Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
Next Post: Baise tells party insurgents to choose between Rauner and Madigan
Posted in:
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column…
“Nothing’s more important for a governor than having a good budget because that allows you to manage the state to do your job.”
Let that recent quote from former Gov. Jim Edgar as reported by the State Journal-Register sink in for a bit.
“Nothing’s more important for a governor than having a good budget because that allows you to manage the state to do your job.”
The budget passed last year over Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto was not a “good budget” because the governor’s budget office wasn’t directly involved. Legislators simply don’t have the expertise to pass a good budget without the governor’s help. The executive branch has experts who know what the agencies and programs need because they are involved with this issue every day.
And so the governor and his administration have been struggling ever since last July to implement a budget that it had almost nothing to do with. That’s insane. No one who is truly interested in governing would allow that to happen.
Whether the governor believes he will be reelected or not, it’s his job to get something done for the future of his state. And the very least he can do is provide some stability going forward by finally doing what every governor before him has done: negotiate and sign a workable budget.
I mean, seriously, we always make such a big deal out of state budgets, but this is a routine, mundane matter almost everywhere else.
House Speaker Michael Madigan told his caucus last week that he believes the governor wants an overtime session so he can blame the resulting gridlock on the Democrats. But Madigan told his House Democrats that he believes voters will blame both sides. This was taken by some of his members as a sign that Madigan finally realizes he needs to get something done one way or another. We’ll see. That assessment could be overly optimistic.
The budgeteers met via teleconference last week and not a word was said about the governor’s repeated demands for an “official” revenue estimate. Instead, they reportedly had a fairly productive discussion about various pension ideas. So, that’s a good sign. The revenue estimate demand was a giant red herring used for political and disruptive purposes.
The Democrats appear to have gamed out the end of the spring session if they can’t do a deal with the governor for whatever reason.
Money for the Quincy veterans home and cash-strapped prisons, universities, etc. will all be put into the appropriations bills to entice Republicans onto the legislation. Some of the Republicans who broke ranks last year may not vote for the legislation when it passes, but may vote for it during the override motion.
Some Republican top dogs have said privately that they believe rank-and-file Democrats and Republicans who voted for the vetoed budget last year feel betrayed because they were told that the budget they passed was balanced when it actually wasn’t. But in talking to those folks, that doesn’t appear to be the case. Many knew what they were getting into and, besides, what’s done is done and they want another budget now. Plus, some disaffected House Republicans are itching for one last fight with the governor before they retire.
House Republican Leader Jim Durkin has painstakingly put his caucus back together twice in the past year. The first time was after the budget override vote, which badly split his caucus. Members were essentially told if they voted for the education funding reform bill, all would be forgiven. And then another blow-up was threatened after Rep. Jeanne Ives nearly defeated Gov. Rauner in the GOP primary. Durkin has managed to keep things mostly cool and separated from caucus business since then.
It’s abundantly clear from his public and private remarks that Senate Republican Leader Bill Brady wants a negotiated budget deal. Durkin, meanwhile, has solidly allied himself with the governor, both in public and reportedly during the leaders’ meetings.
Durkin badly needs Rauner’s money to fund his campaigns against Speaker Madigan this fall. But this alliance can also help move things along if Rauner’s staunch ally Durkin eventually informs the governor that he needs to cut a deal for the good of the state or face yet another stinging defeat. That worked last year on the education funding reform bill.
Whatever happens, it’s long past time that the governor do whatever he can to put together a “good budget” for his state.
* Meanwhile, Treasurer Michael Frerichs had a warning for the governor and the General Assembly…
Speaking on WGN AM-720, Frerichs said the state’s already poor credit rating could drop even further to “junk” status, limiting the investment firms that could purchase state bonds and vastly increasing interest payments to lenders that can still buy Illinois debt.
“I’ve been warning not only is it a real possibility, it is going to happen if there is not a budget in place, I would say, by July 1st. By May 31st it’s possible, by July 1st it most definitely will be,” Frerichs said.
“We would be the first state in the country to have our general obligation bonds rated as junk. That is not a first that any state wants to have, should aspire to,” he said. […]
“We shouldn’t be messing around with this,” he said.
There was some talk last week of putting a parliamentary hold on the approp/budget bills until June 30th to pressure Gov. Rauner into signing them. That’s… not a good idea.
* Related…
* Rauner’s top priorities sidelined in final budget talks of his first term: Now, key Rauner ally House Republican Leader Jim Durkin said GOP lawmakers are “desperately looking to resolve whatever differences over the next three weeks and to leave town at the end of May with a negotiated balanced budget.”
posted by Rich Miller
Monday, May 14, 18 @ 8:58 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
Next Post: Baise tells party insurgents to choose between Rauner and Madigan
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
–“Nothing’s more important for a governor than having a good budget because that allows you to manage the state to do your job.”–
“Managing the state and doing the job” was never at the top of the Rauner list. He had a personal agenda on unions that he attempted to advance by holding hostage or sabotaging core state responsibilities.
Now Rauner will abuse his office in whatever ways he believes will help him get re-elected. Why he wants a second term is beyond me, unless it’s just a matter of ego and self-reverence.
Comment by wordslinger Monday, May 14, 18 @ 9:13 am
Lucky us, they are burning the state down to prove points. We need some good women in Illinois elected who won’t let ego interfere with the people’s business.
Comment by 44th Monday, May 14, 18 @ 9:19 am
==The executive branch has experts==
Change “has” to “should have”.
Comment by Jocko Monday, May 14, 18 @ 9:26 am
I too am wondering why Rauner wants a second term.
Comment by Barrington Monday, May 14, 18 @ 9:42 am
My guess is that Rauner sees a second term as his only chance to get a return on his investment. His primary objective has always seemed to have been to tip the labor/management scales in his favor.
Comment by Pundent Monday, May 14, 18 @ 9:49 am
If Rauner doesn’t cooperate on a budget, hopefully, the four leaders will decide to ignore him. That will be an interesting exercise.
Comment by RNUG Monday, May 14, 18 @ 10:02 am
–If Rauner doesn’t cooperate on a budget, hopefully, the four leaders will decide to ignore him.–
Durkin and Brady can’t ignore him, he’s the only bank they have.
GOP members who don’t need Rauner can ignore him.
Comment by wordslinger Monday, May 14, 18 @ 10:06 am
== Durkin and Brady can’t ignore him, he’s the only bank they have. ==
At a certain point, what do Durkin and Brady need more, Rauner’s money or their members’ support? Without support they don’t have anyone to lead.
Comment by RNUG Monday, May 14, 18 @ 10:13 am
Similarly, I am wondering why Rahm wants a third term.
Comment by Practical Politics Monday, May 14, 18 @ 10:28 am
== I too am wondering why Rauner wants a second term. ==
I’m still wondering why Rauner wanted to be governor in the first place. He has never answered this basic question - why do you want to be governor?
Comment by Angry Republican Monday, May 14, 18 @ 11:32 am
I agree with comments that why either Rahm or BR want or “need: to run - out side of ego.
The article make a very important point in the last years veto budget - did not balance even with the a 32% tax increase. That may be the primary reason BR keeps asking for the the “estimate” of revenue. If Rauner at least get the “right” out that may just the questions asked?
BR does not have a the answer but a solution needs to be developed soon -do we need or want another unbalanced budget?
Comment by cannon649 Monday, May 14, 18 @ 12:18 pm
Rauner as a lame duck will be the perfect argument against term limits.
Comment by Gobblers Knob Monday, May 14, 18 @ 12:27 pm
I wonder if they teach how to kick the can down the road to the tune of billions and billions of dollars at the Edgars fellowship program?
I for one have heard enough out of Edgar.
Comment by allknowingmasterofraccoondom Monday, May 14, 18 @ 3:21 pm
Budget Year #4: Rauner vetoes the budget again.
Comment by M Monday, May 14, 18 @ 7:21 pm