Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** House Illinois Legislative Black Caucus takes caucus position supporting Speaker Madigan’s reelection
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** House Illinois Legislative Black Caucus takes caucus position supporting Speaker Madigan’s reelection

Wednesday, Dec 9, 2020 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Press release…

Statement from the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus House

The Illinois Legislative Black Caucus House held a first of its kind Speaker of the House Candidate’s Forum Saturday, December 5th. Out of the 118 members of the Illinois House, only two candidates availed themselves to our process for Speaker of the 102nd General Assembly. After analysis, we believe our caucus is in a more advantageous position under the leadership of Speaker Madigan to deliver on our priorities. We have a daunting task ahead of us to repair harm done to black communities because of long standing systemic disinvestment, the challenges stemming from COVID-19 and of course the underlying reasons why it is important to pass the Black Caucus’ Policy Agenda: Criminal Justice & Police Reform; Education & Workforce Development; Economic Access; and Access to Health Care.

The members of the House Illinois Legislative Black Caucus have taken a Caucus position in support of Representative Mike Madigan as Speaker for the next General Assembly. We need a Speaker that will provide strong, consistent leadership and support for the challenges ahead.

It’s time to refocus on the work in front of us and be prepared to start the next General Assembly’s business immediately.

This means, of course, that now the opposition cannot reach 60 votes for a different House Speaker.

*** UPDATE *** From the only Black Caucus member who has said he will not vote to reelect Madigan…

State Rep. Maurice West Responds to Black Caucus Statement with 4 words

My position hasn’t changed.

       

34 Comments
  1. - Citizen Kane - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 10:08 pm:

    ===long standing systemic disinvestment===

    Certainly has nothing to do with the longstanding Speaker of the House…


  2. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 10:21 pm:

    Your move, “the 19”

    The “New Day” Caucus needs to put to bed, as ONE voice that the Speakership, as the 19 see it as one, is over.

    It’s up to the 72 (plus Madigan) to remove folks who will be unable to get 60 from the conversation…


  3. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 10:34 pm:

    To the Black Caucus move specifically, and separately;

    This endorsement also puts other possible candidates on notice that the Black Caucus now, and possibly later, are speaking with one voice, so the thought to peeling members away from this specific endorsement will be a heavy lift to the totality, and it’s leverage in all forms, with unity, one voice, they as a collective will be strong to that leverage, so why splinter and get less in any deal.

    And… with MJM still without 60 after this endorsement, the wooing of the caucus in its entirety allows a win-win no matter the outcome, if the Dems stand firm and only put forth a Dem candidate with a locked in 60… and the Black Caucus too. Win-win in this for them.


  4. - Nick - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 10:51 pm:

    Trench warfare it is


  5. - AD - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 10:56 pm:

    GOP, make yourself relevant again. Pull a John Kasich and and broker a deal with the 19 to find a Dem that you can stomach to get behind. It’ll never happen, but it would make for great theater.


  6. - Silencio por favor - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 11:11 pm:

    Madigan will be reelected


  7. - Just Another Anon - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 11:36 pm:

    I wonder if Jesse White is up to presiding over all those votes. I believe he would be the oldest person to preside over a vote of the Illinois House.


  8. - Ok - Wednesday, Dec 9, 20 @ 11:39 pm:

    This may go on long enough that Anna Valencia is presiding over the votes.


  9. - Blue Dog Dem - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 12:59 am:

    If your not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.


  10. - Candy Dogood - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 1:24 am:

    Boy will they look silly if an indictment comes down because someone decides he doesn’t want to die from old age in prison.


  11. - Really - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:09 am:

    And in other news, water is wet. I am shocked. Shocked. I gotta go lie down.


  12. - Austinman - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:14 am:

    “If” is a very big word


  13. - 618er - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:14 am:

    This is gonna get crazy
    So will members of the 19 kiss the ring or stand by their public statements. With what 45 votes, could Durkin actually show some political(and actual leadership) and broker a deal with those votes or reach across the aisle and convince some of those 19 to vote for one of his?

    I know, I know, ridiculous.. but the enemy of my enemy is my friend…


  14. - Stormsw7706 - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:26 am:

    The circular firing squad is forming. As a loyal Democrat I am disturbed that we have a caucus supporting Madigan. He has shown little interest in the black community until recently. One of the surest ways to become a Republican state is for Democrats to continue to support long serving Democrats, especially those identified as targets in a corruption probe. I’m a Democrat because the Moderate wing of the Republican Party disappeared. I suspect there are many like me. Actions like this really test my boundaries. Please enlighten me on what Madigan has done in his tenure to advance the black community.


  15. - Ok - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:31 am:

    The absolute quickest way for the GOP to get a new speaker is to have their entire caucus vote for one of the 19.

    But then what would their bogeyman be?


  16. - SpiDem - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 7:42 am:

    I’m assuming Rep. West, as one of the 19, does not plan to honor this “caucus position”?

    The original reporting suggested we should expect an endorsement signed by 21 of 22 ILBC members.

    The fact that there do not appear to be individual member names attached is interesting to me, as is the fact that this statement arrived nearly 5 days later than originally expected.

    Is it fair to assume that, while the Speaker enjoys the support of the majority caucus, that that support likely falls somewhere below the 21 members originally expected?


  17. - Anyone Remember - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 8:12 am:

    AD - Never going to happen. That manuever was copyrighted by Willie Brown in 1995, and I don’t see the House GOP coughing up the required copyright fee. /S


  18. - Druid Eye - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 8:30 am:

    Madigan got the momentum he needed. At least 6 of the 19 No Caucus can still change their minds and it won’t end their careers. The Speaker needs to clearly state his case why he should remain and have the strongest of arguments.


  19. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 8:33 am:

    === At least 6 of the 19 No Caucus can still change their minds and it won’t end their careers.===

    Yeah. Ok. Name them.


  20. - Gohawks123 - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 8:47 am:

    Buckle up, everyone 2021 for Illinois Politics is about to be a crazy ride.


  21. - May Soon Be Required - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 8:48 am:

    I’ve said it before and say it again.
    1.) Madigan Can’t Win
    2.) No one can beat him
    3.) First candidate (opposition) loses
    4..) Never count Him out


  22. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:14 am:

    ===Yeah. Ok. Name them===

    Exactly right. Don’t come back here until you do.


  23. - Pizza Man - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:18 am:

    As shown, an indictment will probably come during lame duck or reg session in Jan…then what?


  24. - Scorekeeper - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:36 am:

    Maybe I’m reading too much into the word choices, but there are two statements here:

    “we believe our caucus is in a more advantageous position under the leadership of Speaker Madigan”
    “The members… have taken a Caucus position in support of Representative Mike Madigan”

    Neither of those seems to indicate unanimity or a set-in-stone position. How much consensus do they actually have?

    And to release a statement in the evening several days after the meeting? Also makes it seem like things are bubbling under the surface.


  25. - Nova - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:36 am:

    Like others, I question what value Madigan brings to the Black Caucus. Maybe it is a temporary position, and they will ultimately back one of their own members as Speaker once Madigan realizes he doesn’t have the 60 votes needed. But that could take awhile.


  26. - JS Mill - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:38 am:

    Seems like the whole thing is just noise right now. I would assume there is a lot of behind the scenes bargaining going on right now, we will see what happens when nominations start. Until then it is all parlor games and positioning.


  27. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 9:43 am:

    ===As shown, an indictment will probably come during lame duck or reg session in Jan…then what?===

    Maybe, maybe not… the USA decides the trolling when the case is also ripe.


  28. - BeenThereDoneThat - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 10:34 am:

    The indictment is dependent upon one of the recently indicted turning states witness. Doherty or Pramagiore are the best bets. Feds need more than Marquez’s testimony.


  29. - Fav Human - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 10:54 am:

    assuming Rep. West, as one of the 19, does not plan to honor

    Not sure I’d make that assumption. This could be his ticket out of the gang of 19.

    Doherty or Pramagiore are the best bets.

    I am sure they are already singing more than the sing-along Handel. But I doubt they can touch MJM.

    Only one person can do that…..


  30. - VerySmallRocks - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 12:04 pm:

    Well, Ohio couldn’t dump their GOP speaker until he was indicted, so the pattern may continue.


  31. - bear 3 - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 3:34 pm:

    MJM is a pro and very much in control and needed.


  32. - SAP - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 3:38 pm:

    I don’t see how Rep. West, or any of the 19, walk back a pledge to not vote for “Representative” Madigan as Speaker.


  33. - AD - Thursday, Dec 10, 20 @ 3:59 pm:

    === MJM is a pro and very much in control and needed.===

    So was Al Capone


  34. - Touré's Latte - Friday, Dec 11, 20 @ 8:59 am:

    As many have noted, Madigan will leave when Madigan decides to leave. He still has that fair map to do. No one does them better.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Pritzker calls some of Bears proposals 'probably non-starters,' refuses to divert state dollars intended for other purposes (Updated)
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Friends of the Parks responds to Bears’ lakefront stadium proposal
* It’s just a bill
* Judge rejects state motion to move LaSalle Veterans' Home COVID deaths lawsuit to Court of Claims
* Learn something new every day
* Protect Illinois Hospitality – Vote No On House Bill 5345
* Need something to read? Try these Illinois-related books
* Illinois Hospitals Are Driving Economic Activity Across Illinois: $117.7B Annually And 445K Jobs
* Today's quotables
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller