SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Cigarette tax revenues skyrocket 150 percent above July 2012

Monday, Aug 5, 2013

* From a June, 2013 report by the generally anti-tax Heartland Institute

Cigarette tax revenue in Illinois is falling far short of the amount projected last year, state officials say.

In May of 2012, state legislators approved a $1-per-pack increase on the price of cigarettes, nearly doubling the state’s tax rate to $1.98 per pack, the 17th-highest state tax rate in the nation. However, the tax delivered only $212 million of the expected $350 million for the fiscal year ended June 30.

Governor Pat Quinn (D) said the cigarette tax increase would help sustain the state’s Medicaid program, as well as the School Infrastructure Fund, while also discouraging smoking. But The Heartland Institute, Illinois Policy Institute and other public policy groups predicted the state would fail to receive the projected increase in tax revenue. They noted the likelihood that consumers would try to avoid the tax by buying cigarettes out of state, where taxes are lower.

* Also from June, we have this from the Illinois Policy Institute

Remember when the state of Illinois said its new $1 cigarette tax would bring in $350 million in additional revenue?

Unless this tax garners an additional $138 million in the next 10 days, these lofty projections are about to crash and burn.

The cigarette tax hike, which took effect a year ago this month, is only on track to bring in $212 million in revenue for the current fiscal year that ends June 30, according to a report from the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability, or COGFA.

* The AP explained the shortfall in June

There’s typically a decline in cigarette sales after a tax increase, as some people stock up before the rate hike, while others use it as a chance to stop smoking.

“This tax was discussed and talked about quite some time before it actually went into effect, so individuals went out and purchased in bulk a bunch of cigarettes, so more of those packs were sold under the lowered tax rate,” said Jim Muschinske, the commission’s revenue manager.

Total cigarette tax revenue for the year is expected to reach almost $788 million, up 37 percent from the previous year. The money from the cigarette tax is used for the state’s general fund, Medicaid program and School Infrastructure Fund.

* Well, the July revenue report from the Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability was released this morning. COGFA reports that cigarette tax revenue last month was up 150 percent over July of 2012. From the report

While cigarette tax posted an $18 million increase, the gain was due to last July’s falloff related to the “stockpiling” effect of that year’s rate increase. This year, cigarette taxes to the general funds returned to statutory levels.

Discuss.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


41 Comments
  1. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 9:37 am:

    Well whether it be a tax or a price increase from a manufacturer of an product, when the price goes up you generally see less of that item purchased. Of course the price has to be significant enough to notice transaction to transaction.

    If you phased it in (9 cents a month over a year) your pack may only be 9 cents more on monday than it was last friday. Do you notice? maybe. But not enough to stop you.

    But adding a buck? people will buy them over the border (think of our metro areas that are within 15-20 minutes of a state line, just buy 2 or 3 packs next time you are there) or they will use them as an excuse to cut back or quit. That is one of the justifications used to increase smoking taxes.


  2. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 9:41 am:

    ===when the price goes up you generally see less of that item purchased.===

    === COGFA reports that cigarette tax revenue last month was up 150 percent over July of 2012. ===


  3. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 9:49 am:

    @ Rich,

    ok so where is the shortfall? If you do not think I making up basic economic premises that as price increases sales of an item reduce then where did the shortfall come from while at the same time posting a 150% increase?

    I mean I expect when they basically doubled the tax and used the over simplified assumption that it would have no effect on sales numbers they should have see a 100% increase. Are we saying that cigarette sales went up after the increase AND yet their projections were they didn’t go up enough…


  4. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 9:53 am:

    ===ok so where is the shortfall? ===

    For crying out loud, read the post.

    Also, the Dept. of Revenue was so concerned about radical tax stamp stockpiling by retailers that it tried to halt the practice but was rebuffed by a court. Retailers and consumers both stockpiled. Those stockpiles ran out. Revenues are back up.


  5. - wordslinger - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:01 am:

    –Well whether it be a tax or a price increase from a manufacturer of an product, when the price goes up you generally see less of that item purchased.–

    Huh? In classic supply and demand, prices rise to meet the demand. The greater the demand, the higher the price you can command.


  6. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:02 am:

    @Rich,

    ok, I did, twice. on one hand there is a shortfall, then you tell me there isnt and I follow to see a bumb in july. I say the shortfall is because of changes in behavior yet you reply to that with how there is a 150% increase… but that is of one month.

    Guess I cant see why we are arguing other than the fact that you didnt like me pointing out that a drastic change in price modifies behavior and tax projections never seem to account for that.


  7. - Downstater - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:02 am:

    Sounds like the legislators should quadruple the tax. Add in more gambling and taxing medical marijuana sales. let’s add in soda tax increase and liquor tax increase. Could solve all the state’s financial problems.


  8. - Cook County Commoner - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:03 am:

    ===when the price goes up you generally see less of that item purchased.===

    I’m not so sure that theory holds for addictive substances. And one year seems to be too short a period to realize predictable tax collections. I’m seeing a few folks selling tobacco products purchased out of state. I suspect the trend to search out such bargains will increase as tobacco consumers experience financial pressures from other areas. And small entrepreneurs will step in to provide more reasonably price product if the demand is there.


  9. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:08 am:

    ===but that is of one month.===

    Again, read the post.

    ===This year, cigarette taxes to the general funds returned to statutory levels.===

    Your ideology is particularly blinding on this one.


  10. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:09 am:

    @Cook county commoner
    Check wisconsin after their $1 dollar a pack increase last time. And checking the studies about increased taxes shows a decrease in usage: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/11/suppl_1/i62.full

    And 30 years of data shown here show that the larger the increase the bigger negative impact (or positive if you are the one that quits) on purchasing of smokes: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.82.1.94


  11. - PublicServant - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:10 am:

    So, COGFA’s revenue estimates look like they’re on target, and Heartland and IPI tell, on a good day, at best, half-truths that continue to rope in the gullible.


  12. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:11 am:

    @Rich,
    please just follow my links. I know you and I do not ideological agree, but I am arguing data and stats since 1955. And even recent shortfalls seen in other neighboring states.


  13. - wordslinger - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:13 am:

    –Guess I cant see why we are arguing other than the fact that you didnt like me pointing out that a drastic change in price modifies behavior and tax projections never seem to account for that.–

    Historically, COGFA’s record on revenue projections is spot-on.


  14. - Jeff Trigg - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:14 am:

    == the tax delivered only $212 million of the expected $350 million for the fiscal year ended June 30.==

    Who made that mistake and why do they still have government jobs? Don’t forget about the federal matching dollars they lost last year also. They projected $700 million in new revenue, but only got $424 million. Only off by $276 million.

    And we’re supposed to be impressed that this July was better than last July? Last July was the lowest month because that was the month the tax hike went into effect and retailers bought their tax stamps in June. So of course this July would be higher, its apples and oranges because of the environment.

    In 2004, total tobacco tax revenues were at $760 million, before the Cook/Chicago tax hikes. In 2006, it went down to $640 million because of those tax hikes. Last year they were $788 million and I bet this year they will be back below $760 million again, following the trend from 2004 to 2006.

    At $1/pack tax in 2004, around 760 million packs were sold. In 2012 at $2/pack tax, roughly 394 million packs were sold. Not exact but close enough. That paints a better picture than a one month “skyrocketing” report.

    All those retailers who lost sales, and their employees are thankful, I’m sure. Retailers mostly just tacked on a few more cents to the milk and bread prices for non-smokers to help make up for the lost cigarette sales, which is just wonderful for poor people.


  15. - 47th Ward - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:19 am:

    Sometimes a tax hike is about something other than generating more revenue. Generally speaking, you tax things you want less of, like say, pollution.

    There are other state benefits to raising cigarette taxes beyond the revenue it would bring in. Savings on Medicaid in 20 years is a really good example.

    Whether hiking cigarette taxes results in less revenue isn’t really the entire point. If it results in fewer smokers, the state still wins.


  16. - Mark Peysakhovich - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:24 am:

    The whole “they’ll go accross the border to buy smokes” theory is a myth. Hardly anyone sustains such behavior. How do I know? Well, most people, including me, will pay a $2 “convenience” fee at a cash machine rather than taking 5 minutes to go to the bank. And most people will stop and buy milk at a “convenience” store while heading home rather than going another mile down the road to buy it $1 or more cheaper at Walmart. It always amazes me when convenience store owners start saying people will go to Indiana to buy cigs. But convenience stores — where everything is generally most expensive — are a living testament that the opposite is true. Sure, people may drive and stock up initially, but it doesn’t last….


  17. - Anon - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:24 am:

    Since the new hikes, I make my own. Use an injector machine that creates perfectly filtered smokes. Looks just like the real ones and tastes better to.

    Tobacco comes from out of state, and I pay the equivalent of $1 a pack.


  18. - RonOglesby - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:25 am:

    @47th

    Sometimes a tax hike is about something other than generating more revenue. Generally speaking, you tax things you want less of, like say, pollution.

    I COMPLETELY AGREE. BUT, when the revenue and volume of that product being sold reduces, we shouldn’t be surprised. If its really about modifying behavior, then its a success, correct?

    I say this as a some time user of smokeless tobacco. I dont use enough for a price to bother me. BUT habitual users we are impacting may reduce consumption and if we believe it does, that also means we KNOW that raising a prices reduces the items usage. if we are really successful at reducing smoking the actual dollars from that revenue stream will be reduced, thus we can’t have it both ways. Success in reducing a bad behavior AND success in meeting revenue predictions unless we predict low and count on a decrease in consumption.


  19. - Fed up - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:26 am:

    Looks like the states revenue estimates were way off for the first year. The first month of year two of the tax increase shows that if the tax level stays the same they will meet the projections.


  20. - Chris - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:31 am:

    Jeebus people. COGFA predicted $350m in annual revenue from the new tax; July-2013 produced $30m in monthly revenue from the new tax (as that line-item is *only* for the ‘new’ tax). 30*12 is pretty darn close to $350, so it appears likely (tho hardly certain) that the FY-14 total will be in the ballpark of the estimate, after a year of phase-in from the gaming of the tax-stamps at the end of FY-12.


  21. - Jeff Trigg - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:36 am:

    ==Savings on Medicaid in 20 years is a really good example.==

    No its not, because it isn’t true. Non-smokers live longer and use more Medicaid services/dollars.

    ==Increasing the federal excise tax on cigarettes by 50 cents per pack eventually would increase Medicare and Social Security spending, because smokers would be healthier and live longer, according to a Congressional Budget Office report released Wednesday,…==


  22. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:36 am:

    Chris, you may eventually learn that some folks will take their ideology over actual facts any day.


  23. - Jeff Trigg - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:50 am:

    Its ideology that says smokers cost us more in Medicaid, Medicare, SS etc. when the facts, as reported by the Congressional Budget Office with help from MIT, prove that is a myth.

    As for using the apples and oranges comparison from last July to this July, let’s see what the facts are in 6 months and a year because using a one month sample is what ideologues do, not serious statisticians.


  24. - 47th Ward - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 10:55 am:

    ===Its ideology that says smokers cost us more in Medicaid, Medicare, SS etc. when the facts, as reported by the Congressional Budget Office with help from MIT, prove that is a myth.===

    Can you please post the link? I can see how smoking produces savings for SS and Medicare because long-time smokers generally die before they earn a lot of benefits. But Medicaid? Really?


  25. - Anonner - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:04 am:

    Now can we PLEASE tax sugary soft drinks?


  26. - langhorne - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:13 am:

    Mark P, nice discussion points, but bootlegging is real, and has an effect. go into bars in central illinois, and if you are trusted, you can place an order for your brand by the carton, at a steep discount. cigs are the only bootleg product that is the same quality, unlike purses, watches, jeans, etc.

    it is self delusional to increase taxes in order to stunt consumption, yet use it as a basis for funding a program expected to increase.


  27. - Steve - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:17 am:

    It appears price elasticity yet to kick in: which will only encourage Illinois politicians to raise cigarette taxes even higher. Pat Quinn: fighter for taxing the working class smoker.


  28. - Anonymous - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:30 am:

    Timing is everything.

    Reminds me of the Chicago Police touting their dramatic improvement of 9-1-1 response times a while back.

    Of course what they did not tell you was that they were comparing the response times to the prior years snow storm where hundreds of cars were stranded on Lake Shore Drive calling in to be rescued.

    What short memory people have…and the laziness to perform fact checking is amazing.

    Nevertheless, they could double the tax again and it would come no-where close to funding the medical care that will be needed to treat these smokers in the near future.

    On a side note. Medical marihuana, what’s the taxes on that going to be?


  29. - Mark Peysakhovich - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:30 am:

    @ langhorne == but bootlegging is real, and has an effect==

    Bootlegging is always a problem (yet is a tiny slice of the entire pie) which is why my comments are about individual consumer behavior. But the public health nanny state loving pinko commies will still take the tax increases.

    As for === self delusional to increase taxes in order to stunt consumption, yet use it as a basis for funding a program expected to increase ===

    Yes, but I’ll take the tax hike on cigs even if the GA spends it on a golden statue to Blago…. Self delusional to smoke, isn’t it?


  30. - ChrisB - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:34 am:

    I still find it odd that we’re both legalizing Marijuana (which I’m for, btw) and taxing the hell out of smoking to get people to stop “for the health benefits.” Just seems like a paradox that doesn’t jive in my head.

    Also, Mark P, head down to the South Burbs (like Chicago Heights or Steger) or the Indiana border (stop by Three Floyds while you’re at it), and check out the number of C-stores named “No Cook County Tax” or something similar. There are a ton of them. Hell, I used to drive to Indiana to fill my gas tank when there was a huge disparity between gas prices in IL and IN. 50 cents on a 40 gallon tank is pretty huge savings. The key is the difference and whether it’s worth your time.


  31. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:40 am:

    === Just seems like a paradox===

    Perhaps because you’re less than well informed.


  32. - A Modest Proposal - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:55 am:

    Mike P.

    “The whole “they’ll go accross the border to buy smokes” theory is a myth. Hardly anyone sustains such behavior. How do I know? ”

    I live in cook county, and I don’t smoke, but cook does have higher gas prices.

    I do a lot of traveling around the state, and in the past 5 years I have not went to a cook county gas station once.

    Yes I travel more than most people, but because of higher prices, cook county has not seen one cent of money that it would have generated from my wallet.

    I do not specifically travel to get gas, but I do get gas when I travel. I imagine Illinois is losing money on those people who get cigarettes when they travel, rather than the people who are traveling to get cigarettes.


  33. - Jeff Trigg - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:56 am:

    47th, you are right, they didn’t study state’s Medicaid. ( CBO cigarette tax - Google) Someone should. Medicare provides for more older people as Medicaid provides for those not yet of age to use Medicare, such as the $1 billion Medicaid spends to cover the cost of child births in IL. It makes sense that if Medicare doesn’t increase, neither will Medicaid because of the age factor. I bet there are states that have had high cigarette taxes for 20 years now. It would be interesting to see if smokers are costing more than the revenues they’ve provided.

    What facts do we know? Smokers provided about $788 million in state tax revenue last year. Plus state MSA money and the Feds take their cut. Did Illinois’ Medicaid spend $788+ million to pay to treat smoking related illnesses last year? I don’t know, but I highly doubt it.

    Then you must ask, how much are overweight and out of shape people costing the state for Medicaid, and why aren’t they being punished like smokers? Social engineering can go to far and have unintended consequences.

    I’d like to see different facts being provided other than statutory levels or 150% increase. How many packs have been sold each month for the past decade? That’ll help explain why July 2012 was a statistical anomaly making it hard to compare to July 2013.


  34. - Rich Miller - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 11:56 am:

    ===I imagine===

    Your imagination is not data.


  35. - ChrisB - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 12:05 pm:

    @Rich - Sounds about right. It’s just not an issue I really care to inform myself about. Never smoked it, but I’m fine with total legalization. Treat all smokers the same. Arresting people for it just seems absurd. I honestly don’t see any problems with weed.


  36. - wishbone - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 12:19 pm:

    “Tobacco comes from out of state, and I pay the equivalent of $1 a pack.”

    Put the savings away for your chemo.


  37. - Mark Peysakhovich - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 12:49 pm:

    To everyone who suggests some people will avoid tax by buying cigs elsewhere:

    Yes, I agree with all of you. Some people will do that. But some people will look at it as a pain in the ______ and try to quit. This is a marginal issue and cannot/should not be used as a pivotal argument against tax hikes. In fact, the more work people have to do to get their cigs, the more likely they are to consider quitting. And that’s the bottom line for my ilk….


  38. - Mark Peysakhovich - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 12:58 pm:

    Footnoted Fact Sheets from a credible source:

    TOBACCO TAX INCREASES ARE A RELIABLE SOURCE
    OF SUBSTANTIAL NEW STATE REVENUE:
    http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0303.pdf

    Other relevant fact sheets here too: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/facts_issues/fact_sheets/policies/tax/us_state_local/


  39. - walkinfool - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 1:29 pm:

    Illinois ranks 17th highest among the states in this tax. Oh, the horror!


  40. - Ghost - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 2:25 pm:

    keep in mind the cigarette sellers bought extraordinary amounts of the old tax stamps before the change. So for months they were selling cigarettes at the higher price, but pocketing the difference because they bought the stamps at the lower rate. So the State Did not earning the extra tax rate until they ran out of the old stamps, even though they charged consumers as if they were under the new stamps.

    http://www.pjstar.com/news/x1225005993/Cigarette-distributors-drop-lawsuit-over-stamp-sales


  41. - Chris - Monday, Aug 5, 13 @ 3:15 pm:

    “you may eventually learn that some folks will take their ideology over actual facts any day”

    Rich–I know. And if I expressed my real thoughts about such folks, you’d probably be forced to ban me, so I’ll refrain.

    But it’s always fun to spell it all out, and then let them *still* argue that Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* Pet shop criminals
* *** LIVE *** Gov. Rauner's Champaign speech
* U of I: No constitutional right to a faculty position
* Today's number: 1 hour
* Why We Need A Strong Civil Justice System: The civil justice system gives everyone a fair chance
* Simon Institute releases study of 2014 campaign
* The little guys are winning
* Chicago testing snub could cost state as much as $1.17 billion
* Poll: Emanuel 42, Garcia 18, Fioretti 10, Wilson 7, Walls 2
* Rauner hires experienced hand as legislative director
* Firing up the Democrats' base
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Samsung rumored to make bloatware optional, downloadable
        * Motorola outs new Moto G with 4G in Brazil
        * Facebook and Twitter battle to be your Super Bowl second screen
        * Get ready for Super Bowl Sunday with these killer apps
        * How to watch the 2015 Super Bowl on your iPhone, iPad and Apple TV
        * Low supply and delay of Nexus 6 caused Google’s Q4 slow growth
        * OnePlus names its ROM OxygenOS, shares details about the software

        * These Categories Help You Remember Which Fruits Have Low Sugar Content
        * The Antidote: Self-Help for People Who Can’t Stand Positive Thinking
        * Convince Your Boss to Give You a Sabbatical by Learning New Skills
        * Review: Toshiba Chromebook 2
        * Indian rape victim sues Uber in US court
        * New LG Flexible OLED Displays Unveiled
        * The Smartest, Richest Companies Can’t Crack Mobile. The Future Belongs to Anyone Who Can

        * Keith Law likes the White Sox (more than PECOTA does, anyway)
        * Which prospects will make the Top 100 cut?
        * White Sox embrace their position as favorites
        * White Sox embrace position as contenders
        * What else is returning with Gordon Beckham?
        * Which prospects will make the Top 100 cut?
        * The unlikely return of Gordon Beckham's unfortunate offseason tradi...

        ...............


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        January 2015
        December 2014
        November 2014
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Illinois medical marijuana delays grow in messy.....
        * AP NewsBreak: Rauner Staff Receiving Higher Pay.....
        * Hundreds expected to attend Ernie Banks visitation..
        * Riopell: Lieutenant governor from Wheaton there.....
        * Transforming Illinois: Bruce Rauner and the Iss.....
        * Our View: Consolidation could get boost from Go.....
        * ANOTHER OPINION: Take a measure..


        * Cellphone providers bringing 4G coverage to Chicago subways
        * Visitation for Ernie Banks to be held in Chicago
        * On Super Bowl Sunday, veggies are most popular food
        * Missouri man gets 4 years in 1993 Tremont burglary
        * Federal prosecutors drop dozens of stash house sting charges
        * APNewsBreak: Top Rauner staff more highly paid than Quinn's
        * Man given 25-year prison sentence for cheating investors
        * Gov. Rauner wants bureaucratic cuts in education, elsewhere
        *
        * Bradley player arrested on misdemeanor charges at strip club

        * Top Rauner staff receiving higher pay than Quinn's
        * Springfield lawmakers want oversight commission to monitor 10th Street rail promises
        * Rauner staff receiving higher pay than Quinn's
        * New DNR director Rosenthal touts experience
        * Rauner wants bureaucratic cuts in education, elsewhere
        * New DNR director touts experience
        * Springfield unemployment falls to 5.6 percent in December
        * Springfield gaming terminal up 46 percent in 2014; revenue hits $1M
        * Springfield gaming terminals up 46 percent in 2014; revenue hits $1M
        * Rauner among nation's top donors in 2014 elections

        * FCB wins Michelob Ultra work
        * If this alum gets angry, get a grip on your paintings
        * McDonald's Easterbrook: Bringing 'fast' back to fast food
        * Rauner staff receiving higher pay than Quinn's
        * Top Rauner staff more highly paid than Quinn's


          * South Chicago Heights fire displaces 24 people
          * 1 hurt after car slams into house on Far South Side
          * 2 Water Department workers rescued from trench
          * Police ask for help in finding 11-year-old boy
          * 2 men wounded in separate shootings
          * 4th person faces murder charges in deadly Indianapolis house explosion
          * 4G wireless coming to CTA subways later this year
          * Garage fire knocks out cable to 4,000 customers on NW Side
          * Cicero orders church closed after 'safety nightmare'
          * Chicago prosecutors quietly drop charges tied to drug stash house stings


          * Rauner Staff Receiving Higher Pay Than Quinn's
          * National Weather Service Latest Snow Projections
          * Rauner Tells U Of I To Cut Bureaucracy
          * Group Says Railroad Threatens To Isolate East Side
          * Proposal Would Ban Conversion Therapy For Minors
          * Speaker Madigan: How Can Illinois Prevent A Sandy Hook?
          * Listen to State Week - January 23, 2015
          * Guzzardi Wants Parents To Be Able To Opt Kids Out Of Testing
          * Art Beat: Hip Hop Battles, Foreign Film & More
          * Meet The New Springfield Area Arts Council Director


          * Our Opinion: Residency not the best gauge of loyalty
          * Cary Collins: Other options for fixing Illinois' pension problems
          * E.J. Dionne: For the Patriots, without apology
          * Esther Cepeda: Paid sick leave is a worthy prescription
          * George Will: Bud Selig's winning legacy
          * Quote of the Day: Friday, Jan. 30, 2015
          * Top Rauner staff receiving higher pay than Quinn's
          * Springfield lawmakers want oversight commission to monitor 10th Street rail promises
          * New DNR director Rosenthal touts experience
          * Rauner wants bureaucratic cuts in education, elsewhere


          * Carbondale schools approach full capacity
          * Snow likely this weekend; how much will we get?
          * I-64 closed by tanker truck crash
          * Westbound I-64 closed by tanker truck crash in O’Fallon
          * Top of the Morning, Jan. 30, 2015
          * Businesses are ready for Polar Bear
          * No injuries reported in RI house fire
          * A super forecast it isn't
          * Upcoming Services (Jan. 30)
          * Seeing red


          * Hoffman Estates chamber hands out annual awards
          * NY firm sends 5,000 Super Bowl pizzas to US troops overseas
          * Author Stephen King visits Florida to support libraries
          * Pakistanis fleeing offensive find new dangers in Afghanistan
          * Meet Ida May Fuller, recipient of 1st Social Security check

          * Shimkus votes to prohibit taxpayer funding...
          * Congressman visits WVC to talk bills, comm...
          * Subcommittee Continues Work Toward Pro-Job...
          * On 42nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade, Shimku...
          * Shimkus Votes for No Taxpayer Funding for ...
          * Shimkus: 'We Need to Get This Monkey Off O...
          * 'More limited' TSCA measure expected in US...
          * Shimkus nominates two from Highland to ser...
          * Illinois congressmen urge NGA to construct...
          * Congressional swearing-in set for Benton o...

          * New Congress stumbles through its first month...
          * Milbank: GOP misjudges Loretta Lynch...
          * Senate chips away the rust during Keystone......
          * Milbank: How the GOP misjudged Loretta Lynch...

          * Iran vote delayed to avoid influencing Isr......
          * Benjamin Netanyahu Stuns Israel Backers by......
          * The 47-Part Keystone XL Vote-a-thon is Now......

          * Diary Of A Lost Pregnancy, Part 6: The Garage Doors Of Fresno
          * Inside Lawrence House
          * It's Back! The Beachwood Super Bowl Halftime Show Prop Bet: Katy Perry Edition
          * The Week In Chicago Rock
          * We’ve moved!
          * In The Lyons Of Fire
          * BGA Backs New State Disclosure Effort
          * Budget Crisis Task Force Examines Illinois’ Debt Woes
          * To Cut Costs, Suburbs Eye Police Dept. Merger
          * State’s High Court Hears IG’s Case


          * IDHS reminds eligible workers to take advantage of free tax help and the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) - More than 30 sites offer free tax services Statewide
          * IEMA, American Lung Association Launch Health House - Radon Excellence Program in Savoy - Two Champaign builders coordinating with Heyworth radon mitigator in program to reduce radon-related lung cancer risks in new homes
          * One Confirmed Case of Measles in Illinois
          * Governor announces latest round of agency appointments
          * Rauner announces “Turnaround Team” - Stellar team to help turn Illinois around




              Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller