Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Freezing the fund
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Freezing the fund

Friday, Dec 19, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the New York Times we have a more detailed report about the federal government’s attempt to freeze the governor’s campaign fund…

Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois plans to ask that he be permitted to use campaign funds to defend himself against federal corruption charges, a lawyer who represents the head of the embattled governor’s campaign fund said Thursday.

Michael D. Ettinger, the lawyer for Mr. Blagojevich’s brother, Robert, who is chairman of the campaign fund, The Friends of Blagojevich, said that the governor would make the request to the judge assigned to his case when and if he is formally indicted.

“There’s a real question about how he will be able to pay for his defense,” Mr. Ettinger said. […]

Mr. Blagojevich may also be blocked from using campaign funds to pay for his defense. Mr. Ettinger said the fund has received a letter from the office of United States Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald warning that federal prosecutors would seek the forfeiture of the campaign contributions, and advising that the fund should not spend, dissipate, or conceal any of its resources. There was $3.6 million in the fund as of June 30, according to public filings.

* More from the Sun-Times

Meanwhile, defense lawyer Michael Ettinger, who represents Robert Blagojevich, said there is an expectation that the governor’s campaign fund will be indicted.

“There’s precedent from [former Gov. George] Ryan,” Ettinger said. “I assume they’ll do that here too.”

If that happens, Ettinger said they’ll seek a hearing to have attorney fees set aside from the campaign.

Earlier this week, prosecutors notified the fund that they would seek to freeze it.

“Don’t spend it or conceal it or dissipate it, we’ll seek reimbursement if you do,” Ettinger said the letter stated.

* This bit of background shows that there is a precedent for using a frozen campaign fund to pay legal expenses, however…

Gov. Blagojevich’s last campaign finance report shows Friends of Blagojevich had $3.6 million in the bank as of June 30. The 76-page affidavit that accompanies the criminal complaint filed against Blagojevich cites a cooperating witness as saying his campaign was seeking to raise $2.5 million by the end of the year, when a tougher campaign fundraising law takes effect. […]

Putting attorneys and Blagojevich on notice that the campaign money could be forfeited if he were convicted could effectively freeze the fund — something the government did as it built its case against former Gov. George Ryan.

The Citizens for Ryan campaign fund eventually was charged and convicted of racketeering, although U.S. District Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer allowed the fund’s defense attorney to tap it for his fee.

* They want to use the campaign money because, as I told you yesterday, Attorney General Lisa Madigan has turned thumbs down on taxpayer financing

Taxpayers will not have to foot the bill to defend Gov. Rod Blagojevich against criminal charges or moves to oust him from office, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said Thursday.

“It is absurd to suggest that taxpayers must finance the defense of a criminal action against Governor Blagojevich who is accused of corruptly betraying the public trust for personal and financial gain,” Madigan said in a letter to defense attorney Ed Genson.

Genson submitted a letter to Madigan Wednesday specifically outlining the cases against the governor and requesting the state pay for his defense in those cases.

Genson later claimed he didn’t expect taxpayers to fund his criminal defense, only his defense against ongoing impeachment proceedings.

Discuss.

* Related…

* Gov. Blagojevich on his own for legal bills

* AG rejects Blago request for representation

* Rod Blagojevich thwarted in attempt to have state pay legal costs

       

14 Comments
  1. - How Ironic - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 9:46 am:

    I think that this is an excellent move by the feds. If the money is ill-gotten, it shouldn’t be allowed to help keep him out of jail.

    I’m glad the AG has dis-allowed payment by the state for defense.

    Jim Leach of WMAY did have an interesting point however, about the impeachment. As it is a State Action, against a state official, it perhaps wouldn’t be out of line for the state to pay for that defense.

    But not the criminal case. That should be all on the Gov.


  2. - DuPage Dave - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 9:51 am:

    This raises the question as to why an elected official’s campaign fund would ever be allowed to pay for his criminal defense. Such use would make the campaign fund essentially a personal fund, which I don’t believe is the intent of a campaign fund. Other than paying for staff salaries, office rent, TV commercials, and printed materials, what else should campaign funds ever be used for?

    Also- why should officials with no election opponents (e.g., Mike Madigan) be allowed to accumulate millions in “campaign” funds, then dole them out to others who do face a challenge at the polls?


  3. - Ghost - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:00 am:

    It would be interesting to see soem civil suits, perhaps even a class acion, brough against the fund to return money to 1, donors who contributed under pressure to do so in order to get or keep contracts; and/or 2, donors who were misled.


  4. - wordslinger - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:03 am:

    I’ll bet anything that when Congress passed the RICO Act in 1970, they never dreamed it would one day be used to go after campaign funds — or that lawmakers would be prosecuted under criminal statutes designed to go after the Mafia.


  5. - VanillaMan - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:13 am:

    Blagojevich made his illegal thinking public when Fitzgerald allowed the audio tapes to include Blagojevich’s suggestion of moving campaign funds to “prepay” a lawyer. That is simple money laundering, and anyone would know that this method is illegal.

    So the freeze is good to go.


  6. - VanillaMan - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:16 am:

    When the RICO Act was passed by legislators, many of them had experiences enough to craft the legislation correctly. They had mob ties and used RICO to innoculate themselves against both the mob and against any future illegalities they had conducted previously. These legislators weren’t virgins.


  7. - wordslinger - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:24 am:

    VMman, I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. I doubt if they thought it would ever be used against campaign funds. In fact, it took 10 years after passage for RICO to be used at all.


  8. - You Go Boy - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:27 am:

    “Friends of Blagojevich” - wow, the name itself is hilarious. It will soon be “Friend of Blagojevich”, and it will consist of a mirror.


  9. - zatoichi - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:50 am:

    If I gave money to a politician’s campaign fund, I would expect that the money would be spent on the costs of getting the person I liked into office. The concept of using that money after the election to cover personal legal costs or to be given to other’s campaigns strikes me as a disingenuous change of why the money was requested and given. If the bucks are not specifically campaign related then use them as desired. It just strikes me as odd that the campaign group “Friends of Blagojevich” wanted more dollars to cover legal expenses that have nothing to do with campaigning. But hey, ya want to give away your bucks, be my guest.


  10. - Attorney Fees - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 10:57 am:

    Note, in the Ryan case it was the attorney defending the campaign itself (Tom Breen) that was allowed by the Judge to get reimbursed for his fees in fighting the charges and the forfeiture against the Campaign. The freeze on the account in that case did not allow for Ryan to use the funds for his own defense attorneys.


  11. - Ghost - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 1:11 pm:

    VM, prepaying atorneys is perfectly legal, these funds are often refrred to as retainers.


  12. - Rich Miller - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 1:13 pm:

    Ghost is right.


  13. - no plan B - Friday, Dec 19, 08 @ 5:04 pm:

    Regarding prepaying attorneys - I believe Blago’s plan to prepay was to intentionally hand over much more money than needed with the understanding to get a “refund” later. I’m pretty sure that’s not the legitimate purpose of a retainer.


  14. - BLOGOPSTER - Saturday, Dec 20, 08 @ 2:47 pm:

    Governor Rod Blago signed the paperwork to Fire ALPLM Director, Rick Beard after being accused of shoplifting. Losing a 200K a year job. In this case the Governor felt that waiting for the right of due process was not necessary. Mr. Beard has only been charged with a crime at this time. Now he asks the people of Illinois to be patient until he can prove he has done nothing illegal in a court of law. Who will pay Mr. Beards defense team.
    Fool me once, shame on you.
    Fool me twice, Shame on me.
    Fool me three times……


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Study: Invest in Kids scholarship students lag, but report called 'meaningless'
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Judge denies city's motion for stay in Bring Chicago Home case (Updated)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller