SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The new preamble

Monday, Dec 2, 2013

* As with House Speaker Madigan’s original SB!, the pension reform conference committee report has a preamble explaining the reasoning behind the bill

Section 1. Legislative statement.

At the time of passage of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly, Illinois has both atypically large debts and structural budgetary imbalances that will, unless addressed by the General Assembly, lead to even greater and rapidly growing debts and deficits. Already, Illinois has the lowest credit rating of any state, and it faces the prospect of future credit downgrades that will further increase the high cost of borrowing.

The State has taken significant action to address these fiscal troubles, including, but not limited to, increasing the income tax and reducing pension benefits for future employees.

Further, the State has enacted a series of budgets over the last several fiscal years that resulted in deep cuts to important discretionary programs that are essential to the people of Illinois.

At the time of passage of this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly, the State’s retirement systems have unfunded actuarially accrued liabilities of approximately $100 billion.

Meanwhile, the State’s annual pension contribution has substantially increased in recent years, and will continue to increase in coming years. The General Assembly recognizes that without significant pension reform, the unfunded liability and the State’s pension contribution will continue to grow, and further burden the fiscal stability of both the State and its retirement systems.

This amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly is intended to address the fiscal issues facing the State and its retirement systems in a manner that is feasible, consistent with the Illinois Constitution, and advantageous to both the taxpayers and employees impacted by these changes. Having considered other alternatives that would not involve changes to the retirement systems, the General Assembly has determined that the fiscal problems facing the State and its retirement systems cannot be solved without making some changes to the structure of the retirement systems. As a result, this amendatory Act requires more fiscal responsibility of the State, while minimizing the impact on current and retired State employees.

Going forward, the automatic annual increase in retirement annuity will be based on a participant’s years of service to the State and inflation, which more accurately reflects changes in the cost of living. For participants who have yet to receive an annuity, a pensionable salary cap will be imposed; however, it will only impact future salary increases that exceed a cap. Those workers 45 years of age and younger will be required to work an additional 4 months for each year under 46, which results in a minimal increase in retirement age given that the life expectancy for a 45 year old is 87 years of age. Current employees will receive a 1% reduction in required employee contributions.

With these changes, the State can adopt an actuarially sound funding formula that will result in the pension systems achieving 100% funding no later than 2044. The State will also make additional contributions that will considerably aid in reducing the unfunded actuarially accrued liability.

The General Assembly finds that this amendatory Act of the 98th General Assembly will lead to fiscal stability for the State and its pension systems.


- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Six Degrees of Separation - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:26 am:

    The primary difference in this preamble and the SB1 preamble seems to be the lack of a “fiscal emergency” necessitating an overriding action of a constitutional provision, and instead stating that the bill is constitutional without that consideration.

  2. - Anon - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:27 am:

    Are Judges included in the new pension deal?

  3. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:28 am:

    This flies in the face of the old adage: “A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.” That is likely to be the response when this gets to the courts.

    The Speaker has been in the driver’s seat for somewhere in the neighborhood of 40 years. His goal has clearly never been to stabilize the pension systems. Why does he suddenly decide it’s an emergency.

  4. - pensioner - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:29 am:

    And the fools say blah blah blah.

  5. - wordslinger - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:36 am:

    What Six said. No “police powers.” The GA is telling the courts that the legislation is “consistent with the Constitution.” We’ll see.

  6. - kimocat - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:42 am:

    “Having considered other alternatives that would not require changes to the retirement systems…” Really? And what were those exactly? It seems to me that any options that didn’t involve stiffing retirees was never considered. At least it would have been more honest just to say we know we are the ones who created this so-called “crisis”, but have decided that the path of least resistance is to take it out of the hides of both active and retired public employees. Merry Christmas.

  7. - archimedes - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:43 am:

    I am a retired, receiving a TRS pension. After reading the TRS summary of the changes Rich provided (thank you Rich!) I am actually less critical of this than I was.

    Here is why:
    1. The bill changes to EAN payments - putting the bulk of the savings at the back of the 30 years.

    2. Almost 1/2 of the State “savings” in cost is not related to benefit cuts. The payment changes make a big difference.

    That said - it is still unconstitutional. It diminishes already earned benefits (my annual increase will decrease from 3% to 0.8%). A better argument could have been made if it only diminished future benefits for current employees - but that would have really cut into the savings. Even that is likely unconstitutional.

