SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the Day

Tuesday, Sep 3, 2013

Posted by Barton Lorimor (@bartonlorimor)

* Recommendations made by the Illinois Early Learning Council are reportedly being taken seriously by Gov. Pat Quinn’s administration…

The proposed rule changes, for example, would require day care providers to offer children at least two occasions per day of age-appropriate outdoor time, depending on the weather.

Children would be prevented from remaining still for more than 30 minutes, outside of scheduled nap times.

The rules would ban children younger than 2 from watching television and limit children age 2 and older to watching one hour per day of TV.

The new nutrition rules include a prohibition on serving snacks with high sugar or fat content and on using trans fats or saturated fats as butter substitutes.

Current rules forbid serving desserts with high sugar and fat content but don’t mention serving those items as snacks.

In addition, infants may not have bottles in their cribs, and older children may not carry no-spill cups throughout the day or night unless the cups contain only water.

All of this, according to the Erickson report, is being done to circumvent childhood obesity.

QUESTION: Should these proposed restrictions on unhealthy snacks and amount of down time be enacted? Please answer in comments below and explain your answer. For example, if “Yes,” then should there be other items on this list? If “No, then would you approve of any of these recommendations?

- Posted by Barton Lorimor        


49 Comments
  1. - Anonymour - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 7:22 am:

    The children need to be still more than 30 minutes if they want to grow up to be legislators.


  2. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:12 am:

    Meh, they’re all good common-sense proposals but I don’t know that the GA needs to weigh in on it. I think most parents and daycare center operators can figure it out.

    It’s not like the state has the means to enforce it, anyway.


  3. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:13 am:

    What’s the “over-under” on the number of “nanny-state” references on this thread? And since this deals with pre-schoolers, is “nanny-state” still a pejorative?


  4. - OneMan - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:31 am:

    Wordslinger has a good point. Considering what our old day care provider had to deal with when dealing with the state… She ended up videotaping the inspector and he stopped entering the facility (her home) when she did I am not sure how this is going to be enforced.

    It sounds nice, but when it comes down to it, it is mostly unenforceable and will likely make day care more expensive, that along with the minimum wage hike he is proposing (raising costs at day care as well) is going to just raise costs.


  5. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:32 am:

    OneMan, according to the story, home daycare providers are not included in the proposal.


  6. - And I Approved This Message - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:38 am:

    If you have a preschooler who remains still for more than 30 minutes outside of scheduled nap times you should seek immediate medical attention.


  7. - Joan P. - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 9:07 am:

    Honest to god, I thought this came from The Onion.


  8. - TooManyJens - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 9:11 am:

    They’re good guidelines, but should be left as that.


  9. - Wumpus - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 9:19 am:

    Common sense…how do I get a state job inspecting facilities making sure these guidelines are met? Who do I have to marry?


  10. - Anon - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 9:20 am:

    How does “Voices For Illinois Children” weigh in on this?


  11. - Chavez-respecting Obamist - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 9:31 am:

    I agree with TooManyJens–good guidelines but unenforceable.


  12. - Tom - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:18 am:

    after years of trying to lose weight, I finally have come to realize, a diet high in fat and protein makes me less hungry and I lose weight. I eat butter all the time. The food police don’t know what they are talking about. Let parents decide.


  13. - Tom - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:23 am:

    BTW, these are not common sense proposals. Most low fat foods have had their fat content replace with sugar. Low fat milk is worse for a person wanting to watch their waist line than whole milk. Fat satiates you. It controls spikes in your insulin levels. It just has to be the right kind of fats. Think about this: the conventional wisdom of low fat is what people have been saying for the last 40 years. Just look at how fat we have become in those 40 years. These rules are continuing the problem.


  14. - None of the Above - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:29 am:

    Nanny state?

    How in the world do you implement the proposed rules as to food? Every time a school district tries to provide students with nutrious meals most of the food ends up uneaten and tossed into the garbage. One of the reasons that so many schools served up sugary foods was that it was the only way to get the children to eat anything.

    Of course, is it asking too much for the parents to accept responsibility for feeding their own children?


  15. - Responsa - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:33 am:

    Heh. Have any of the authors of these recommendations actually ever had children? The points just seem more rhetorical and fantastical than, you know, doable or enforceable.

    We know the term “nanny state” irritates some people (like Word) but then exactly what are we allowed to call this type of silliness as a substitute euphemism? “Get off my lawn” is pretty overused too. But they both get the point across. Any suggestions?

    No Gov. Quinn, let’s not further bog down the GA on a shiny object. They have plenty on their plates already. How’s that pension thing coming along, BTW?


  16. - Just Observing - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:41 am:

    We don’t need more regulations in this area. Many of these pre-school regulations provide no flexibility and may not be the best option for all individuals. Case in point… my girlfriend’s 4.5 year old son goes to a pre-school/daycare… the state mandates that the children have nap/quiet time everyday… when her son naps it takes forever (literally hours) for him to fall asleep at night… he is often up playing in his bed until 10:00 p.m. or so… if he misses his nap he crashes around 8:00 p.m. While my gf encourages the daycare operator not to nap her son… since she is required by law to offer quiet/nap time her son falls asleep during that time… if he was allowed to play/learn instead he wouldn’t fall asleep.


  17. - walkinfool - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:47 am:

    This piece came out on the slowest news day of the year — but it still beat out Jack Franks’ release calling for a special GA session to fire Metra board en masse.


  18. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    ==Of course, is it asking too much for the parents to accept responsibility for feeding their own children? ==

    What exactly is that supposed to mean? Kids need to be fed during the day. Or are you against school lunches of any kind?


  19. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    Sorry. That was me above.


  20. - Downstater - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 10:59 am:

    The “nanny state” alive and doing harm in Illinois.


  21. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:01 am:

    ==The “nanny state” alive and doing harm in Illinois. =

    I think some of the recommendations are kind of silly but I hardly think a proposal on children’s nutrition and exercise is “doing harm.”


  22. - crazybleedingheart - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:06 am:

    The state licenses daycares, does it not?

    The state pays for a great deal of daycare, correct?

    Seems relevant. Especially since the behaviors being targeted are already not practiced by “good” (privately-paid expensive daycare) but are not unusual in daycare available to low-income folks using state aid.


  23. - woodchuck - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:08 am:

    If they’re going for “rules” then it will be through the JCAR process –not the entire GA. It would be interesting to see the argument if the proposed rules have statutory authority (primary question for JCAR members, then to look at the fiscal impact on the regulated entities).


  24. - Yogi - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:12 am:

    This is an over reach of government and would be difficult to regulate However, they could be used as guidelines for daycare centers to consider. Also, why the assumption that all overweight children go to daycare? I’ll bet there are stay at home Moms that talk on the phone all day while junior eats cookies and watches TV,


  25. - Keyser Soze - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:22 am:

    Is this a social experiment, or does evidence compel these measures? Maybe TV is good for us.


  26. - crazybleedingheart - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:26 am:

    Hello? There are already regulations. It takes 2 seconds to google them and find a summary.

    http://www.state.il.us/dcfs/docs/cfs105052.pdf

    These changes appear to add specifics to general instructions (this kind of physical activity qualifies as the mandatory “large muscle exercise” ), or clarify loopholes (you can’t serve banned food by calling it “snack” instead of “dessert”).

    None of it is that big of a deal or a change, unless one is against licensing day care as a principle.

    In which case…well, luckily, that’s a fringe opinion held by shrieking paranoids.


  27. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:26 am:

    “…but I hardly think a proposal on children’s nutrition and exercise is “doing harm.”

    Unless the administration creates a new ‘bureaucracy’ loaded with patronage appointees to implement & monitor it. Wouldn’t be shocking to see that.


  28. - Mongo - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:29 am:

    I am all in favor of these as a guideline. Obesity is a critical problem and worse, it leads to many secondary health conditions that have a great fiscal impact.

    Downstater, really, “The nanny state alive and doing harm in Illinois.” How, pray tell, does this set of get-em-active proposals do harm?


  29. - dupage dan - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:32 am:

    The children of this state are a great asset, like a great river - our children are like the mighty Mississippi River. And, if you toss too many cupcakes into the river they will clog it up and there will be more flooding in Cairo. So, to save the children we have to end cupcakes in Illinois.

    Now, who could be against that?


  30. - Robert the Bruce - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    No to all. Parents can make these choices with day care providers. Just means more paperwork, more rules, ultimately higher day care prices becuase of meddling legislature.


  31. - Angry Republican - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:41 am:

    “We know the term “nanny state” irritates some people (like Word) but then exactly what are we allowed to call this type of silliness as a substitute euphemism? “Get off my lawn” is pretty overused too. But they both get the point across. Any suggestions?”

    Try using paternalism instead


  32. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:47 am:

    As has been pointed out, daycare centers are licensed and subject to regulation. Many also take a lot of taxpayer money.

    It’s hardly “nanny-state” or paternalistic to set rules for commercial daycare providers, particularly when it’s on the taxpayer dime.

    Unless you think they should just get the money and have no accountability. Is that a good business practice?


  33. - Yossarian Lives - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:47 am:

    I don’t see anyone suggesting that all overweight children go to daycare. But most of us would agree that having government inspectors coming into people’s homes and regulating what they feed their children would be a vast overreach. I know I would.

    A parent paying a daycare center to take care of his or her child is a business transaction. Parents pay caregivers to provide some minimal level of care. I think, in its role of protecting consumers, the government is justified in definining that minimal level of care and making sure parents get what they pay for.


  34. - Aldyth - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:49 am:

    Are the day care operators supposed to stand over the kids with a stopwatch?


  35. - Anon - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 11:53 am:

    Here’s my idea for enforcement. Just like tobacco/cigarettes we use undercover agents. We send undercover 18 month olds in to the day care and see if they let them watch TV. Then, we bust ‘em!!

    Or, we can go in some internet chat rooms and pretend to be an infant looking to keep a bottle in his crib. When the person comes to the mall to give us the bottle, we rush in and arrest them.

    I should run for office with these great ideas.


  36. - Responsa - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 12:10 pm:

    ==A parent paying a daycare center to take care of his or her child is a business transaction. Parents pay caregivers to provide some minimal level of care. I think, in its role of protecting consumers, the government is justified in definining that minimal level of care and making sure parents get what they pay for.==

    Wait. Isn’t this new proposal supposed to be all about obesity which affects only a subset of children — as opposed to providing a level of basic care as in heat, physical safety, teacher competence, etc. which, as you point out is what parents of all children expect and pay for from daycare? Let’s not move the goal posts too far here.


  37. - Gregor - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 12:43 pm:

    You know, not every daycare is run by a PhD. in child psychology and early learning. Many small ones are run by one or two, good-hearted, caring people who love taking care of kids, and they may not have much graduate level education. For them, clear guidelines can only help. Without them, and the enforcement component, the smaller daycare operations could become simple 8-hour kid warehouses for the folks on low incomes, out there trying to work and save money.

    Also, not all parents have a great model of parenting to follow themselves these days, when kids are having kids of their own. The guidelines used by the daycare become a model that carries over into the home, and this can only be a good thing, long-term.

    The nanny-state argument people sometimes forget that the entire world is not living in an identical background, with all the same advantages. Raising a smarter, healthier new generation can only help us all as a community and society.


  38. - Yossarian Lives - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 1:12 pm:

    Very good points, Gregor.

    Obesity affects a subset of children (too large a subset), but they are not always readily identiable. They don’t necessarily come to daycare already overweight. Genetic factors affect weight gain, to be sure, but so does diet. How is a daycare center to know which of its young charges will become overweight or obese if given a diet of high-sugar, high-fat foods? Also, I’d argue the intention of the rules is (or ought to be) to promote health in young children, not just prevent obesity. A high-sugar, high-fat diet is good for almost no one - whether or not the person is or becomes obese.


  39. - Just Observing - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 2:09 pm:

    === Also, not all parents have a great model of parenting to follow themselves these days, when kids are having kids of their own. The guidelines used by the daycare become a model that carries over into the home, and this can only be a good thing, long-term. ===

    This implies that those in government had better parents and are better parents and thus know more than the rest of us.


  40. - leonard - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 2:37 pm:

    Anon-I’ll vote for you—-I’m sure there’s sincerity in the proposal,but no consideration for common sense or implementation.


  41. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:01 pm:

    ==This implies that those in government had better parents and are better parents and thus know more than the rest of us.==

    No, it doesn’t. It recognizes the realities out there. There is nothing wrong with the government setting standards or guidelines for things. The kind of logic in your statement implies that the government shouldn’t be doing anything at all and knows nothing at all. Bull.


  42. - Judgment Day (Road Trip) - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:04 pm:

    That’s what we need - more mounds of paper. First off, all these ‘wonderful’ ideas will have to be tracked. You are basically going to have to turn any daycare operation into an assembly line (who did what when, how many times, etc.).

    We’re not going to have kids, we’re going to have pre-school laboratory test humanoids. Having had some regulatory involvement on the fringe with some pre-school daycare programs, I’m developing a picture in my mind over how this is going to work, and it’s not pretty.

    We probably should consider either (a) bar codes, or (b) RFID chips on each pre-schooler.

    I’ll second the comment made by Joan P.:
    “Honest to god, I thought this came from The Onion.”


  43. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:09 pm:

    LOL, JD, try the decaf.


  44. - Judgment Day (Road Trip) - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:26 pm:

    Actually, the more I think about it - this has real potential for a great standup comedy routine. I mean, think about it - what daycare operator wants to feed preschoolers more sugar? The little darlings will be bouncing off the walls and ceilings. You wouldn’t be able to keep them still for 30 seconds, much less 30 minutes.

    That’s it! - we’ve identified Pat Quinn’s true calling - standup comedy.


  45. - None of the Above - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:27 pm:

    Obesity? Why? Hasn’t there been a President’s Council on Physical Fitness since the Sixties?

    The greatest threat to children’s waistlines is inactivity. Television and video games are to blame. It pains me see so many empty baseball diamonds in park districts. In addition to organized leagues, we held sandlot games constantly back in the day. Boys did not need to be put on Ritalin because they were burning up their excess energy in sports.

    Nostalgia.


  46. - Keyser Soze - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 3:59 pm:

    DuPage Dan:

    The river runs free. It runs for the people. The river speaks the truth.

    P.S. Were you quoting Pat Quinn?


  47. - Responsa - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 5:45 pm:

    Yes, Keyser Soze. Barring an actual flood, when the mighty Mississippi River is referenced here–especially in nonsensical run-on sentences– it’s usually somebody’s attempt to mimic the governor’s tic.


  48. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 6:02 pm:

    The day care operators interviewed in the story support the changes or say they are already implementing them, but the blogsters argue they are a bad idea or unenforceable.

    Friends, you oughta see a doctor about that knee-jerk.

    If it makes ya feel any better, liberals are probably just as guilty, although not quite as often. Life is much simpler when you are automatically against any government regulation, no matter how common sense.

    Liberals actually have to know a bit about the government program that is being cut before they are outraged.

    Who watches the Watchmen?


  49. - Just The Way It Is One - Tuesday, Sep 3, 13 @ 8:34 pm:

    No, on just about everythin on THAT list, except for the one, perhaps, regarding avoidance of snacks to little ones with too much sugar or fat (and trans fats) except that a clearer definition OF said foods too high in fat or sugar is needed–i.e. what’s noted is too vague…! The others are just too intrusive and/or restrictive Orders by the Government on how to raise kids–i.e. something loving Parents or Guardians (or licensed Caregivers already under regulations) can decide well-enough…!


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Fracking rules finally unveiled
* Question of the day
* A big IDOT roundup
* Even Steven, for now
* *** UPDATED x1 - Confirmed *** Report: Libertarians file charges
* Big guys dinged a bit, but little guys helped a lot
* Today's photo
* Stark contrasts on taxes, minimum wage
* Yesterday's blog posts

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............


Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

          
        * Windows Phone 8.1 GDR2 tipped to bring some much needed updates
        * Openmix turns you into a smartphone DJ
        * Our top 10 new Windows Phone games of August
        * Apple Reveals Common Reasons for App Rejections on New Developer Page
        * Tables, Tablets, Data And Eating
        * Sony teases just how water resistant its IFA products will be
        * Pocket Lock locks your phone automatically when you put it in a pocket

        * YouTube’s Donation Feature Is Now Live In Four Countries
        * iPhone 6 Pre-Order Date Pegged For 19th September By Dutch Carrier
        * Internet Explorer 11′s Market Share Is On The Rise
        * Scientist Uses Physics To Visually Map Out His WiFi Signal
        * Assembled iPhone 6 Compared To iPhone 5s In Video
        * Apple “Actively Investigating” iCloud Hack
        * Apple, FBI investigate alleged theft of nude celebrity photos

        * Noesi looks to continue push toward season's end
        * Williams conveys important message to Little Leaguers
        * Podcast: Dunn Deal
        * Thoughts on the Adrian Nieto experiment
        * Breaks turn in Quintana's favor against Tigers
        * Molina outrighted; roster spot opens up for Rodon
        * Wilkins, Snodgress part of White Sox shuffle


        Main Menu
        Home
        Illinois
        YouTube
        Pundit rankings
        Obama
        Subscriber Content
        Durbin
        Burris
        Blagojevich Trial
        Advertising
        Updated Posts
        Polls

        Archives
        August 2014
        July 2014
        June 2014
        May 2014
        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005

        Syndication

        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0
        WordPress

        Loading


        * Why is Gov. Pat Quinn living off minimum wage f.....
        * Why is Gov. Pat Quinn living off minimum wage f.....
        * Divvy faces growing pains in Chicago..
        * Unions Still Big Political Players..
        * Politicians gear up for election season..


        * Cubs honor Jackie Robinson West little leaguers
        * Man found dead in central Illinois was hit by car
        * US eating habits improve a bit _ except among poor
        * Study: Action-packed TV might make you snack more
        * Patients to start applying for medical marijuana
        * US Rep. Duckworth announces she's pregnant
        * Bloomington shuttle bus driver charged with DUI
        * Chicago police: Murders down, shootings up
        * Little League team honored with parade in Vegas
        * Rauner vow revives governor's mansion question

        * Does the governor need to live in the Executive Mansion?
        * Statehouse Insider: Hands off investments
        * State of unions: AFSCME wins some, loses some on outsourcing
        * State of unions: Domination of Illinois' workforce becomes campaign issue
        * State of unions: Lawmakers approved keeping some workers out of unions
        * State of Illinois posts applications for medical marijuana businesses
        * DNR issues long-awaited ‘fracking’ rules
        * Quinn grants 38 clemency requests
        * IDNR issues long-awaited ‘fracking’ rules
        * Court rules state retirees can stop paying health insurance premiums

        * If only it were this easy to lift share prices
        * 'Chicagoland' star returns to school
        * Amid re-election fight, Quinn pushes through a tax on business
        * Chicago's worst IPO in 2014: Ryerson
        * Why ComEd is worried about your smartphone


        * CPS can cheer, but challenges remain
        * Elmhurst couple in murder-suicide were doting parents: neighbors
        * When Europe pays  kidnappers, Americans die
        * ‘Long way to go’ but Roseland Hospital showing signs of stability
        * Rogers Park woman killed in crash on Tri-State Tollway near Schiller Park
        * Prosecutors: Man in CTA stabbing permanently disfigured
        * CTA offering free rides for students on first day of school
        * Alvarez: Crime lab backlog held up DNA evidence on Evans’ gun
        * More rain, storms possible for rest of Labor Day
        * Pullman Park needs Congress’ support


        * Survivors of Elmhurst family laud parents 'unwavering' commitment
        * 1 dead, 13 hurt in shootings across city
        * I-90/94 reopened after semi rollover leads to inbound closure
        * 1 in custody after shooting in Oak Forest forest preserve
        * Body of Chicago Heights boy, 14, pulled from Kankakee River
        * Rainstorms part of Labor Day forecast
        * Tammy Duckworth pregnant, expecting girl in December
        * Cops: Man batters woman and child, throws toddler from vehicle
        * Tougher rules ahead on domestic abuse
        * New sculpture in Niles to be dedicated to St. John Paul II


        * Newborn Found Alive In Jacksonville Trash Bin
        * DNR Releases Fracking Rules
        * Listen to State Week - August 29, 2014
        * 'Belleville' The Movie Is NOT A Documentary
        * Journalist and doctor encourage honest conversations about death
        * Undocumented Immigrants Call For Presidential Orders
        * State Retirees To Stop Paying Health Premiums
        * How America's most plentiful bird disappeared
        * Pregnant Workers To Be Protected Under New Law
        * Updates From The Prairie Capital Convention Center


        * Does the governor need to live in the Executive Mansion?
        * Our Opinion: Driving into floodwater a deadly practice
        * Angie Muhs: A debate in Springfield would send the right message from candidates
        * Charles Krauthammer: Lower corporate tax rates. Now.
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Dillman, Watson looking at possible runs for alderman
        * Statehouse Insider: Hands off investments
        * Statehouse Insider: Hands off investments
        * State of unions: AFSCME wins some, loses some on outsourcing
        * State of unions: Domination of Illinois' workforce becomes campaign issue
        * State of unions: Lawmakers approved keeping some workers out of unions


        * Bloomington shuttle bus driver charged with DUI
        * PHOTOS: Labor Day Pops Concert
        * US Rep. Duckworth announces she's pregnant
        * Showers gone before Boom begins
        * Local site joins exclusive Sesquicentennial Farm Program
        * Head-on collision on I-255 kills one, critically injures another
        * US eating habits improve a bit _ except among poor
        * Wet weather on the way
        * Union members tout organized labor in annual parade
        * Man found dead in central Illinois was hit by car


        * Soler's Wrigley debut big hit for Cubs
        * Cubs won't rush Rizzo back to lineup
        * Americans detained in North Korea call for U.S. help
        * Pakistan's premier challenged by raging protests
        * Iraqi prime minister pledges to root out militants

        * At a glance: How metro-east residents vote...
        * Tom Kacich: Rauner's focus will soon shift...
        * Shimkus not taking anything for granted de...
        * Shimkus Supports Strikes, Criticizes Presi...
        * #DirtyDenier$ Day 5: Congressman John M. S...
        * Politics Notebook: Shimkus to meet with ve...
        * GOP congressmen from Illinois, Kentucky to...
        * Facebook, Local Chambers of Commerce Host ...
        * Roskam hires wounded veteran in West Chica...
        * Jan Schakowsky: Tom Marino's Response to '...

        * Durbin, Bustos slam Schilling for work wit......
        * Durbin, Bustos slam Schilling for work wit......
        * Durbin, Bustos slam Schilling for work wit......
        * Durbin, Bustos slam Schilling for work wit......
        * 47th Annual Labor day picnic...

        * Rubio, Colleagues Call For Latin American ......
        * Putin Hopeful Russia Won’t Lose Right to H......

        * Report: Minimum Wage Increase Would Help 1 In 5 Illinois Children
        * Southwest Side Chicagoans Question TIF Use In 23rd Ward (UPDATED)
        * Harris v. Quinn: Another Nail In The Coffin Or Shot In The Arm For Labor?
        * OP-ED: What FDR Actually Said And What Bruce Rauner Doesn't Get This Labor Day
        * Election 2014
        * Guest Post: Harris v. Quinn: Another Nail In The Coffin Or Shot In The Arm For Labor?
        * Congresswoman Schakowsky Participates In 'Come Care With Me Day'
        * Why New York City Opposed Abe Lincoln
        * New London school board takes back its offer to “Dr.” Terrence Carter.
        * Greg Hinz. Both Quinn and Rauner bob and weave on pension fix.


        * Governor Quinn Invests $102 Million in High-Speed Rail Upgrades on Chicago-St. Louis Line - Funding Will Improve Capacity, Safety on Joliet-Dwight Segment
        * Quinn Refuses to Answer New IDOT Questions
        * IDNR Delivers Revised Rules to Implement Hydraulic Fracturing Regulatory Act - Rules strengthened to ensure public participation, improve transparency, toughen penalties and protect the environment
        * Governor Quinn Proclaims September as “Recovery Month” in Illinois - Encourages people to speak up about mental illness and substance abuse
        * Governor Quinn Dedicates Jane Byrne Interchange - Governor Renames Circle Interchange in Honor of Chicago’s First and Only Female Mayor to Date




            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller