SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Thursday, Sep 30, 2010

* The Highway Loss Data Institute released a study this week that claims state bans on texting while driving don’t work. Jamey Dunn fills us in

The institute compared insurance claims data with stats from before and after the bans, as well as with those of neighboring states that did not have bans. Researchers also considered other factors that can affect collision rates, such as seasonal changes in traffic. The instance of collisions did not go down in any of the states; in fact, it went up a small amount in three of the four states studied. The largest increase was 9 percent in Minnesota. According to the study: “If the goal of texting and cell phone bans is the reduction of crash risk, then the bans have so far been ineffective.”

And I can attest to this…

From the report: “This unexpected consequence of banning texting suggests that texting drivers have responded to the law perhaps by attempting to avoid fines by hiding their phones from view. If this causes them to take their eyes off the road more than before the ban, then the bans may make texting more dangerous rather than eliminating it.”

I’ve held my iPhone down low when looking up phone numbers because I didn’t want to get busted for texting, even though I wasn’t texting. I stopped doing that when I realized what an idiot I was being.

* So, what to do? Ban cellphone usage entirely? Rep. John D’Amico, a sponsor of the Illinois texting ban, says that’s a way to go…

D’Amico said a ban on using cell phones while driving would be a better solution. Illinois currently bans drivers from talking on phones in school and construction zones. He compared a possible ban to laws against driving while intoxicated, which have become more strictly enforced, causing the drunken driving to elicit more of a social stigma than it did in past decades. He said people will eventually see using a cell phone the way people see driving drunk now, and will say: “‘Boy I can’t believe we used to be allowed to do that.’”

But the Institute says that won’t help much, either…

Fleming said another study from the institute found hands-free options to be just as dangerous as standard cell phones. However, the same study also found cell phone bans to be ineffective in cutting accidents. Fleming acknowledges that such results are disappointing to those interested in improving driver safety. But, she said, if police can find better ways to catch violators in the act of texting or talking on the phone, bans could help make roads safer.

* Mobile phone usage while driving is potentially very dangerous, however...

A Virginia Tech study last year found that among truckers, dialing a cell phone made a driver 5.9 times more likely to cause an accident, while text messaging increased the likelihood 23.2 times.

* The Question: Should the state ban cellphone usage while driving? Period. Not just mandate hands-free use, but ban it entirely. Explain.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


44 Comments
  1. - Matt - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:15 pm:

    I think a total ban goes way too far. In this age, we need our cell phones, simple as that. Any supporter of that should try not using their cell phone in their car for a week and see how well it works. Nevermind the fact that it would be violated with ease. I highly doubt an officer could spot a tiny bluetooth headseat on the right ear of a driver.


  2. - Fan of the Game - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:16 pm:

    No. Talking on the phone is no more of a distraction than fiddling with the radio/CD/mp3 player or eating a Quarter Pounder or talking to the person in the seat next to you.

    Driving by itself is inherently dangerous, and we assume those risks when we get in a car. Cell phones–for better or worse–are a huge part of the social and business landscape, and banning their use while driving will require a paradigm shift for which people and society are not prepared.


  3. - A.B. - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:19 pm:

    No.

    I can see a requirement for use of a hands free device and a requirement for voice activated dialing.

    The one thing a ban on cell phone use would do is create a bloody election season for the next year.


  4. - Anon - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:21 pm:

    No. People who can’t responsibly operate a phone while driving (there are ways of doing it) probably have just as much problems with other distractions, like that restaurant they just passed or what Onarga reminds them of.


  5. - shore - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:22 pm:

    I think implementation is going to be very difficult and that needs to be a legit consideration. How does a cop know when you opened a text or capitolfaxblog.com on your blackberry and how does he prove it-lots of people read emails while sitting in traffice? does a police officer, given the recession, really want to create a whole new category of arrests to make? If a police officer is sitting hidden looking for speeding vehicles on a highway, does he keep his eyes peeled for speeding drivers, drunk drivers and now trying to figure out if a guy driving at 50 mph has a snickers bar or a cell phone in his hand? can the courts really deal with a whole new set of cases where a driver contests a 120 dollar ticket because a cop thought he was reading about alexi’s latest bank loan on cap fax while driving his kid to gymnastics?

    I see the need for it and would support it largely because the thought of a huge truck driving into me because he was checking his fantasy football scores scares me, but implementation is going to be very very hard.


  6. - Nieva - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:27 pm:

    I worked for IDOT for 20 years and all I can say is when you are flagging traffic it is easy to spot the texters and distracted drivers. They are the ones crossing the center line and the last to stop at your flag. They always say they are sorry when they run the flag and have to back up but sorry don’t get it when they run over and kill or injure the flagman or somebody in the line of traffic that has already stopped. If it’s that important to make the call or recieve it pull off and put on the flashers if you can. If not wait till you get home. Most of the texts that are sent are much about nothing anyway!!


  7. - Redbright - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:27 pm:

    Given the massive civil disobedience on this issue, why not just up the fine A LOT for using a cellphone in any mode while causing an accident.


  8. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:28 pm:

    The study is pathetic, sponsored by interested parties (a consortium of insurers), and the media has done a horrible disservice to the public by touting it so unquestioningly. http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/moneyblog/archive/2010/09/29/don-t-write-off-texting-while-driving-bans.aspx


  9. - bored now - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:29 pm:

    no. i definitely will use my phone no matter what, but i do pull off the road to text or to dial a number that’s not in my recall numbers.


  10. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:30 pm:

    Here’s how to stop this insanity: the auto insurance industry needs to put a clause in their policies that if an accident happens while texting they will pay out to third parties but not the driver. This won’t stop all, but it’d stop a lot.


  11. - vole - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:36 pm:

    Yes. People believe they can master multitasking. But this has been scientifically proven wrong. People are only able to concentrate on one task at a time. When you talk on a cell phone you are distracted from your primary task. You bounce back and forth between attention to the road and attention to your phone conversation. It only takes a fraction of a second of distraction to endanger your life, your passengers and other drivers.

    The next time you talk on your cell phone, do a little self testing. After concentrating on your call, try to recall the scene you just drove through. Much of it will be a total blank.

    And talking on a cell phone is not the same as talking with a passenger. Your passengers have their eyes on the road too and often aid the driver in spotting danger ahead.

    Claiming the need is only heightening your own sense of importance. You are only adding to the dangers on the road.

    Talk with motorcyclists. One of their greatest fears is getting creamed by a distracted cell phone user.


  12. - Thoughts... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:40 pm:

    I’ve been guilty of all of the above but pretty much stopped after I got rear-ended by a guy who was talking on his phone. It was very low speed, but still.

    I remember a study that concluded that talking on a cell phone, whether hands free or not, basically makes you as dangerous as a drunk driver. That’s enough for me - I’m for a ban.

    Will it be difficult? Sure. Implementation and more importantly, compliance, will be an arduous process, but that’s not new. When the seat belt law was put in place, compliance was what, 50-60%? And now it’s north of 80%. When people realized that there was a serious penalty for DUI, rather than “go home and take it easy,” the number of people driving drunk went down.

    I’m loathe to put a new mandate on cops, especially considering violent crime, but if an effort is made, compliance will rise. Right now, I don’t see that effort in Chicago cops. I’ve seen texters/talkers drive in front of cops more times than I can count. Heck, I’ve seen cops on their phones. And as a pedestrian, I’ve nearly been hit by driving/texting drivers dozens of times as well. They’re dangerous. It’d suck for the drive to Springfield, but I’m all for it.


  13. - Cincinnatus - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:40 pm:

    Redbright (modified slightly to say if the cellphone cause another violation) + lake county democrat = correct solution


  14. - We Todd Did - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:48 pm:

    The state should ban everything that might hurt anybody. If anyone is hurt for any reason it is obviously the State of Illinois’ fault. We need to legislate away all risk no matter how significant. We should pass a bill banning cancer, problem solved.


  15. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:49 pm:

    20 years ago no one used their cellphones while driving. Why is it a necessity now?


  16. - John Bambenek - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:52 pm:

    Why don’t we just permanently revoke the licenses of people who repeatedly cause accidents? It might be a lot easier to enforce than outlawing this or that behavior.


  17. - Cuban Pilot - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:52 pm:

    No. A total ban should not be implemented because the overwhelming majority of people will just ignore this law. Why institute a law that no one will follow? The more scofflaws you create, the less respect people have the for law.


  18. - Responsa - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:56 pm:

    Texting is the biggest problem because it is so ubiquitous now and involves both the eyes AND the hands. Hand held devices which allow surfing the net and checking email while driving are a close second. Add to that, the fact that a lot of texters and surfers are younger drivers who lack driving experience (and judgment) in general.

    For twenty years users of car phones and cell phones mostly managed to still watch the road and drive while talking. Before that was the CB radio. The latest technology has moved vehicular communication into a whole nother and more dangerous level. Open liquor is against the law in cars and cannot be visible. Open cellphones should be put away too. I do believe hands free for outgoing and incoming voice conversation should be legal in cars, though.


  19. - Wondering... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:57 pm:

    No. But I am with Cincinnatus and RB and LCD… jack up the fines for violations and allow insurance companies to modify coverage for accidents caused by cell phone use. Hit them where it hurts… in the pocket.


  20. - D.P. Gumby - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:02 pm:

    I have more trouble getting the CD out of its case than I do w/ my cell phone…but then I couldn’t text and drive if my life depended on it, so I don’t see how anyone does it. Now, what about the in car computer and GPS systems, etc. There needs to be increased safety mechanisms for use of cell phones in vehicles…oral dialing etc as prohibition and high fines will be ineffective.


  21. - Segatari - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:02 pm:

    Why don’t they target OTHER activities while driving? Why does the cell phone get the blame for EVERYTHING? They should mandate keeping both hands on the wheel the entire time they are in the car and be quiet. I’ll tell you right now, I will NOT obey a cell phone ban. I will look for any cops then make my call.


  22. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:04 pm:

    You could ban it, but it couldn’t be enforced. Perhaps natural selection will remedy this problem.

    The law should be against reckless driving regardless of the cause. (Oh, hey, we already have that! Let’s enforce it.)


  23. - Vote Quimby! - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:05 pm:

    No, not a complete ban. Instead, how about increasing fines for improper lane usage. I have lost count how many people I could tell were texting or using a phone who couldn’t keep it between the lines.


  24. - Irish - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:07 pm:

    No, Unless you are also going to ban, reading a paper or book while driving, ( I have seen this quite often driving into Chicago), putting on makeup, eating, and talking to passengers. I have followed people who tend to speed up when they are not talking and then you see them turn to their passengers and gesturing and carrying on a conversation, they begin to slow down. This goes on over and over. I try to get around them asap.

    Handsfree is the way to go. I drive to northern Wisconsin quite often and have no difficulty receiving and making calls hands free. I stay completely focused on the traffic and road. I am in the car seven hours and receive many calls from family or work. I think you will cause more problems if you have drivers frantically trying to get to the side of the road to receive an incoming call.

    I wonder if a study has been done regarding the use of any electronic device, ie i-pods, and driving and if the numbers are similar. I have seen and ridden with people who are fiddling with their GPS as much if not more than their cell phone.

    The real solution for all of it might be to put the technology currently advertised for Mercedes -Benz, where the car notifies you if you drift into another lane, or stops the car if you don’t notice something/someone in front of you.


  25. - vole - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:08 pm:

    “jack up the fines for violations and allow insurance companies to modify coverage for accidents caused by cell phone use. Hit them where it hurts… in the pocket.”

    What kind of measure would you use for fatalities or extremely disabling injuries? A bit too late then.

    And fines imply that laws prohibiting cell phone use are in place.

    Americans suck at prevention. Live for the moment.


  26. - Concerned Observer - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:08 pm:

    No.

    And I saw a state legislator texting/checking his email/something on his cell phone while stuck in traffic on the Eisenhower Tuesday. I don’t know who it was, but his license plate has the same number as John Fritchey’s district (it wasn’t Fritchey, of course — House license plates are done by seniority).


  27. - WRMNpolitics - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:12 pm:

    Unfortunately, another law will not have the intended effect of stopping texting or distractions from cellphone usage. One only has to look at the equipment in today’s vehicles to see that our cars have evolved from methods of transportation to mobile living spaces, with cupholders, dvd players, satellite entertainment , cellphone communications and in some cases, built in beverage coolers. This has changed the way we think of and operate our vehicles. Until technology is installed in vehicles that eliminate the ability to use a cellphone when the car is in motion, no law will have solve the problem.


  28. - Aldyth - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:22 pm:

    Yes, with the addition that cell phone use is banned while the vehicle is in motion.

    Most of us can remember a time when we functioned perfectly well without a cell phone. The world does not need to reach us or us reach the world every single moment of the day. When we’re driving or using a restroom, cell phones don’t belong.


  29. - SangamoGOP - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:27 pm:

    Upon hearing that current law has no “positive” effect, D’Amico naturally fell to a legislator’s default position which is enact legislation restricts even more. Of course, the obvious thing would be to get rid of the initial legislation and stop trying to legislate away risk. There are already negligence standards on the books. There is no need for more legislation!


  30. - Thoughts... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:30 pm:

    ===Perhaps natural selection will remedy this problem.===

    Doubt it - if that were the case, the only victims of DUI wrecks would be the drunks, and that’s almost never the case


  31. - TwoFeetThick - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:49 pm:

    Easy one - ban it, with penalties on par with those for DUI. Get caught, lose your license. I can’t count how many times I’ve almost been hit by some idiot on what was no doubt a very important call. Just a couple of weeks ago I saw a car about to cross my path coming up on a stop sign at what I knew would be too fast to stop (I did not have a stop sign). I slammed my brakes on and swerved, and clearly saw the phone stuck to her head as she turned to see who was honking at her. I’m surprised she even noticed that. I would like to think that she immediately hung up the phone and spent the rest of the day thanking God that she didn’t get a face full of my front bumper, but I’m sure she was totally clueless as to what almost happened and why.


  32. - Cincinnatus - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:50 pm:

    I had a woman flip her minivan (son broke his arm) in front of me while she was fishing for change for an upcoming toll booth. Let’s ban tolls…


  33. - schwarz - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:57 pm:

    Yes and violations should result in hefty fines. I don’t know about the rest of you but I want the drivers around me to be completely focused on driving.


  34. - No Peotone Airport - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 2:27 pm:

    Yes.

    I’ve had too many close calls now, both where I was nearly a victim, and also where I might have victimized someone else. No message or conversation warrants the risk being taken.

    It’s the right thing to do, and it should be done.


  35. - Pot Stirrer - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 2:53 pm:

    Ban them? Heck no. Those of us that are road warriors have to do business on the road with a phone and I have been doing so for twenty years.

    Are they more dangerous and distracting. Of course, but less so on the rural interstate than in the middle of Chicago expressway traffic.

    As was pointed out repeatedly earlier, if it is not cell phones, it would be something else.

    I do think that it might be worthwhile to consider some type of “NO PHONE ZONE” sign in areas that have experienced particular problems and enforce that.

    Texting is absolutely out of the question.

    But the reality is, some folks will never adhere to it anyway. As long as they are not running into me I just consider it part of the “culling of the herd.”

    But while we are at it, lets cover something more critical. I cannot even believe the number of kids I still see standing up in seats while their parents are driving down the road. I say send those folks to jail on the spot.


  36. - Ghost - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:01 pm:

    Sorry I was too busy watching my in car DVD while eatin food from the fast food restraunt and using my wirless hotspot to read this blog to text my answer to your phone.

    No, there are so many things that happen in a care already this is less then a drop in a bucket.


  37. - Ghost - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:32 pm:

    You want fewer accidents? we need a law prohibiting spouses from nagging the driver….


  38. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:33 pm:

    I would cheer you, Ghost, but I’d be afraid my wife would see it. lol


  39. - Wensicia - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 4:28 pm:

    Yes, ban them. Driving was never this risky over ten years ago. I’ve had a few close calls with people using cellphones, I would never use mine in the car. I don’t know if fines would hurt, but a ticket for cell phone use should have greater weight than any other moving violation, causing your insurance to rise and/or be discontinued with repeated violations. Any accident tied to cellphone use should also carry a charge of negligent or reckless disregard for others, or something like it.


  40. - Say WHAT? - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 5:05 pm:

    Texting while driving is currently illegal, but so many still do it daily. On my way to and from works I see them, their little thumbs getting a work out, other drivers having to dodge them, honk at them to keep from being hit. I have all but been run off the road by texters. Being on a cell phone in school zones is illegal, but I drive through one every day and see people on their cell phones who don’t plan to change their ways. How are these laws enforceable? If we continue to pass laws that are not enforceable, then where are the teeth? Uninforceable laws are worthless.


  41. - curious - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 5:26 pm:

    YES! I feel that there are so many more cars on the road these days and more distractions-you need to put the phone away and focus on driving. There are so many things going on while driving bicycle riders, pedestricians, construction.

    The laws that D’Amico has passed have saved lives-bottom line isn’t that what we are trying to do? Technology keeps moving forward-it’s suppose to make lives easier but there are times-like driving that we should ALL concentrate on driving.

    For those that say not to ban cell phones I would like to see comments if someone in your family were hit and killed or severly injured by a person on a cell phone or texting. It’s easy to complain that you need to be on your phone until something bad happens.

    For once we have someone in office that is trying to make our roads safer and save lives-it’s nice to see that our politiians are banning together to make roads in Illinois safer. We as drivers need to follow the law or I say double-even triple fines and then let’s see how many people are on the phone! GREAT law!

    If drunk drivers continued to drive drunk or drink in the car should we eleminate that law? If people continue to murder should we eleminate that law? Where is common sense?


  42. - Park - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 6:26 pm:

    How ’bout no texting while walking? Downtown Chicago, I have to pass a bunch of people slowing the walk to the office by playing thumbtag. People, get a life….it can wait.


  43. - cynically anonymous - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 8:16 pm:

    It would be nice if we could legislate common sense and courtesy and then this discussion wouldn’t be necessary. But since studies seem to show that using cell phones while driving is comparable to driving drunk, I think they should be banned and the penalties for getting caught on a par with DUI or crossing the tracks when the lights are flashing ($250). Yes it would be inconvenient, and yes, people would still do it, but hopefully it would be a deterrent for more people than not and fewer of us would get rear-ended or nearly sideswiped, or maimed or killed.


  44. - Huh? - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 11:21 pm:

    This would be very easy to enforce by requiring manufacturers to include an application that would deactivate the device if it were going facter than 5 miles per hour.

    The imbedded GPS can be used to determine if the device were exceeding the “speed limit”.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* React to remap reform ruling
* Divided court kicks remap reform off ballot
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: TRS update
* Unanimously approved bill awaiting Rauner signature
* Rockford provider desperately needs state cash that isn't coming
* Today's number: 95.02 percent
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Federal judge rules Gill can remain on ballot
* Rate the new Baricevic ad
* The Rauner template
* Yet another race to the bottom in the US Senate race
* Beware the reformers
* SIU newspaper "consultant" pushed hard to land printing contract for his paper
* Cassidy "dare" lauded, but don't hold your breath
* Unclear on the concept
* An ever-changing semantics game
* The latest on redistricting reform
* Munger, Mendoza to face off at Tribune editorial board meeting
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Mostly familiar Sony Xperia X Compact and Xperia XZ specifications rumored
* First-gen Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 begins receiving OTA Marshmallow after all
* Truecaller lands pre-install deal with Huawei as it crosses 90M monthly users
* [TA Deals] You can get these premium over-ear headphones for $79! (73% off)
* OnePlus Bullets V2 are the plain ‘ol earbuds we’ve always deserved
* XDA devs craft up Android Nougat for Nexus 5, Nexus 7 (2013)
* Hong Kong has the Moto E3 Power

* White Sox rally past M's on Frazier's walk-off hit
* Frazier sets RISP issues aside with clutch hits
* Sox won't reveal direction until after season
* Frazier ties it, then sinks M's on walk-off hit
* White Sox rally past M's on Frazier's walk-off hit
* Sale faces fellow ace Felix, Mariners at Cell
* Top Sox pick Burdi could be September callup

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Illinois governor to make appearances in southe.....
* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear .....
* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear .....


* Illinois corn maze pays tribute to 'Star Trek' anniversary
* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear on ballot
* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear on ballot
* Universities awarded grants to study harmful algae blooms
* Chicago-area imam pleads guilty to sex abuse charges
* Chicago-area imam pleads guilty to sex abuse charges
* Comptroller hopefuls argue independence from Madigan, Rauner
* Comptroller hopefuls argue independence from Madigan, Rauner
* Mayors seek hearing on Waukesha water withdrawal decision
* Illinois officials to analyze fairgrounds flooding, damage

* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear on ballot
* Comptroller hopefuls argue independence from Madigan, Rauner
* Springfield-area jobless rate remains lowest in Illinois
* Illinois 'Obamacare' health insurance rates up significantly
* Rauner's office warns teachers' pension change could be 'devastating'
* IDOT to analyze fairgrounds flood-control measures
* Rauner signs bill to punish trafficking guns into Illinois
* Rauner to sign bill to clamp down on gun trafficking
* Gov. Rauner signs bills to assist juvenile, other offenders
* Gov. Rauner signs package of criminal justice legislation

* In victory for Madigan, Illinois remap plan is tossed by divided court
* Sephora's new Michigan Avenue store features high-tech touches
* How to get a first class upgrade every time
* A celebrated pastry chef turns to painting
* Amazon to open its first brick-and-mortar bookstore in Chicago


* Vehicle hit by gunfire on I-57 in Matteson
* Police: Man shot after shooting at woman in West Englewood
* 10 shot in Thursday attacks across Chicago
* Georgia Nicols horoscopes for Aug. 26, 2016
* Dear Abby: Friend took my kidney, then ditched me
* Man shot in West Town
* White Sox, Frazier enjoy walk-off win over Mariners
* Man shot in Jefferson Park
* Red Line trains to bypass stations for weekend track work
* State trooper hospitalized, two wounded in South Side shooting


* 2 shot by Illinois State Police on South Side
* 1 dead, 10 wounded in separate shootings
* Lessons learned: Ex-NBA star shares his story at high school
* Striking miners kill deputy minister in Bolivia: official
* 1 dead, at least 4 injured in Belgium in accidental blast
* Clinton might be the GOP's savior — how strange is that?
* Todd Frazier comes through for 7-6 White Sox victory over Mariners
* Judge in Stanford rape case to stop hearing criminal cases
* U.S. troubles over Trump and TPP risk emboldening China in Asia
* Russia sees Syria war solution closer after thaw in ties with Turkey


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Illinois redistricting referendum won't appear on ballot
* Comptroller hopefuls argue independence from Madigan, Rauner
* Springfield-area jobless rate remains lowest in Illinois
* Bernard Schoenburg: Illinois an 'outlier' in party appointments to legislative vacancies
* Esther Cepeda: One man's clutter could be another man's treasure
* Scott Reeder: A case for tempering justice with mercy
* Illinois 'Obamacare' health insurance rates up significantly
* Eugene Robinson: Trump's 360-degree 'pivot'
* Rauner's office warns teachers' pension change could be 'devastating'
* IDOT to analyze fairgrounds flood-control measures


* Are you ready for some football? Friday night football is back in Southern Illinois
* Mount Zion helplessly devoted to Grease Fest
* Patricia 'Patty' Spangler
* Barbara Downs
* Evelyn Patton
* Louis Wildermuth
* Mary Fann
* Jerry Morgan
* William Kemper Jr.
* Jerry Fiorina


* Scout's grapefruit juice spray is solution to geese in park
* Family places organic lotion they created on the market
* Car bomb attack in Turkey kills 11 police; 78 wounded
* Memories remain, mementoes left behind in family homestead
* VW: employee chief floats idea of taking stakes in suppliers

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Dick Durbin's war on affordable banking - ......
* Dick Durbin's war on affordable banking - ......

* Duckworth critical of Kirk during visit to......

* Trash Movie Night Returns To Fat Cat on Wednesday -- With Dinosaurs!
* “The Driver’s Side” – News From The Motorist’s Perspective
* The Comic Con
* Presidential insults; what else is new?
* CTU Preps For Possible Strike In October
* Judge Orders Release Of Additional Clinton Emails
* Cartoon Of The Day
* Cartoon of the Day - 8/24/16 IL black unemployment rate
* Transgender Performer Sues Over Chicago's Ban On Female Nudity In Bars
* New Illinois Law Imposes Stiff Penalties For Gun Trafficking


* Governor Announces First Sheltered Market - Sheltered markets ensure equal opportunities for businesses owned by women, minorities and persons with disabilities
* Governor Rauner Signs Bill to Give Former Offenders a Brighter Future
* Statement on Health Care Rate Filings
* Governor Opens Minority Entrepreneurship Program Applications
* Governor Rauner Signs Firearms Trafficking Bill to Help Protect Communities from Gun Violence




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller