
Comment by wordslinger Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 7:41 pm
Blago may fly in on the state plane, but he’ll have to take Amtrak home: one way or another, he’s leaving Springfield on a rail.
Comment by Lt. Torello, M.C.U. Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 9:38 pm
Anyone know what time the closing will be?
Comment by Chicago Cynic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 9:50 pm
Hey, another post ready to break 200 comments! This week has been a real emotional roller coaster for us legislative staffers and I don’t think we can take another day of it… I dread the thought of the Senators dragging on with more caucuses and more “debate” after Blago speaks and then having to put off the vote until Friday. Please, just get it done tomorrow and stop Rod before he shoots off his mouth again!
Comment by Bookworm Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 10:18 pm
Rich Miller is right on about the governor’s “legal, personal, political” statements. Those words, coupled with other of his statements, should be more than enough to demonstrate that the governor breached the fiduciary duty he owes the people of Illinois. That duty is one the law applies to many relationships, and requires that the person owing the duty act solely for the benefit and in the interests of the person(s) owed the duty, and must not use the relationship in order to further his own personal interests. An agent must act solely for the benefit of his principal, a corporate board solely for the benefit of the stockholders, a trustee solely for the benefit of beneficiaries, and a lawyer solely in the interests of his client. The governor owes the same duty to the people of Illinois. It is recognized in the oath of office, requiring that the governor “faithfully” discharge the duties of the office. The governor therefore may not use the office in order to further his own personal interests, but must make every decision based solely on what he believes to be in the best interests of Illinois. Would any Illinois citizen consider relevant to who is the next senator whether the governor’s wife gets a higher paying job? Or the decision whether a hospital gets a grant to be conditioned on a campaign contribution? It doesn’t matter whether any of this is criminal, it is a breach of a fiduciary duty and therefore violates the law. Removal from office on that account is most certainly justice according to law.
Comment by Mike Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 10:28 pm
I don’t think he’s prepared for the fact that Senators can object when he mischaracterizes the Senate rules. That should throw him off his game.
And that makes 200.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 10:28 pm
Rod’s going to show up with a case NOS Energy Drinks and proceed in talking in tongues.
Note: To security, make sure he goes through the metal detector and is frisked before entering chambers.
Comment by Shakedown Street Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 11:02 pm
There are three ways for our soon-to-be ex-Gov. Sleazy to get home from Springfield Thursday.
First, he can bum a ride with Senate President John Cullerton, who stuffs Blago into the trunk of his car for the ride home.
Second, he gets a lift from one of those tabloid TV “journalists” in exchange for an “exclusive” story.
Third, the AMTRAK train leaves Springfield at 4:53 pm. Be under it, Rod!
Comment by Randall Sherman Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 11:56 pm
Oh, and the Chief Justice is Fitzgerald, Rich, not Thomas!
Comment by Randall Sherman Wednesday, Jan 28, 09 @ 11:58 pm
Fourth option for getting home: drive white Bronco up I-55 at minimum speed.
Comment by Bookworm Thursday, Jan 29, 09 @ 6:17 am
how many more of these senators are going to bore us before they vote?
Comment by Anonymous Thursday, Jan 29, 09 @ 4:35 pm