Latest Post | Last 10 Posts | Archives
Previous Post: Tribune doubles down on swastika tweet
Next Post: Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
Posted in:
* Laquan McDonald was shot October 20, 2014. The video was released on November 24, 2015. From a December 8, 2015 Paris Schutz interview of Mayor Rahm Emanuel about the case…
PS: When did you first learn that there were discrepancies between the initial reports from officers on the scene that night and the video?
MRE: When we get the information, that it’s public, that’s when I learned it like everybody else.
PS: So former superintendent McCarthy didn’t tell you that there might be a problem between the official reports and what the video shows?
MRE: No. That’s not what he briefed me about.
* But that’s not what former police superintendent Garry McCarthy said this morning on WVON…
Charles Thomas: What did the mayor know and when did he know it? When did you brief him on the LaQuan McDonald shooting and what that videotape said?
Garry McCarthy: The shooting I believe happened on a Monday night, so it would’ve been at my Wednesday briefing that we did the shooting review. And after that, I spoke to the mayor and I told him all about it.
Maze Jackson: Did he know about it?
Garry McCarthy: I told him about the shooting and the video a few days afterwards.
Maze Jackson: Did he see the tape?
Garry McCarthy: Now, that, I can’t answer.
Charles Thomas: How did you tell him about the video? Did you tell him that the video did not jive with what the officers on the street said about it?
Garry McCarthy: Well, Charles, you’ve got to realize, I didn’t know that. We didn’t know that at the time because the investigation was underway. I got a high-level briefing from Dave McMartin, who’s the chief who conducted the preliminary investigation. And what I told the mayor was, the officer is going to have a problem explaining what’s going on here. And [Officer Jason Van Dyke] was stripped of his authority.
* According to the Tribune, Officer Van Dyke was stripped of his police powers nine days after the shooting…
Authorities said the city’s Independent Police Review Authority opened an investigation into the shooting within hours, and Van Dyke was stripped of his police powers nine days after the shooting.
* Now, some caveats. McCarthy is talking about running for mayor. So, the timing here could possibly be suspect. And as far as I can tell, this is the first time McCarthy has said anything like the story he told this morning. For instance, from a 2016 Tribune story…
In his first public remarks since the Laquan McDonald controversy cost him his job as Chicago police superintendent, Garry McCarthy distanced himself from any responsibility in the handling of the fatal police shooting, saying by law his only role was to strip the officer of his police powers.
During a panel discussion on policing earlier this week at Harvard University, McCarthy said he viewed the video of Officer Jason Van Dyke shooting the black teen 16 times on the day after the Oct. 20, 2014, incident.
“That was the end of my involvement until the Independent Police Review Authority recommended that I take the only disciplinary step that I could take by Illinois state law, which is to strip that officer of his police authority, which I did immediately,” he said Tuesday, according to a recording of his appearance. “After that, I was completely not involved in it.”
I’ve asked the mayor’s office for comment.
posted by Rich Miller
Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 12:48 pm
Sorry, comments are closed at this time.
Previous Post: Tribune doubles down on swastika tweet
Next Post: Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
WordPress Mobile Edition available at alexking.org.
powered by WordPress.
I wouldn’t trust Gerry McCarthy if he told me my hair was on fire and showed me the flames in a mirror.
Comment by Roadrager Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 12:56 pm
Big question was who decided to embargo the video til after the mayoral election, knowing it would hurt Rahms re-election chances?
Comment by Pickles!! Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 1:06 pm
I really don’t want to defend either of these guys, but I don’t think these statements are inconsistent with one another.
Paris asked Rahm whether McCarthy told him there was a discrepancy between what the officers on the scene reported and what was clear on the video. He said no.
In the interview with Charles and Maze, McCarthy said that he did not know that there was a discrepancy because it appears he was only briefed on what the video showed and what actually happened, not what the officers had claimed to have happened.
That doesn’t excuse either for not asking the question as to what the officers on the scene claimed to have happened.
Comment by Juice Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 1:24 pm
===In the interview with Charles and Maze, McCarthy said that he did not know that there was a discrepancy===
Not at first. But he did soon after. Read it again.
“I got a high-level briefing from Dave McMartin, who’s the chief who conducted the preliminary investigation. And what I told the mayor was, the officer is going to have a problem explaining what’s going on here. And [Officer Jason Van Dyke] was stripped of his authority.”
Comment by Rich Miller Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 1:37 pm
What a cluster!
Comment by Anonymous Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 2:01 pm
Rich, I think there are two plausible explanations for what McCarthy is saying is a “problem” in that sentence.
One would be that Van Dyke is going to have a problem explaining why the dash cam video from the scene appears to contradict what he and his fellow officers reported in the aftermath of the shooting.
The other is that Van Dyke is going to have a problem explaining why he felt the need to use lethal force when the dash cam video pretty clearly shows that the use of force was excessive.
Both are entirely plausible. But in the context of McCarthy saying “we didn’t know that at the time” I think the second explanation makes more sense.
Comment by Juice Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 2:13 pm
To repeat a comment made last year- The Mayor really ought to reimburse the City the 5 million the City spent on the settlement out of his campaign fund. You can argue all you want but it seems like the payment was nothing other then a campaign expense
Comment by Sue Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 2:18 pm
I agree with Juice. This exchange is nothing.
Comment by Terry Salad Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 2:29 pm
Wow McCarthy is such a white knight. Bunch of Monday morning QB’ing and tip toein’ to score some political points for a potential mayoral bid.
Comment by Boone's is Back Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 3:06 pm
Yeah, McCarthy has a beef, but this version of his story makes a lot more sense than previous ones.
Emanuel’s Sgt. Schultz Act is ludicrous, as is that of those on the City Council.
If you are to believe those guys, on April 15, 2015, Emanuel recommended a $5 million settlement to the McDonald family and the City Council approved it unanimously in five seconds without a peep — and none of them had a clue as to what was going on.
Comment by wordslinger Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 3:14 pm
There are so many skeletons in that guy’s closet that he needs two closets.
Comment by Shytown Friday, Dec 8, 17 @ 4:01 pm
Rahm will not be able to get around the bad shooting, and McCarthy will trounce him over it.
Comment by Rahm has problems Wednesday, Dec 13, 17 @ 8:30 pm