image
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
“No-party consent” is the law of the land

Thursday, Jun 19, 2014

* When the Illinois Supreme Court struck down the state’s eavesdropping law in March, many rejoiced. The overly harsh felony punishment for recording clearly public conversations and events was clearly being abused by law enforcement to harass individuals who were only attempting to protect themselves.

But with the Court’s action, we’ve gone from a crazily strict “all-party consent” statute to an insane “no-party consent” situation.

Not only can I now secretly record a private conversation with you without your knowledge, I can legally record a conversation between you and someone else without either of you knowing what I’m doing.

In other words, if I had wanted to (and I didn’t… I’m just sayin’) I could’ve recorded secret legislative party caucus meetings during the spring session and there was legally nothing that anybody could’ve done about it. Again, I wouldn’t do such a thing, but I could’ve if I had wanted to.

* I meant to write about that during the last couple weeks of session to spur some action, but it just fell through the cracks, as did the legislation designed to restore some common sense protections into the law. But various disagreements between law enforcement and privacy rights activists and between the House and the Senate killed the bill.

Illinois Public Radio has more

Ed Yohnka, with the Illinois Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, says he wishes the court hadn’t struck down the entire law, but sees this as an opportunity for a clean slate. Yohnka says the ACLU wants…

“The continuation of all-party consent, which people in Illinois have really grown accustomed to, but also a bill that would recognize the evolving and changing dynamics of modern technology,” he said. […]

Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago) says truly private conversations ought to still be protected. Raoul is the architect of new legislation to replace the old law.

“Right now we have a gaping hole in terms of our public policy as to how we protect such conversations,” he said. “There’s nothing in state law that protects the invasion of such privacy.”

The measure passed the Senate on the last day of the legislature’s spring session, but did not get a vote in the House. Raoul says he thinks the measure has a good chance of passing during the fall veto session.

I’m not so sure about that. I plan to write more about this for subscribers in the coming days, but there are some very real disagreements between the two chambers over how to proceed. And until those are resolved, we’re gonna continue to have no-party consent in Illinois.

By the way, there are clear constitutional protections which cover law enforcement’s behavior. They don’t have carte blanche, but private citizens do.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


31 Comments
  1. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:18 am:

    This seems to contradict the right to privacy that has been ruled a constitutional right, I believe that’s actually a pretty big deal on a lot of Supreme Court rulings.


  2. - Pat C - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:21 am:

    Why not? Did the guy who recorded Romney saying 49% get prosecuted? I don’t think anyone there consented.


  3. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:26 am:

    The right to privacy protects you against the government, not against someone else. (Other statutes regarding invasion of privacy might protect you, but those aren’t constitutional.)

    “All party” consent may be the ACLU’s goal, but that goes too far. For example, the special ed kid who recorded the abuse he received from an awful teacher would be in violation of all-party consent. A businesswomen who recorded the shake-down from an alderman would be in violation. Maybe the law should focus on how the recordings are used rather than who gave consent.


  4. - OneMan - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    Also does this mean if someone recorded something in the past and wanted to release it now could they without risk of being charged?

    That could be interesting.


  5. - Mason born - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:30 am:

    All party consent seems appropriate between private parties. However Public officials whether police or other should be considered to have given consent anytime they deal with the public.


  6. - Bluefish - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:31 am:

    “This is a great idea…NOT” said Donald Sterling.


  7. - Plutocrat03 - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:38 am:

    Privacy seems like so last century. Droves and droves of people offer up their email streams to faceless corporations who then make billions marketing the data mined from scanning the communications. Many people carry cell phones, (smart or otherwise) which broadcast a wide ranging amount of data about themselves on a minute by minute basis. Most retail locations have some sort of video surveillance.

    Then we have the governmental data streams of security/traffic cameras.

    Seems to me that we have voluntarily given up any sense of privacy some time ago. It ain’t coming back.


  8. - lake county democrat - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:43 am:

    Interesting and very good that you’re putting some light on this issue - I had no idea. I’m undecided whether it should be two party or one party consent between private parties, but no party consent (me recording a conversation between other people) is riduclous.


  9. - Bring Back Boone's - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:53 am:

    Why can’t the GA write a section in particular for law enforcement and another for private citizens. It seems like the considerations are entirely different for both.


  10. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:56 am:

    don`t say anything in public you would`t say in court keep your words soft and sweet you never know what ones you will eat


  11. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 10:57 am:

    ===don`t say anything in public you would`t say in court ===

    You’ve completely missed the point. You can’t now say anything in private - in your own home - that you “wouldn’t say in court.”


  12. - Mason born - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:02 am:

    Plutocrat

    Don’t forget the NSA, By their own admission, recording all e-mails, texts, and most phone conversations.

    To me that is one reason why this is such a sticky topic right now.


  13. - Allen Skillicorn - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:16 am:

    Just make sure it’s legal to record elected officials, police, and those in power. IL has significant corruption problems, and the previous unconstitutional law just made things worse.


  14. - wordslinger - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:19 am:

    It’s a brave new world. Anyone with a smart phone can record you anytime, anywhere.

    Keep in mind, too, that the whiz kids can easily track your activity on the Internet and figure out who you are in a New York minute. I’m not talking about he NSA, I’m talking private concerns.

    Act accordingly, lol.


  15. - Just Observing - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:50 am:

    === Why not? Did the guy who recorded Romney saying 49% get prosecuted? I don’t think anyone there consented. ===

    1. That was in a different state… different laws.
    2. I’m guessing that is considered a “public” event even if it was invite-only. One has less expectation of privacy giving a speech in front of 40 people than a one-on-one conversation in, say, an office.


  16. - Just Observing - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:51 am:

    Does this apply to recording of telephone calls to?


  17. - A guy... - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 11:56 am:

    People are going to have to start blinking in Morse Code. Even then, it’s only a temporary fix.


  18. - Commander Norton - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:03 pm:

    I’m flummoxed by the ACLU’s position on this. It seems like they would be much more concerned by the prospect of public officials violating individual rights with no fear of accountability from a passerby with a cellphone and a YouTube account than by the possibility of private citizens invading each other’s privacy.

    There’s a middle ground - “public” and “private” can be defined in the law, and where the lines get blurry, most judges will “know it when they see it.”

    All party consent makes no sense - especially in a public, large-crowd setting where the voices of many people may be heard distinctly on a recording of a rally or an encounter with law enforcement.


  19. - Pacman - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:12 pm:

    Any new law should include one party consent for law enforcement like all other states and the Feds.


  20. - Chris - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:16 pm:

    Not *quite* the total wild west:

    “This does not mean, however, that recording of communications is now universally permitted in Illinois:

    Recordings may still be subject to the “one-party” consent rule of the Federal wiretap act.
    Communications reaching other states may be subject to the wiretapping laws of the remote state.
    Secret recordings may still support an Illinois common-law claim for intrusion into the privacy of another. See, e.g., Narducci v. Village of Bellwood, 444 F. Supp. 2d 924, 938 (N.D. Ill. 2006).
    Another Illinois statute, not necessarily affected by the decision in the Melongo case, makes it illegal to “videotape, photograph, or film” people without their consent in “a restroom, tanning bed, or tanning salon, locker room, changing room or hotel bedroom.” 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/26-4(a) (scroll down).”

    http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/illinois-recording-law


  21. - wordslinger - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 12:16 pm:

    –Does this apply to recording of telephone calls to?–

    I think courts have ruled that if you use a wireless device there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, as you’re literally broadcasting the communication.


  22. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:09 pm:

    ==People are going to have to start blinking in Morse Code.==

    Won’t work. The camera’s out there recording you can be used to decipher it. lol


  23. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:27 pm:

    When a statute is ruled unconstitutional, the law returns to the state it was in before the unconstitutional law was passed. I think that means Illinois returns to a one party consent state.


  24. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:31 pm:

    ===I think that means Illinois returns to a one party consent state.===

    Kwame and Nekrtitz both say no party.


  25. - Leave a Light on George - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 2:35 pm:

    One party consent is the way to go. Almost every other state and the feds allow it. One party consent will still allow for the Donald Sterling’s of the world to be exposed. His mistress is the one party who consented to be recorded in that instance.


  26. - in the know - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 3:03 pm:

    Read the language for yourselves: its HB 4283 SenAm1
    http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=09800HB4283sam001&GA=98&SessionId=85&DocTypeId=HB&LegID=78445&DocNum=4283&GAID=12&Session=
    It does differentiate between public and public officials, it gives law enforcement appropriate tools for serious crimes and it requires greater oversight than if the law were not declared unconstitutional. Read the Supreme Court decisions, listen to the oral arguments. The legislative work on this was extensive and thorough. This bill is a perfect example from both sides (the ACLU and the police who both opposed) that the enemy of the good is THEIR perfect.


  27. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 6:13 pm:

    Rep. Nekritz and Sen. Raoul are both great lawyers, but there’s a valid argument that the language reverts by operation of constitutional law. If the Supreme Court struck down the definition of conversation in 14-1, the argument may be different. But the court only invalidated 14-2(a)(1)(A), because the breadth of two party consent interfered with First Amendment rights. In the late 70’s, Public Act 79-1159 added the constitutionally infirm language which turned Illinois from a one party to two party state. Now, I think, we go back.


  28. - charles in charge - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 8:04 pm:

    ==But the court only invalidated 14-2(a)(1)(A), because the breadth of two party consent interfered with First Amendment rights.==

    No, that is just wrong. From the Melongo opinion: “We conclude as we did in Clark, 2014 IL 115776, that the recording provision of the eavesdropping statute (720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(1) (West 2008)), burdens substantially more speech than is necessary to serve a legitimate state interest in protecting conversational privacy. Thus, it does not survive intermediate scrutiny. We hold that the recording provision is unconstitutional on its face because a substantial number of its applications violate the first amendment. . . . Defendant raises an additional claim that is not present in Clark. She argues that what she describes as the “publishing provision” of the statute (720 ILCS 5/14-2(a)(3) (West 2008)), is also unconstitutional. The plain language of this provision criminalizes the publication of any recording made on a cellphone or other such device, regardless of consent. This alone would seem to be sufficient to invalidate the provision. . . . We, therefore, find the publishing provision to be overbroad as well.”

    Subparagraphs (a)(1) and (a) (3) were thrown out entirely, on their face. The only thing that survives is (a)(2), a provision prohibiting the manufacture or possession of an “eavesdropping device”–a provision, I might add, that has never been prosecuted even once and serves no earthly purpose.


  29. - archibald - Thursday, Jun 19, 14 @ 9:40 pm:

    ==The only thing that survives is (a)(2)==

    You make a fair point, (3) is gone, And it makes sense because, if you’re guilty of publishing under (3) you’re probably guilty of eavesdropping under (1). But that doesn’t address whether the law reverts to its previous state and restores one party consent under the previous (1). In any event, I wouldn’t take the chance on being the test ‘no party’ consent case. Although, I’m sure some folks are skittish about using the statute at the moment.


  30. - Lobo y olla - Friday, Jun 20, 14 @ 6:59 am:

    Not only can I now secretly record a private conversation with you without your knowledge, I can legally record a conversation between you and someone else without either of you knowing what I’m doing.

    That conduct would violate federal law.


  31. - Lobo y olla - Friday, Jun 20, 14 @ 7:02 am:

    I think courts have ruled that if you use a wireless device there is no reasonable expectation of privacy, as you’re literally broadcasting the communication.

    That is entirely incorrect, Word. Cell phones are completely protected. A warrant is needed to intercept the content of electronic conversations . Remember Farnham’s chats?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Caption contest!
* *** LIVE *** Session coverage
* Prison contract work rules hit
* Question of the day
* Muttering, resignation follow new appointment
* Today's quotables: Rauner vs. Madigan
* *** UPDATED x1 - NWMC didn't advance *** Makanda: Oops!
* Rate Exelon's new TV and radio ads
* *** UPDATED x2 - Fritchey: More needs to be done *** Alvarez to divert low-level drug crimes
* $1.6 billion versus (at least) $2.2 billion
* Rauner is not a news junkie
* Rauner opens new campaign front in pursuit of grand bargain
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition, fundraiser list and more
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * LG showcases the Watch Urbane in beautiful time lapse video of Barcelona
        * LG G4 free toys, Nokia smartphones, Android Wear update & more – Pocketnow Daily
        * Humble Bundle teams up with Tin Man Games for latest mobile bundle
        * Samsung launches “Next is Now” campaign for Galaxy S6, S6 edge
        * Google+ brings changes, Material Design to Communities pages
        * More OPPO R7 leaked pictures, bezel-less display is gorgeous
        * LG G4 leaks, Huawei P8, Nokia Alcatel | Pocketnow Weekly 144

        * To Make Breast and Ovarian Cancer Tests More Affordable, Color Genomics Raises $15M
        * Capture All Of Your Adventures With This WiFi-Enabled Full HD Action Camera
        * Oppo Outs Another Entry-Level Android 4.4 Smartphone For $111
        * Native Union Unveils iPhone Case Made From Marble
        * Disney Research Finds A Way To Make Dubbing More Believable
        * The problem with using Facebook to fight crime
        * Initial Apple Watch Production Speculated To Be Built-To-Order

        * Four-run ninth rescues White Sox in opener
        * Petricka back in the mix for reshuffled bullpen
        * Focus for Hahn, Ventura remains in dugout
        * Rodon to get feet wet in 'pen before moving to rotation
        * White Sox Minor League Update: April 19-25
        * Rodon's future lies in White Sox rotation
        * White Sox try to rebound vs. Tribe behind Danks

        ...............


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        April 2015
        March 2015
        February 2015
        January 2015
        December 2014
        November 2014
        October 2014
        September 2014
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Miller: Gov. Bruce Rauner has big bucks behind .....
        * GOP’s Darin LaHood favored in race to replace S.....
        * Rauner opens new campaign front in pursuit of g.....
        * Rauner's dangerous talk of Chicago schools bank.....
        * Divided Rockford City Council endorses Rauner '.....
        * Rock Valley College's Citizenship program could.....
        * GOP's Darin LaHood favored in race to replace S.....
        * New IDOC director says union contracts causing .....
        * Racoons running rampant in Aledo..
        * Rockford City Council Talks Rauner Turnaround A.....


        * GOP's Darin LaHood favored in race to replace Schock
        * Trucker gets three-year sentence in fatal Tollway crash
        * Former Chicago Bears linebacker Doug Buffone dead at 70
        * Chicago police officer cleared in woman's shooting death
        * Madison man pleads guilty in fatal hit-and-run of teen
        * Chicago police officer cleared in woman's shooting death
        * Interim Chicago schools chief calls for independent audit
        * GOP's LaHood remains front-runner in race to replace Schock
        * Low-level drug offenders in Chicago to be treated not jailed
        * Autopsy set after man's body found in vehicle in Rock River

        * Davis: Improvement needed in Springfield VA clinic wait times
        * New IDOC director says union contracts causing problems
        * GOP's LaHood remains front-runner in race to replace Schock
        * Illinois House votes to limit specialty license plates
        * Senate Democratic leadership shuffle bruises Schumer-Durbin friendship
        * Hopes dim for school funding formula overhaul's passage
        * State education board member quits over superintendent hire
        * Statehouse Insider: We're getting to the bottom of this
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Bruce Rauner is no Jim Thompson on labor issue
        * Madigan forms committee to review Rauner budget activities

        * Caterpillar hikes CEO pay to $17.1 million
        * Tribune Media pays up for top execs
        * U of C Medical Center nurses prepare to strike next week
        * Mayer Brown picks new partner to lead Chicago office
        * Kraft Mac & Cheese shedding the dyes


          * Alvarez proposes steering minor drug offenders to treatment
          * Protesters gather after officer's acquittal in fatal shooting
          * Judge acquits Chicago cop in fatal off-duty shooting, sparking anger
          * Lawsuit over naked crime scene photos headed for trial
          * Police: Man shot in back dies, 2nd man injured in separate shooting
          * Trucker gets three years in prison for fatal I-88 crash
          * Judge says Berrios doesn't have to pay $10,000 ethics fine
          * Retired bishop recounts Cardinal George's final moments
          * 5th Schock staffer says he's been subpoenaed
          * Three charged in connection with Zion shooting


          * Emergency room visits for mental health skyrocket in Chicago
          * Rauner's first 100 days: The fight between unions and Rauner
          * New Illinois education chief is urban school reform leader
          * Emanuel tells Spike Lee he doesn't like name 'Chiraq' for film
          * Chicago police officer cleared in woman's shooting death
          * Portage Park church mourns 'favorite son' Cardinal George
          * CPS Board president says Chicago schools under investigation
          * Cook County prosecutor to try new approach to drug crimes
          * Cardinal Francis George helped 'make his people holy'
          * Remembering Chicago's Cardinal Francis George


          * Davis: Improvement needed in Springfield VA clinic wait times
          * Our Opinion: Springfield still struggles to be tourist friendly
          * Kathleen Parker: 2016: The woman trap
          * Quote of the Day: Tuesday, April 21, 2015
          * New IDOC director says union contracts causing problems
          * GOP's LaHood remains front-runner in race to replace Schock
          * Illinois House votes to limit specialty license plates
          * Senate Democratic leadership shuffle bruises Schumer-Durbin friendship
          * Matt Dietrich: The dizzying agenda of Bruce Rauner
          * Hopes dim for school funding formula overhaul's passage


          * Griggsville-Perry takes two against Pittsfield
          * Carrollton downs Lady Tigers
          * Local Scoreboard
          * PBL girls' basketball nets new coach
          * Monday's highlights: Fisher dominates on the diamond
          * Kroner: For Litchfield, waiting pays off
          * Area statistics: Boys' tennis (April 21)
          * UI roundup: Softball's Thomas wins two awards
          * Former Illini racing past her competition
          * Students lead sexual assault awareness efforts


          * Imrem: Bulls stand their ground vs. battling Bucks
          * 'Sad day for Bears Nation' as former Bears captain Doug Buffone dies
          * Butler, Bulls battle their way to 2-0 series lead
          * Wheaton North savors victory against Naperville Central
          * 3 years for truck driver in fatal I-88 crash; trooper ‘insulted' by apology

          * Bost Checks Out Traffic Safety Days
          * Davis: Improvement needed in Springfield V...
          * Transit representatives, state politicians...
          * Congressional Candidates Are Fundraising L...
          * Simple answers to complex issues?
          * Lawmakers urge Congress to 'man up' on tra...
          * Surprise! Couple's 'secret' twin birth rev...
          * Durbin: New mission needed for Springfield...
          * Students stress importance of 4-H to Congress
          * FD: Family dog dies in 'suspicious' fire i...

          * ROBINSON: Confirm Loretta Lynch now...
          * Sharpton: GOP Opposes Loretta Lynch To ‘Se......
          * Corinthian Colleges' Long And Winding Road......

          * Republicans Want to Add Jailed Reporter to......
          * US senators condemn reported charges of es......
          * Kirk, Rubio condemn reported charges again......
          * Procedural mastermind Harry Reid has a plo......

          * Track Demolition To Close Wilson For A Week
          * Pensacola Place Sells For $66 Million
          * The Weekend In Chicago Rock
          * CPS CEO Bryd-Bennett Taking Leave Of Absence During Federal Probe (UPDATED)
          * Report: 2014 Wall Street Bonuses Were Double The Earnings Of 1 Million Low-Wage Workers
          * Report Finds Illinois Emergency Responders May Be Unaware Of Chemical Dangers
          * Interim CPS CEO Wants Independent Audit
          * Parking 101: How To Keep Tow Trucks From Towing Your Car
          * Mayor’s Motorcade Caught Blowing Through Red Lights…Again
          * Report: Illinois Black Unemployment Rate Expected To Fall In 2015, But Still At 'Crisis Level'


          * Illinoisans Receive Governor’s Volunteer Service Award - 6thAnnual Awards Ceremony to be Held on April 20thin Springfield
          * Get Smart About College Planning During Money Smart Week® - College Illinois!® 529 Prepaid Tuition Program offers tips to plan for--and afford--the cost of college
          * Motorcycle Season Revs Up, Riders Urged to “Gear Up-Ride Smart” - New Campaign Touts Staying Safe Through Proper Gear, Education
          * IDOT’s Operation Teen Safe Driving Program Announces 2014-15 Winning Schools - Innovative Program Helps Save Lives, Promotes Safe Driving Habits
          * State of Illinois Takes Action on Medical Cannabis Dispensary Applicants





              Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller