Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar


Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives


Previous Post: Rauner wants more prison guards, new minority programs
Next Post: Rauner grant freeze prompts protest

Heat turned up on Schock

Posted in:

* Tribune

A watchdog group Tuesday asked the Office of Congressional Ethics to examine whether Rep. Aaron Schock of Illinois acted improperly by accepting free services from an interior designer who redid his offices with a “Downton Abbey” motif.

The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington asked for the probe in a letter from Anne Weismann, its interim executive director and chief counsel.

The request was prompted by a story in Tuesday’s Washington Post about the fresh decor in the Republican lawmaker’s Rayburn Building office. […]

The paper quoted Schock’s office as saying Brahler offered her services for free, His congressional district includes Jacksonville, Ill., where Euro Trash is located.

The complaint is here.

* Meanwhile, USA Today looks at past spending by Schock

In December 2009 he paid $7,400 to an Illinois design/build firm called KBL Design Center, and then another $21,000 to a hardwood floor company, a building contractor and company called Old World Granite and Marble that apparently makes high-end countertops. He then spent $6,600 on an Illinois painting contractor.

Two months later, Schock spent $79,061 on furniture purchases, including $5,123 from a company called Mulnix Industries that specializes in hardwood podiums.

Around the same time, Schock spent more than $4,000 with a fine-leather furniture company called Garrett Leather.

All of the expenditures came out of Schock’s taxpayer-funded office account, which lawmakers can use to buy office furniture and pay for renovations.

Oof.

posted by Rich Miller
Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:16 am

Comments

  1. [Insert list detailing every time Aaron Schock complained about wasteful spending]

    Comment by J Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:20 am

  2. Whatever was he thinking?

    Comment by Aldyth Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:21 am

  3. Re that USA TODAY spending, if it all did go into his office, then -legally-, I think that part is in the clear.

    I mean, I wouldn’t be happy about it were I his constituent, but it’s his constituents’ job to police that part of it. Only if some of this stuff found its way into Schock’s own house, would he be in trouble with the law.

    Comment by ZC Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:21 am

  4. “Aaron? I just want to say one word to you. Just one word. Are you listening? Optics.”

    Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:21 am

  5. I wonder how this is going to play in Peoria.

    Comment by 47th Ward Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:22 am

  6. Schock has disappointed, since the day he appeared shirtless. Thought he would grow-up, but appears he hasn’t.

    Comment by Apocalypse Now Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:27 am

  7. I don’t think elected officials should have to work in a concrete bunker, but neither should they work in the Taj Mahal. A happy medium would be good. This tilts a bit more toward the Taj Mahal end of the spectrum.

    Comment by Ron Burgundy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:28 am

  8. The Today show made fun of it this am. Glad he didn’t take his inspiration from the Zombie Apocalypse

    Comment by Langhorne Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:30 am

  9. From experience when they spend taxpayer money on stuff like this they think of it as their money not the taxpayer’s…

    Comment by Mouthy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:31 am

  10. Schadenfreude

    ;-))))

    Comment by Westward Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:32 am

  11. –Two months later, Schock spent $79,061 on furniture purchases–

    That’s $10,000 more than I paid for my house in 2004.

    Comment by Streator Curmudgeon Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:32 am

  12. Only the best and edgiest…

    Comment by A guy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:33 am

  13. Also, well done 47th Ward

    Comment by LizPhairTax Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:34 am

  14. Oh the horror! Come on people get a life - are you all nuts?

    Comment by A Citizen Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:36 am

  15. What ZC said. The govt was the ultimate recipient. Move along.

    Comment by thechampaignlife Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:36 am

  16. When asked for comment about the heat being turned up on his dealings, Schock responded “boy, it is a bit warm in here, huh?”

    Comment by Todd Gak Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:48 am

  17. [Slow bass line starts]

    [Undoes first button]

    Comment by Todd Gak Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:50 am

  18. ==I don’t think elected officials should have to work in a concrete bunker==

    Have you seen the Stratton Building?

    Comment by Tree Stand Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:50 am

  19. In a red room, you just can’t tell if someone is turning red or not.

    Comment by A guy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:51 am

  20. Is Annie Brahler, the designer, a plant? Schock’s has been targeted before.

    Comment by Smitty Irving Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 9:52 am

  21. ==Is Annie Brahler, the designer, a plant?==

    Hardly. It appears from the initial Washington Post story that she is a local designer who has previously done good work for the Congressman and got a chance to do something nice.

    Everyone wins. The Congressman gets a unique and nice office, the designer gets a chance to showcase her work a bit, and the taxpayers save money on the design costs.

    Until everything falls apart like a car wreck in slow motion, as it has here.

    Comment by Formerly Known As... Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:03 am

  22. === What ZC said. The govt was the ultimate recipient. Move along. ===

    Exactly. Not one single taxpayer reaped any single benefit, “the govt,” in the person of Congressman Schock, did.

    Comment by Juvenal Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:04 am

  23. I like Aaron, I really do. But like I said yesterday, anyone surprised by this stuff simply doesn’t know him. He’s always been extravagant and fabulous. He’s still the only person I’ve ever seen wear a smoking jacket on the House floor and Prada loafers sans socks at the state fair (watch your step Aaron!).

    Appalling because of the waste? Absolutely. Suprising? Not in the least.

    And streator Curmudgeon - I sold my Springfield house in 2002 for just slightly less than that furniture cost myself.

    Comment by Joe Bidenopolous Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:05 am

  24. 47th
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JWTaaS7LdU

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:11 am

  25. Reading between the lines its hard not to the corrolaries between Schock and Rutherford.

    Comment by Teve Demotte Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:15 am

  26. Awww, thanks Soccermom. Now my face is redder than the walls in Schock’s office.

    Comment by 47th Ward Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:19 am

  27. That’s just OUT of site.

    Comment by Beans and Franks Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:38 am

  28. sight…

    Comment by Beans and Franks Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:39 am

  29. === 47th Ward - Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:19 am:

    Awww, thanks Soccermom. Now my face is redder than the walls in Schock’s office.===

    She do do that to you, don’t she? You’re smitten.

    Comment by A guy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:40 am

  30. Oh my goodness — Schock is now news in the UK.

    http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2015/feb/03/downton-abbey-decor-why-be-ashamed

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:41 am

  31. I love that the Guardian made this point:

    Let’s not forget, however, that Downton Abbey is on PBS, which is in part funded by the government (and viewers like you, as they so often tell us). The Republicans have been trying to destroy PBS for years and Mitt Romney made a pledge in 2012 that he would cut its funding were he elected president. How can Schock stand so firmly behind the channel’s biggest hit when his party has put PBS on the chopping block?

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:43 am

  32. 47th — that means you could sneak right into Schock’s office and take photos, and no one would see you! Clever…

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:43 am

  33. Some are work-horses; others are show-horses.

    Comment by Old Shepherd Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:44 am

  34. Love it Soccermom—bringing it back to enjoying the station that the government helps bring to our homes—PBS.

    Comment by Belle Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:46 am

  35. In the homeland of “Downton Abbey” the British have a word for politicians who behave like Aaron Schock: posh boys.

    – MrJM

    Comment by MrJM Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:50 am

  36. - Soccermom -, I hope your tribute doesn’t foreshadow a departure?

    If you have to “go”, the statewide bus tour needs to happen soon…

    To the Post,

    To all the young Flacks out there…

    Making a “deal” with a reporter who already has a story in the can…choosing exclusivity versus an exclusive ain’t changing minds. Be better, and do t be so naive that no one would have found out about the decor, or you could have controlled the message.

    You can’t control blatantly bad optics.

    Amateur Hour.

    Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:50 am

  37. Instead of Downton Abbey, he should have used Bruce Wayne’s mansion as a model. That show is on good old American TV station Fox.

    Comment by a drop in Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:51 am

  38. Perhaps he should spend some time watching “Call the Midwives” so he can understand the healthcare issues before their National HealthCare System was put into place. Since the characters aren’t rich, there may not be as many opportunities to gather decorating ideas.

    Comment by Belle Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:52 am

  39. It is amusing that the British newspapers frequently do most of the heavy-lifting in terms of reporting on American politics. What happened to the American media? If you want to see in depth articles, you have to read the newspapers from the United Kingdom that have no inhibition about criticizing the President or the Congress regardless of party affiliation.

    Comment by Under Further Review Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 10:53 am

  40. Although it occurs to me that 47th’s camouflage would only work if he is wearing an all-red suit (Santa minus the white fur trim?) or is, um, unclothed.

    But really — what could possibly go wrong if someone just happened to wander into a congressman’s office wearing nothing but a sense of fiscal indignation?

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:03 am

  41. Eww.

    Comment by 47th Ward Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:05 am

  42. Holy crap!
    He thinks he is Chester Arthur!

    Comment by VanillaMan Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:08 am

  43. === Soccermom - Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:03 am:

    Although it occurs to me that 47th’s camouflage would only work if he is wearing an all-red suit (Santa minus the white fur trim?) or is, um, unclothed.

    But really — what could possibly go wrong if someone just happened to wander into a congressman’s office wearing nothing but a sense of fiscal indignation?===

    You want this story to go well beyond England, don’t you? lol

    Comment by A guy Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:09 am

  44. Just looked at the photos of Schock’s office.

    I have a picture of Lincoln in my home office too–in a frame I bought at Dollar General.

    But red walls? What VanillaMan said.

    Comment by Streator Curmudgeon Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:13 am

  45. @Vanilla Man:

    I was fairly sure that Chester Alan Arthur was one of the presidents featured on a framed print in Shock’s outer office or reception area. I did spot Woodrow Wilson in the same photo.

    All in all, it reminded me of a English pub themed restaurant.

    Comment by Under Further Review Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:15 am

  46. ==But really — what could possibly go wrong if someone just happened to wander into a congressman’s office wearing nothing but a sense of fiscal indignation?==

    The customer-constituent is always right. Always.

    You offer them a seat on one of those fancy Downton Abbey chairs, have a spot of tea and then pose for pictures with a stark red 47th in all his glory.

    No? lol

    Comment by Formerly Known As... Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:33 am

  47. Schock’s picture would go nicely next to Webster’s definition of vanity.

    Comment by Left Leaner Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 11:42 am

  48. I am thinking of this
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8IQ5-89ey8

    Comment by Soccermom Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 12:39 pm

  49. Congressman Schock’s district includes Bloomington-Normal. The only time he has made an appearance is for fundraising. We do not know him any other way. He needs to come regularly to all areas of his district and report about what is happening in Washington and give us the rationale for his votes and not charge! We pay his salary! Congressman worry about how the press is reporting what happens in Washington. Why don’t they have regular sessions with constituents in their district to tell them what is happening and not have us have to depend on the press.

    Comment by Rgal Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 12:48 pm

  50. Ethical or not, it appears he has no sense of optics.

    Illinois is $9 billion short!
    Oooooh, is that leather? I’ll take 2!

    Comment by Illini97 Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 1:14 pm

  51. There are more ways than one to increase your net worth in D.C. Or at least the appearance of net worth to improve your stature among those of wealth and celebrity. Its all part of the game in gaining some rungs up the hierarchical ladder. Schock like many others in high positions gains his sense of identity with the trappings of wealth. He is great at the fund raising game to sustain his place and promote his rise. I just wish he didn’t also fall in line with the rest of the D.C. Republican ideologues and would actually represent his district more along the moderate lines of LaHood and Michel. Too bad democracy or the political party system in Illinois is so weak that the democrats can’t put up a solid candidate to compete with him and his war chest.

    Comment by vole Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 1:25 pm

  52. At least the red room was from Downton Abbey instead of Fifty Shades of Grey.

    Comment by Bigtwich Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 2:27 pm

  53. What Teve said. A lot like Rutherford.

    Comment by Well then Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 2:28 pm

  54. He’s now reported to be quoting Taylor Swift: “Haters gotta hate”

    https://vine.co/v/OF63AAEmi7J

    Comment by Irishpirate Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 4:41 pm

  55. Schock’s office made a CNN editorial about Republican policies:

    http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/04/opinion/kohn-schock-downton-abbey/index.html

    Comment by Streator Curmudgeon Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 5:10 pm

  56. Under Further Review @ 10:53 AM:

    You nailed it! Thanks for pointing that out as I don’t think most folks are aware of the level of coverage about the US in the UK.

    Comment by Macoupin Minority Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 6:50 pm

  57. How much of that could he afford if he made minimum wage.

    Comment by rilt Wednesday, Feb 4, 15 @ 8:38 pm

Add a comment

Sorry, comments are closed at this time.

Previous Post: Rauner wants more prison guards, new minority programs
Next Post: Rauner grant freeze prompts protest


Last 10 posts:

more Posts (Archives)

WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.

powered by WordPress.