Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Braun apologizes for “crack” crack, and other crime and punishment news
Posted in:
* 2:32 pm - I’ll post the order in a minute granting a stay of the appellate ruling declaring the state’s capital bill to be unconstitutional.
* Basically, what this means is that everything with the capital bill is now status quo ante. Drivers service fees don’t have to be immediately refunded and projects apparently can carry on, at least until the Supremes rule otherwise (or not).
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Feb 1, 11 @ 2:32 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Braun apologizes for “crack” crack, and other crime and punishment news
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Any legal eagles know if that indicates which way they’ll bounce?
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Feb 1, 11 @ 4:03 pm
It doesn’t indicate anything.
The State filed a motion for a stay, and Wirtz filed a motion saying he was fine with a stay. So the ISC granted it.
Comment by dave Tuesday, Feb 1, 11 @ 4:46 pm
dave, we had that info yesterday. The point is, it’s stayed.
Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Feb 1, 11 @ 4:56 pm
Rich, I think you are being a bit short with Dave.
“The point” is not that is was stayed because that’s not what wordslinger’s asked. He asked if the granting of the motion provided an indication as to a SC ruling. Dave answered that, though he could have answered it better by explaining that courts usually grant agreed (or expressed “no objection”) motions and therefore one should not draw an inference from it.
Comment by Edison Parker Tuesday, Feb 1, 11 @ 5:34 pm