    The preamble still contains language that would rationalize the State use of police power to diminish the contract. “Having considered other alternatives” and “cannot be solved without making some structural change to the retirement system” all seem to be justifying this as reasonable and necessary for an important public purpose.

  8. - Curmudgeon - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:45 am:

    Just to start the comments ball rolling, here’s my situation.

    State non-management employee in my 70s, was hoping to retire in a few years. Based on what’s been released on the COLA changes, my expected lifetime pension payments will decrease between $213,900 and $226,400 depending on what the CPI is in future years.

    Of course, if the legislators get away with this theft, I expect they’ll be back again for more in five or ten years.

  9. - PublicServant - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:49 am:

    No more talk is necessary. I’ve called my legislators and asked them to vote against this immoral and unconstitutional theft of my earned pension. The preamble is meaningless. Other options exist that are constitutional. Some require true “heavy lifting” on the part of legislators, and passing an unconstitutional bill is nothing approaching heavy lifting, it is, in affect, the current legislature joining the ranks of those past legislatures that have abdicated their responsibilities to pay their bills like I and hopefully the rest of you do, and declaring that “we’ve tried and this is what we came up with” will hopefully be met with a “Nope. Unconstitutional. Try harder.” by the courts, IF it passes.

    Also, the 100% funding goal is totally unnecessary for public pensions since the state exists in perpetuity and cannot declare bankruptcy. And why 30 years since it took us 60+ years of “borrowing” state employee funds to get us into this mess in the first place?

    My legislators know how I feel, and the reasons behind those feelings. Call yours and let them know that you pay your debts and that you expect the state to pay theirs too. Tell them to vote no on this pension theft bill.

  10. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:50 am:

    To the Post,

    Saying something is Constitutional in intent does not manke it absolutely so. All the detractors or nay sayers or even those in “100%” in favor of everything in this, and since its a compromise, that group is razor thin at best, everyone will be waiting for the next step, and the courts will see if it is constitutional.

    To the Weekend,

    Thanks to Rich for “keeping the lights on” and the updates. You posts and analysis of what was being said, nor not, made all the updates even more compelling. The “story behind the story” makes all the posts more than just links “just because”. Appreciate the work on a “holiday weekend”.

    To “RNUG”, well done. Another set of “eyes” on things is always good, and you did yourself and the analysis a solid. “RNUG”, you and quite a few others keep me reading and learning, and not posting and looking foolish about Pensions. Thanks for your “Take” and cool move on Rich’s part to include you.

    Thanks to you both.

  11. - Rusty618 - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:50 am:

    “Meanwhile, the State’s annual pension contribution has substantially increased in recent years, and will continue to increase in coming years.”

    That’s what happens when skip out on payments for many years and have to play catch up now!

  12. - UIC Guy - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:53 am:

    Thanks, Pot (9:28 a.m.). I didn’t know that adage and it does seem to fit the current situation completely.

  13. - Wensicia - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:54 am:

    Like Willy, I appreciated the updates over a busy holiday weekend.

  14. - Griz - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:55 am:

    So now TRS will punish for Social Security as Social Security punishes for TRS with WEP and GPO.

    Really? How many ways can you beat someone?

  15. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 9:56 am:

    ==With these changes, the State can adopt an actuarially sound funding formula that will result in the pension systems achieving 100% funding no later than 2044.==

    Oh, really? Wasn’t that the plan with all of the previous “fixes”? This flies in the face of both reason and history.

  16. - Formerly Known As... - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:05 am:

    “We’re broke, broke I say!

    Meanwhile, we are busy finding revenue streams to pay for a new, multi-billion dollar capital bill.

    That new bill may or may not include bronzed doors for the governor’s mansion, to match those on the capitol building.”

  17. - walkinfool - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:08 am:

    Kudos and thank you to RNUG for his quick analysis this weekend.

    Take it to the court house. It’s not as black and white as many wish it were.

  18. - Samurai - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:09 am:

    The City of San Jose, California passed an ordinance containing pension reform similar to the proposed Illinois legislation. Lawsuits were filed in State and Federal Courts claiming, among other things, that the ordinance is a violation of Due Process and the California Constitutional Contracts Clause as well as Federal Law. Though there are differences between California and Illinois, the San Jose litigation will be of guidance for both sides in Illinois pension reform litigation. There was an article discussing San Jose pension reform in a Wall Street Journal article several days ago. The California court is expected to rule in several weeks.

    For those who enjoy reading legal documents, all Pleadings, Motions and Briefs are available at the San Jose City Attorney website, including filings by AFSCME.

    AFSCME Local 101 Post Trial Brief:
    City’s Post Trial Brief:

  19. - AFSCME Steward - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:09 am:

    Really ??? In fact the income tax increase is currently set to expire. If the “state” (actually the legislators who are more worried about their political futures than solving problems) was actually doing what was necessary to resolve the issue, revenue would be part of the discussion. The “pension reform” is now, and has always been, not focused on a fair solution but on winning the next election. Everyone wants to blame the unions and lazy mooching stae employees. But the pension mess has existed long before the state ever had unionized employees. The problem was so serious that the 1970 con-con committee, who wrote the current Illinois Constitution, foresaw the current dilema and wrote constitutional protections into the law. MJM was part of that process. State employees and retirees are protesting loudly, except for a sudden supicious late deal with Cullerton, the voices of those affected have been excluded from the process. The law to be voted on is clearly unconstitutional, and the arguments that are in the preamble to this bill were why the constitutional provision to protect pensions in there in the first place. The legislators cannot with any credibility skip the pension payments needed to adequately fund the pension then plead poverty when it blows up in their faces. They need to uses revenue solutions and further cuts to meet the constitutional protection. The citizens of Illinois have benefited from programs paid for with money that should have gone into the pension system. Maybe when they have to pay more taxes to fix the problem they’ll finally take a look at some of these so called leaders and remove them from office.

    “The State has taken significant action to address these fiscal troubles, including, but not limited to, increasing the income tax and reducing pension benefits for future employees.”

  20. - Cassandra - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:12 am:

    The bottom line: in order to get the level of savings desired, the proposal diminishes/impairs pensions. The more savings, the more diminishment.
    Even the most ardent conspiracy theorist has to wonder how the Supremes can can get around the diminishment language, however much they might want to help out Madigan and Quinn. So all this talk about “consideration” is just silly. Where in the constitution does it talk about consideration with respect to pensions.

  21. - wordslinger - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:15 am:

    Yeah, Rich invested as much time and effort in pensions over the long weekend as I did in eating, movies and football (Saturday football was epic, with the Hawks to boot).

    I especially enjoyed the Tribbies giving up their editorial page to Ken Griffin without identifying him as Rauner’s boy. I imagine some of the Tribbies felt the need for a shower after that.

    Of course, at this point in their history, the Tribbies aren’t going to honk off any hedgies in the billionaire boys club. They are for sale,and Griffin is a potential buyer.

    “Why, yes, Mr. Griffin, you can have our editorial pages. In fact, you can have the whole rag for the low, low price of….”

  22. - AFSCME Steward - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:17 am:

    I am not a lawyer, but I do know this about contracts, one party cannot set the terms of the contract for both sides, and then sign it for them. In order for there to be consideration there needs to be negotiation and agreement on the part of both parties. This so called consideration is a farce.

    “So all this talk about “consideration” is just silly. Where in the constitution does it talk about consideration with respect to pensions.”

  23. - Out Here In The Middle - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:19 am:

    Apologize if everyone thinks this is off-topic. Setting aside the questions about what the courts will do — I’m curious what impact readers think this would have on future contract negotiations — not just union contracts. What would a contract with the State of Illinois mean if the Legislature can simply rewrite the provisions anytime in the future?

  24. - Soccertease - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:23 am:

    Seems like a lot of work went into the preamble (and the new bill too), but to me it doesn’t change the fundamental issues and it’s still unconstitutional. A rational judge will say: “OK, you screwed up for 30-40 years; you have fixed the system going forward with new hires; in the meantime you need to either raise taxes temporarily until the retirees die off or just hope the money is there to pay them.”

  25. - PublicServant - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    Cassandra, the pensions are a contract, and as such can be modified through consideration AND AGREEMENT by both parties to the contract. The problem here is that you can’t call something consideration, when the other party to the contract hasn’t been given the opportunity to consider it, and possibly say no.

  26. - Bobbysox - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    It seems clear to me that if the ISC decides based on the rule of law and precedent, this is unconstitutional. No question. Only if they decide based instead on politics could they even consider any other outcome.

  27. - Demoralized - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:36 am:

    ==The problem here is that you can’t call something consideration, when the other party to the contract hasn’t been given the opportunity to consider it, and possibly say no. ==

    They will get that opportunity by lobbying the GA to vote no and also in court. You can’t negotiate with somebody who doesn’t want to negotiate. Why waste your time?

  28. - Cassandra - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:46 am:

    Pub Servant

    But the constitution also says that the benefit cannot be diminished or impaired. It doesn’t say
    that it can be changed for adequate consideration, but that’s irrelevant because there is no question but that this proposal is a diminishment for all affected. As I argued above, by their lights, that’s the only way Quinn, Madigan et al can get the “savings” (ha-that’s another topic) they want. By diminishment.

  29. - RNUG - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 11:00 am:

    OW, Walkinfool, etc.

    Thank you.

    And a big Thank You to Rich for the opportunity to comment over the weekend.

  30. - Irish - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 11:14 am:

    I hope the judges that decide the constitutionality of this bill remember the millions Madigan promised to build the new school in his district, the millions, maybe billions that have been promised to build the Illiana expressway(the new “bridge to nowhere”), the millions for the extension of the Elgin O’hare expressway, the possible millions worth of tax breaks to ADM, etc. etc..

    Maybe the leaders can’t say “fiscal emergency” with a straight face. No…..that can’t be it.

  31. - Eugene - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 12:06 pm:

    If this plan is constitutional then words have no meaning. Basically, this is the state’s political elite telling teachers and public servants: it’s constitutional because we say so. This whole process makes a mockery of the rule of law. And then passing another corporate giveaway on the same day - words fail me.

  32. - low level - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 12:24 pm:

    And remember, the idea for the CC originated right here on your site, Rich. And many didn’t think it was going to help resolve anything.

    It did, in that it gave time for the leaders to take a step back and work on the problem without it being in the papers all summer

  33. - Outsider - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 12:25 pm:

    Those assuming an ISC overturn better be sitting when the opinion comes down.

  34. - Quinn is the Grinch - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 10:00 pm:

    Governor Quinn is the Grinch that stole Christmas to State employees and retirees. He is heartless. He lied in his last campaign when he said that he had a heart. He has an ice cold heart like all Chicago machine democrats.

  35. - Old and in the Way - Monday, Dec 2, 13 @ 11:43 pm:

    Isn’t it amazing that the GA can embrace a progressive diminishment of the COLA (the wealthier get hit harder) but reject a progressive income tax!

    The preamble is doggerel! We had no choice but to negate our contractual pensions after we shorted your pension payments for 40 years! We had no choice…….

    If this passes judicial review then there is NO contract of any kind that the GA cannot duck or invalidate. Let’s buy some Caterpillar tractors that we can’t pay for and see how that one plays! Hey how about some capital bonds……due in twenty years? No, this is too brazen even for Illinois…..

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Afternoon updates
* Hospitals back removal of income tax sunsets
* The other strategy
* *** UPDATED 1x *** Quinn onboard; Rauner latches onto term limits proposal
* Because Illinois is a real battleground state
* Quinn dodges Rahm question on "Morning Joe"
* Morning Shorts
* Yesterday's blog posts

Visit our advertisers...








Search This Blog...

Search the 98th General Assembly By Bill Number
(example: HB0001)

Search the 98th General Assembly By Keyword

        * Hulu Plus app now casts to PS3, PS4, Xbox One
        * Sony brings Lifelog, SmartBand fitness apps to non-Sony Androids
        * What will become of Google+?
        * Calling all filmmakers: Do you have what it takes to create Nokia’s next video?
        * Hidden WP8.1 USB settings uncovered with Bing’s help
        * Our favourite 5 new Windows Phone apps of the week
        * Apple, Samsung bicker over jury verdict form

        * Google+ Integration To End
        * Buffalo BSHSBE33 NFC-Enabled Bluetooth Headset
        * XCOM: Enemy Unknown Hits Android
        * EIZO FlexScan S1933 19-Inch LCD Monitor
        * IFTTT For Android Makes It Official Debut On Google Play
        * ASUS GeForce GT 640 Low-Profile Graphics Card
        * Google Testing New Mobile Search Redesign

        * Detroit Tigers 7, Chicago White Sox 4: Scherzer Stops Sox
        * Quintana solid, but drops finale in Detroit
        * Johnson starts homestand opener vs. Rays
        * Quintana solid, but drops finale in Detroit
        * Walks working against the White Sox' plans for the bullpen
        * Viciedo maturing at the plate
        * Beckham returns, thrust into starting lineup

        Main Menu
        Pundit rankings
        Subscriber Content
        Blagojevich Trial
        Updated Posts

        April 2014
        March 2014
        February 2014
        January 2014
        December 2013
        November 2013
        October 2013
        September 2013
        August 2013
        July 2013
        June 2013
        May 2013
        April 2013
        March 2013
        February 2013
        January 2013
        December 2012
        November 2012
        October 2012
        September 2012
        August 2012
        July 2012
        June 2012
        May 2012
        April 2012
        March 2012
        February 2012
        January 2012
        December 2011
        November 2011
        October 2011
        September 2011
        August 2011
        July 2011
        June 2011
        May 2011
        April 2011
        March 2011
        February 2011
        January 2011
        December 2010
        November 2010
        October 2010
        September 2010
        August 2010
        July 2010
        June 2010
        May 2010
        April 2010
        March 2010
        February 2010
        January 2010
        December 2009
        November 2009
        October 2009
        September 2009
        August 2009
        July 2009
        June 2009
        May 2009
        April 2009
        March 2009
        February 2009
        January 2009
        December 2008
        November 2008
        October 2008
        September 2008
        August 2008
        July 2008
        June 2008
        May 2008
        April 2008
        March 2008
        February 2008
        January 2008
        December 2007
        November 2007
        October 2007
        September 2007
        August 2007
        July 2007
        June 2007
        May 2007
        April 2007
        March 2007
        February 2007
        January 2007
        December 2006
        November 2006
        October 2006
        September 2006
        August 2006
        July 2006
        June 2006
        May 2006
        April 2006
        March 2006
        February 2006
        January 2006
        December 2005
        April 2005
        March 2005
        February 2005
        January 2005
        December 2004
        November 2004
        October 2004

        Blog*Spot Archives
        November 2005
        October 2005
        September 2005
        August 2005
        July 2005
        June 2005
        May 2005


        RSS Feed 2.0
        Comments RSS 2.0


        * Sosnowski, other state leaders respond to Gov. .....
        * Minimum- and low-wage workers react to Gov. Pat.....
        * Governor Pat Quinn press conference: Western Il.....

        * Man charged with giving girlfriend HIV
        * Man charged with giving girlfriend HIV
        * Ill. jobs screened for political ties after hiring
        * Ex-Marine sentenced to die in sailor's slaying
        * Quinn: Obama library should get private funds too
        * Twice-fired police chief charged with battery
        * Illinois governor praises work of slain doctor
        * Illinois researchers to study Washington mudslide
        * Severe storms loom across central US this weekend
        * Severe storms loom across central US this weekend

        * Bankruptcy court trial sought over $3.8 million paid to Parsons
        * Amazon takes hit in states with online tax, study says
        * State audit: Police training money misspent
        * Audit: Treasurer's office has 30 guns not given to police
        * Madigan: 'Misunderstanding' on Obama library vote
        * Madigan re-elected to lead state Democratic party
        * Hastert, other state Republicans supporting immigration reform
        * Lawsuit seeks investigation of hiring under Quinn
        * Patronage allegations give Rauner fodder in race against Quinn
        * Bill would get state police cruisers on road

        * Chicago City Council committee OKs plastic bag ban
        * Feds to review Northwestern bid to unionize
        * United stock takes biggest tumble since October 2011
        * Next up for CPS: Barack Obama College Prep
        * Bronze statue of Roger Ebert unveiled at Ebertfest

        * Priest in 2nd child abuse investigation won’t be alone with kids: archdiocese
        * Woman sexually assaulted near Matteson Metra station
        * Reject firefighter staffing bill
        * Chicago man charged with giving girlfriend HIV; wife died of AIDS
        * Trio charged with robbing stores, gas stations in city, suburbs
        * His wife died of AIDS, now Chicago man is charged with giving girlfriend HIV
        * Pedicab operators say a crackdown could put them out of business
        * Robo-calls on pension reform bill raise Rauner-Rahm rift
        * Truck fatally strikes semi driver taking picture of accident
        * Semi fatally strikes pedestrian in Noble Square

        * Illinois graduated income tax vote next week
        * Woman sexually assaulted in Matteson
        * Dutch man charged in Chicago with selling drugs for bitcoins
        * 1 dead, 4 injured in shootings
        * Ravinia sales brisk, but wait long, as ticket-buying opens
        * New Chicago high school to be named for Obama
        * Lawyers for men charged in NIU hazing death challenge law
        * Coach fired in Maine West hazing scandal fails to win back job
        * Illinoisans have lowest home-state opinions in the U.S., poll says
        * Mom on death penalty for Torrez: ""I only wish I could do it myself"

        * Secret recording shows Uber's efforts to poach Chicago cabbies
        * Springfield Ordinances for Lincoln's Funeral Unearthed
        * Illinois Finally Gets 'No Child Left Behind' Waiver
        * Chicago aldermen pass plastic bag ban
        * City Council panel passes plastic bag ban
        * Marian Anderson Tribute - 'The Concert That Shook The Establishment'
        * Organic foods sold by Walmart create fear among some organic farmers and farm advocates
        * Senator Kirk joins Revolution in backing Small BREW Act
        * Listen To State Week - April 18, 2014
        * Earth Friendly Event In Springfield This Weekend

        * State jobs screened for political rules after hires
        * Quinn: Obama library should get private funds too
        * Rauner skips GOP event over pastor's comments
        * Quinn backs term limits for constitutional officers
        * Rauner wants Quinn to release hiring documents
        * Bernard Schoenburg: Barr borrowed late in sheriff campaign to keep ads flowing
        * Cristal Thomas: Protecting Illinois’ pregnant workers shouldn’t be a heavy lift
        * Remap group says it is not political
        * Quinn clout hiring faces scrutiny
        * Judge OKs use of lawmaker's post-arrest statement

        * Farm truck crossing railroad tracks hit by passenger train
        * UPDATED: Passenger train hits farm truck near Savoy
        * ISU rehires fired grounds worker
        * Lawnmowers taken from Lowe's
        * Train hits farm implement near Savoy
        * Updated: New Central High School site proposed
        * I-74 bridge meeting draws large crowd
        * Updated: Ebert knew about plans for statue
        * Robber sentenced to 10 years in prison
        * Three charged with Social Security fraud

        * The 10th District money race
        * Aurora Democrat calls out IHSA
        * Lawyers: Ill. hazing law vague, unconstitutional
        * Ill. House OKs lower-cost hunting bill for seniors
        * Quinn’s running mate takes new consulting job

        * Rep. Lipinski Reviews Operations at Hanson...
        * Lipinski announces 2014 Congressional Art ...
        * Lipinski seeks artistic submissions - The ...
        * Lemont VFW honors Vietnam veterans - Subur...
        * Lipinski Votes to Protect the Paychecks of...
        * Meet the 8 House Dems who don't co-sponsor...
        * Jeff Vorva's Editor's Notebook: In this ca...
        * Rep. Lipinski to Honor Vietnam Veterans at...
        * Rep. Lipinski Helps Secure Funds for Safet...
        * Rep. Lipinski Reviews Operations at Hanson...

        * Loading Koch Industries Website Too Many T......
        * Maryland and DC among worst for food aller......
        * Cleveland State University to reestablish ......
        * Convicted political boss Al Sanchez runnin......
        * Candidates make last filings for local, st......

        * Illinois Lt. Gov. Simon opposes pension le......
        * Dillard Odd Man Out on Pension Deal Reaction...
        * Sen. Mark Kirk sides with Rauner on pensio......
        * Governor's race infighting threatens pensi......
        * SCHOONERS - Home of Everyone's Favorite Be......

        * Major Oil & Gas Firm To List Drilling Chemicals
        * Durbin Says FDA E-Cigarette Regulations Don't Go Far Enough
        * Herbalife Punished 600 Distributors For Medical Claims: ABC News
        * Harmon To Push For Graduated Tax Vote Next Week
        * Madigan blames Tea Party for $100M Obama Library re-vote
        * Oberweis remains committed to border security, immigration law enforcement
        * One In Ten U.S. Bridges In Urgent Need Of Repair: Report
        * Chicago Plastic Bag Ban Clears Committee, Heads To Full City Council
        * Quinn Announces Support For Term Limits For Statewide Lawmakers
        * Chicago High School To Be Named After Obama

        * Cases of Chlamydia, Gonorrhea and HIV on the Rise Nationally - Residents Are Encouraged to Get Tested for STDs
        * State Insurance Regulators Urge Property Owners to Review/Add Coverage to Protect from Floods & Water Damage - Most homeowners’ policies do not cover flood damage
        * Governor Quinn Statement on New Proposal to Enact Term Limits for Constitutional Officers
        * Statement from Governor Quinn on the Passing of Dr. Jerry Umanos
        * Governor Quinn Proclaims “Wrigley Field Day” - Home of the Chicago Cubs Turns 100 Years Old Today

            Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller