Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Ives, Kennedy up with two new ads
Next Post: Rauner on pension cost-shift’s impact on property taxes: “It’ll help bring them down”
Posted in:
*** UPDATE 3 *** Speaker Madigan’s statement…
“I spoke with Kelly Cassidy today. I told her I will cooperate fully and I will ask independent counsel Kelly Smith-Haley to assist.”
*** UPDATE 4 *** I checked in with Rep. Cassidy via text about her chat with Speaker Madigan today. “I spoke briefly to him as a professional courtesy that I was releasing the statement,” she wrote.
What did Madigan say? “He asked me how to accomplish the independence, and indicated he would be willing to cooperate.”
Also: “He never mentioned the firm or the attorney.”
* Rep. Kelly Cassidy (D-Chicago)…
“The slow and steady drip of accusations and dismissals has turned into an endless cycle of lather, rinse, repeat, highlighting the culture of harassment in the legislature and political campaigns.
I am calling for an independent investigation into this culture that appears to pervade the organizations led by Speaker Madigan. Because of the unique interconnectedness of his Capitol and political operations, the investigation must not be hampered by organizational boundaries. The investigator(s) should not be Democratic elected officials, individuals or firms with pre-existing ties to the Speaker and should have demonstrated experience with investigations of this nature.
We must get to the bottom of this with confidence in the independence of the investigator. We need to force the very real culture change required to truly show that #timesup.”
*** UPDATE 1 *** Tribune…
“We need a real, independent law firm, not someone that is hired by the chair of the party, and that’s what’s happened,” said Sen. Melinda Bush, D-Grayslake. “Whether or not they are wonderful people, it doesn’t matter. They’ve been hired by him. If you are going to do a true independent council, a true independent group, they have to be people that are clearly independent from the head of the (Democratic Party of Illinois).”
Bush said she did not believe the chair of the Democratic Party should serve as speaker of the House or president of the Senate. Bush stopped short of calling for Madigan to step down from his chairmanship of the party, but said “I think it’s something he should seriously consider, however, for the good of the party going forward.”
“I think there is an incestuous relationship that occurs there that is not healthy,” Bush said.
Asked about the calls for Madigan to step down as head of the party, Madigan spokesman Steve Brown said “that’s not going to happen.” He pointed to comments Madigan made last week following calls to resign by Democratic Rep. Scott Drury, a frequent critic of Madigan who is running for attorney general.
* Meanwhile…
My full statement calling on Speaker Madigan to step down as Democratic Party Chair and as House Speaker: https://t.co/2fcvT0rMcJ #twill #TimesUp #MeToo
— Sharon Fairley (@FairleyForAG) February 20, 2018
Rep. Drury, who is now back on the AG Dem ballot, has written a letter to Speaker Madigan, calling on him to step down as speaker and agree to testify under oath about sexual harassment and abuse; also wants an independent special counsel to conduct a statewide investigation.
— Tina Sfondeles (@TinaSfon) February 20, 2018
*** UPDATE 2 *** Press release…
Today, Comptroller Susana A. Mendoza, Congresswoman Cheri Bustos and State Representative Carol Ammons issued the following joint statement regarding the sexual harassment panel they are in the process of developing:
“We agreed to serve on this panel because it is clear that institutionalized systems have perpetuated sexism, sexual harassment, and inequality in our state’s political system. We thank the women who have come forward with their experiences for their bravery and courage.
“We recognize the importance and benefit to everyone when women are in positions of influential leadership and are active in all levels of our political system, from campaign staff to candidate. All women should be able to engage, achieve and excel in the workplace without fear of being excluded, harassed, discriminated, or retaliated against. It shouldn’t matter whether you work in a restaurant, a factory, a board room, a state capitol or a political campaign.
“When any woman finds herself being sexually harassed, resources should be readily available for her to seek justice and hold the perpetrators accountable. Survivors of sexual harassment must feel that their claims will be taken seriously, addressed promptly and that they can report incidents without fear of retribution. The culture of the ‘good old boy’ network is not changing fast enough and our panel will seek to accelerate the change of that culture.
“Since the hashtag MeToo caught fire in 2017, we have seen a flood of sexual harassment victims come forward. This is a problem on all levels of government and in all parties. The only significant and sustaining solution will be to change the dynamics and composition of leadership in politics.
“We have begun discussions about how to structure this panel and define its mission to include the voices of women around Illinois and make recommendations. At its core, in order for this panel to be effective in presenting legitimate findings and effective solutions, it must be completely independent. We take this responsibility seriously and, in the coming days, we will be publicly outlining the scope of the panel’s goals and our timeline after we have the opportunity to discuss the most effective path forward as a team.”
posted by Rich Miller
Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:28 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Ives, Kennedy up with two new ads
Next Post: Rauner on pension cost-shift’s impact on property taxes: “It’ll help bring them down”
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
-The investigator(s) should not be Democratic elected officials, individuals or firms with pre-existing ties to the Speaker and should have demonstrated experience with investigations of this nature.-
This maybe the hardest part.
Comment by Come on man! Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:34 am
Time for him to resign and slink away.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:35 am
It would have got really interesting if someone had got on rhe ballot against him for State Central Committeeman.
Amazing that no one in the District smelled blood in the water and the one giy who did file turned in less than 200 sigs.
Comment by Fax Machine Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:36 am
Kelly Cassidy for Speaker.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:39 am
I can just imagine the mobs storming the Speaker’s office with “Probe the Culture” signs.
Comment by VanillaMan Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:41 am
==Kelly Cassidy for Speaker==
Bold move! That’s a smart play.
Comment by Abraham Obama Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:41 am
I second the nomination of Rep. Cassidy for Speaker.
Comment by Anonymrs Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:41 am
That’s a direct shot from a Dem. rep. — and, I’m guessing, a future candidate for speaker.
Still, if you’re going to take that shot, you should be prepared to say exactly what you’re calling for.
Who, exactly, has the authority (derived from where?) to conduct an “independent” investigation of a “culture” across governmental staff and political organizations? Who’s paying for it?
Stay tuned.
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:44 am
Kudos to Kelly. She has been steadfast in this and I expect her to continue leading the charge. She doesn’t need Madigan so is perfectly positioned to take him on, but not in a Drury posturing way. She wants to see change because it’s the right thing to do.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:46 am
Investigations into “culture?” Are we going to start a rating system for cultures of each representative’s office? And for the political organizations? Annual cultural reviews for those who don’t pass the culture test? I’m all for investigating crimes. I’m not so hot on investigating cultures.
Comment by NoGifts Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:48 am
When Cassidy faced her first primary in 2012, she was happy to embrace Madigan and take Democratic Majority money and cash from MJM allies directed to her campaign to hold her seat. Hypocrite.
Comment by King Louis XVI Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:49 am
This is where it get’s interesting….
So the speaker in less than a week fires a current staff member and former staff member from his organization. Can he really spurn the call for an independent investigation? It only offers his opponents the chance to ask what he’s hiding.
JB campaign better be ready to answer the question, “Do you favor an independent probe?”
Comment by Downstate Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:49 am
Madigan should appoint Cassidy to lead the investigation. Empower her to compel testimony from his team, urge them to cooperate and hold hearings. She is independent enough to look into the various Democratic Party operations that report to Madigan.
If Madigan wants to put this behind him, something like this needs to happen. She asked for the ball. I say give it to her and let her run with it.
Comment by 47th Ward Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:51 am
Cassidy’s request is whats known as CYA.
Comment by MOON Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:52 am
At issue Who knew what & when ? Oh there is the people who have their feelings hurt or skills challenged component that is getting thrown into the mix. This is the definition of “a hot mess” and not going away anytime soon.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:54 am
Cassidy has some guts.
Comment by Anon Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:54 am
Daniel Biss’s talking points would seem more credible if they were coming from someone who hadn’t endorsed him.
Harrassment, abuse and bullying aren’t limited to one campaign or one party. Ask anyone who has been around politics any amount of time at all. Ask Marisa Adam. Ask Republicans.
Turning this into a bunch of talking points is a disservice.
Comment by Thomas Paine Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:55 am
47th Ward,
Love the idea! Let her name a Republican as co-chair, and they can get started!
Comment by Downstate Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:56 am
–Madigan should appoint Cassidy to lead the investigation.–
Cassidy would be disqualified by Cassidy’s own criteria, which includes taking Madigan campaign money.
Comment by King Louis XVI Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:57 am
=== she was happy to embrace Madigan and take Democratic Majority money===
Good point. She really should have used her crystal ball to predict that sexual harassment allegations would emerge 6 years later and refuse the money in 2012.
Comment by PJ Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 11:57 am
–Cassidy’s request is whats known as CYA.–
Unless she puts some meat on the bones of whatever it is she’s requesting, I’d say that’s correct. A political action, not a real goo-goo one.
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:09 pm
The Attorney General is best suited to perform an independent probe into the Speaker and his organizations.
Comment by Just Me Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:14 pm
=The Attorney General is best suited to perform an independent probe into the Speaker and his organizations.=
please please please tell me you are speaking with snark. Because if that is snark, well done my friend.
if that was sincerity, all hope is lost.
Comment by Iggy Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:24 pm
==Kelly Cassidy for Speaker==
I don’t know if I would go that far, but this is a perfect opportunity for Cassidy, Ammons, Gordon-Booth, et al to push Madigan out the door. He’s made it clear he isn’t retiring any time soon, and every dem in this state that isn’t on DPI or House of Reps payroll knows Madigan has become a Jurassic-era Pelosi type of millstone that hurts dems running for office in Illinois much more than he helps. If the IL Dem party is ever going to move past the 1980’s, it’s going to be without Madigan at the top of the food chain. This is the best and probably last opportunity they are going to get to force him out, sans Pritzker getting the nomination and bankrolling a parallel organization to DPI (which probably won’t happen, given JB’s prevaricating whenever the speakers name is mentioned).
After years of representatives anonymously complaining about being treated like mushrooms, here’s their chance to change the dynamic. Hope they don’t blow it.
Comment by Lester Holt’s Mustache Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:30 pm
Republicans are licking their chops because once Madiganis gone, there will be nobody left to protect the targets.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:40 pm
It should be noted that the Constitution does not require a party line vote on speaker.
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:40 pm
Cassidy could have offered some idea how to would conduct an investigation. I am sure she, Biss and Drury could have come up with something.
When do they start asking how many staffers they’ve disrespected or made cry in the corner? Or are those conversations not relevant to changing the culture?
Glass houses, ladies and gentlemen.
Comment by waiter Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:46 pm
“Cassidy’s request is whats known as CYA”
Why? She doesn’t have a general election race and not much of one in the primary so she doesn’t neeed CYA? That’s not what this is about by any stretch. She has shown repeatedly that she wants to see real change down there.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:55 pm
I think Waiter is spot on. You need clean hands in this climate if you’re going to toss bombs around. Neither Cassidy or Biss do. Will it come back to bite them? I don’t know, but it’s a dangerous game to play with your career.
Comment by Centennial Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:55 pm
— culture of harassment—
Oy. I’ve opposed bills in committees that Cassidy was a member of and it wasn’t a pleasant experience.
In a republican controlled House, how many bills impacting LGBT issues, women reproductive rights, and criminal justice reforms would pass?
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 12:58 pm
This all just a bunch of hot air until someone credible announces they will challenge Madigan for speaker.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:10 pm
“In a Republican controlled House”…
Not only nothing on the issues anon mentioned, but the last time we had GOP House we got : parental notification, Chief Illiniwek, control of Chicago schools handed to Mayor of said city (elected school board anyone?) among other measures…
A real progressive agenda in other words…/s
Comment by low level Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:15 pm
Kelly “Jerry McGuire” Cassidy
Comment by Make a statement Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:20 pm
—-Because of the unique interconnectedness—-
Speaking of interconnectedness should a legislator vote present on bills relating to issues pushed by their roommates or their boss, if they hold outside employment?
Comment by Olivia Pope Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:21 pm
@Anonymous 12:58 & low level:
A Republican house is more likely the longer MJM sycophants keep propping him up forever like the corpse in Weekend at Bernie’s.
Madigan is a political liability who cost Dems House seats in a 2016 Dem wave election and would have drowned Susana Mendoza’s campaign but for Leslie Munger’s team waiting too long to run ads.
Madigan needs to go for the sake of the Democratic Party and progressive politics.
That the House Dem women’s caucus can’t co-sign this Cassidy statement shows me the caucus was nothing but a MJM CYA project and not interested in actually making the Dem Party better for women. Such a shame.
And I don’t want to hear MJM apologists with innuendo about the GOP caucus having harasser skeletons in the closet too and I don’t need to be reminded that the GOP political agenda is worse for me as a woman. That is what I expect from the GOP, especially one headed by a creep like Trump.
I expect Dems to do and be better to women. I am not convinced this will happen as long as MJM controls the party.
Comment by hisgirlfriday Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:45 pm
“Oy. I’ve opposed bills in committees that Cassidy was a member of and it wasn’t a pleasant experience.”
So she was tough and you call it bullying? I think you’re mixing apples and grapefruit.
Comment by Chicago Cynic Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:48 pm
Is one of the people commenting here Dan Proft in disguise? What Cassidy is doing is what’s called ‘the right thing’. Taking MJM money when one is starting out as a legislator and personally witnessing & reacting to the often toxic nature of his inner circle are not mutually exclusive. Cassidy isn’t a lawyer, but is someone with integrity who will ensure that whomever gets charged (lucky them!) with the investigation truly is free of ties to Madigan or the party or the other party- it is possible, you know. As for funding an independent investigation? Not going to pretend I know how these things work, but imagining there are plenty of folks willing to fund it- anonymously or named.
Comment by LoyalVirus Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 1:54 pm
“It should be noted that the Constitution does not require a party line vote on speaker. ”
That darn old pesky Constitution.
Comment by mama Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 2:16 pm
–Taking MJM money when one is starting out as a legislator … –
Cassidy has been taking Madigan’s help in her 2018 primary petition fight against an opponent who challenged her petitions.
Comment by King Louis XVI Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 3:00 pm
===Madigan is a political liability who cost Dems House seats in a 2016 Dem wave election===
He lost the Bradley, Franks (who moved on), Cloonen and Skoogs seats. And picked up Katie Stuarts district. Pretty sure all those lost seats happened in areas that Trump did well in and not where the Dem wave was happening.
Comment by Been There Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 3:11 pm
Step down? Come on he believes he is too important to the General Assembly. He can’t imagine how Illinois government could actually function without him.
He is becoming a joke
Comment by Etown Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 3:57 pm
While I don’t disagree with someone investigating, Ms. Bush suggests that the person should not be selected by Mr. Madigan, or paid for by Mr. Madigan or DPI. So, who should appoint and who should pay?
Oh, I know…this is a job for the Attorney Gene…oh wait.
So again, who appoints and who pays?
Comment by Commonsense in Illinois Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 4:08 pm
–“We need a real, independent law firm, not someone that is hired by the chair of the party, and that’s what’s happened,” said Sen. Melinda Bush, D-Grayslake.–
If you’re going to throw this stuff out there, will you make an effort to tighten it down?
Who, with what authority, hired by whom?
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 4:12 pm
==Cassidy has been taking Madigan’s help in her 2018 primary petition fight against an opponent who challenged her petitions.==
Once again, before these allegations. And was she supposed to hire her own personal lawyer to defend against a nuisance petition challenge?
Comment by PJ Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 4:24 pm
=== A Republican house is more likely the longer MJM sycophants keep propping him up forever like the corpse in Weekend at Bernie’s.
Madigan needs to go for the sake of the Democratic Party and progressive politics. ===
What basis do you have for saying that because I don’t actually think you know what you are talking about. The 2016 election was about Trump, plain and simple. Look at some of the places that the Dems lost seats - all downstate districts where Trump performed well. People like John Bradley significantly overperformed Hillary Clinton. Do you honestly believe that a more “progressive” candidate would have have a better result in these places?
Comment by Too Much to Handle Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 4:50 pm
The reported culture of sexual harassment and limited opportunity for women in Springfield goes way beyond any one person or party. While having Speaker Madigan step down from leadership in the House or with the Democratic Party may solve a political problem for some and give a great optic for others, it will take way more than his stepping down to improve the culture. There are 59 state senators and 119 representatives, the majority of which are men. How many of our other male legislators, Democrats and Republicans alike, keep this culture going? How many of their staffers? How many of their campaign workers?
After we’re done in Springfield, what about our federal government? What about Cook County? What about the City? I don’t agree with many of Madigan’s approaches. If I were closer to the situation down in Springfield, I may or may not see things differently. At this point, I think, before anyone calls for Madigan’s ouster, the practices of the Governor, the Legislature, the Judicial Branch, their staffs and political campaigns need to be reviewed systematically, with a rigorous and standardized approach and set of sanctions. Anything less, in my opinion, is politics as usual.
Comment by Valerie F. Leonard Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 5:00 pm
Who cares about Madigan? Nobody out here. Women, in this arena it’s time for you to show some courage here too in the face of the person who funded much/all of your campaigns (along with your male counterparts) and now wants to dictate how this is going to go for you too. Seriously, get going and run fast and hard. It’s all political theatre so he and his cronies can survive to ruin our state another day. Get him out. Do the entire state a favor. And while you’re at it, kick out all the Chicago Machine men - Burke, Berrios, O’Connor, Lang, Lipinski, D’Amico and more. #timesupmadigan #timesupchicagomachine
Comment by E Pluribus Unum Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 5:30 pm
E Pluribus Unum, this isn’t Facebook. FYI.
Comment by Rich Miller Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 5:35 pm
re: “Culture”
Rep. Conroy is satisfied her concerns were addressed?
Re: GOP house
I really love these people who are either new to Illinois or have forgotten how HDems were able to win 60 and then 62 seats w a Repub map… who think Illinois has always been rock solid blue.
Comment by low level Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 5:45 pm
” Look at some of the places that the Dems lost seats - all downstate districts where Trump performed well.” Explain this fact to BVR who claims that he elected these legislators and that Trump had no coat tails.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Feb 20, 18 @ 6:20 pm