Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Madigan on the attack, offers to discuss modified version of “Turnaround Agenda”
Next Post: *** UPDATED x1 *** Are we really going to have to wait until 2018?
Posted in:
* NY Times…
Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey may be pressing his own candidacy to be the next chairman of the Republican National Committee, but Mr. Trump, who has the final say, appears to have other ideas.
A person close to Mr. Trump said the president-elect’s allies are coalescing around Nick Ayers, a member of the transition team, to be the party’s chairman. Mercedes Schlapp, another Republican operative, is being considered for a role as co-chairwoman.
* From July…
Pence’s vice presidential race is headed by the same operative, Nick Ayers, who ran Rauner’s 2014 race for governor. Ayers described himself to me in a telephone call last year as a key player in Rauner’s campaign—the guy who drafted the campaign plan, hired staff, and handled media buying. He said, “I was the one who on election night [November 4, 2014] called [Rauner] and Diana in their hotel suite and told them we had won. I gave them the news before the AP called it.” […]
In addition to guiding Rauner, who had never run for as much as student council president before taking the state’s top job in 2014 from incumbent governor Pat Quinn, Ayers also connects to Rauner through the Schrimpf twins, Mike and Chris. When Ayers, 33, became executive director of the Republican Governors Association in 2007, he hired both Schrimpfs (also 33), Chris first, as communication director.
Ayers claims credit for later talking Mike Schrimpf into working for Rauner as communications chief, before the venture capitalist formally entered the race. Schrimpf stayed on during the campaign, and until well into Rauner’s first term […]
Interestingly, while Ayers made plenty of money working for Rauner—Politico’s Natasha Korecki reported late last year that Ayers’ Target Enterprises, which creates campaign ads, “was one of [Rauner’s]…biggest payees”
Schrimpf was in Springfield briefly last week, by the way.
* Also from July…
In 2014, Ayers reinvented himself, this time with a much lower profile, finding new success on the shadowy edges of the dark-money world, where avoiding scrutiny is the point. After the Pawlenty debacle, Ayers went to work for Target Enterprises, an ad-buying firm based in Los Angeles. Ayers and his new employer picked up work consulting on the campaign of Bruce Rauner, an extremely wealthy Republican businessman from Chicago, who ran for governor as an outsider against a crowded field of Republicans and a troubled incumbent Democrat. Shortly before Ayers went to work for Rauner, his opponents came under fire from mysterious outside groups.
The groups, based in Ohio, emerged out of the blue to lob factually dubious attacks at Rauner’s opponents, and then disappeared. Far more experienced Republican candidates and would-be candidates fell by the wayside. The Ohio groups doing the attacks—with vague names such as Jobs & Progress Fund—hid the source of their money and the motivations for the attacks. (It later came out that one of the groups was partially funded by Ayers’ old employer, the Republican Governors Association.) But the limited paper trail they left showed that they had hired Ayers’ consulting firm. Rauner’s campaign denied any knowledge of the outside groups or who was funding them, despite their close ties to Ayers.
More background on those mysterious 2014 primary ads is on this site.
* But it appeared to start even earlier…
In early 2013, Rauner was publicly considering a run for Illinois governor, as was Rep. Aaron Schock (R). Quite suddenly, a previously unknown — at least to Illinoisans — group, the Jobs & Progress Fund, began running a series of ads on television and radio tearing Schock down for allegedly voting for huge tax increases and “a mountain of debt.”
Jobs & Progress, an Ohio group, had less than a month earlier changed its name from the equally bland Ohio First for a Better Government. A politically active 501(c)(4) nonprofit, the group is not required to disclose its donors, nor did it share much else on its initial corporate filings besides the name of its attorney, David Langdon. Langdon is known in Ohio as a staunch conservative and opponent of campaign finance disclosure.
Schock wasn’t even a declared candidate at the time, though there was a good deal of buzz that he’d throw his hat into the ring. All of that immediately screeched to a halt.
“It looked to everybody that it was a brushback pitch,” said Rich Miller, a blogger and local pundit who covered the mysterious attacks at the time. “It was getting fairly clear that (Schock) was gearing up for something like that and then those ads appeared and everything kind of stopped.”
posted by Rich Miller
Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:39 am
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Madigan on the attack, offers to discuss modified version of “Turnaround Agenda”
Next Post: *** UPDATED x1 *** Are we really going to have to wait until 2018?
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
Yes, Schock got the message … Rutherford got the treatment.
Next on the list are House Dems who continue to vote for Mike Madigan as Speaker.
Comment by Deft Wing Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:44 am
How fitting!
Comment by ILGOV2018 Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:51 am
===Next on the list are House Dems who continue to vote for Mike Madigan as Speaker.===
They vote for Madigan or not, Rauner is coming after them.
The fact you ignore that makes your shill-like antics and ignorance to institutional knowledge on other topics more glaring.
Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:54 am
And what would happen should the Speaker step aside? Lou Lang or whomever just gives in on everything the Governor wants?
No, because the Democrats legislators and their *voters* don’t want the turnaround agenda. Win a majority if you want to run the state on your terms only.
Comment by ArchPundit Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:56 am
“Next on the list are House Dems who continue to vote for Mike Madigan as Speaker.”
What else ya got tough guy?
Comment by Give Me A Break Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:57 am
All I could think of was the speech Deep Throat makes to Robert Redford in “All the President’s Men”: “…they wanted to run against McGovern and look who they are running against…”
Comment by 32nd Ward Roscoe Village Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:57 am
OW-you make me smile everyday with your commentary. You have enlightened me on many issues facing the state and I share your wisdom with my co-workers on a daily basis. Thank you.
Comment by ILGOV2018 Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 11:58 am
- ILGOV2018 -
Thank you, for your very kind words, I’ve probably learned more here then I’ve ever passed on. My wisdom is on par with the “broken clock, right twice a day” example most often so be careful when you pass on my musings (disclaimer).
To the Post,
I have wondered recently the endictment of Schock and the ads targeting Schock, while not easily and obviously interwoven (likely not connected in any way), the theme captured by going after Schock’s hubris made for the dark money an easy target, and the for the Feds an easier target to indict.
Comment by Oswego Willy Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 12:07 pm
=Yes, Schock got the message … Rutherford got the treatment.=
I guess the factually dubious part is of no concern for you. When it happens to your “guy” it may become a concern.
Until then, as Kevin Bacon said on Animal House “All is well!”
BTW- Still waiting for that copy of the Rauner’s balanced budget with real revenues that you must have. No?
Any day now, or are you just a gutless hack? Say it ain’t so.
Comment by JS Mill Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 12:20 pm
DW: You’re a good writer, and I usually enjoy your comments, but sometimes you appear to be a paid amplifier for a specific political tactic.
Do you think 24/7/365 personal attack campaigning is good for the state? Does your preferred path to successful government require delay and destruction? Are you a serious commenter or a player?
Comment by walker Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 1:37 pm
Walker,
LOL! I am decidedly unpaid - although I am willing to receive tributes.
Unlike what some have said about me (ironically the one who says it frequently suffers from several Freudian slips), I simply call them as I see them.
In that regard, I am chagrined by the 24/7/365 world we now live in; including the world of politics. But that’s just the way things are now.
With respect to Illinois - and your second inquiry - I long ago came to the conclusion that Madigan and Rauner have more in common than either would likely ever admit. One, however, must exit Illinois governance with the resulting “winner” getting the spoils of this total war- meaning the clean-up and recovery will be long and arduous. It’s unfortunate but it’s our lot in Illinois. Put another way, there would be no need for a Rauner but for the existence (and tenure) of a Madigan.
So we got both.
Last, see my reply to your initial question. I call them as I see them. I know that I am in the great minority in this space (seemingly populated mostly by Dems, lobbyists favored by Dems, state workers and union proponents), but there are other perspectives than those typically exhibited here (including the gent who hosts, posts and sometimes chimes in … and even that other person who truly believes she/he/it is Rich’s collaborator and assistant.)
My views, thus, are genuine .. and strangely not that unique … except, again, in this space.
Cheers to you, sir.
Comment by Deft Wing Wednesday, Dec 7, 16 @ 2:37 pm