* From Republican Cook County Commissioner Sean Morrison….
The Danger of Vitriolic Language in Politics:
A Call for Civility and Respect
In recent years, we have witnessed a distressing escalation in the use of vitriolic language in our political discourse. It has become all too common to see political opponents referred to in dehumanizing terms, their characters slandered with reckless abandon. This trend is not just divisive; it is profoundly dangerous.
Words have power. When we call our opponents by demeaning names or spread falsehoods about their intentions and integrity, we erode the foundations of civil discourse. We replace meaningful debate with personal attacks, and in doing so, we undermine the very essence of democracy.
The consequences of such behavior are far-reaching and severe. Beyond the immediate harm to individuals and their reputations, there is a broader societal impact. Vitriolic language creates an atmosphere of hostility and mistrust. It polarizes communities, driving wedges between neighbors and friends who may hold differing political views.
Most troubling of all, this toxic rhetoric can incite violence. History has shown us time and again that words can inspire actions, particularly among those who may already be prone to instability or extremism. When political discourse descends into a battleground of insults and character assassinations, it sets a dangerous precedent. It sends a message that such behavior is acceptable, even encouraged.
As a community and as a nation, we must unequivocally reject this path. We cannot afford to normalize or condone the use of vitriolic language in our political discourse. Instead, we must demand a return to civility, respect, and empathy in our interactions with one another.
Leadership starts with each of us. Whether we hold public office or participate as engaged citizens, we have a responsibility to model the behavior we wish to see. We can passionately advocate for our beliefs without resorting to personal attacks. We can engage in debates based on facts and principles, not on the vilification of our opponents.
It is time to restore dignity to our political conversations. Let us commit ourselves to fostering an environment where differences of opinion are respected, where dialogue is constructive, and where our shared values of decency and fairness prevail.
I call upon all individuals, regardless of political affiliation, to join me in condemning the use of vitriolic language in politics. Let us work together to build a future where our discourse reflects the best of who we are as a community and as a nation.
The stakes are too high to ignore. The time for change is now.
Agreed.
* However, I would’ve found this op-ed far more believable if Commissioner Morrison had included himself in that admonition…
* A search of Morrison’s account using the word “hate” brought up tons of hits, including these…
* And…
- P. - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 7:59 am:
Funny how many times I’ve seen some wildly inappropriate comment on social media and it’s this guy’s - Morrison - avatar above it. Bro is super petty and obnoxious on Twitter.
- ChicagoVinny - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:01 am:
“We’re all trying to find who did this”
- Flyin'Elvis'-Utah Chapter - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:30 am:
So, a hypocritical Republican???
Well, I’ll be.
- DuPage Saint - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:37 am:
The problem is many people just don’t listen to what they say. I bet if you took his quotes and said a Democrat just said this he would condemn it yet when he says it it is ok
- Demoralized - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:37 am:
One of the worst inventions in the history of mankind has been social media platforms.
- DuPage Dad - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:39 am:
I truly don’t think he would find any of those posts to be incongruent with his statement. Which is the scary thing.
- TheInvisibleMan - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:48 am:
“if Commissioner Morrison had included himself”
Why would he? We’ve been playing this ‘be civil’ game for awhile. And people keep falling for it. Even he knows it’s just nonsense, by the examples of his own words given.
Those who see themselves at the top of the pecking order, in reality or just in their imagination, will always try to control the language of those who they see as below them.
‘be civil’ is just another directive of control he sees as making his life and control of others easier.
The past few generations have grown up with adults telling them “violent video games cause violence”. And know that’s no more true than “cannabis is a gateway drug”.
He even gives away the game and mentions the actual reason;
“particularly among those who may already be prone to instability or extremism”. It’s why he isn’t calling for any mental health care.
It’s not the words causing violence. It’s the already existing motivations and mindset of the person who commits the violence. No different than how video games don’t cause violence, already violent people do.
Many of us have been brought up to believe words are some magic incantation - because it gives an easy path to remove the responsibility from the person taking the actions.
I reject that default mindset of codependence.
The violence exists before the words.
Can violent words precede violent actions? Sure. But they aren’t the cause. You could easily convince someone who already wants to be violent, to be violent, without using any violent words at all.
Historically, and in almost every case, violence enters politics shortly after religion does(The Troubles). Frankly, that makes far more sense. Religion has trained people to be subservient and obedient(to others or something imaginary). If we are serious about stopping violence, then lets start talking about that. But we won’t because that shines too bright a light on the world we have collectively created.
- Downstate - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:50 am:
The DNC Convention in Chicago is an excellent time to showcase how a convention, without vitriol, can be conducted.
And like the Olympics, Super Bowl and NCAA tourneys, the event is a great way to showcase the Democrat-led city of Chicago to a national viewing audience.
- low level - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 8:55 am:
Beverly Republicans are something else…
- Gravitas - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 9:38 am:
If you want to see vitriolic rhetoric, visit Milwaukee and look at the Democratic sponsored billboards and advertising trucks.
- ElTacoBandito - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 9:39 am:
===Beverly Republicans are something else…==
Love the distrust and hatred of government from a neighborhood where half of them work for said government.
- Socially DIstant watcher - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 9:49 am:
For some people, “bury the hatchet” means “unite around my candidate.” They are eager to claim the win so they can rewrite history and depict themselves above the fray.
- Annonin' - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 9:51 am:
Generally the GOPie whacks lack mirrors when they issue their pious calls for love, unity and moderation. But it is o.k. And the hilite of this a.m. convention coverage was the report Rep. Miller was a track star at Naperville Hi before becoming a whack.
- Homebody - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:04 am:
I tire of anyone in the media giving any credence to pearl clutching by Republican politicians.
- AlfondoGonz - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:05 am:
The GOP has turned the temperature up to boiling, and now complains that it is hot.
- CBS - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:08 am:
== Love the distrust and hatred of government from a neighborhood where half of them work for said government. ==
The tavern keeper who put up that sign ran for alderman and got crushed.
- Excitable Boy - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:16 am:
Self awareness and sound judgement aren’t Morrison’s strongest attributes.
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2018/6/18/18367224/county-pol-defends-vouching-for-employee-charged-in-child-sex-case
- Tequila Mockingbird - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:18 am:
Antisocial media was actually mislabeled social media.
Guilty are on both sides of the fence.
- Big Dipper - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:23 am:
==where half of them work for said government.==
And belong to unions.
- Downstate - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:27 am:
Sometimes vitriol can be a mask for internal party dissension. If there is disagreement within a party, the loudest wing (even if screaming at the other party) gains influence in their own party by denigrating the other. And that is tough to control.
- low level - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:29 am:
==Love the distrust and hatred of government from a neighborhood where half of them work for said government.==
==And belong to unions.==
Precisely. Their hypocrisy is astounding.
- Tom Gasman - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:31 am:
The Huffington Post has not received the message.
- low level - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:34 am:
==The Huffington Post has not received the message==
Do you have any examples?
- Demoralized - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:39 am:
==The Huffington Post has not received the message.==
Sigh. The “whataboutism” police have arrived.
- low level - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 10:43 am:
==The tavern keeper who put up that sign ran for alderman and got crushed.==
We were referring to Beverly Republicans specifically, not the neighborhood as a whole.
- Downstate - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:02 am:
In my many decades of politic-watching, it seems as the vitriol tends to ebb and flow. Ranting candidates (on both sides of the aisles, and even in the primaries) will win, but they’ll sometimes lose.
I can specifically recall candidates that lost because they went “low”. Admittedly, these were more often at the local or regional level.
But I can think of national candidates, on both sides of the aisle, that were successful and spoke “above the fray”.
I really think the idea of vitriol in campaigns is but a pendulum that will swing back and forth.
The contrast of political positions on issues (immigration, crime, abortion, education, foreign affairs) has likely never been more stark. Hence, the election results will hopefully offer more clarity on the direction of those topics.
- Grandson of Man - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:12 am:
It’s all lip service. Trump already started back up with division again, demonizing and lying about Democrats in social media. MAGA (no more GOP) is doing this fake unity bit for appearances only and to try to shame and silence Democrats. No one should fall for it. It’s not vitriolic to call Trump what he really is, a true threat to democracy. This should be done by the Fourth Estate, but to national corporate political news media, apparently, calling people fascists is more offensive than fascism itself.
- OneMan - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:15 am:
When I use that sort of language, it is speaking truth to power and being authentic; when you use that language, it is vitriolic, hateful, and inappropriate.
Got it
- James - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:31 am:
I am not convinced that “rhetoric” has anything to do with violence. Even if it does, who gets the draw the lines around what is acceptable free speech and what isn’t? I didn’t find Biden’s remarks about “bullseye” on Trump to be out of bounds. Obviously Biden didn’t want someone to shoot at Trump. It’s a figure of speech. So much silliness.
- Paddyrollingstone - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:38 am:
==Love the distrust and hatred of government from a neighborhood where half of them work for said government.==
==And belong to unions.==
==Precisely. Their hypocrisy is astounding.==
As long as I live, I will never understand this
- Big Dipper - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 11:42 am:
When they were demagoguing about immigrants committing crimes at the RNC and it gave Willie Horton vibes.
- JS Mill - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 12:03 pm:
=One of the worst inventions in the history of mankind has been social media platforms.=
Yes
=If you want to see vitriolic rhetoric, visit Milwaukee and look at the Democratic sponsored billboards and advertising trucks.=
Your thoughts on Morrison? I’ll wait…
- Mr. Middleground - Wednesday, Jul 17, 24 @ 12:26 pm:
Rich misses the point—more whataboutism instead of just saying we need more of these statements.