Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Debate open thread
Posted in:
* Jem Bartholomew at the Tow Center for Digital Journalism in the Columbia Journalism Review…
Tow Center reporting shows that LGIS—as well as the Epoch Times—is currently a commercial printing client of Gannett, the nation’s largest local news publisher. […]
The [Daily Herald] owner “took million[s] of dollars in payments from LGIS over a seven-year period to publish and distribute the chain’s newspapers,” an LGIS paper wrote, which Paddock did not deny in emails to the Tow Center. Paddock canceled LGIS’s contract in September—a spokesperson said it would formalize its commercial screening process, add publishing disclaimers in sensitive cases, and strengthen the commercial/editorial separation—but defended the need to diversify revenue amid a “historic downturn” in local news. But Proft, on Twitter, didn’t seem fazed by Paddock canceling LGIS’s contract. The papers had already found a new publisher, he said.
Gannett, the nation’s largest local newspaper chain, is still printing LGIS content. LGIS “are a commercial print client,” a Gannett spokesperson said by email. The Epoch Times, which has been labeled “a leading purveyor of right-wing misinformation” by the New York Times, is also a commercial client. Asked directly whether printing these papers ran counter to an online Gannett mission statement “to serve as a forum for better understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation,” the spokesperson said: “We do not discuss our clients and have no further comment.”
LGIS “are a commercial print client,” a Gannett spokesperson said by email. The Epoch Times, which has been labeled “a leading purveyor of right-wing misinformation” by the New York Times, is also a commercial client. Asked directly whether printing these papers ran counter to an online Gannett mission statement “to serve as a forum for better understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation,” the spokesperson said: “We do not discuss our clients and have no further comment.”
* Illinois newspapers owned by Gannett…
• Canton Daily Ledger
• The Journal Standard, Freeport
• The Register-Mail, Galesburg
• Star Courier, Kewanee
• Lincoln Courier
• The McDonough County Voice, Macomb
• Pekin Daily Times
• Peoria Journal Star
• Pontiac Daily Leader
• Rockford Register Star
• The State Journal-Register, Springfield
• Daily Review Atlas, Monmouth
• Du Quoin Evening Call
• Olney Daily Mail
• The Carmi Times
• The Daily Republican, Marion
posted by Rich Miller
Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:17 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Question of the day
Next Post: Debate open thread
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Who could have figured letting conglomerates buy up all the newspapers would lead to some questionable decisions?
Comment by Excitable Boy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:21 pm
Look, in order to afford putting out quality, fact-based journalism, we have to put out poor quality, highly opinionated propaganda.
Comment by Prenuer Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:22 pm
===Asked directly whether printing these papers ran counter to an online Gannett mission statement “to serve as a forum for better understanding and unity to help make the USA truly one nation,” the spokesperson said: “We do not discuss our clients and have no further comment.”===
I just thought that was worth highlighting. Sums it up rather nicely I think.
Comment by 47th Ward Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:25 pm
There are all sorts of large commercial printers who, I’m sure, could handle this print job. No ties to journalism. Problem solved. I am not a reader of these opinion products (I’ll stop short of calling them newspapers) nor of Mr. Proft, but I fear we are headed down a slippery slope when we want to restrain what can be printed, who can print it and who makes the decision.
Comment by up2now Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:32 pm
At least those papers don’t have much reputation to lose.
Comment by Candy Dogood Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:35 pm
It is a commercial endeavor. They are not endorsing the mailings unless you consider it an endorsement to take the money and print. I think it becomes a slippery slope to say they can’t ethically do this. If it is not screaming fire in a theater let it go. But right is trying to overturn liable laws for newspapers maybe that should happen.
Comment by DuPage Saint Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:37 pm
Need to add the disinfo papers in Illinois run by Dan Proft and Brian Timpone:
Carbondale Reporter
Chambana Sun
Chicago City Wire
Cook County Record
Cornell-Ransom Guide
Crete Review
DeKalb Times
DuPage Policy Journal
East Central Reporter
Egyptian Review
Galesburg Reporter
Grundy Reporter
Illinois Business Daily
Illinois Valley Times
Kane County Reporter
Kankakee Times
Kendall County Times
La Harpe Guide
Lake County Gazette
Lansing Reporter
Lynwood Times
Macon Reporter
Madison County Guide
McHenry Times
McLean County Times
Metro East Sun
Metro East Today
North Cook News
North Egypt News
NW Illinois News
Peoria Standard
Prairie State Wire
Quincy Reporter
Rock Island Today
Rockford Sun
Salem News Wire
Sangamon Sun
Save Your Home Now
SE Illinois News
South Central Reporter
South Cook News
South West Illinois News
Southern Illinois News
West Central Reporter
West Cook News
West Loop Today
Westfield Reporter
Will County Gazette
Comment by Bippy Gluck Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:39 pm
Sorry, still hung up on the Daily Herald/Paddock taking million(s) of dollars in payment from Proft in exchange for printing his fake papers.
The only surprise with Gannett is that they charge. Figured they’d market it as “premium content” and secretly drain more money off the auto-pay subscribers.
Comment by Michelle Flaherty Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:41 pm
-“We do not discuss our clients and have no further comment.”-
No one sketchy ever says that. /s
Comment by Ron Burgundy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:43 pm
Ethics and Integrity are lost in the bean counters as the stock and trade of journalism isn’t measured in the dollars a reputation lost.
The checks cash the same… they cash the same.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:43 pm
* curses profusely into comment filter *
Huh. Isn’t this an interesting development.
Comment by Dirty Red Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:45 pm
===It is a commercial endeavor===
“But there’s good money in distributing propaganda” doesn’t sound like the best defense.
Especially not in an age where the Right Wing settles further and further into rhetoric that seems a lot like what we might have been hearing in the Balkans 30 years ago.
Comment by Candy Dogood Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:48 pm
===but I fear we are headed down a slippery slope when we want to restrain what can be printed, who can print it and who makes the decision.===
If Paddock and Gannett are knowingly printing lies and disinformation for the sake of profit, that is the slippery slope I’m more concerned about. Jeesh.
Comment by Baloneymous Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:54 pm
I’m betting money that the printing is being done at the journal star printing facility. They spent a mint to build it for the prior owners. No that means much I guess.
Comment by Gfalkes Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:55 pm
Shock.
Comment by XonXoff Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:56 pm
Silver-lining is Gannett will ruin the fake newspaper like they do the real ones.
Comment by Stormsw7706 Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:58 pm
===but I fear we are headed down a slippery slope when we want to restrain what can be printed, who can print it and who makes the decision.===
So let them print alternative facts?
It’s like saying science books that say creation… printed by, say, the New England Journal of Medicine is merely stopping that slippery slope?
The comedy actually writes itself.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 4:59 pm
It’s all about the money
Comment by Shytown Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 5:02 pm
Not a dimes worth of difference between a Proft paper and the SJR aka Paywall Central. And the subscriber only stories are junk news like restaurant reviews and entertainment. While also running out Bernie Schoenberg and subsequently eliminating respectable Statehouse coverage.
Comment by Academic union state employee Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 5:04 pm
The folks saying this is a business decision baffle me. Proft is a maliciously direct competitor with journalism. He is opposed to the existence of Gannett and Paddock’s newspapers and taking direct steps to undermine them. Working with him isn’t a good business decision. The US Mint isn’t mining crypto. Dee Snyder didn’t offer an album track to Tipper Gore.
Comment by vern Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 5:36 pm
Those papers should run a rider at the bottom of every editorial they write on state politics stating their parent companies distribute the Proft pamphlets. If they don’t, they’re hiding a conflict that they’d be so anxious to point out if they were an elected official.
Comment by Yeah no Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 5:38 pm
Color me not surprised. Once proud pillars of true journalism were taken over by Gannet and decimated. Take the State Journal Register. It contains very little real information and certainly no investigative journalism. It’s only real use would be to line the cat box. I’m not surprised in the least that Gannet would print Proft’s rags if it means income.
Comment by Manchester Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:03 pm
With this infusion of Proft-Uihlein dirty money, maybe Gannett’s next round of layoffs will come after Christmas instead of before it.
Comment by Roadrager Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:03 pm
- Dee Snyder didn’t offer an album track to Tipper Gore. -
This is your second absolute banger this week by my count.
Comment by Excitable Boy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:06 pm
“So let them print alternative facts?”
How benevolent of you to “let” someone print anything.
As if the “mainstream media” have never printed “alternative facts?” If they benefit your “side” alternative facts are awesome.
I’m not a big fan of Proft or these papers. But who prints them is no different than blaming Kinkos/Fedex if Proft made thousands of copies at their shop.
Paddock and Gannett are in the printing business. They printed paper. That’s what they do. Glad someone thinks they have the power to “let” them decide what they can print.
Comment by Michael Westen Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:26 pm
===How benevolent of you to “let” someone print anything.===
It’s an ethics question.
No ethics, no problem.
:)
===As if the “mainstream media” have never printed “alternative facts?” If they benefit your “side” alternative facts are awesome.===
These Proft osiers are fashioned and advertised as “alternative news”. Proft says so.
===blaming Kinkos/FedEx===
Kinkos or FedEx… do they claim any journalism as their brand?
===Paddock and Gannett are in the printing business===
They are in the news business, then they print their news. Keep up.
===Glad someone thinks they have the power to “let” them decide what they can print.===
When you lack industry ethics to journalism, do you think they care?
lol
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:35 pm
Gannett claims no journalism at the printing plant. Neither did Paddock. So, no. Try to keep up. Wonder if Proft should run it by you to see who you will be kind enough to “let” print paper.
Comment by Michael Westen Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:41 pm
===Gannett claims===
Either you are in journalism and it matters… or it doesn’t
If you lack these ethics it’s good you’re not a journalist
===Wonder if Proft should run it by you to see who===
Proft looked for soulless newspapers to print his rag.
He’s doing exactly what he wants.
If you lack ethics to the journalism, it’s no wonder you’re fine with it.
Alternative facts as a term was created to ease the conscience of people who tried to walk this line, but ethics stopped them.
Create a phony term, the grifting began.
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:46 pm
A printing plant is not “journalism.” If they contributed to the content you’d have a point. But they don’t, so you don’t. Maybe you just don’t know what a printing plant is. It’s hard to keep track of all the things you don’t know. A printing plant takes someone else’s copy and puts ink on paper. Printing plants don’t have “ethics.” They have ink and paper. Grifting seems another term you have no clue about. There are a lot of those in your case.
Comment by Michael Westen Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 6:59 pm
===If they contributed to the content you’d have a point.===
No.
Like the Daily Herald learned, you can’t parse, otherwise they would’ve decided their integrity would t matter.
It’s like you can’t grasp why the Daily Herald stopped printing… ethics. They wrote all about it in the phony letter, lol
===But they don’t, so you don’t. Maybe you just don’t know what a printing plant is.===
The ethics of a company putting and giving content to print is the ethical question.
===Grifting seems another term you have no clue about.===
Appeasing the likes of Uihlein got the sole purpose of cash, forgetting the ethics, that’s the grift here.
Anything else?
Comment by Oswego Willy Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 7:08 pm
Please stop giving Prof(I)t and Timpone the attention they crave.
Comment by DougChicago Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 8:09 pm
The Du Quoin Evening Call is no more.
Comment by dr. reason a. goodwin Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 10:17 pm
Can we sue for unsolicited material. I even got a book today called The Governor You Do Not Know. This seems like a violation of my privacy.
Comment by Ashante Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 10:19 pm
The scary thing is that they have my home address. I didn’t chose to be an election judge after hearing the testimony on the Jan 6 hearing and Ms Ruby and her daughter. These are scary times.
Comment by Ashante Thursday, Oct 6, 22 @ 10:31 pm
High quality pearl clutching
Comment by Franklin Friday, Oct 7, 22 @ 8:21 am
===pearl clutching===
Lacking ethics means mocking those who understand ethics.
Comment by Oswego Willy Friday, Oct 7, 22 @ 8:25 am