SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Thursday, Sep 30, 2010

* The Highway Loss Data Institute released a study this week that claims state bans on texting while driving don’t work. Jamey Dunn fills us in

The institute compared insurance claims data with stats from before and after the bans, as well as with those of neighboring states that did not have bans. Researchers also considered other factors that can affect collision rates, such as seasonal changes in traffic. The instance of collisions did not go down in any of the states; in fact, it went up a small amount in three of the four states studied. The largest increase was 9 percent in Minnesota. According to the study: “If the goal of texting and cell phone bans is the reduction of crash risk, then the bans have so far been ineffective.”

And I can attest to this…

From the report: “This unexpected consequence of banning texting suggests that texting drivers have responded to the law perhaps by attempting to avoid fines by hiding their phones from view. If this causes them to take their eyes off the road more than before the ban, then the bans may make texting more dangerous rather than eliminating it.”

I’ve held my iPhone down low when looking up phone numbers because I didn’t want to get busted for texting, even though I wasn’t texting. I stopped doing that when I realized what an idiot I was being.

* So, what to do? Ban cellphone usage entirely? Rep. John D’Amico, a sponsor of the Illinois texting ban, says that’s a way to go…

D’Amico said a ban on using cell phones while driving would be a better solution. Illinois currently bans drivers from talking on phones in school and construction zones. He compared a possible ban to laws against driving while intoxicated, which have become more strictly enforced, causing the drunken driving to elicit more of a social stigma than it did in past decades. He said people will eventually see using a cell phone the way people see driving drunk now, and will say: “‘Boy I can’t believe we used to be allowed to do that.’”

But the Institute says that won’t help much, either…

Fleming said another study from the institute found hands-free options to be just as dangerous as standard cell phones. However, the same study also found cell phone bans to be ineffective in cutting accidents. Fleming acknowledges that such results are disappointing to those interested in improving driver safety. But, she said, if police can find better ways to catch violators in the act of texting or talking on the phone, bans could help make roads safer.

* Mobile phone usage while driving is potentially very dangerous, however...

A Virginia Tech study last year found that among truckers, dialing a cell phone made a driver 5.9 times more likely to cause an accident, while text messaging increased the likelihood 23.2 times.

* The Question: Should the state ban cellphone usage while driving? Period. Not just mandate hands-free use, but ban it entirely. Explain.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Matt - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:15 pm:

    I think a total ban goes way too far. In this age, we need our cell phones, simple as that. Any supporter of that should try not using their cell phone in their car for a week and see how well it works. Nevermind the fact that it would be violated with ease. I highly doubt an officer could spot a tiny bluetooth headseat on the right ear of a driver.

  2. - Fan of the Game - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:16 pm:

    No. Talking on the phone is no more of a distraction than fiddling with the radio/CD/mp3 player or eating a Quarter Pounder or talking to the person in the seat next to you.

    Driving by itself is inherently dangerous, and we assume those risks when we get in a car. Cell phones–for better or worse–are a huge part of the social and business landscape, and banning their use while driving will require a paradigm shift for which people and society are not prepared.

  3. - A.B. - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:19 pm:


    I can see a requirement for use of a hands free device and a requirement for voice activated dialing.

    The one thing a ban on cell phone use would do is create a bloody election season for the next year.

  4. - Anon - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:21 pm:

    No. People who can’t responsibly operate a phone while driving (there are ways of doing it) probably have just as much problems with other distractions, like that restaurant they just passed or what Onarga reminds them of.

  5. - shore - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:22 pm:

    I think implementation is going to be very difficult and that needs to be a legit consideration. How does a cop know when you opened a text or on your blackberry and how does he prove it-lots of people read emails while sitting in traffice? does a police officer, given the recession, really want to create a whole new category of arrests to make? If a police officer is sitting hidden looking for speeding vehicles on a highway, does he keep his eyes peeled for speeding drivers, drunk drivers and now trying to figure out if a guy driving at 50 mph has a snickers bar or a cell phone in his hand? can the courts really deal with a whole new set of cases where a driver contests a 120 dollar ticket because a cop thought he was reading about alexi’s latest bank loan on cap fax while driving his kid to gymnastics?

    I see the need for it and would support it largely because the thought of a huge truck driving into me because he was checking his fantasy football scores scares me, but implementation is going to be very very hard.

  6. - Nieva - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:27 pm:

    I worked for IDOT for 20 years and all I can say is when you are flagging traffic it is easy to spot the texters and distracted drivers. They are the ones crossing the center line and the last to stop at your flag. They always say they are sorry when they run the flag and have to back up but sorry don’t get it when they run over and kill or injure the flagman or somebody in the line of traffic that has already stopped. If it’s that important to make the call or recieve it pull off and put on the flashers if you can. If not wait till you get home. Most of the texts that are sent are much about nothing anyway!!

  7. - Redbright - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:27 pm:

    Given the massive civil disobedience on this issue, why not just up the fine A LOT for using a cellphone in any mode while causing an accident.

  8. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:28 pm:

    The study is pathetic, sponsored by interested parties (a consortium of insurers), and the media has done a horrible disservice to the public by touting it so unquestioningly.

  9. - bored now - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:29 pm:

    no. i definitely will use my phone no matter what, but i do pull off the road to text or to dial a number that’s not in my recall numbers.

  10. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:30 pm:

    Here’s how to stop this insanity: the auto insurance industry needs to put a clause in their policies that if an accident happens while texting they will pay out to third parties but not the driver. This won’t stop all, but it’d stop a lot.

  11. - vole - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:36 pm:

    Yes. People believe they can master multitasking. But this has been scientifically proven wrong. People are only able to concentrate on one task at a time. When you talk on a cell phone you are distracted from your primary task. You bounce back and forth between attention to the road and attention to your phone conversation. It only takes a fraction of a second of distraction to endanger your life, your passengers and other drivers.

    The next time you talk on your cell phone, do a little self testing. After concentrating on your call, try to recall the scene you just drove through. Much of it will be a total blank.

    And talking on a cell phone is not the same as talking with a passenger. Your passengers have their eyes on the road too and often aid the driver in spotting danger ahead.

    Claiming the need is only heightening your own sense of importance. You are only adding to the dangers on the road.

    Talk with motorcyclists. One of their greatest fears is getting creamed by a distracted cell phone user.

  12. - Thoughts... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:40 pm:

    I’ve been guilty of all of the above but pretty much stopped after I got rear-ended by a guy who was talking on his phone. It was very low speed, but still.

    I remember a study that concluded that talking on a cell phone, whether hands free or not, basically makes you as dangerous as a drunk driver. That’s enough for me - I’m for a ban.

    Will it be difficult? Sure. Implementation and more importantly, compliance, will be an arduous process, but that’s not new. When the seat belt law was put in place, compliance was what, 50-60%? And now it’s north of 80%. When people realized that there was a serious penalty for DUI, rather than “go home and take it easy,” the number of people driving drunk went down.

    I’m loathe to put a new mandate on cops, especially considering violent crime, but if an effort is made, compliance will rise. Right now, I don’t see that effort in Chicago cops. I’ve seen texters/talkers drive in front of cops more times than I can count. Heck, I’ve seen cops on their phones. And as a pedestrian, I’ve nearly been hit by driving/texting drivers dozens of times as well. They’re dangerous. It’d suck for the drive to Springfield, but I’m all for it.

  13. - Cincinnatus - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:40 pm:

    Redbright (modified slightly to say if the cellphone cause another violation) + lake county democrat = correct solution

  14. - We Todd Did - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:48 pm:

    The state should ban everything that might hurt anybody. If anyone is hurt for any reason it is obviously the State of Illinois’ fault. We need to legislate away all risk no matter how significant. We should pass a bill banning cancer, problem solved.

  15. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:49 pm:

    20 years ago no one used their cellphones while driving. Why is it a necessity now?

  16. - John Bambenek - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:52 pm:

    Why don’t we just permanently revoke the licenses of people who repeatedly cause accidents? It might be a lot easier to enforce than outlawing this or that behavior.

  17. - Cuban Pilot - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:52 pm:

    No. A total ban should not be implemented because the overwhelming majority of people will just ignore this law. Why institute a law that no one will follow? The more scofflaws you create, the less respect people have the for law.

  18. - Responsa - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:56 pm:

    Texting is the biggest problem because it is so ubiquitous now and involves both the eyes AND the hands. Hand held devices which allow surfing the net and checking email while driving are a close second. Add to that, the fact that a lot of texters and surfers are younger drivers who lack driving experience (and judgment) in general.

    For twenty years users of car phones and cell phones mostly managed to still watch the road and drive while talking. Before that was the CB radio. The latest technology has moved vehicular communication into a whole nother and more dangerous level. Open liquor is against the law in cars and cannot be visible. Open cellphones should be put away too. I do believe hands free for outgoing and incoming voice conversation should be legal in cars, though.

  19. - Wondering... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 12:57 pm:

    No. But I am with Cincinnatus and RB and LCD… jack up the fines for violations and allow insurance companies to modify coverage for accidents caused by cell phone use. Hit them where it hurts… in the pocket.

  20. - D.P. Gumby - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:02 pm:

    I have more trouble getting the CD out of its case than I do w/ my cell phone…but then I couldn’t text and drive if my life depended on it, so I don’t see how anyone does it. Now, what about the in car computer and GPS systems, etc. There needs to be increased safety mechanisms for use of cell phones in vehicles…oral dialing etc as prohibition and high fines will be ineffective.

  21. - Segatari - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:02 pm:

    Why don’t they target OTHER activities while driving? Why does the cell phone get the blame for EVERYTHING? They should mandate keeping both hands on the wheel the entire time they are in the car and be quiet. I’ll tell you right now, I will NOT obey a cell phone ban. I will look for any cops then make my call.

  22. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:04 pm:

    You could ban it, but it couldn’t be enforced. Perhaps natural selection will remedy this problem.

    The law should be against reckless driving regardless of the cause. (Oh, hey, we already have that! Let’s enforce it.)

  23. - Vote Quimby! - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:05 pm:

    No, not a complete ban. Instead, how about increasing fines for improper lane usage. I have lost count how many people I could tell were texting or using a phone who couldn’t keep it between the lines.

  24. - Irish - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:07 pm:

    No, Unless you are also going to ban, reading a paper or book while driving, ( I have seen this quite often driving into Chicago), putting on makeup, eating, and talking to passengers. I have followed people who tend to speed up when they are not talking and then you see them turn to their passengers and gesturing and carrying on a conversation, they begin to slow down. This goes on over and over. I try to get around them asap.

    Handsfree is the way to go. I drive to northern Wisconsin quite often and have no difficulty receiving and making calls hands free. I stay completely focused on the traffic and road. I am in the car seven hours and receive many calls from family or work. I think you will cause more problems if you have drivers frantically trying to get to the side of the road to receive an incoming call.

    I wonder if a study has been done regarding the use of any electronic device, ie i-pods, and driving and if the numbers are similar. I have seen and ridden with people who are fiddling with their GPS as much if not more than their cell phone.

    The real solution for all of it might be to put the technology currently advertised for Mercedes -Benz, where the car notifies you if you drift into another lane, or stops the car if you don’t notice something/someone in front of you.

  25. - vole - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:08 pm:

    “jack up the fines for violations and allow insurance companies to modify coverage for accidents caused by cell phone use. Hit them where it hurts… in the pocket.”

    What kind of measure would you use for fatalities or extremely disabling injuries? A bit too late then.

    And fines imply that laws prohibiting cell phone use are in place.

    Americans suck at prevention. Live for the moment.

  26. - Concerned Observer - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:08 pm:


    And I saw a state legislator texting/checking his email/something on his cell phone while stuck in traffic on the Eisenhower Tuesday. I don’t know who it was, but his license plate has the same number as John Fritchey’s district (it wasn’t Fritchey, of course — House license plates are done by seniority).

  27. - WRMNpolitics - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:12 pm:

    Unfortunately, another law will not have the intended effect of stopping texting or distractions from cellphone usage. One only has to look at the equipment in today’s vehicles to see that our cars have evolved from methods of transportation to mobile living spaces, with cupholders, dvd players, satellite entertainment , cellphone communications and in some cases, built in beverage coolers. This has changed the way we think of and operate our vehicles. Until technology is installed in vehicles that eliminate the ability to use a cellphone when the car is in motion, no law will have solve the problem.

  28. - Aldyth - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:22 pm:

    Yes, with the addition that cell phone use is banned while the vehicle is in motion.

    Most of us can remember a time when we functioned perfectly well without a cell phone. The world does not need to reach us or us reach the world every single moment of the day. When we’re driving or using a restroom, cell phones don’t belong.

  29. - SangamoGOP - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:27 pm:

    Upon hearing that current law has no “positive” effect, D’Amico naturally fell to a legislator’s default position which is enact legislation restricts even more. Of course, the obvious thing would be to get rid of the initial legislation and stop trying to legislate away risk. There are already negligence standards on the books. There is no need for more legislation!

  30. - Thoughts... - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:30 pm:

    ===Perhaps natural selection will remedy this problem.===

    Doubt it - if that were the case, the only victims of DUI wrecks would be the drunks, and that’s almost never the case

  31. - TwoFeetThick - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:49 pm:

    Easy one - ban it, with penalties on par with those for DUI. Get caught, lose your license. I can’t count how many times I’ve almost been hit by some idiot on what was no doubt a very important call. Just a couple of weeks ago I saw a car about to cross my path coming up on a stop sign at what I knew would be too fast to stop (I did not have a stop sign). I slammed my brakes on and swerved, and clearly saw the phone stuck to her head as she turned to see who was honking at her. I’m surprised she even noticed that. I would like to think that she immediately hung up the phone and spent the rest of the day thanking God that she didn’t get a face full of my front bumper, but I’m sure she was totally clueless as to what almost happened and why.

  32. - Cincinnatus - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:50 pm:

    I had a woman flip her minivan (son broke his arm) in front of me while she was fishing for change for an upcoming toll booth. Let’s ban tolls…

  33. - schwarz - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 1:57 pm:

    Yes and violations should result in hefty fines. I don’t know about the rest of you but I want the drivers around me to be completely focused on driving.

  34. - No Peotone Airport - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 2:27 pm:


    I’ve had too many close calls now, both where I was nearly a victim, and also where I might have victimized someone else. No message or conversation warrants the risk being taken.

    It’s the right thing to do, and it should be done.

  35. - Pot Stirrer - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 2:53 pm:

    Ban them? Heck no. Those of us that are road warriors have to do business on the road with a phone and I have been doing so for twenty years.

    Are they more dangerous and distracting. Of course, but less so on the rural interstate than in the middle of Chicago expressway traffic.

    As was pointed out repeatedly earlier, if it is not cell phones, it would be something else.

    I do think that it might be worthwhile to consider some type of “NO PHONE ZONE” sign in areas that have experienced particular problems and enforce that.

    Texting is absolutely out of the question.

    But the reality is, some folks will never adhere to it anyway. As long as they are not running into me I just consider it part of the “culling of the herd.”

    But while we are at it, lets cover something more critical. I cannot even believe the number of kids I still see standing up in seats while their parents are driving down the road. I say send those folks to jail on the spot.

  36. - Ghost - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:01 pm:

    Sorry I was too busy watching my in car DVD while eatin food from the fast food restraunt and using my wirless hotspot to read this blog to text my answer to your phone.

    No, there are so many things that happen in a care already this is less then a drop in a bucket.

  37. - Ghost - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:32 pm:

    You want fewer accidents? we need a law prohibiting spouses from nagging the driver….

  38. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 3:33 pm:

    I would cheer you, Ghost, but I’d be afraid my wife would see it. lol

  39. - Wensicia - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 4:28 pm:

    Yes, ban them. Driving was never this risky over ten years ago. I’ve had a few close calls with people using cellphones, I would never use mine in the car. I don’t know if fines would hurt, but a ticket for cell phone use should have greater weight than any other moving violation, causing your insurance to rise and/or be discontinued with repeated violations. Any accident tied to cellphone use should also carry a charge of negligent or reckless disregard for others, or something like it.

  40. - Say WHAT? - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 5:05 pm:

    Texting while driving is currently illegal, but so many still do it daily. On my way to and from works I see them, their little thumbs getting a work out, other drivers having to dodge them, honk at them to keep from being hit. I have all but been run off the road by texters. Being on a cell phone in school zones is illegal, but I drive through one every day and see people on their cell phones who don’t plan to change their ways. How are these laws enforceable? If we continue to pass laws that are not enforceable, then where are the teeth? Uninforceable laws are worthless.

  41. - curious - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 5:26 pm:

    YES! I feel that there are so many more cars on the road these days and more distractions-you need to put the phone away and focus on driving. There are so many things going on while driving bicycle riders, pedestricians, construction.

    The laws that D’Amico has passed have saved lives-bottom line isn’t that what we are trying to do? Technology keeps moving forward-it’s suppose to make lives easier but there are times-like driving that we should ALL concentrate on driving.

    For those that say not to ban cell phones I would like to see comments if someone in your family were hit and killed or severly injured by a person on a cell phone or texting. It’s easy to complain that you need to be on your phone until something bad happens.

    For once we have someone in office that is trying to make our roads safer and save lives-it’s nice to see that our politiians are banning together to make roads in Illinois safer. We as drivers need to follow the law or I say double-even triple fines and then let’s see how many people are on the phone! GREAT law!

    If drunk drivers continued to drive drunk or drink in the car should we eleminate that law? If people continue to murder should we eleminate that law? Where is common sense?

  42. - Park - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 6:26 pm:

    How ’bout no texting while walking? Downtown Chicago, I have to pass a bunch of people slowing the walk to the office by playing thumbtag. People, get a life….it can wait.

  43. - cynically anonymous - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 8:16 pm:

    It would be nice if we could legislate common sense and courtesy and then this discussion wouldn’t be necessary. But since studies seem to show that using cell phones while driving is comparable to driving drunk, I think they should be banned and the penalties for getting caught on a par with DUI or crossing the tracks when the lights are flashing ($250). Yes it would be inconvenient, and yes, people would still do it, but hopefully it would be a deterrent for more people than not and fewer of us would get rear-ended or nearly sideswiped, or maimed or killed.

  44. - Huh? - Thursday, Sep 30, 10 @ 11:21 pm:

    This would be very easy to enforce by requiring manufacturers to include an application that would deactivate the device if it were going facter than 5 miles per hour.

    The imbedded GPS can be used to determine if the device were exceeding the “speed limit”.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Program reminder
* I am dreading this World Series
* Question of the day
* The Financial Times reports from... Ottawa?
* Caption contest!
* Nope. That was the Russians, not us
* Another Republican touts Green Party vote to help Rauner
* The opposite of transparent
* Tribune attempts Kirk diagnosis
* Wagers made on World Series
* A good question
* Could the SJ-R move the needle for DelGiorno?
* Chicago appears to account for most of state's net voter registration gain since '08
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Dold demanded DCCC ad linking him to Trump be taken off the air
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...






Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

* Intel offering Basis B1 refunds in wake of platform shutdown
* Samsung Galaxy S8 edge specs, Google Pixel water resistance & more – Pocketnow Daily
* A tale of iMessage on Android and of Apple opening source
* First WiGig products certified with 8Gbps potential
* DirecTV Now will be $35 per month for 100 channels
* Google announces cloud-based whiteboard called Jamboard
* AT&T Project Hemisphere used to spy on citizens

* White Sox developing promising OF prospects
* Podcast: 2016 White Sox Outfield Review
* mikecws91's Offseason Plan
* The ten best developments of the 2016 White Sox season
* KenWo4LiFe's off-season plan
* Getz to oversee White Sox Minor Leagues
* Getz to oversee White Sox Minor Leagues


Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0


* Illinois comptroller candidates face off in tel.....
* Rauner, Kasich Place World Series WagerGovernor.....
* Governors place bets over series - Jacksonville.....
* Munger, Mendoza battle over campaign ties, pens.....
* Comptroller candidates claim independence from .....

* Company asks pipeline protesters to leave North Dakota land
* Prosecutors say man dressed as meter reader in man's death
* Central Illinois couple wins $134M lottery jackpot
* U of Illinois will use donation to open analytics center
* Bling and baseball: Cleveland at center of sports storm
* Cleveland Indians get boost from newborn babies in onesies
* Fearing Election Day trouble, some US schools cancel classes
* Aaron Schock agrees to pay $10,000 fine to settle FEC case
* Illinois guard: No bonus repayment issues for soldiers
* Cleveland Indians get boost from newborn babies

* Feds end lease with Illinois for state park, citing neglect
* Statehouse Insider: Tomorrow's a new day; in Illinois, that may not be good
* Cook County lawyer who posed as judge criminally charged
* 1,100 non-union state workers getting $3,016 bonuses
* Springfield veteran honored for volunteer work
* Central Illinois soldier killed in Afghanistan
* Rauner administration awarding more than $3 million in bonuses to non-union workers
* SIU injury-prevention program reinstated through stopgap budget
* Survey: 386 state jobs could relocate to Springfield
* SIU injury-prevention program reinstated through state's stopgap spending plan

* Sponsors go to bat for historic Cubs-Indians World Series matchup
* Trump brand loses luster with affluent
* Live blog: 2016 World Series Game 1—Cubs at Indians
* Will Silver Cross be wooed when longtime CEO departs?

* Dear Abby: Girlfriend talks to exes, keeps me secret
* Georgia Nicols horoscopes for Oct. 26, 2016
* A surreal night of history, Kyle Schwarber and strikeouts
* Trump, GOP look to ‘Obamacare’ report as comeback lifeline
* 6 wounded in South Side shootings Tuesday
* Man tries to lure 9-year-old girl into his car in Austin
* 1 wounded in Longwood Manor shooting
* Munger, Mendoza battle over campaign ties, pensions — and Trump
* Police: Woman hit by stray bullet while driving on South Side
* Boy, 15, shot in Woodlawn

* Trump can't just be defeated. He must be humiliated.
* Bobcat lovers seek hunting permits in bid to thwart Illinois' first cull since '72
* Cubs-Indians, Game 1: A night of firsts
* At least 9 injured during stabbing incident at County Jail
* Corey Kluber helps Indians to 6-0 victory over Cubs in World Series opener
* World Series Game 1: Indians defeat the Cubs 6-0
* Cook County poised to adopt $13 hourly minimum wage affecting suburbs
* Rachel Marsden: Why America should recall the Vietnam War when choosing its next president
* Trump says Obamacare is 'blowing up' after gloomy report
* Amid lagging polls, Trump stops holding high-dollar fundraisers

The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.

* Our Opinion: LaHood endorsed in 18th Congressional District
* Leroy Jordan: Race Riot site must be preserved, taught to students
* E.J. Dionne: Trump is not a GOP aberration
* Michael Gerson: Where the new right has failed
* Esther Cepeda: The anger and resentment stoked by Trump will persist after Election Day
* Our Opinion: Endorsing Bourne, DelGiorno for the Illinois House
* Kathleen Parker: You can dress him up, but Trump is Trump
* Our Opinion: Leslie Munger endorsed for Illinois comptroller
* Feds end lease with Illinois for state park, citing neglect
* Our Opinion: With poor choices, Clinton gets nod for president

* Colona students make Christmas brighter with Giving Trees
* Area prep volleyball leaders (Week of Oct. 24)
* Area prep boys' soccer leaders: Week of Oct. 24
* Tuesday's postseason volleyball roundup
* On campus: Catching up with area standouts
* Athletes of the Week: Oakwood's Bolton, Urbana's Rosenstein
* Tigers see soccer season end
* Girls' cross-country postseason heats up
* Quarterback uncertainty still exists for Illini
* Health improving for Illini

* Rozner: Cubs not down or out after Game 1 defeat
* Imrem: Schwarber prime example of Cubs' family values
* Images: Chicago Cubs fall to Cleveland Indians in Game 1 of the World Series
* Boys soccer: Benet rises to the occasion
* Girls volleyball: Palatine outlasts Barrington in three sets

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* Sheila Simon, Sen. Dick Durbin talk budget......

* Live Thursday: US Senate debate - The Stat......
* Live Thursday: U.S. Senate debate - The St......

* Early voting a perk or scam? Or just a reason for malcontents to complain?
* Government Report Sparks Debate Over U.S. Fuel Economy Standards
* Report: Rauner Has Donated $46 Million In Political Funds To GOP Candidates
* Cartoon Of The Day
* Cartoon of the Day - 10/25/16 Trump toon
* Report Calls For The Closure Of All Youth Prisons
* Cook County Minimum Wage Plan Slated For Committee Hearing
* Midwest Hospitals Team Up For Patient Safety
* Early Voting Begins Monday In Illinois (UPDATED)
* Cook County Committee Advances Minimum Wage Hike Proposal

* Governor’s Children’s Cabinet Makes Lead Poisoning Prevention A Priority - October 23-30, 2016 - National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week
* Illinois EPA Sponsors Interactive Environmental Education Event with Riverton Elementary School - Riverton Third and Fourth Graders “Dive In!” to Celebrate the Environment
* Illinois Department of Veterans’ Affairs Honors Veteran Mr. George Pempek
* Illinois Partners with State of Telangana, India to Strengthen Smart State Initiatives - State to state agreement to accelerate opportunities and service to citizens
* Illinois EPA Announces Vehicle Emissions Testing Network Updates - New Contract to Offer More Efficient, Less Expensive Tests

      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller