Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » 2013 » May
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Which of the following legislative issues do you think will be resolved one way or another by May 31st?…

* 1 - Pension reform

* 2 - Gay marriage

* 3 - Concealed carry

* 4 - Gaming expansion

* 5 - Budget

* 6 - Fracking

* 7 - McCormick Place expansion

* Take the poll and vote for as many as you think will pass, then please explain your answers in comments.


online polls

  29 Comments      


Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Statehouse roundup

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

  Comments Off      


Cullerton still pushing his pension compromise bill

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the Sun-Times’ transcript of Senate President John Cullerton’s Friday afternoon press conference

“If you go back and look at the Senate Bill 1 that I introduced, it had two parts. It had both bills in the same one, and the one that the House passed was primary. And I sponsored it and wanted that to go to a court. And if, and only if, they threw it out would they have to look at the back-up. And Ty Fahner and the Tribune editorial board and the Republicans who said they would be for that came off the bill. And I didn’t have enough votes because, of course, the unions were against it. So congratulations business community, who now want me to only call the first part of the bill and not the second part even though the second part, the one that we passed, had a three-fifths vote. Republicans and Democrats alike, Republicans in the House, are urging the speaker to call [SB2404] so they can vote for it. And [Madigan’s] bill barely passed.

“So, you know, I’ve always been trying. And I, by the way, called for a vote Senator Biss’ bill, which is very similar to the speaker’s bill, and it got 23 votes. Seven votes short, and by the way, seven Republicans voted ‘no.’ And I voted for it. I’m sponsoring Senate Bill 1. It doesn’t have enough votes. It has fewer votes than Senator Biss’ bill because now the unions have gone out and they’ve actively worked against it, okay. So, I’m going to continue next week to see if I can reach some kind of compromise. Maybe the Tribune editorial board and the business community would - and the Sun-Times editorial board - would change their position and go back to my original Senate Bill 1 that I originally proposed, which has both bills with theirs being primary. And then we can have the court decide on that.”

Q: Would you lose union support on a bill like that?
A: “That would be up to them to decide. I suppose they probably would be against that. That’s why I’m having trouble passing Senate Bill 1, you see. I just want to emphasize that I’m not holding us back from trying to advance compromises.”

Q: Do you have any idea how close SB2404 is to getting 60 votes in the House?
A: “The bill that we passed here with 40? That had two people missing when we passed it so we would have 42? I would say probably 84 votes, maybe 85 like [Speaker Madigan’s concealed carry bill] got today.”

Discuss.

  16 Comments      


Compromise coming on concealed carry?

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* We talked a lot about the House’s concealed carry vote on Friday, including audio of Senate President John Cullerton’s remarks. Here’s the transcript, which may help show you the way forward

“…So there’s a consensus on - very close to a consensus on - what a concealed-carry law should be. And that’s what our task should be this session, not to go out and do a wish list that the NRA - that has nothing to do with concealed carry that preempts home-rule.”

Q: Are you going to call SB2193 for a vote?
A: “Well, I’m going to try to defeat the bill, and we’re going to have a caucus on it on Monday.”

Q: Madigan said he thought SB2193 would have overwhelming support in the Senate. Can you say where the vote might be?
A: “What would have overwhelming vote in his chamber would be the pension vote that we passed over there that is still in Rules Committee. I don’t know what he bases that on. We have a different makeup here. We have a lot more Democrats than he has over there. We won a few more seats than he did. So, I don’t know why he would predict that.”

Q: But he also successfully lobbied against Sen. Raoul’s bill last week…
A: “That’s true, but now what we’re saying, as it relates to concealed carry, we’re accepting the Brandon Phelps version of concealed carry.”

Q: Do you have an idea how much ground you may need to make up to defeat SB2193?
A: “I really don’t know. The people who want to pass a bill have the burden of going forward and getting 36 votes. So the question is how far back is Senator Forby (the bill’s Senate sponsor) in getting his 36 votes.”

Q: So do you envision calling it, having it rejected and then moving forward with a compromise proposal?
A: “Well that’s what I would hope we have.”

Q: So there will be a vote on Phelps’ bill in the Senate as it is now?
A: “Well, maybe our caucus doesn’t want to go forward with it. Maybe we’ll have a caucus and see there is no support, and we’ll go ahead with an alternative. Once the members realize there’s an alternative that’s very similar, almost identical to the House alternative, maybe we can avoid this. Maybe we can focus our attention on concealed carry, which is what the courts tasked us with doing, and then solve that part of the problem we have facing us.”

The transcript doesn’t show it, but Cullerton is now in favor of preemption of local concealed carry ordinances - something that would be unheard of just a week or so ago. The overwhelming House vote in favor probably moved him (and quite a few of his more liberal members) off that particular dime.

Cullerton is, however, “violently” against the “super preemption” of all local gun ordinances currently on the books.

* The Tribune editorial board actually may have correctly predicted the future on this one

Imagine the push-back from citizens if you strip local governments of their ability to pass local firearms laws. That’s the most noxious provision of legislation the House approved Friday. The bill includes other reasonable safeguards and restrictions.

We wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the provision pre-empting local firearms laws is a loss leader, added to the bill so it can be negotiated away in talks with the Senate. That chamber, less open to concealed carry, wants to let municipalities and other local governments set rules for their unique circumstances.

So cut a compromise. The Senate can make changes in the House bill — most important, strip out that pre-emption provision — and send it back to the House. You’re not that far from meeting the mandate of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

A “loss leader” is probably right on the money. I told subscribers as much last week.

Discuss.

  18 Comments      


Quotes of the day

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* SJ-R

Illinois Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka isn’t in the running to take a position she once had — chairman of the Republican Party of Illinois. But she’s not shy in saying what she thinks of the job after just “a tad of discussion” that she could take it again.

“That has got to be the worst job in the world,” Topinka said. “It is horrendous. It was just so wearing after two years of that. I was thrilled when I was able to divest myself of it.”

Accurate.

* Wouldn’t Joe Walsh have to give up his brand new radio gig if he took the chairmanship? I doubt he’d get the chairmanship anyhow, but here’s what he had to say

“The Republican Party in this state is irrelevant,” Walsh said. “We’ve been an irrelevant force for a long, long time. … Party leaders going all the way back to Jim Thompson, Jim Edgar, George Ryan, Tom Cross, you name ’em, we’ve all been happy playing second fiddle, and we’ve let the Democrats run this state. I really do believe that the Republican Party … has been complicit, in this almost criminal arrangement, where we let the Democrats run the state and we just take a little bit of power wherever we can have it. That’s got to end.”

Yeah, Thompson, Edgar and Ryan ceded all sorts of power to the Democratic Party. Right. Please.

Go read the whole thing.

  6 Comments      


Isn’t this where we came in?

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* AP

Illinois Democrats seemed poised to rule almost unchallenged in the state Capitol after winning super majorities in the House and Senate last fall. But as intraparty divisions have surfaced, things haven’t been that simple.

Heading into the final week of the legislative session, Democrats are split on some of the state’s biggest issues, from the nation’s worst pension crisis to the public possession of guns, gay marriage and gambling expansion. Lawmakers also have yet to get a deal on the state budget, the expansion of Medicaid or how to regulate a high-volume oil and gas drilling process known as “fracking.”

It’s a weighty agenda to wade through by Friday’s scheduled adjournment, even in a statehouse accustomed to leaving legislation to the last minute.

“It is unusual in the scope of what has to be done,” said Rep. Greg Harris, a Chicago Democrat who’s working to pass a measure in the House to legalize same-sex marriage. “Those are each big things on any one day, much less all at one time.”

Also too, McCormick Place expansion. That’s kinda disappeared from the media’s radar screen.

* We’ll get to the individual topics later. The budget, however, is moving forward

House and Senate Democrats have agreed on a proposed Illinois budget that would keep education funding at the same level and increase human services spending.

Sen. Heather Steans is one of the Legislature’s budget negotiators. She says Democrats will present their 2014 spending plan early next week, after which Republicans will get a chance to weigh in on it.

Gov. Pat Quinn proposed cutting education funding by about $400 million, a cut he said was difficult but necessary.

But Steans says unanticipated revenue increases helped restore that money. Democrats also want to reduce the amount of money that goes to local governments.

* More

In his budget proposal, Gov. Pat Quinn called for a cut of about $300 million to K-12 education and another $100 million to higher education. Cullerton said the cut to K-12 education would have resulted in general state aid to schools being prorated at an 82 percent level, rather than the 89 percent this year.

The General Assembly’s budget plan calls for maintaining an 89 percent level, he said.

Sullivan said the budget will also preserve transportation assistance for school districts, a priority for downstate lawmakers.

Cullerton said the issue of accounting for back wages owed to union employees as well as raises contained in their new contract is “still up for negotiation.”

Sullivan said some areas of human services will see additional cuts, although they will not be across-the-board.

* Transcript of Cullerton’s comments about the budget from Friday

Q: What’s the agreement principle on the budget from here?
A: “Well the fact that the House and the Senate Democrats actually worked together on a budget is a first in the last four years. So, I’m really encouraged by that. And we have an agreement on the amount of money we have to spend and a general idea of where these categories of money should go. You know, how much for higher [education, how much for elementary and secondary, that sort of thing. And we’re working through all the different line items over the weekend to make sure we have an agreement. Then we will share this with Republicans. We will not vote on it on Monday. We will give data that we have to them, at least in the Senate. I can’t speak for the House. And we’ll vote on it maybe two or three days later.”

“I’m very confident that the Republicans are going to like the budget, and hopefully we can get them to vote for it.”

Q: Will education money be restored?
A: “That was our number-one priority to restore education money and to try to not create new old bills.”

Q: How much will be restored?
A: “We’re hoping to get back to 89 percent of [the foundation level]. The governor’s budget was like 82 percent.”

Q: Have you figured out how to deal with the back-wages owed to unions?
A: “That’s still, I think, up for negotiations in terms of how to deal with the back-wages as well as the new contract.”

Q: Do you see forcing the governor to choose between paying the back-wages and laying off workers in state agencies?
A: “Well, I would just say that if you look at what we’ve done this year, there’s been a number of supplementals that we’ve passed. As you see, a budget is just an authorization to spend, and we don’t know exactly what’s going to happen during the course of the year in terms of revenues…So, I would say if you manage your agencies and if you look like you need more money, you come back and we react.”

* Related…

* 10 Things to know about Legislature’s final week

* Lawmakers have a week left — and much unsettled: With the state’s top four ruling Democrats at least appearing out of sync, the long out-of-power Republicans are wondering what the endgame will be.

* Big issues remain as adjournment nears: The legislation to provide state incentives to attract a $1.2 billion fertilizer plant on Tuscola’s west side is struck in the House Rules Committee. Rose said he is confident the measure will be considered in the closing days of the session. “I think this is classic Speaker Madigan. He holds all of his cards until the end,” Rose said. “There are too many jobs at stake with this.”

* With one week left, lawmakers have lots left on their plates

* New lawmakers have to hustle on big issues

* Big issues remain unresolved for state lawmakers

* McCormick plan vexes hoteliers

  3 Comments      


*** LIVE *** SESSION COVERAGE

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The Senate isn’t in today, but the House convenes at 3 o’clock. I’ll fire up the blog at about 2 or 2:30. Want to have a bit of Oscar the Puppy time before we start that last long, hard slog.

Blackberry users click here

  3 Comments      


Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)

Sunday, May 26, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

  Comments Off      


« NEWER POSTS PREVIOUS POSTS »
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Republicans denied TRO in bid to be appointed to ballot
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* It’s almost a law
* Credit Unions: A Smart Financial Choice for Illinois Consumers
* Was the CTU lobby day over-hyped?
* 'Re-renters' tax in the budget mix?
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Get The Facts On The Illinois Prescription Drug Board
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller