Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Tribune endorses Quigley, whacks Fritchey
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Tribune endorses Quigley, whacks Fritchey

Tuesday, Feb 17, 2009

* 5:06 pm - The Chicago Tribune has just endorsed Cook County Commissioner Mike Quigley in the 5th Congressional District race…

Quigley has been a forceful, persistent critic of Cook County Board President Todd Stroger. Even better, Quigley has done exhaustive work on how county government could provide better health care and other services to people in far more efficient and cost-effective ways.

His reports on how to improve county government are without parallel in Illinois politics. They’re not goo-goo yammer. They’re tightly researched and spot-on accurate in their assertions about best practices and likely savings. He produces facts, facts, facts. If Quigley’s ideas had all been put in place, the county would not be crying now for more money. […]

There is more to him than his work on government reform. Quigley has an outstanding record on human rights, health care and the environment. (The Reader said he’s “arguably the greenest elected official in Chicago.”) He has sound ideas on reviving the U.S. economy, on national health care, on how to put people back to work.

Quigley couldn’t have written that better himself. Notice how the line about Todd Stroger will help Quigley fend off attacks by Rep. Feigenholtz over his endorsement of Stroger and his support for Stroger’s first budget.

And at the end of the piece, the Trib whacks Fritchey…

Another candidate, state Rep. John Fritchey talks about reform, but voters really ought to take a look at how Fritchey deflected the hard questioning of Sen. Roland Burris during testimony at the now-infamous House impeachment committee hearing. Rep. Fritchey, whose interests were you serving there? Not the public’s.

This Burris explosion is coming at absolutely the wrong time for Fritchey.

The Sun-Times also endorsed Quigley. Like the Tribune, it praised several of the other candidates. Unlike the Trib, the CS-T didn’t mention Fritchey’s name in its endorsement.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

24 Comments
  1. - Oh, please.... - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 5:22 pm:

    I can’t believe the Tribune and others are seriously trying to blame Reps. Fritchey and Durkin for asking the wrong question, rather than the fact that Burris was skirting the truth, avoiding the question…and now we find out, outright lying. Ridiculous.


  2. - fed up - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 5:22 pm:

    The public has every right to judge Fritchey by the friends he keeps and helps protect. I like quigley but worry about what will happebn if he leaves the Crook Co. board.


  3. - AliveInFive - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 5:56 pm:

    Suprised the Trib did not cite Quigley for his deft handling of Bernie’s baseball tickets. He was really good at that and actually got things done.
    Doubt his “spot on” studies won’t mean squat in DC.
    The move will split some votes and help Sara win in a walk


  4. - walter sobchak - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 5:58 pm:

    I remember Fritchey jumping in and interrupting Durkin’s questioning of Burris. It, and his improbable tan, stood out as being incongruous. Not knowing much more about him than his sort of ‘good government’ appearances on the Roe Conn show, it made me change my mind about him. Just another potentially bent politician was my take. Rich, is right, the Burris explosion has a kill radius just wide enough to kill his chance to win the 5th. Lets hope it doesn’t make him take the fifth.


  5. - Carl Nyberg - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 6:08 pm:

    If Quigley wins by a relatively narrow margin it will allow the major newspaper editorial boards to claim they are relevant again.

    And if Quigley wins without buying TV ads that will be noteworthy too.


  6. - Levois - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 6:30 pm:

    Meh I don’t have a problem with him interrupting Durkin. His line of questioning didn’t seem to go anywhere, although I do understand where he was going. I think this is a bum rap anyway.


  7. - 4 percent - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 6:39 pm:

    where is Michael Flanagan when we need him?!


  8. - Lakefront Liberal - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 6:45 pm:

    I can’t believe both papers actually made a good endorsement! Though my nickname is “Lakefront Liberal” what we DON’T need in congress are more liberal yes-men (or women). What we need are people who will stand up to the monied/powerful interests, which Quigley has no problem doing. And he’s liberal/progressive to boot!

    I have been a Quigley fan for a long time, but what really sealed it for me was going to a City Club luncheon where he was scheduled to talk about TIFs. There he was telling a room full of corporate types and politicos that TIFs are a slush fund that Mayor Daley uses to reward his cronies. In those words! It’s one thing for Fritchey to criticize Blago from behind the shadow of Madigan, but who is out there protecting Quigley when he calls out the Mayor? No one. Against Stroger he at least has a little back up (though very little), but on the TIF thing he is really out there on his own. And he wouldn’t have to do it at all, it would be a hell of a lot easier for him to just keep his mouth shut on TIFs, and on county government, but he doesn’t.


  9. - JonShibleyFan - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 7:15 pm:

    “where is Michael Flanagan when we need him?! ”

    Gettin’ rich off of being a one and done Congressman in his eponymous Capitol Hill lobbying firm.


  10. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 8:13 pm:

    What was Pat O’Connor doing in this race anyway? Was he just another dude on the ballot to help Sara?


  11. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 8:17 pm:

    Good question.


  12. - Pot calling kettle - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 8:36 pm:

    Read the Hearing transcript. Fritchey interrupted when the Republican questioning became irrelevant. When they started asking “what if”s and “will you run in 2010?”

    When Jil Tracy was on track and asking about contacts with the Gov’s people, Fritchey said not a word. Same with Durkin’s questioning. He only jumps in when the Republican’s veer off the impeachment track.

    I don’t know Fritchey, he may be a complete hack, but I don’t think his actions in the Burris testimony were out of line.

    If the Fritchey is at fault, it’s for not pursuing the line of questioning about who Burris talked to and when, but this applies to just about every member of the committee.


  13. - Amy - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 8:48 pm:

    is the Tribune trying to refer to Banks family connections with the Fritchey slap? the blogosphere loves Fritchey, which seems logical since he is a good writer, uses blogs, is communicative and smart, but that connection is a huge issue.


  14. - blackdem - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 9:37 pm:

    Its funny how the Tribune Board thinks they know everything. Where are the “spot on” answers on Cook County??? Not his reform 2003 document that puts all of the county services on the local governments..Or better yet someone define a “reformer” How can you work for the Mayor (claypool), or be a democrat and when no one likes you and you have no clout (Quigley) do you all of a sudden become a reformer. Quigleys chief of staff and other memebers of his camp was on Strogers transition team. He was with Stroger until he couldnt get anywhere and he and Claypool decided to run for board president using the Axelrod method..Tear down the current administration and try to ride to victory. Quigley has not has any meaningful iyems EVER enacted. Lets talk about action and results not so called plans on paper


  15. - Amy - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 10:19 pm:

    “Tear down the current administration and try to ride to victory.”
    I think that the two gentlemen you mention have tried to create change, good change. One of them has a track record reforming the park district. The other was at the County Board before the wave of reformers, presenting alternative ideas. Now both of them do that at the County Board, trying to change a government that is Dickensian.


  16. - Fritchey Watcher - Tuesday, Feb 17, 09 @ 11:28 pm:

    I’ve never been comfortable with Fritchey’s association with the Banks, especially the zoning stuff with his father in law. I think the Tribune got this one right.

    Feigenholtz really didn’t do a good job at the Trib endorsement session. She was really evasive about her push-poll.


  17. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 6:48 am:

    I’m supporting Feigenholtz in this race, but Fritchey’s only mistake was wearing the wrong hat at the wrong time.

    He was acting as a lawmaker who understands the legal proceedings and the precedence of an impeachment investigation.

    The committee’s mission was a fact-finding one. Committee members should not have been asking hypothetical questions. And if I had been Burris’s attorney, I would have advised him not to answer them.

    You’re absolutely right that Fritchey’s actions weren’t smart for a CANDIDATE. As a candidate, he should have seized the opportunity to issue a headline-grabbing yet inconsequential press release, backed up by some superfluous speech during the proceedings.

    Instead, the Tribune whacks him for doing his job.


  18. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 8:02 am:

    ==The committee’s mission was a fact-finding one.==

    YDD, I think that’s the exact problem that Burris and Fritchey have with this right now.

    Burris and Fritchey knew exactly why Burris was called and what information the committee was looking for.

    Burris, behaving like a criminal defendant by parsing words and omitting obvious points of interest, and Fritchey, by inexplicably choosing to act like a criminal defense attorney, brought this wrath upon themselves.


  19. - 44th Ward - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 8:21 am:

    The Quigley endorsement is more of an attest to Tom Bowen’s strategy and skill than actual difference between the candidates…Tom’s had experience with both the S-T and Trib from his time with Congressman Foster. Give credit where credit is due…the problem is that we NEED Mike on the County Board. Unless Vallas can somehow take over…

    The Trib whacking Fritchey seems a little disingenuous. Have to agree with YDD in that Rep Fritchey put his job as State Rep first and Candidate second in the proceedings. The swipe from the Trib was undeserved.


  20. - Amy - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 8:56 am:

    O’connor has a commercial, and it’s on.


  21. - Phineas J. Whoopee - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 9:01 am:

    I remember watching the Burris testimony and saying to myself, why is Fritchey defending this guy? I chalked it up to a pol wanting to sound important, say intelligent things and slap around the Repubs a little. Basically, show them who’s boss of the committee. It was pointless grandstanding but I don’t think he meant to cover for Burris.

    His opponents should realize this and give Fritchey a pass. lol


  22. - CC - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 10:47 am:

    “As a candidate, he should have seized the opportunity to issue a headline-grabbing yet inconsequential press release, backed up by some superfluous speech during the proceedings.”

    That’s all Fritchey ever does. He’s a media hound with a big mouth and very white teeth. He has to get his face in the picture. Now it get’s him in trouble. It made him look dumb w/ Geraldo. How stupid can you get? Now the Burris stuff. The Sun Times and the Tribune were right on w/ Quigley.


  23. - Larry Mullholland - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 10:50 am:

    Fritchey gets whacked for running point for Burris…As I recall, it was Lou Lang who interjected on merit during the questioning by the r’s…


  24. - Larry Mullholland - Wednesday, Feb 18, 09 @ 11:07 am:

    Pages 964 & 965 of the transcript

    Lou Lang
    Line 13 & 14
    …you have a loop you want to close “Close it up. Otherwise, lets move on…”

    Page 966 Line 18
    Currie to Durkin
    “Lets move on… Finish this line of questioning quite quickly..

    Durkin was attempting to show a historical financial Burris/Blago relationship that benefitted Blago and was rushed along by Currie & Lang


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Campaign notebook
* Federal judge rejects lawsuit over gas pump signs touting gas tax freeze
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and some campaign updates
* Ken Griffin coverage roundup
* Digging into that new poll
* *** UPDATED x3 *** Pritzker to call special session on abortion rights
* Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization react
* Roe v. Wade overturned
* New law expands sports team license plate options
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* LIVE COVERAGE
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller