SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
“No-party consent” is the law of the land

Thursday, Jun 19, 2014

* When the Illinois Supreme Court struck down the state’s eavesdropping law in March, many rejoiced. The overly harsh felony punishment for recording clearly public conversations and events was clearly being abused by law enforcement to harass individuals who were only attempting to protect themselves.

But with the Court’s action, we’ve gone from a crazily strict “all-party consent” statute to an insane “no-party consent” situation.

Not only can I now secretly record a private conversation with you without your knowledge, I can legally record a conversation between you and someone else without either of you knowing what I’m doing.

In other words, if I had wanted to (and I didn’t… I’m just sayin’) I could’ve recorded secret legislative party caucus meetings during the spring session and there was legally nothing that anybody could’ve done about it. Again, I wouldn’t do such a thing, but I could’ve if I had wanted to.

* I meant to write about that during the last couple weeks of session to spur some action, but it just fell through the cracks, as did the legislation designed to restore some common sense protections into the law. But various disagreements between law enforcement and privacy rights activists and between the House and the Senate killed the bill.

Illinois Public Radio has more

Ed Yohnka, with the Illinois Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, says he wishes the court hadn’t struck down the entire law, but sees this as an opportunity for a clean slate. Yohnka says the ACLU wants…

“The continuation of all-party consent, which people in Illinois have really grown accustomed to, but also a bill that would recognize the evolving and changing dynamics of modern technology,” he said. […]

Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) says truly private conversations ought to still be protected. Raoul is the architect of new legislation to replace the old law.

“Right now we have a gaping hole in terms of our public policy as to how we protect such conversations,” he said. “There’s nothing in state law that protects the invasion of such privacy.”

The measure passed the Senate on the last day of the legislature’s spring session, but did not get a vote in the House. Raoul says he thinks the measure has a good chance of passing during the fall veto session.

I’m not so sure about that. I plan to write more about this for subscribers in the coming days, but there are some very real disagreements between the two chambers over how to proceed. And until those are resolved, we’re gonna continue to have no-party consent in Illinois.

By the way, there are clear constitutional protections which cover law enforcement’s behavior. They don’t have carte blanche, but private citizens do.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


31 Comments
  1. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:18 am:

    This seems to contradict the right to privacy that has been ruled a constitutional right, I believe that’s actually a pretty big deal on a lot of Supreme Court rulings.


  2. - Pat C - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:21 am:

    Why not? Did the guy who recorded Romney saying 49% get prosecuted? I don’t think anyone there consented.


  3. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:26 am:

    The right to privacy protects you against the government, not against someone else. (Other statutes regarding invasion of privacy might protect you, but those aren’t constitutional.)

    “All party” consent may be the ACLU’s goal, but that goes too far. For example, the special ed kid who recorded the abuse he received from an awful teacher would be in violation of all-party consent. A businesswomen who recorded the shake-down from an alderman would be in violation. Maybe the law should focus on how the recordings are used rather than who gave consent.


  4. - OneMan - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    Also does this mean if someone recorded something in the past and wanted to release it now could they without risk of being charged?

    That could be interesting.


  5. - Mason born - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    All party consent seems appropriate between private parties. However Public officials whether police or other should be considered to have given consent anytime they deal with the public.


  6. - Bluefish - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:31 am:

    “This is a great idea…NOT” said Donald Sterling.


  7. - Plutocrat03 - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:38 am:

    Privacy seems like so last century. Droves and droves of people offer up their email streams to faceless corporations who then make billions marketing the data mined from scanning the communications. Many people carry cell phones, (smart or otherwise) which broadcast a wide ranging amount of data about themselves on a minute by minute basis. Most retail locations have some sort of video surveillance.

    Then we have the governmental data streams of security/traffic cameras.

    Seems to me that we have voluntarily given up any sense of privacy some time ago. It ain’t coming back.


  8. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:43 am:

    Interesting and very good that you’re putting some light on this issue - I had no idea. I’m undecided whether it should be two party or one party consent between private parties, but no party consent (me recording a conversation between other people) is riduclous.


  9. - Bring Back Boone's - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:53 am:

    Why can’t the GA write a section in particular for law enforcement and another for private citizens. It seems like the considerations are entirely different for both.


  10. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:56 am:

    don`t say anything in public you would`t say in court keep your words soft and sweet you never know what ones you will eat


  11. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:57 am:

    ===don`t say anything in public you would`t say in court ===

    You’ve completely missed the point. You can’t now say anything in private - in your own home - that you “wouldn’t say in court.”


  12. - Mason born - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    Plutocrat

    Don’t forget the NSA, By their own admission, recording all e-mails, texts, and most phone conversations.

    To me that is one reason why this is such a sticky topic right now.


  13. - Allen Skillicorn - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:16 am:

    Just make sure it’s legal to record elected officials, police, and those in power. IL has significant corruption problems, and the previous unconstitutional law just made things worse.


  14. - wordslinger - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:19 am:

    It’s a brave new world. Anyone with a smart phone can record you anytime, anywhere.

    Keep in mind, too, that the whiz kids can easily track your activity on the Internet and figure out who you are in a New York minute. I’m not talking about he NSA, I’m talking private concerns.

    Act accordingly, lol.


  15. - Just Observing - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:50 am:

    === Why not? Did the guy who recorded Romney saying 49% get prosecuted? I don’t think anyone there consented. ===

    1. That was in a different state… different laws.
    2. I’m guessing that is considered a “public” event even if it was invite-only. One has less expectation of privacy giving a speech in front of 40 people than a one-on-one conversation in, say, an office.


  16. - Just Observing - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:51 am:

    Does this apply to recording of telephone calls to?


  17. - A guy... - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:56 am:

    People are going to have to start blinking in Morse Code. Even then, it’s only a temporary fix.


  18. - Commander Norton - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:03 pm:

    I’m flummoxed by the ACLU’s position on this. It seems like they would be much more concerned by the prospect of public officials violating individual rights with no fear of accountability from a passerby with a cellphone and a YouTube account than by the possibility of private citizens invading each other’s privacy.

    There’s a middle ground - “public” and “private” can be defined in the law, and where the lines get blurry, most judges will “know it when they see it.”

    All party consent makes no sense - especially in a public, large-crowd setting where the voices of many people may be heard distinctly on a recording of a rally or an encounter with law enforcement.


  19. - Pacman - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:12 pm:

    Any new law should include one party consent for law enforcement like all other states and the Feds.


  20. - Chris - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:16 pm:

    Not *quite* the total wild west:

    “This does not mean, however, that recording of communications is now universally permitted in Illinois:

    Recordings may still be subject to the “one-party” consent rule of the Federal wiretap act.
    Communications reaching other states may be subject to the wiretapping laws of the remote state.
    Secret recordings may still support an Illinois common-law claim for intrusion into the privacy of another. See, e.g., Narducci v. Village of Bellwood, 444 F. Supp. 2d 924, 938 (N.D. Ill. 2006).
    Another Illinois statute, not necessarily affected by the decision in the Melongo case, makes it illegal to “videotape, photograph, or film” people without their consent in “a restroom, tanning bed, or tanning salon, locker room, changing room or hotel bedroom.” 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/26-4(a) (scroll down).”

    http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/illinois-recording-law


  21. - wordslinger - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:16 pm:

    –Does this apply to recording of telephone calls to?–

    I think courts have ruled that if you use a wireless device there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, as you’re literally broadcasting the communication.


  22. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:09 pm:

    ==People are going to have to start blinking in Morse Code.==

    Won’t work. The camera’s out there recording you can be used to decipher it. lol


  23. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:27 pm:

    When a statute is ruled unconstitutional, the law returns to the state it was in before the unconstitutional law was passed. I think that means Illinois returns to a one party consent state.


  24. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:31 pm:

    ===I think that means Illinois returns to a one party consent state.===

    Kwame and Nekrtitz both say no party.


  25. - Leave a Light on George - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:35 pm:

    One party consent is the way to go. Almost every other state and the feds allow it. One party consent will still allow for the Donald Sterling’s of the world to be exposed. His mistress is the one party who consented to be recorded in that instance.


  26. - in the know - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 3:03 pm:

    Read the language for yourselves: its HB 4283 SenAm1
    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=09800HB4283sam001&GA=98&SessionId=85&DocTypeId=HB&LegID=78445&DocNum=4283&GAID=12&Session=
    It does differentiate between public and public officials, it gives law enforcement appropriate tools for serious crimes and it requires greater oversight than if the law were not declared unconstitutional. Read the Supreme Court decisions, listen to the oral arguments. The legislative work on this was extensive and thorough. This bill is a perfect example from both sides (the ACLU and the police who both opposed) that the enemy of the good is THEIR perfect.


  27. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 6:13 pm:

    Rep. Nekritz and Sen. Raoul are both great lawyers, but there’s a valid argument that the language reverts by operation of constitutional law. If the Supreme Court struck down the definition of conversation in 14-1, the argument may be different. But the court only invalidated 14-2(a)(1)(A), because the breadth of two party consent interfered with First Amendment rights. In the late 70’s, Public Act 79-1159 added the constitutionally infirm language which turned Illinois from a one party to two party state. Now, I think, we go back.


  28. - charles in charge - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 8:04 pm:

    ==But the court only invalidated 14-2(a)(1)(A), because the breadth of two party consent interfered with First Amendment rights.==

    No, that is just wrong. From the Melongo opinion: “We conclude as we did in Clark, 2014 IL 115776, that the recording provision of the eavesdropping statute (720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(1) (West 2008)), burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to serve a legitimate state interest in protecting conversational privacy. Thus, it does not survive intermediate scrutiny. We hold that the recording provision is unconstitutional on its face because a substantial number of its applications violate the first amendment. . . . Defendant raises an additional claim that is not present in Clark. She argues that what she describes as the “publishing provision” of the statute (720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(3) (West 2008)), is also unconstitutional. The plain language of this provision criminalizes the publication of any recording made on a cellphone or other such device, regardless of consent. This alone would seem to be sufficient to invalidate the provision. . . . We, therefore, find the publishing provision to be overbroad as well.”

    Subparagraphs (a)(1) and (a) (3) were thrown out entirely, on their face. The only thing that survives is (a)(2), a provision prohibiting the manufacture or possession of an “eavesdropping device”–a provision, I might add, that has never been prosecuted even once and serves no earthly purpose.


  29. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 9:40 pm:

    ==The only thing that survives is (a)(2)==

    You make a fair point, (3) is gone, And it makes sense because, if you’re guilty of publishing under (3) you’re probably guilty of eavesdropping under (1). But that doesn’t address whether the law reverts to its previous state and restores one party consent under the previous (1). In any event, I wouldn’t take the chance on being the test ‘no party’ consent case. Although, I’m sure some folks are skittish about using the statute at the moment.


  30. - Lobo y olla - Friday, Jun 20, 14 @ 6:59 am:

    Not only can I now secretly record a private conversation with you without your knowledge, I can legally record a conversation between you and someone else without either of you knowing what I’m doing.

    That conduct would violate federal law.


  31. - Lobo y olla - Friday, Jun 20, 14 @ 7:02 am:

    I think courts have ruled that if you use a wireless device there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, as you’re literally broadcasting the communication.

    That is entirely incorrect, Word. Cell phones are completely protected. A warrant is needed to intercept the content of electronic conversations . Remember Farnham’s chats?


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Yet another stumble
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * TWRP descends on LG G Watch, Samsung Gear Live
        * T-Mobile announces new limited-time family plans: 4 people get 10GB LTE for $100, from July 30
        * Microsoft Is Back To Bashing Apple In Latest Advertisment
        * How to automatically add movies to your Mac media server
        * Sony Xperia Z3 might not be compatible with T-Mo’s 700MHz band after all
        * Samsung officially launches 7-inch Galaxy Tab Q in China
        * Photoshop CC 2014 review: Image editor gets new time-saving features

        * World’s Largest British Classic Car Collection Bought By Jaguar
        * Three Quick Ways to Declutter in 10 Minutes
        * Android 4.4.3 Update Lands On European HTC One M8
        * Real estate convergence? Zillow to buy Trulia for $3.5B
        * Build a Wearable UV Alarm that Reminds You to Apply More Sunscreen
        * Samsung indefinitely delays the release of its first Tizen smartphone
        * Tabs Board Switches Google Chrome Tabs by Voice

        * White Sox Minor League Update: July 27-Aug. 2
        * New draftee Rodon tops White Sox updated Top 20
        * White Sox focused on long-term at Trade Deadline
        * Carroll strong but bullpen falters in finale
        * Parental love common thread among Hall inductees
        * Carroll strong but bullpen falters in finale
        * Class of 2014 takes its place among game's legends


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * New law expands state Holocaust Commission - Th.....
        * Election 2014: Dissecting Pat Quinn's, Bruce Ra.....
        * Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn signs legislation expan.....
        * Fashion Fair head to keynote Howard U fundraise.....
        * Quinn, Rauner plans both leave questions - Sauk.....
        * Frank Thomas inducted in Baseball Hall of Fame;.....
        * More from Brian Ethridge..
        * New law expands Illinois Holocaust Commission..


        * Developmental center closure could take time
        * Police: Chicago men arrested for shooting boy
        * Virus drugmaker fights pediatricians' new advice
        * Police: Indiana mom, girls shot in robbery attempt
        * AAR says air carrier deal means up to 175 jobs
        * Gov. Quinn to live off equivalent of minimum wage
        * Cahokia Mounds excavators make interesting find
        * Police: 1 man charged in Chicago train robbery
        * More Illinois counties could join camera program
        * Police: 1 man charged in Chicago train robbery

        * Quinn: Landfill's PCB approval may be withdrawn
        * New law expands state Holocaust Commission
        * To fight crime, Chicago tries wiping away arrests
        * Quinn, Rauner budget plans debatable
        * Back pay, OT pushes state government’s ‘$100,000 club’ to 7,800
        * Back pay, OT pushes state government's '$100,000 club' to 7,800
        * Quinn signs $1B plan for road repair in Illinois
        * Rauner meets with county GOP
        * Rauner meets with Sangamon County GOP
        * Howlett Building closed Tuesday after small fire

        * Dollar Tree to buy Family Dollar in $8.5 billion deal
        * Another local tax inversion? Hospira in talks for Danone unit
        * Democratic candidate for Illinois Treasurer needs on the job training
        * Tribune Publishing CEO: We're buying newspapers
        * Poor families use 'supervouchers' to rent in city's priciest buildings


        * Man dead, police officer wounded after shooting in Bucktown
        * Man accused of stealing kid’s bike charged with hitting dad
        * 2 teens killed, 2 hurt in crash
        * Horses on parade: Statues to honor fallen police officers, raise money
        * Man charged in Orange Line robbery
        * Los Angeles man arrested in 1992 murder of Skokie teen
        * ‘I have faith and hope,’ Lisa Stebic’s sister says
        * Prosecutor: Shooter knew rival wasn’t in crowd but fired anyway
        * Women at work: Balancing life’s load as electricians
        * Charges pending in CTA robbery


        * Man killed, off-duty officer wounded during struggle in Bucktown
        * Addison mother and daughters shot during Hammond robbery attempt
        * Illinois-based firm overhauls China business in meat safety scandal
        * Hearing today for 2 men charged in shooting of boy, 3
        * 5 injured, including 4 teens, in Loop crash
        * Police: 2 charged in shooting of 3-year-old
        * 5 shot in separate Sunday attacks
        * Public art display of horse statues to honor fallen officers
        * Pedestrian hit by car in Avondale


        * So, when is it Jane Byrne's turn?
        * Seven Months And Two Storms Later, Executive Mansion Gets Mini-Fix
        * State Police Cancels New Trooper Training, Citing Budget
        * Feds' Immigrant Numbers For Illinois May Not Tell Whole Story
        * Listen to State Week - July 25, 2014
        * Inspector General Discloses Political Hiring Investigation
        * Man Robbed By Fake Police On I-55
        * Illinois Sees Growth In Tax Revenue, But It Won't Last Long
        * Business, Labor Leaders Urge Quinn Administration To Finish Fracking Rules
        * Pullman to get an indoor sports facility


        * New law expands state Holocaust Commission
        * Quinn, Rauner budget plans debatable
        * Angie Muhs: Who will be the next First Citizen?
        * Tony Leone: Put the ALPLM under federal control
        * Back pay, OT pushes state government’s ‘$100,000 club’ to 7,800
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Schneider stresses fiscal issues in seeking GOP wins
        * Our Opinion: No harm in Houston changing his mind
        * Statehouse Insider: That’s not a tax hike, is it?
        * Rauner meets with county GOP
        * Rauner event on Saturday moved to Boondock's


        * Daily business briefing: Dollar Tree buying Family Dollar
        * Jim Bohannon 7/28/2014
        * GOP chairs pick Bennett for House run
        * Dill leaves role with FREDCO; Group searches for a new executive director
        * Decatur woman dies in car wreck
        * Cool temperatures in forecast for this week
        * Much cooler Monday, and it stays that way this week
        * UI Ice Arena closure forces teams to prepare elsewhere
        * Cobden woman hurt in wreck
        * Tax law trumps tutorial


        * Inland Real Estate recognized for environmental efforts
        * Meat scare banishes most burgers in Shanghai
        * Dollar Tree buying Family Dollar for $8.5 billion
        * Don't be fooled by the Fed's placid facade
        * China gets Xbox as Microsoft beats rivals to $10 billion market

        * Statement by Rep. Jan Schakowsky on Presid...
        * Atanus disputes email announcing withdrawa...
        * Malkin's news for Dems: It's 'not an inter...
        * Labor Dept., Dems renewing push to hike mi...
        * Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Imwit) Dares To #Li...
        * Illinois Congresswoman Takes on Minimum-Wa...
        * Rep. Jan Schakowsky's minimum-wage menu is...
        * 'It's an adventure'! Michelle Malkin and f...
        * What Does Representative Schakowsky Usuall...
        * Jan Schakowsky tries minimum wage - Politico

        * YouGov finds rosy picture for GOP in Senat......
        * Dem leaders urge minimum wage hike, critic......
        * ATF Efforts Raised in Chicago...
        * ATF Efforts Raised in Chicago...
        * Rand Paul Talks to Black and Democrats Fli......

        * Sen. Rose: Quinn too little, too late to C......
        * Councils bid to electrify Doncaster-Cleeth......
        * Kirk again calls for removal of VA hospita......
        * On ADA anniversary, retiring Harkin promis......
        * Content about Alaska...

        * Chicago’s AUSL alum, “Dr.” Terrence P. Carter isn’t done with New London, Connecticut quite yet.
        * John Dillon. A Bitter Pill: Illinois Supreme Court’s decision and Chicago corporate media.
        * What's red and blue and on a mezzanine? CTA's new Division and LaSalle entrance debuts
        * Former Redflex Employee Testifies At Federal Grand Jury Hearing
        * Did 'Tomahawk Chop' overwhelm White Sox, Chicago moments of glory?
        * Illinois home sales and prices increase in June #IARMarketStats
        * Infographic: Illinois Home Sales and Prices Up This June #IARMarketStats
        * You could win big in the Game On Giveaway!
        * Study reveals the hidden cost of foreclosures in Chicago neighborhoods
        * Morning Minute: Illinois and U.S. housing markets pick up in June


        * Governor Quinn Proclaims “Frank Thomas Day” in Illinois - Honors “The Big Hurt” and the Class of 2014 Hall of Famers
        * Governor Quinn Signs Legislation to Expand the Holocaust and Genocide Commission - Commission Works to Increase Public Awareness Through Educational Programs, Events and Outreach
        * Governor Quinn Breaks Ground on New Pullman Community Center in Chicago - Center will Increase Year-Round Recreational Opportunities for Chicago’s South Side and Create Jobs
        * Governor Quinn Announces Investment for Broadview Park Project - New Development Will Create Jobs and Improve Recreational Facilities
        * Governor Quinn Statement on Unaccompanied Children Crossing the US Border




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller