Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar

It’s just a bill

Posted in:

Illinois

* Kelsey Landis at the BND…

Gov. J.B. Pritzker said Illinois lawmakers will consider whether there should be statewide standards for warehouses following a tornado that killed six people at an Amazon facility in Edwardsville. […]

The General Assembly plans to hold hearings to explore what can be done in the upcoming session, said state Rep. Jay Hoffman, D-Swansea. He said he has discussed the issue with state Rep. Katie Stuart, D-Edwardsville, and state Sen. Rachelle Crowe, D-Glen Carbon.

“It was actually in their districts, not mine, but it doesn’t matter. We have warehouses throughout Illinois and throughout the metro-east,” Hoffman said. “We need to figure out whether the codes were followed and if the codes were followed, are the codes strong enough?” […]

“It would seem to me there should have been more safe zones for the workers that were actually safe zones,” Hoffman said.

* WCIA…

An Illinois Lawmaker wants to empower judges to remove guns from the hands of those accused of domestic violence.

“I believe this bill, specifically, this part of the bill will have an impact and remove firearms from many volatile situations, preventing intimate partner homicide,” Representative Denyse Wang Stoneback (D-Skokie) said.

When a domestic abuse victim asks for an order of protection, there is a two week period before the hearing. A judge will often issue an emergency order of protection during that time. Right now, courts often wait to suspend a suspect’s FOID card after that emergency order is over. But Stoneback’s bill would allow judges to suspend FOID cards during the emergency order of protection period as well.

According to Stoneback, Some have the power to suspend somebody’s FOID Card along with issuing the emergency order of protection. Stoneback’s bill would ensure that the judge’s understand they have that power in law.

“Judges in Illinois have interpreted sometimes a lot in both directions,” Stoneback said. “Sometimes they have removed firearms, with ex parte hearings due to imminent dangerous or volatile situations, and in light of the fact that the respondent will have notice of hearing at a later date, and other other judges have chosen not to remove firearms during this period.”

* Press release…

With a focus on protecting victims of violent crime and their families, Illinois House Republican Leader Jim Durkin (R-Western Springs) introduced legislation on Thursday to overhaul Illinois’ Prisoner Review Board (PRB) and provide greater weight to the interests of victims of violent crime, rather than criminals.

“Today, I am here to give hope to the forgotten voices in our present criminal justice system, the victims of crime. The despair and anguish felt by crime victims and the futility they experience seeking closure for the tragic and brutal loss of a family member, loved one, or friend cannot be discounted,” said Durkin. “That pain and torment is only fueled by the decisions of Governor Pritzker’s Prisoner Review Board.”

According to Durkin, there are a number of recent examples of violent offenders being released by Pritzker’s PRB over the objections of victims, their families, law enforcement, and judges.

Paul Bryant has a long history of violent crimes, including numerous convictions for murder, rape, home invasion, burglary and more. Bryant was convicted of killing a 59-year-old woman whose throat he slashed during a robbery in 1976 and the murder of a 19-year-old woman who he raped, beat, strangled and set on fire in 1977. Another woman was held at knifepoint, robbed, and raped in her home.

Ultimately, Bryant was caught after breaking into a woman’s home, robbing and raping her, and returning several days later to rape her again. The repeat victim was able to identify Bryant as the man who repeatedly violated her. The judge who sentenced Bryant to 500 to 1,500 years for just one of the murders he committed said at the time he wanted to send a message to future parole boards that Bryant should never be released. On July 14, 2020, Pritzker’s PRB voted to release him.

Ray Larsen, a man convicted of murdering a child and deviant sexual behavior, made headlines last year when, just days after being released, he absconded from the state, violating the terms of his parole and becoming a fugitive. It wasn’t the first time that Larsen had proven himself a risk.

In May of 1972, while on a 3-day furlough, Larson entered the home of an older woman sexually assaulted and robbed her. Following the assault, he went to Schiller Woods Forrest Preserve “Looking for something to shoot” when he came across 16-year-old Frank Casolari, who was fishing. Larson shot the boy 23 times and left his naked body in the woods. He was caught the next day in a stolen vehicle with an underage girl who had been missing overnight.

Ultimately, Larson was released by Pritzker’s PRB on May 13, 2021, over the objection of Attorney General Kwame Raoul, whose office tried to delay the decision for 90 days so Larson could be evaluated as a possible sexually violent person. Ultimately, the PRB was forced to rescind Larson’s parole.

In July of 1970, Chicago Police Sergeant James Severin and Officer Anthony Rizzato volunteered for the “walk and talk” community outreach program, which aimed to reduce crime. On July 17, Severin and Rizzato were murdered in cold blood while crossing a baseball field as part of a coordinated sniper attack planned and executed by a local gang. Johnny Veal was an integral part of planning and carrying out this attack on law enforcement and bragged about his involvement to rival gang members.

Testifying before the PRB, Sgt. Severin’s nephew said he remembered his uncle saying how much he loved working with the kids at the local baseball field the week before he was brutally murdered on the same baseball field. Even Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx voiced opposition to Veal’s parole, calling the officer’s murders a “cold blooded execution,” while also pointing out that Veal bragged about the crimes. Nevertheless, Pritzker’s PRB voted to release Veal on February 21, 2021.

Durkin’s legislation, House Bill 5126, makes a number of reforms aimed at protecting victims of violent crime and ensuring dangerous offenders remain behind bars.

Under Durkin’s proposal, victim-focused reforms would be instituted to the Prisoner Review Board. Durkin’s legislation does the following:
· Codifies the mission statement of the PRB:

o The PRB is to protect the rights of victims of crime, their families, and the citizens of Illinois by ensuring that the rule of law is upheld and justice is carried out. The Board has the responsibility to give voice to the victims, their family members, and public safety officials when an inmate’s situation is being reviewed.

· Requires five members of the board to have experience as a law enforcement officer or prosecutors.
· Increases transparency by:

o Making En Banc hearings available for viewing via live stream.
o Making clemency recommendations from the board to the Governor available to the public with appropriate redactions to protect the victim’s identity.

· Requires a higher 2/3 vote threshold for parole of people convicted of 1st-degree murder.
· Outlines those who may present testimony at the parole hearing:

o One representative of the person under consideration for parole.
o One representative of law enforcement from the county of conviction.
o One family member of each victim.

· The Governor has to grant or deny the decisions of PRB to release an inmate on parole or to revoke their parole or aftercare release in cases of 1st degree murder. These decisions are subject to FOIA.
· In regards to clemency hearings, the legislation:

o Requires the board to give victims registered with the Board written notice of the application for clemency within seven days of the filing of the application.
o If the victim does not file a witness statement 30 days prior to the clemency hearing date, the board shall send a second written notice to the victim.
o The victim can ask for an extension of 45 days to submit their victim’s statement. If an extension is requested, the board cannot proceed with a hearing until after the extension has expired.

“The state of Illinois must change. This administration is placing criminals above victims, and are disregarding the voice of victims across the state, said Durkin. “There is no reason that cold blooded murderers are released back into society against the wishes of the people they hurt so profoundly. Governor Pritzker gave Veal, Larson and Bryant got the second chance that their victims and loved ones will never get.”

posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 2:40 pm

Comments

= Stoneback’s bill would ensure that the judge’s understand they have that power in law. =

So now we have to pass laws saying “we meant it last time we passed this law”?

Comment by JoanP Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 2:50 pm
The issue of releasing prisoners at the end of their sentence is not an easy one to resolve. I used to be of the “lot them up” camp. Now I don’t know. Things that people do can be horrific, yet we need to distinguish between punishment and vengeance. The anger and damage to those injured may never end, but that can’t be the sole criteria or some people may never achieve release.
I would look to rehabilitation and liklihood of reoffending, not solely to what those who the criminal injured or killed want This is a societal judgement not just the judgement of the person harmed.

Comment by Banish Misfortune Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 2:57 pm
“”over the objection of Attorney General Kwame Raoul… Ultimately, the PRB was forced to rescind Larson’s parole.”"

“”Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx voiced opposition to Veal’s parole,”"

Durkin’s allies on these cases?

Comment by walker Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:15 pm
Durkin put out a lot of words about wanting more people in jail longer. He thinks what ails our state is that not enough people are behind bars. Amazing.

Comment by Perrid Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:27 pm
“…Stoneback’s bill would allow judges to suspend FOID cards during the emergency order of protection period as well.” I don’t care for “pre-crime” Star Chamber hearings where someone is judged in absentia. Really going back pre-Magna Carta on this one.

I attended a Chicago domestic court hearing with a friend a couple of years ago. Sometimes the “victim” can actually be the aggressor, so it goes both ways. The unspoken assumption there seemed to be that the man was always going to be the “bad guy.”

Comment by Elmer Keith Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:29 pm
I am trying to figure out a way to say this without coming across like I am insulting people who have felt very personal, tragic losses as victims of crimes…

We cannot let our penal system continue to be governed by the desires of those who seek vengeance. It just isn’t working. We spend more money on incarceration and punishment than any other county by a massive amount, and it is a proven failure in terms of having positive impacts for society as a whole.

We can continue catering to the very real and understandable emotional desire for vengeance, but we do so at the cost of never building a better society.

Comment by Homebody Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:43 pm
All this talk of keeping offenders locked up for longer and longer stints, yet there is no recognition of how IDOC’s former rehabilitative services (GED, vocational, etc) have been gutted under Republican leadership. To Banish Misfortune’s point, locking someone up, throwing away the key and leaving them to sit in a cell (potentially for 23 hours a day) without any effort at rehabilitation, amounts to vengeance. I’m a fan of victim’s rights. I’m also a fan of working to equip offenders in Illinois prisons with the tools that they can use to become constructive members of society. Surprise surpise (in today’s “tough on crime” environment), Durkin’s bill addresses only one side of the equation.

Comment by In the Know Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 3:47 pm
SO why not push for an actual real parole system? Good behavior, education, skills training, leadership etc etc. Base it off a points system?
There will obviously be crimes so heinous people will get sentenced with no possibility of parole.
For all others isn’t the point of the system to punish for the offense while at the same time helping to find a way to survive back in society upon release?

Comment by Frank talks Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 4:03 pm
I thought that the Prisoner Review Board only handles parole hearings for individuals who were sentenced prior February 1, 1978 when determined sentences became the law in Illinois.

Comment by Retired SURS Employee Friday, Jan 28, 22 @ 4:32 pm