A great library for a great man
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured. On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, urgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war—seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came. One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. “Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.” If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.” With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
|
A good question (Updated)
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller From today’s Illinois Campaign for Political Reform The Race is On blog: The Prairie Political Action Committee, a federal PAC associated with Sen. Durbin’s staff, has given $92.5K to the Illinois Democratic County Chairmans Association. And they aren’t even on the ballot this year. Don’t they have to file with the State Board of Elections if they’re giving more than $3,000 to an Illinois political organization within a 12-month period? The last I checked, the Prairie Political Action Committee hadn’t filed any state paperwork. You’ll find the relevant statutes here. There’s no mention of an exception for a federal PAC.  (10 ILCS 5/9‑1.8) (from Ch. 46, par. 9‑1.8) I think they gotta file. UPDATE: Chris Rhodes of the CrossBlog points out in the comment section that the Prairie Political Action Committee contributed to Rep. Careen Gordon (D-Coal City). The PAC gave Gordon $5,000 on October 6. There’s almost no doubt that the PAC has to file. And, how much does the State Board of Elections website suck? Type the word “Prairie” into the Contributor Search Page and you get bupkiss for results. I know the new director inherited that clunky old 1990s junker, but he ought to fix it. They actually have to code every committee, contributor, etc. by hand. Ridiculous. And a waste of money. UPDATE 2: This could be one of those situations I’ve worried about - when I thought it would be fun to post a little tidbit here and it may turn out to be Fax-worthy. Oops. I’m gonna have to watch that. Don’t want to screw up my real gig.
|
Breaking news
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller Will the weirdness never stop? Illinois Senate candidate Alan Keyes’ 2000 presidential campaign has been fined $23,000 for campaign finance violations including taking excessive contributions. The earlier story said it was just $1,500 in anonymous contributions.
|
Bean releases poll
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller I wrote about this in this morning’s Capitol Fax, but since Melissa Bean’s campaign has issued a press release, I figured it was safe to disclose it now. LAKE ZURICH – With three weeks to go before the election, Melissa Bean has surged in the polls and is now in a statistical dead heat with U.S. Rep. Phil Crane in the campaign to represent Illinois’ 8th Congressional district. Melissa Bean has closed to within two points, 44%-46%, against Crane, the most senior Republican in the House of Representatives, according to polling released by the Bean campaign. [Snip] That’s a pretty high margin of error.
|
“Candy” (updated with video links)
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller The new Gordon Maag TV ad I wrote about today has just landed in my in-box. It’s harsh. You can click here to see the 5th District Supreme Court candidate’s spot. He used candy to lure the children into the house. The Republican Karmeier’s attack ad was pretty harsh as well, as was Democrat Maag’s first negative hit on Karmeier. My question is, why isn’t the local media doing any “truth squad” work on this campaign? Click here to watch Maag’s first negative TV ad, which ran all last week and the first part of this week. We count on judges to protect us and put violent criminals behind bars. And click here to watch Karmeier’s first attack ad. Before we pick a judge to make important decisions, their record matters. [Newspaper clipping: Candidate for Illinois Court gets Low Marks From Attorneys” - St. Louis Post Dispatch (no date)] I think I’ll be analyzing these ads in tomorrow’s Capitol Fax (since nobody else is). Without seeing the ads it’s difficult to comment on them, which is why I uploaded them. Not sure how long it will last, though. Whatever. What do you, the blogosphere, think of these three spots?
|
Trouble?
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Congratulations, Mike!
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller My favorite Mike Lawrence story is from the days when he was Gov. Jim Edgar’s spokesman. I’m pretty harried because of Internet access problems last night and a surreal difficulty getting anyone to talk about Gordon Maag’s new ad this morning, so I’ll tell you right now I won’t get this story completely right. Anyway, the way I remember it, Edgar was in favor of a certain “revenue enhancement” that looked an awful lot like a tax increase. This was Edgar’s first term, remember, when he said he would only sign a tax hike if it received a three-fifths majority in both chambers. The budget was in dire straits and Edgar needed the money in a big way. So, we asked Lawrence, the spokesman, why his boss’ non-tax increase idea looked so much like a tax increase. Lawrence said, and I’m paraphrasing here, “I think it’s a tax increase. The governor and I disagree.” Well, that killed the guv’s plan right then and there, but Lawrence was not fired, or even publicly reprimanded. The respect I had for him that day has never waned. Imagine that - a press secretary who told the truth. Lawrence deserved this job, and I’m happy that he got it. CARBONDALE, Ill. - - Veteran newsman, press secretary and respected political analyst Mike Lawrence is the new director of Southern Illinois University Carbondale’s Public Policy Institute. Provost and Vice Chancellor John M. Dunn announced the appointment today (Tuesday, Oct. 5).
|
Transcript
Thursday, Oct 14, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller If you just didn’t get enough of Tuesday’s debate, there’s a transcript here and the audio file is here.
|
A bit much
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller Keyes campaign gloats over debate “win” in campaign e-mail: (SPRINGFIELD, OCTOBER 13) – Keyes 2004 campaign manager Bill Pascoe, reacting to Alan Keyes’ clear win in last night’s debate against Barack Obama, released the following statement: Now he’s going after mainstream voters? Now? Or does he believe that he’s the mainstream guy and people are finally waking up to this undeniable fact? His relatively sedate delivery last night suggests the former, but I’m pretty sure it’s the latter.
|
An invaluable tool
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller I was just talking to Cindi Canary over at the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform about something that I’m writing for Thursday or Friday and she tipped me to the ICPR’s new blog. Called “The Race is On!” the blog wades through A-1’s every day and pulls out some of the tastier bits. Here’s today’s:
I will be all over this site in the coming days.
|
More on Mike Baer
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller From the State Journal-Register:
Read the full story. The SJ-R did a good job on this one.
|
Favorite Debate Headline
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH ALAN KEYES? Kudos to Eric Zorn.
|
Bean has new poll
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller As a follow-up on today’s Phil Crane story, Melissa Bean reportedly has a brand spanking new poll “that shows the race is tighter than Joan Rivers’ face,” according to a reliable source in the area. Like I wrote in the Capitol Fax today, if Crane wins, it won’t be by much.
|
Making a little lemonade
Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 - Posted by Rich Miller All those lawsuits could soon be used as a cash cow in Madison County. Raising filing fee(s) on attorneys who file lawsuits in Madison County will add a half million dollars to the fiscal 2005 Madison County budget, said County Board Chairman Alan Dunstan.
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |