Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Morning Shorts
Next Post: Round-Up: State Government
Posted in:
* New Cook County health board faces showdown with Todd Stroger
Board president — who gave up direct control of county hospital, hiring and budget — lectured health chief at recent meeting and lets him know Stroger still influences his budget
* Cook health officials on hot seat over hospital plan
* Tuesday Illinois political docket: Daley budget details, Stroger forest preserve budget
* Will Daley have the guts to stop voodoo budgeting?
Be sure to watch the magic show, beginning at 10 a.m. in the City Council chambers as the city’s chief prestidigitator employs his best-ever sleight of hand to evaporate a $519.7 million (or whatever the latest number is) budget deficit without a tax increase.[…]
Daley lays the city’s budget problems on the recession, which has cut substantially into revenues generated from taxes, licenses and other sources. That’s certainly true; corporate revenues have declined, according to the preliminary budget that he released months ago, from $3.2 billion in the 2009 budget to $2.8 billion projected for the fiscal year beginning Jan. 1.
But you might also expect expenditures would also decline. Families are cutting their budgets, eating out less, buying cheaper clothes, skipping vacations and so forth. Silly me. This is government; this is Chicago government. Instead of reducing expenditures, Daley expects them to rise in fiscal year 2010 by 5.2 percent, to $3.3 billion.
Because personnel accounts for some 80 percent of city expenditures, you would be right to find the reason for the increase in labor costs. The preliminary budget identifies those costs as stemming from wage and health care increases, much of them required by labor contracts. Also to blame is the city having to subsidize the debt service for funds that go into employee pension funds. Special funds also have seen cost increases, such as the 5.9 percent increase at O’Hare International Airport.
* Daley looks at ways to cut Chicago’s budget
Daley announced plans Monday to save $114 million by eliminating vacant jobs, continuing furloughs and cutting expenses like travel and supplies by $20 million.[…]
His cost-saving plans include eliminating 220 vacant jobs.
The city will also save $70 million through union agreements and continued unpaid holidays and furloughs for nonunion workers.
Nonunion workers, including Daley, will take 24 unpaid days off next year.
* Daley: City Managers To Take Nearly Five Weeks Off
Thousands Of City Workers To Take 24 Unpaid Days In 2010
* Layoff notices for bus drivers, other CTA workers
Layoff notices have been sent to nearly 2,000 CTA bus drivers and other unionized employees, warning that their jobs could be eliminated in the next two months because of budget problems that also could lead to higher fares and service cuts to close a massive $300 million budget gap.
“They want to mimic what City Hall did with the unions — the furlough days, the unpaid vacations and holidays, things of that nature,” said Darrell Jefferson, president of the bus driver and mechanic’s union, which is expected to bear the brunt of the layoffs. “We’re not open to that.
* End the free rides
The Regional Transportation Authority recently surveyed senior citizens who ride the trains and buses for free and found, not surprisingly, that 70 percent of them think it’s a fine program that ought to be continued. If you’re wondering why Illinois lawmakers can’t bring themselves to eliminate that perk, even as the transit providers slash routes and raise fares for everyone else, there’s your answer.
Almost half of the riders who responded — 46 percent — never went to the trouble of applying for a senior fare card back when the discount was only 50 percent.
A year after the free rides went into effect, the region’s three transit systems are providing an average of 3.1 million free rides per month, the RTA estimates. Roughly 1.7 million of those rides are taken by riders who previously paid half price. The other 1.4 million are taken by people who used to pay full fare or didn’t take mass transit at all.
That’s almost 6 percent of total ridership. The freebies are costing at least $49 million a year, a number that will soar if not checked. By 2030, the region’s senior population is expected to be more than double what it was in 2000.
* Still paying for Blagojevich’s mistakes
We support state Rep. Suzie Bassi’s efforts to repeal the free rides except for low-income seniors. The Palatine Republican’s proposal would revert to the old system in which seniors who don’t qualify for free rides receive half-price fares.
Senate Republican leader Christine Radogno of Lemont also is taking up the cause. Her spokeswoman told Pyke in a Sunday follow-up story that Radogno “feels strongly a senior partner in a law firm doesn’t deserve a free ride downtown. Every dollar counts.”
Even though the idea clearly was politically motivated by Blagojevich, Bassi concedes that now it will be difficult for legislators to reverse course, saying seniors are an important constituent group.
* Daley: Police hiring to stay slow
After hiring only 46 Chicago Police officers all year, Mayor Daley acknowledged Monday that the slowdown would continue in 2010, dramatically impacting the city’s ability to fill 591 police vacancies.[…]
To save $10 million, Daley’s 2009 budget slowed police hiring to a crawl — with only 200 officers expected to be hired all year.
But, as city revenues plummeted, City Hall opted not to maintain even that snail’s pace. Only one class of 46 officers entered the police academy this year.
As of Oct. 9, the Chicago Police Department was 591 officers short of its authorized strength of 13,500 — and that’s not counting hundreds of other officers on duty- and non-duty disability.
* Uptown neighbors stand up against gangs — literally
* Chicago’s most dangerous hour? Statistically it’s 9 to 10 p.m.
* Northwestern University: Prosecutor defends subpoena of students’ notes, grades
Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez says all information is relevant
* Al Sanchez case: FBI agent tells judge he didn’t connect the dots over key witness at trial for ex-Streets and Sanitation boss
Government witness was under drug investigation, officials say
posted by Mike Murray
Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 8:05 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Morning Shorts
Next Post: Round-Up: State Government
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Little Dick should be at his best today. Tune in to watch the show!I hope someone asks him why HE lost the Olympics.
Comment by Bill Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 9:05 am
Now Bill, there’s a lot to blame Daley for, but I don’t think the Olympics loss is one of them.
There seems to be a consensus that the failure was the IOC sticking it to the USOC for trying to set up it’s own Olympics channel, cutting the IOC out of the cash. The IOC loves cash.
The USOC leadership was forced to resign after Copenhagen when every national sporting federation chimed in with a vote of no confidence.
Lot of fun in Rio last weekend — running police/gangs gun battles: 21 dead and a police helicopter shot down.
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 9:34 am
Good for the residents of Uptown taking their neighborhood back. Helen Shiller is in trouble? we’ll see.
Comment by Will County Woman Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:17 am
Regarding the free rides, no other city in America does this. All a challenger has to do is get a picture of a wealthy old couple getting a free ride while a kid can’t go back to college because his loans got scrapped. Springfield could be the worst city in Illinois.
Comment by shore Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:38 am
I don’t think we should be forcing fixed income seniors to have to choose between transportation costs and purchasing their medicine.
How many seniors are going to have to eat cat food just so they can pay the fare to go see their physicians?
Comment by Leroy Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:42 am
For many reasons, PQ just ain’t gonna get rid of the free senior rides. Makes him a bad guy and would cost him votes.
Comment by dupage dan Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:43 am
–Springfield could be the worst city in Illinois.–
What’s with the gratuitous cheap shot at Springfield? It’s totally unrelated to the thread or your post.
Springfield has issues, but it’s a great town. I think every eighth grader in the state should visit and learn something.
Shore, I guess when that bile comes up, you have to let it out.
Comment by wordslinger Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:47 am
===Even though the idea clearly was politically motivated by Blagojevich, Bassi concedes that now it will be difficult for legislators to reverse course, saying seniors are an important constituent group.=== I believe that speaks to why we have the problems that we do. Pols ar more interested in getting reelected than they are in doing what is correct for their constituencies and the state. And if I’m not mistaken, that is what they are elected to do. So maybe one rep has a majority of his/her constituency that is made up of seniors (which I doubt), but the rest don’t. It should be a no brainer vote. Leave it for those who can’t afford it and make the rest pay something. Just my opinion.
Comment by Cranky Old Man Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 10:55 am
==Regarding the free rides, no other city in America does this==
Shore, hmmm… not sure you’ve done much research. Prince George County, Maryland has such a seniors ride free program, the entire state of Pennsylvania offers free rides to seniors (funded by the Lottery, the transit agencies are reimbursed for any ride taken by a senior), etc. Plenty of examples… it’s just that here, the program is an unfunded mandate that the RTA cannot afford.
Comment by KeepSmiling Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 11:20 am
–
How many seniors are going to have to eat cat food just so they can pay the fare to go see their physicians?
–
Um, zero?
Sheesh.
Comment by macbeth Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 11:34 am
How many seniors are going to have to eat cat food just so they can pay the fare to go see their physicians?
I give my cat Purina that keeps him from suffering from furballs. So, if these seniors are suffering from furballs and expecting to eat cat food in order to pay for the car ride to their doctor’s office - they can just spend about $3.50 for a five pound bag and solve their problem at the same time. It will help them keep their teeth white and their hair lush too!
Comment by VanillaMan Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 12:09 pm
=== How many seniors are going to have to eat cat food just so they can pay the fare to go see their physicians? ====
Velveeta and Spam are far cheaper then cat food.
I do like your logic, instead of making prescritpions reasonably priced we will offer free bus rides. I am sure the seniors in retirment communties and who belong to chuches where they already have free transport will appreciate the free bus rides over prescription pricing supports.
Comment by Ghost Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 12:52 pm
======
Pols ar more interested in getting reelected than they are in doing what is correct for their constituencies and the state. And if I’m not mistaken, that is what they are elected to do.
======
Yay, someone else who gets it, too!
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 2:05 pm
=== Pols ar more interested in getting reelected than they are in doing what is correct for their constituencies and the state. And if I’m not mistaken, that is what they are elected to do. ===
this is one of my favorite logical fallacies.
First, politicians are elected by a majority of voters to do what the majority thinks is best; otherwise the majority picksa new canidate. Thus, as a generality, a politician is elected to carry out the will of the people who elected them, that is the will of the majority. therefore a politician who does what the majority of their consituents desire is doing what they are elected to do. In contrast, going against the majority is failing to perform your elected job.
Comment by Ghost Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 3:23 pm
First, politicians are elected by a majority of voters to do what the majority thinks is best; otherwise the majority picksa new canidate. Thus, as a generality, a politician is elected to carry out the will of the people who elected them, that is the will of the majority. therefore a politician who does what the majority of their consituents desire is doing what they are elected to do. In contrast, going against the majority is failing to perform your elected job
So I guess all those Southern Democrats in the 60s were just doing their jobs?
Comment by ben tej Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 5:47 pm
Just to clarify, Ghost, that’s what I meant. Hence the need to change your position on issues every once in a while–e.g., because people move around over time and/or when you’re running for another office.
Business folks get it. I don’t understand why some have such a difficult time applying that to elected officials.
Comment by Anonymous Tuesday, Oct 20, 09 @ 6:59 pm