Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » New budget has a surprise for local governments
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
New budget has a surprise for local governments

Tuesday, Aug 22, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* WVIK

While finally having a state budget for Illinois is good news, there’s a cost for local governments and residents. The new budget includes a sales tax collection fee of 2 per cent, meaning the state will keep some of the revenue generated by local sales taxes.

The official reason for the sales tax collection fee is to pay the state’s administrative cost - of collecting the money and remitting it to local governments. Unofficially it’ll help Illinois make up for its huge past due bills and big budget deficits.

Kathy Carr, Finance Director for Moline, says the new fee will cost her city 172,000 dollars a year - Moline has been using sales tax revenue for the general fund and for road construction and repairs. […]

East Moline will lose about 9,000 dollars per year according to Finance Director Megan Petersen - her city also uses this money for street maintenance and repairs.

* That’s mostly true, but not 100 percent. There’s also this problem. From the Illinois Department of Revenue

In accordance with current statute, the Illinois Department of Revenue is required to provide an estimated entitlement* of the amount of Personal Property Replacement Taxes for Fiscal Year 2018.

The FY18 replacement tax allocations are estimated at $1,117 million. This is a decline of 23.84% from FY17 replacement tax allocations that totaled $1,467 million.

Replacement tax allocations are estimated to be lower for several reasons:

    * Replacement tax revenues are expected to decrease by approximately 2% due to weak domestic profits suppressing replacement tax receipts.

    * The reconciliation of the tax year 2015 and 2016 returns involved with the tax calculation split was completed last year which resulted in additional monies of $235.6 million being deposited into the PPRT fund during FY-17. The income tax/replacement tax deposit percentages have been adjusted for FY-18, therefore no additional monies have been built into this estimate for FY-18.

    * The statutory refund fund transfer to the PPRT fund is $10.1 million because more replacement tax refunds were paid in FY-17, whereas last year’s transfer amount was $63 million.

    * The business income tax refund fund percentage has increased from 17.25% in FY17 to 17.5% in FY18.

    * Public Act 100-0021 authorized $297 million in expenditures out of the PPRT fund for FY-18.

The PPRT distribution will fall by $350 million , and $297 million of that is due to the state’s new sales tax collection “fee.” So, about 85 percent of the reduction is due to the new fee. ADDING: Too much road traveling last night and not enough coffee this morning. These are two different things. Sorry. The point is, locals are gonna be up in arms.

I would expect this story to grow as more and more local governments discover what’s going on. You can click here for the full list of governments and what they’re getting.

       

20 Comments
  1. - allknowingmasterofracoondom - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:21 am:

    Everyone is responsible for the fiscal mess of the State of Illinois - everyone. Therefore we won’t get out of the mess without everyone bleeding a bit. Local’s will scream and yell, but the party is over and someone has to pay the tab.


  2. - Smalls - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:22 am:

    I am having trouble following the trail on this one. “* Public Act 100-0021 authorized $297 million in expenditures out of the PPRT fund for FY-18.

    The PPRT distribution will fall by $350 million, and $297 million of that is due to the state’s new sales tax collection “fee.” So, about 85 percent of the reduction is due to the new fee.”

    How is the $297 million out of PPRT related to the new sales tax fee? PPRT has nothing to do with sales tax, it is corporate income tax. So if money is being transferred out of there, isn’t it just corporate income tax being transferred out? Just trying to understand where the new 2% collection fee fits into this.


  3. - blue dog dem - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:26 am:

    Haven’t we all come to the agreement that the entire state was going to have to suffer a wee bit? I think there should have been a larger cut to LGDF as well.


  4. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:28 am:

    Smalls, you may be right. Hmm.


  5. - Don Gerard - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:29 am:

    Hey, SOMEone needs to pay on that $2M a day in fees for unpaid backlogged bills, amirite?


  6. - Smalls - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:33 am:

    There is no question that there is a reduction of the PPRT going to local governments. I am just not sure that the 2% collection fee has anything to do with it. I believe that is an entirely separate reduction for local governments.


  7. - Anon221 - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:42 am:

    Looks like this is another way the school districts will get hit. For instance:

    ARTHUR CUSD 305
    2018 estimated $296,908
    2017 payments $389,837.12

    Estimated Reduction of $92,919.12

    Any of this figured into Rauner’s AV or SB1?


  8. - Ducky LaMoore - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:47 am:

    ===I think there should have been a larger cut to LGDF as well.===

    Well golly gee willickers, imagine that, you and the Governor agree. I believe he actually wanted to end LGDF though.


  9. - Jake From Elwood - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:48 am:

    The allocations are $1.117 Billion from PPRT.
    The $297 million is what was the State transfers from the PPRT annually. This has been ongoing for several years for pensions, regional superintendents of schools, and higher education, and the amount is spiking.


  10. - blue dog dem - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:53 am:

    Ducky. Just offering my take. A 20% reduction would be painful to many. I get it. But getting back to the age old argument of raising taxes or spending cuts. I like(not really but conceded) a blend of both.


  11. - Philo - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 11:05 am:

    This post is completely confused. PPRT has nothing to do with the 2% sales tax fee. PPRT is based on corporate income and is supposed to compensate local govs for money lost when the State abolished local personal property taxes.


  12. - Annonin' - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 11:09 am:

    This story is really nearly 2 months old….if the local govt guys try readin’ the bills they might have been aware. Guesssin’ GovJunk failed to make a call askin’ for help on his veto.


  13. - Philo - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 11:18 am:

    The Illinois Municipal League has been on this 2% fee issue for months. They say it will cost local govs collectively about $60 million a year.


  14. - Shemp - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 11:33 am:

    “Haircuts” at the local level would be easier to take if local governments had some latitude, but so much of what drives local expenses are derived from mandates and state legislation.


  15. - illini97 - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 12:12 pm:

    — blue dog dem - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 10:53 am:

    Ducky. Just offering my take. A 20% reduction would be painful to many. I get it. But getting back to the age old argument of raising taxes or spending cuts. I like(not really but conceded) a blend of both. —

    My hometown has reduced spending over the last several years and is running lean. Why should we take a hit for State mismanagement?

    I thought the Governor was in favor of local control.


  16. - Bobby Hill - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 12:27 pm:

    Will 2% be taken from the collection of county school facility sales tax as well?


  17. - blue dog dem - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 12:27 pm:

    Illini97. My hometown(and yours) just had its income taxes raised to allow the LGDF kickback. I had no local control over that. Just gotta find the right blend.


  18. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 12:37 pm:

    I’ll bet a $1 that the lobbyists at the Illinois Minicipal League were aware of the chargeback and agreed not to oppose it.

    98% of Something > 100% of Nothing


  19. - Kirk Dillard - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 4:29 pm:

    The 2% collection fee also amounts to $24 million for the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). Springfield rakes in that cash from taxpayers in the collar counties and it impacts the over 2 million daily workers and students who rely on the CTA, Metra and Pace to get to work and schools. The new state budget reduced other mass transit sales tax monies, funds for transporting people with disabilities as required by federal law and its share for mandating free and reduced rides….over another $30 million. Those are mandates–albeit unfunded– which the CTA, Metra and Pace can NOT eliminate. Not a pretty picture if you have to get to work or school in Chicagoland!


  20. - blue dog dem - Tuesday, Aug 22, 17 @ 8:42 pm:

    KD. Did CtA sign their latest contract?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller