Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: *** UPDATED x2 - Rauner to meet with GOP leaders, then 4 leaders meet without Rauner - Gov. Rauner to be included *** The leaders’ meeting is back on track
Next Post: *** UPDATED x4 - Pawar, Biss, Kennedy, Pritzker respond *** Rauner says again that he hasn’t been happier in 20 years
Posted in:
* Finke on school funding reform…
Republicans have called Senate Bill 1, which was crafted by Sen. Andy Manar, D-Bunker Hill, a bailout for the Chicago school system. They are behind Senate Bill 1124 which they said will provide more money to the neediest school districts while also not giving the Chicago schools benefits that other districts do not receive.
Manar and other Democrats have denied that Chicago gets special treatment under SB1 and that the bill will guarantee that any new money allocated to K-12 education will be directed to the neediest school districts. No school district will get less money under SB1 than it does now.
During a committee of the whole meeting Saturday in the House, a number of school superintendents testified in favor of SB1, including Don Cox, superintendent of the Staunton School District. Cox said he believes SB1 is the most equitable way to achieve adequate school funding.
“We do not suffer from a spending problem in our district,” Cox said. “We suffer from a revenue problem.”
* The Senate Democrats sent out these bullet points about the Republican funding reform proposal…
· It would result in the loss of federal funding for special education and free/reduced lunch programs in school districts statewide.
· It represents a redistribution of dollars from poor school districts to wealthy school districts.
· It creates winning and losing school districts.
· There is no Republican-sponsored revenue bill to pay for school funding.
· There are no known proponents for Senate Bill 1124, which is sponsored by Senator Jason Barickman (R-Bloomington).
· The Republicans’ full court press for Senate Bill 1124 began three weeks after May 31, the final day of the legislative session.
· Barickman and Rauner education secretary Beth Purvis directly contradicted each other about details of the proposal while answering questions throughout this afternoon’s hearing.
* And, among other things, the GOP sent out this…
Aurora East Unit School District 131 does better under #SB1124. #fixestheformula #norednumbers pic.twitter.com/YBfZu79Pcq
— ILSenateGOP (@ILSenateGOP) June 24, 2017
And this…
All Illinois school districts would benefit from a more equitable distribution of state education dollars under a compromise proposal introduced by State Senator Jason Barickman (R-Bloomington) to fix the state’s broken school aid formula and end the budget stalemate, according to data released by the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE).
“This is a true compromise that embraces the priorities of lawmakers from both parties and both legislative chambers, and reflects the recommendations of the Governor’s bipartisan, bicameral Illinois School Funding Reform Commission,” Sen. Barickman said.
“Our legislation focuses on agreed-to principles and best practices to create real equity by treating all districts and students fairly under one system, regardless of zip code,” Barickman continued. “Now the data from ISBE clearly demonstrates that this is the most equitable plan for all students.”
The ISBE data show how schools would fare under Amendment 3 to Senate Bill 1124 as part of a compromise package of budget and reform measures that Sen. Barickman says would be signed by the Governor.
posted by Rich Miller
Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 11:09 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: *** UPDATED x2 - Rauner to meet with GOP leaders, then 4 leaders meet without Rauner - Gov. Rauner to be included *** The leaders’ meeting is back on track
Next Post: *** UPDATED x4 - Pawar, Biss, Kennedy, Pritzker respond *** Rauner says again that he hasn’t been happier in 20 years
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
GOP numbers are inaccurate and inflated. They run $672 million through the projected model despite only appropriating $288 million in their budget bill. The amount over comes from running FY 17 funds through the model, which were distributed in a separate manner, despite the bill not calling for this.
Comment by Kids not Politics Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 11:30 am
Of course Senate Bill 1 is a Chicago bailout. Only a. Lind partisan or a Democrat owned journalist would suggest otherwise. Manar wrote it and it doesn’t get past his own caucus unless Cullerton and the rest of the mathematically challenged Chicago folks get something to brag about back home. The Mayor and CPS can’t negotiate a decent deal with their teachers and will forever be the asking for new monies. They continue to get the special block grant that no one else gets plus money for their pensions. They are getting special treatment that none of the other districts get because of their incompetence. That makes it a bailout.
Comment by Really Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 11:45 am
=== They continue to get the special block grant that no one else gets plus money for their pensions. They are getting special treatment that none of the other districts get===
Um, CPS doesn’t receive categorial grants like every other district, it receives the block grant. And the state picks up the full employer and legacy costs for all other school districts in the state except CPS.
Comment by Rich Miller Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 11:51 am
How can SB1 be a bailout if it gives Chicago less than SB1124?
Per the “overall gain” column, CPS is getting $94million more, under SB1124.
Comment by cdog Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 12:04 pm
==would result in the loss of federal funding for special education==
NO. Both SB 1 and SB 1124 (pages 376 and 383) have language saying local schools must treat part of General State Aid as if it were State money for special ed to meet Maintenance of Effort (MOE).
Ridiculous, but true.
Neither bill supports direct and dedicated funding for special ed Summer School or for special ed teachers.
Both bills fund special ed based on one position for 141 GENERAL education students.
Anyone want to defend that? Why pretend every school district has exactly the same percentage of students in special ed?
Comment by winners and losers Sunday, Jun 25, 17 @ 1:09 pm