SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Take a breath

Monday, Feb 25, 2013

* I told subscribers about this on Friday

, House Speaker Mike Madigan, the Attorney General’s father, announced that next Tuesday, the Illinois House will meet to discuss “gun safety and unlawful use of weapons”. A concealed carry proposal is among the items to be discussed.

* The response by the Illinois State Rifle Association…

MIKE MADIGAN READY TO INSULT YOUR INTELLIGENCE ONCE AGAIN

Mike Madigan is ticked off…

Why is Mike Madigan so ticked off? Quite simply, he’s ticked off because the 7th District Court of Appeals has told him plainly that the legislature must bow to constitutional authority – not to the whims of Mike Madigan. And we all know what a control freak Mike Madigan is.

No, Mike Madigan is no longer in control of the concealed carry debate. The courts have said once and for all that Illinois will join 49 other states in allowing citizens to carry defensive firearms.

The court has really ticked Madigan off…

Mike Madigan is so ticked off that he plans to introduce his own version of a concealed carry bill early next week. Of course, under Madigan’s carry bill, the only people who would be allowed to carry would be… um… nobody.

Although the details of Madigan’s concealed carry bill (HB1155) have not yet been released, those close to Madigan are saying that it will be the most restrictive concealed carry bill in the nation.

One insider termed Madigan’s proposal, “…the closest thing to no-carry at all.”

That’s not what’s gonna happen, as subscribers already know. And this hardline stance portrayed to its own members is not what ISRA is saying elsewhere. For instance

Richard Pearson, the executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association which advocates for gun ownership, said Illinois might be able to keep some restrictions on concealed carry.

“But they have to be reasonable,” Pearson said. “They can’t make it so restrictive that average people can’t do it.”

* Meanwhile, here’s my weekly syndicated newspaper column

Illinois House Democrats were told during a private caucus meeting in Springfield last week that, despite what Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez says, inaction on concealed carry would have serious consequences.

As you most assuredly know, a three-judge panel of the federal appeals court in Chicago gave the General Assembly until June 8 to pass a law allowing some form of carrying a loaded gun in public. The full appeals court upheld that ruling by a 5-4 vote on Friday in an appeal by state Attorney General Lisa Madigan.

After the June 8 deadline, Illinois’ law against carrying a loaded gun will no longer apply. Illinois is the only state in the nation that totally bars concealed or open carry by citizens.

However, an aide to Alvarez told the House Judiciary Committee last week that the federal appeals court’s position means nothing to the state.

Paul Castiglione, a representative of Alvarez, dropped a bomb during a hearing by the committee that was called to discuss concealed carry when he declared that until the U.S. or Illinois Supreme courts rule, the appellate court decision is “not binding” on the state.

“Only the Illinois Supreme Court can declare a statute from this body to be unconstitutional,” Castiglione told the committee members.

He also took aim at warnings by the National Rifle Association that if no new concealed-carry law is put into place before the deadline, then gun owners would be free to carry assault rifles down Michigan Avenue.

Castiglione insisted that his office would continue to enforce the current law.

“Anyone who decides, for example, to walk down Michigan Avenue in Chicago carrying an AK-15 (sic) would be subject to arrest and prosecution,” he said.

But that’s not how the House Democrats’ legal staff sees the world.

At one point during that closed-door Democratic caucus meeting, Rep. Ken Dunkin (D-Chicago) rose to ask whether the staff was saying that if the Legislature does not pass a concealed-carry law, he could legally carry a loaded semi-automatic rifle into the Statehouse after June 8.

“Yes,” he was told.

A stunned silence fell over the caucus meeting, said several House Democrats who attended.

“I think they finally get it now,” one pro-gun House Democrat said of his colleagues.

Some historically anti-gun members talked after the committee meeting about how they need to vote for a concealed-carry bill. So, Dunkin’s question and the answer given appear to have worked.

At least for now, a lot of House members are not willing to kick this particular can down the road.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Jesse White’s office says no way will it allow people to walk into the statehouse with a gun, regardless of what legislators do this spring. They believe state law backs them up, and White controls access to the Capitol, so he should know.

White long has been a gun control proponent. In fact, according to a recent poll by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute, he’s in the mainstream of Illinois thought on this controversial topic.

The survey found that 72 percent of Illinoisans believe that “laws covering the sale of firearms should be made more strict,” while just 2.2 percent said they should be less strict, 21 percent said they should remain the same and 4 percent didn’t know.

The poll also found that 66 percent of downstate voters, 55 percent of conservatives and 55 percent of Republicans favor stricter gun control in Illinois, according to the institute’s poll.

One issue pushed by liberals is banning high-capacity ammunition magazines of more than 10 rounds. The poll found that 63 percent agree that’s desirable while 33 percent oppose the idea.

Its results show that 52 percent of downstaters support the ammo limit (42 percent oppose) as well as 46 percent of conservatives (46 percent against) and 44 percent of Republicans (50 percent oppose). Also, 68 percent of women and 58 percent of men favor such a restriction, according to the poll.

And 49.7 percent of those polled said they believed the Second Amendment does not include the right to carry a concealed weapon in public, while 39.5 percent said it does and 11 percent didn’t know.

Among those downstate, 50 percent said the Second Amendment specifies such a right, while 36 percent said it doesn’t. By party, 68 percent of Democrats say there’s no such constitutional right, while 62 percent of Republicans believe there is, a very significant partisan divide.

Under the federal appeals court rulings, a concealed-carry law has to be passed by lawmakers, but as that poll clearly shows, it ain’t gonna be easy.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


37 Comments
  1. - shore - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 9:51 am:

    It’s not something I’m passionate about, but out of curiosity is the gun issue the one that draws the most vitriol on the blog from commenters?


  2. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 9:55 am:

    The 10th circuit just came down with a ruling of no const right to concealed carry. I would think that would motivate the antigun folks to keep fighting this all the way to the supremes.


  3. - Leave a Light on George - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:03 am:

    We ain’t in the 10th circuit and open carry is just fine with me.


  4. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    We aren’t in the 10th but this seems like we now have a circuit split which makes this ripe for scotus to get involved.


  5. - Fred's Mustache - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    === We ain’t in the 10th circuit ===

    True, but you better believe that the 10th Circuit ruling makes it much more likely that the Supremes take this case to resolve the split among the Circuits.


  6. - Jasper - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:21 am:

    On a semi-related note, one of the pro-gun lobbyists was comparing Gerry McCarthy to Bull O’Connor this weekend.

    The pro-gun people don’t seem to realize that now that they’ve won in the courts, it is time to calm down and get moderates to their side.

    Instead, they are continuing down the same old path. It is disappointing.


  7. - Leave a Light on George - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:22 am:

    I would appreciate a link to the 10th circuit decision but let’s take hisgirlfriday at their word.

    “The 10th circuit just came down with a ruling of no const right to concealed carry.”

    Illinois has NO CARRY so I don’t see how this changes the June deadline issued by the 7th circuit. The Supremes have said that carrying a gun outside the home for defense is constitutional. Concealed carry is a related but separate issue.


  8. - wordslinger - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:23 am:

    I would hope that if conceal-carry is allowed on the rolling sardine cans of rush hour trains and buses — where the only authority is the driver — that it would also be allowed under the wide, protected corridors of The Dome.


  9. - Nieva - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:24 am:

    If you ask people in my small county I would guess conceal carry would be favored by 90 percent or more. Most of the people here will never visit Chicago and really don’t care what kind of gun laws they have there. It really is upsetting to them that they are controlled by a place that can’t get their own house in order. I guess that would be the same for Washington too.


  10. - wordslinger - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:32 am:

    –Most of the people here will never visit Chicago and really don’t care what kind of gun laws they have there.–

    Tell that to the NRA and ISRA. They’re the ones opposed to a regional/home rule compromise.


  11. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:35 am:

    I may be a little slow here on Monday morning, but how does the hypothetical open carry of an assault rifle into the Capitol have anything to do with the concealed carry issue?


  12. - Colossus - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:39 am:

    Nieva - That’s how a whole lot of small counties are, and that’s a perfectly valid stance to start from. It seem that many downstate counties that have a different experience from Chicago aren’t terribly interested in getting to know the reasons why Chicago is interested in a different approach to guns. Here, let’s try an experiment:

    “Most of the people here will never visit downstate and really don’t care what kind of gun laws they have there.”

    The Chicago experience with guns is radically different than the downstate experience with guns. They are both valid points to begin the conversation from, but saying that Chicago’s experience shouldn’t count is a very poor place to start your thinking. They both must be at the table, not just the side that happens to be easy for you to relate to.


  13. - 47th Ward - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:43 am:

    AA,

    If no CC bill is passed by the Court’s deadline, there will be no restrictions on gun possession other than a current FOID. The court ruled that the ban was illegal, and it’s ruling gave Illinois 180 days to replace the ban with a CC law.

    There will be a law. No way we’re going to risk a situation where there is no law governing the carrying of ready to use weapons.


  14. - langhorne - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:47 am:

    havent we seen this play from he-madigan before? a contentious issue is roiling along, and he stakes out a somewhat exaggerated position, and we then nibble our way back towards the center. show folks how bad it can be done, and anything less seems like progress.

    i think the anti gun folks are willing to go along w concealed carry, as long as you have successfully completed the police academy and carry where not more than one other person is assembling. throw in certification of sanity by a panel of experts and review by your local sheriff before sending the app to the state, and you have a pretty good bill.


  15. - hisgirlfriday - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    Leave a light on george: sorry I am typing from a phone so linking is hard. Try tinyurl.com/b4uou8g


  16. - benji - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:52 am:

    >Tell that to the NRA and ISRA.

    Most does not mean all. You tell the NRA and ISRA, and Judge Posner too that we will only be infringing some of the people’s rights, like the majority of the State’s population.


  17. - Cook County Commoner - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 11:01 am:

    Over the weekend I listened to PBS interviews of single, African-American mothers living in Gary. Each owned a firearm (pistol) and I suspect, judging from comments, most carried on the street for self-protection.
    The program was likely produced by Indiana PBS, so it focused on Gary. However, my conversations with workers in my downtown Chicago office indicate a serious and escalating public safety issue in the poorer communities.
    Government cannot limit policing in poor neighborhoods and then deny residents the oppotunity to protect themselves.
    And as the salary and pension costs of unionized public safety personell continues to cause decreased services in many areas, the need for residents to arm themselves continues.
    The state and especially Chicago needs to pass some common sense concealed carry laws. They are not protecting residents, so they must allow residents to protect themselves.


  18. - Kevin Highland - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 11:14 am:

    I think the NRA/ISRA stance of no home rule boils down to the question of; Do inalienable rights change based on what city or county you are located. I would think, most people would agree you have the right to defend yourself regardless of what city you are in.


  19. - Liberty_First - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 11:20 am:

    Cook County Commoner: http://tinyurl.com/adggprg
    Farrakhan told a crowd of more than 7,000 people at the UIC Pavilion that national lawmakers are using Chicago’s violence epidemic to push for stronger gun control laws but said the Second Amendment has nothing to do with the spate of shootings in Chicago.
    “The guns that every one of our young people have, are they legal? No!” Farrakhan said.
    Instead, Farrakhan had a different idea for how to address gun violence. In addition to sending letters to black military leaders, Farrakhan said he planned to contact the city’s gang leaders to recruit gang members to “protect” any land the Nation of Islam might buy in the future.
    “All you gangbangers, we know you love to shoot, but you’re killing yourselves,” Farrakhan said. “All your weapons are illegal and you’re using them like savages.”
    But Farrakhan said gangbangers are “natural soldiers” and could be taught “the science of war” to become protectors of the Nation of Islam’s assets in the future.


  20. - langhorne - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    seriously, though, i think mental health considerations will be a significant skirmish line. it has been unwell individuals who have done the mass shootings and serial killings, so regardless of how they acquired their weapons, ordinary people may be required to divulge personal info, such as any recent diagnoses or certain types of prescriptions.

    with the auditor general finding that only 3 counties submit currently required mental health info, there is also the mental health issue relating to local officials (procedures, not the officials).

    another skirmish line may have to do with home rule. have we had rulings on previous carry bills as to their infringement of home rule? if they do, more votes are needed. if not, home rule units can pile on w more requirements, making a patchwork nightmare.


  21. - Just Observing - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    === Tell that to the NRA and ISRA. They’re the ones opposed to a regional/home rule compromise. ===

    No, it’s not just the NRA and ISRA… as a Chicagoan I too prefer not to have my constitutional rights squashed.


  22. - RNUG - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 12:37 pm:

    Arthur Andersen @ 10:35 am:

    Basically, the 7th said there was a right to carry outside the home. They did not explicitly say whether that right should be exercised via open carry or concealed carry; instead the 7th gave the GA 180 days to figure out what this State wnated to allow. If no new law is passed, both open carry and concealed carry would be allowed under most people’s reading of the 7th.

    Maybe I’m mis-reading things, but it seems to me a lot of people, especially in the north-east corner of the state, are scared of the sight of a gun and don’t want to see people carrying openly if that ended up being “allowed”. Plus there is the issue of accidently “concealing” if you put on a coat or sweater. If you are going to ban open carry, then the alternative is concealed carry.

    So if the GA is going to pass a new Unlawful Use of a Weapon law, it comes down to which gets banned or limited: open or concealed. As Rich noted in the column above, it may be sinking in they have to allow one or the other.


  23. - davidh - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 12:37 pm:

    From the Wall Street Journal’s write up about the 10th Circuit’s decision: “In a decision likely to hearten backers of gun-control measures, a federal appeals court in Denver said Friday that carrying concealed firearms isn’t protected by the Second Amendment.” The rest of the WSJ’s story is here: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323864304578320661793999462.html?mod=googlenews_wsj


  24. - Logic not emotion - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 12:51 pm:

    We have an unusual situation in that it appears both sides are hoping Lisa Madigan appeals the 7th’s decision to SCOTUS.

    I think the antis should look at other states and see if their doomsday scenarios have actually happened. I feel safer in most places in Indiana than I do in most places in Chicago.

    They should also consider that people like Mary Shepard are injured and/or killed as a result of not having access to a firearm before assuming they are on the moral high ground.


  25. - Jasper - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 12:56 pm:

    Logic NE,

    It is sort of hard to just look at other states when you guys are comparing McCarthy to Bull O’Connor. And now the gun lobby is saying that if people are going to vote for Robin Kelly then she’s going to ban soda and tell you what you can have for lunch.

    The moderates hear that sort of stuff and just conclude that the gun owners have gone off the deep end.

    You won. Try to lay low for 180 days.


  26. - Jasper - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 12:58 pm:

    My own reading of the NRA response to the Madigan (alleged) proposal is that the NRA must be convinced that the Madigan proposal passes constitutional muster.

    If not, why does it matter? Posner would just toss it leaving the NRA exactly where it wants to be.


  27. - wordslinger - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 1:11 pm:

    Logic, you talk about others laying out “doomsday scenarios” and claiming “high moral ground” yet I see nary a one.


  28. - Todd - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 1:16 pm:

    We havent seen a madigan proposal. But what we hear about we dont think passes muster. But puts us 2 more behind in litgation


  29. - ArchPundit - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 1:26 pm:

    ===The Supremes have said that carrying a gun outside the home for defense is constitutional

    Where did the Court rule on this? Heller and McDonald only apply to guns in the home. The Supreme Court may rule this way, but it has not yet.


  30. - Iaintcoonsey - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 2:07 pm:

    The 10 district ruling had to do with a non-resident suing to be allowed to carry in CO, not a resident carrying within home state. There is a difference between the 2 cases.


  31. - Anonymous-99 - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 3:10 pm:

    Haven’t read it yet, but this the decision:
    http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/11/11-1149.pdf


  32. - Bigtwich - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 4:43 pm:

    Well, Iaintcoonsey, according to news stories the 10 th said “We conclude that the carrying of concealed firearms is not protected by the Second Amendment”

    Not sure I see a difference.


  33. - Bigtwich - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 4:51 pm:

    Having a split in the circuits also gives a state judge more leeway. Granted courts tend to give more weight to courts in their same area but the Cook County State’s Attorney now has a better argument.


  34. - Leave a Light on George - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 6:19 pm:

    Just so we all know that we all know what were are talking about. From the first few paragraphs of the 10th circuit’s decision.

    “Gray Peterson, a resident of Washington, applied for a concealed handgun license (“CHL”) from the ex officio sheriff of Denver, Colorado. Pursuant to state law, Colorado sheriffs may issue CHLs only to state residents. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-203(1)(a). Peterson’s application was accordingly denied, prompting Peterson to file suit against the Denver sheriff and Colorado’s executive director of the Department of Public Safety. Peterson claims that Colorado’s policy with respect to non-resident CHL applicants violates the Second Amendment, the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV, and several other constitutional provisions.
    The district court concluded that the executive director of the Department of Public Safety is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity because he has no connection to the enforcement of the challenged statute. We agree with that conclusion. Colorado law requires “each sheriff to implement and administer” the CHL licensing scheme. Colo. Rev. Stat. § 18-12-201(3). Because sheriffs are responsible for administering the state’s CHL regime—not the executive director of the Department of Public Safety—
    -3-
    Peterson’s claims against the latter do not fall within the Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), exception to Eleventh Amendment immunity.
    With respect to Peterson’s claims against the Denver sheriff, we conclude that the carrying of concealed firearms is not protected by the Second Amendment or the Privileges and Immunities Clause. In Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897), the Supreme Court stated in dicta that “the right of the people to keep and bear arms is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons.” Id. at 281-82. More recently, in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Court noted that “the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues,” and explained that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions.” Id. at 626. In light of our nation’s extensive practice of restricting citizens’ freedom to carry firearms in a concealed manner, we hold that this activity does not fall within the scope of the Second Amendment’s protections.”


  35. - RNUG - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 8:38 pm:

    Leave a Light on George @ 6:19 pm,

    Doesn’t Colorado allow open carry of a hand gun without a permit?

    Don’t you only need the permit to carry concealed?


  36. - Anonymour - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 9:46 pm:

    Bigtwich, uh, no. A split in the Circuits may make it more likely the U.S. Supreme Court would take the case. But Illinois still has to follow the decision of the 7th Circuit. Illinois lost and has been ordered (or will be within 180 days) to comply with the 7th Circuit’s ruling. Anita Alvarez doesn’t get to choose to disobey a court order.


  37. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Feb 25, 13 @ 10:37 pm:

    Thanks, guys. Get it now.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Poll: Illinois crime victims want less prison spending, more education, rehab and mental health/drug treatment
* Report: White Sox trade Sale
* Could a Kentucky case spur local "right to work" in Illinois?
* A bill so nice, he's signing it twice
* *** UPDATED x2 - Radogno responds - GOMB responds *** Harris wants budget working group reinstated
* There are only two "sides" to pick from
* Because being governor apparently isn't enough work
* Yingling's second inartful Madigan dodge
* It's time to start taking this threat seriously
* "Personal economic coercion" harshly denounced
* Emanuel wants Rauner to publicly side with him on sanctuary cities issue
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

  
* Instagram fine tunes safety and privacy controls
* Apple Seeds Fifth Beta of tvOS 10.1 to Developers
* Holiday Gift Guide 2016: Best for the home
* Deal: Save $100 on the Asus Chromebook Flip, the laptop that turns into a tablet
* U.S. Supreme Court sides with Samsung, nullifies $399 million payment to Apple
* Mophie Launches Juice Pack Air Battery Case With Wireless Charging for iPhone 7 and 7 Plus
* Google Pixel Review: Android at its best, on mixed hardware

* Nationals shopping for big Sale?
* White Sox dismiss concerns about Sale
* White Sox contribute 3 items to Play Ball auction
* Nationals shopping for big Sale?
* For Hahn and White Sox, patience a virtue
* Interest swirls around Sale, but price is high
* Quintana commits to World Baseball Classic

...............


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Loading


* Report: Emanuel Urges Rauner to Support Chicago.....
* Berkowitz goes 1 on 2 with Speaker Madigan/Rep......
* Report: Emanuel Urges Rauner to Support Chicago.....
* Berkowitz: One on One w/ Speaker Madigan on Sat.....
* Berkowitz: One on One w/ Speaker Madigan on Sat.....
* Mendoza sworn in as Illinois comptroller - Sauk.....
* Rauner to sign energy bill in Pt. Byron - OurQu.....
* Long Time Political Observer Doubting Any Long .....


* U of Illinois says no to sanctuary status for immigrants
* Pipeline delays cost builder millions, risking contract loss
* Chicago's Emanuel spoke with Trump about sanctuary cities
* Longtime state Rep. Franks now leading McHenry County Board
* New Cook County prosecutor promises to reshape office
* Arrest made after man on Chicago rail tracks disrupts trains
* Chicago newspaper suing city over Laquan McDonald emails
* Fraternity backs Indiana State chapter probation after death
* Spokesman offers few clues on Trump's pipeline stance
* EXCHANGE: First black woman is Illinois State Police colonel

* Prosecutors: Don't move Aaron Schock trial out of Springfield
* Mendoza on state's financial crisis: 'We're going to get out of this'
* State employee's friends, coworkers rally after stroke
* Labor board formalizes AFSCME ruling; union will fight
* Mendoza sworn in as Illinois comptroller
* Another year of financial uncertainty looms for Illinois
* Lawmakers sue comptroller for not paying them
* Electronic road signs are dark near Effingham due to budget
* State lawmakers vote to spare 2 nuclear plants
* Legislature OKs Exelon subsidy plan, goes to Rauner

* Here's where Illinois hospitals rank in patient safety survey
* Trump jabs Boeing on Air Force One deal
* Thoma Bravo to sell software firm for $2.8 billion
* These rising stars occupy all corners of the tech world
* DRW's Wilson faces industry ban in CFTC showdown


* 70-year-old man charged with DUI after fatal Skyway crash
* Supreme Court upholds broad power to curb insider trading
* White Sox trade Chris Sale to Red Sox for prospects
* Police: Missing woman last seen in September in South Shore
* Injured Jonathan Toews to stay off the ice ‘a few more days’
* Petition asks University of Illinois to be immigrant sanctuary
* Man charged with robbing Hinsdale gas station with Airsoft gun
* Man wearing surgical mask robs Park Ridge store
* Survey: Parents binge on media, say they’re good role models
* Former Fed official Edward W. ‘Mike’ Kelley Jr. dead at 84


* Top cop: 'Chicago is not out of control' - just parts of it are violent
* White Sox on verge of deal to send Chris Sale to Red Sox
* Paisley Park a lonesome kingdom without Prince
* How will Bears impact teams' push for NFC North championship?
* Trump's tough tweet goal: Rattle Boeing
* Parents of tweens, teens spend 9(!) hours a day staring at screens
* Republicans are going to let Trump do whatever he wants
* Older Americans are happiest in Hawaii, least happy in West Virginia: analysis
* Despite tariff talk, companies hesitate to criticize Trump
* Trump says Boeing's contract to build Air Force One should be canceled


The widget AQL4JYGHIY powered by Feed Informer does not exist.


* Prosecutors: Don't move Aaron Schock trial out of Springfield
* Our View: Time to tear down the YWCA building
* Our View: Time to tear down the YWCA building in downtown Springfield
* Kathleen Parker: Trump's demagogic illogic strikes again
* Mendoza on state's financial crisis: 'We're going to get out of this'
* State employee's friends, coworkers rally after stroke
* Labor board formalizes AFSCME ruling; union will fight
* Mendoza sworn in as Illinois comptroller
* Our View: Susana Mendoza, be a voice of reason for the state’s finances
* Lisa Madigan: Illinois needs to protect children from lead exposure


* UI administrators say no to becoming sanctuary campus
* Google hits renewable energy goal
* 12-06-16 Jim Turpin with Champaign County State's Attorney Julia Rietz @jrietz1
* Noon update: Falling temps, Grammy noms, checkpoint reopened at airport
* 12-06-16 Penny for Your Thoughts
* Boil order lifted in Murphysboro
* CityLink general manager Al Stanek to retire at end of year
* Update: Missing elderly Herrin man found in Tennessee
* Sharply colder air on the move
* Warrant issued in Urbana homicide


* Report: White Sox trade Sale to Boston for Moncada, pitcher, 2 others
* Oakland Raiders can end 14-year playoff drought this weekend
* Fremd tries to save alum's life with bone marrow drive
* U of Illinois says no to sanctuary status for immigrants
* Head of IOC inquiry into Russian doping steps down

* House lawmakers overcome hurdle on key tra...
* Rodney Davis talks funding with Bloomingto...
* The agency that fought Illiana gets a new ...
* Rep. Dold takes educational cruise down Ch...
* Lawmakers decry high turnover rate of VA h...
* CBD Oil, and politics
* Simon considering state Senate bid
* Killer Congressman Tom MacArthur trying to...
* Shutdown? State may not notice
* Rep. Bob Dold

* A dream not to be deferred - New York Dail......

* SEIU leaders say planned Monday strike by ......

* Get it in writing? It is in writing. It’s called the pension protection clause of the Illinois Constitution.
* Zombies in Washington (an art project).
* Demolition Equipment Moves In On Maryville
* Exelon bailout passes Illinois House and Senate
* Will Rauner join Emanuel in defying Trump's plan to end sanctuary cities?
* Trump fans celebrate: "It's the most wonderful time in 8 years"
* Rauner to sign Exelon bailout bill Wednesday
* From and Chougule: Right-to-Work Zones in Deep-Blue Illinois?
* Rauner vetoes $215M deal for Chicago Public Schools, citing broken agreement
* Akin: Downstate voters send clear message: Stop lawsuit abuse in Illinois


* Rauner calls on Democratic legislators to withdraw lawsuit seeking paychecks
* Illinois Department of Labor Moves Registrations to Online Format - Another step in the Rauner Administration’s efforts to modernize government
* Illinois Student Assistance Commission Announces 2017-18 Illinois State Scholars - More Than 19,300 high school students recognized for outstanding academic achievement
* Get Your Flu Shot During National Influenza Vaccination Week And Stay Healthy For The Holidays
* Thanksgiving Holiday Travel Brings Lowest Fatality Rate In Six Years




      Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller