Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Jan 6, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller

Today’s State Journal-Register editorial endorsed “a short list of obvious reforms” for Congress.

Ban the 200-plus ex-congressmen now working as lobbyists from walking freely onto the House floor during sessions.

Stop allowing lawmakers to use “earmarks” to provide millions to favored companies and organizations without the usual public scrutiny.

Require the deliberations of all conference committees - in which differences between House and Senate bills are reconciled and earmarks are smuggled into legislation - to be public.

Mandate that the language of all bills be posted on the Internet at least 24 hours before they are voted on, except when a supermajority of the House or Senate agrees otherwise.

I know I usually concentrate on Illinois politics, but the never-ending DC scandals could wind up impacting some Illinois races.

What do you think of the SJ-R’s list, and what, if anything, would you add? Also, do you think any reforms will really work?

       

8 Comments
  1. - RFK fan - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 8:18 am:

    There is another side to “earmarks”. I’ve worked for non-profits through which “the people” were well-served by funds being directed our way by helpful congresspersons. It doesn’t all go to companies.

    I’d add some other reforms, including making sure that each bill actually only deals with one topic–no tacking on non-germane amendments, especially that deal with funding…

    …and, of course, (never happen) public financing of campaigns.


  2. - Rod's Hair - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 9:01 am:

    They should also be extended to the IL GA; except more thought about the method of appropriating $ is needed. The GA is quick to tell other orgs. such as municipalities that their meetings, notices, ordinances, etc. need to be open to the public and posted accordingly. Why not theirs? Why isn’t the press association pushing the legislation to open up the GA. I would love to attend a caucus meeting!


  3. - Anon - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 9:37 am:

    The scandals in the Congress are a huge issue. And the money being makes one wonder why the G is not more active out there.
    Meanwhile.

    HOW ABOUT SOME REFORMS FOR THE MEDIA:
    1.tell us a little about how editorial board decisions are made.
    2. Paying for free office space in State House
    3. Accepting free staff from U of I.
    4. Take a break from quoting numbskulls academics, who have never worked a campaign or made a donation, about politics
    5. Less reliance on polls in covering campaigns


  4. - Navin Johnson - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 9:46 am:

    All the reforms listed are worthy. However, until the issue of $ and politics is confronted head on, the corruption will continue unabated. Both parties are tarnished by corruption. At the federal level it is falling primarily on the Republicans because they hold all the levers of power. In Chicago/Cook County/Illinois it is falling primarily on Democrats because they hold all the levers of power. Corruption is about the only truly bipartisan issue that exists.

    I would add a Clean Elections system like that in Arizona or Maine. Both systems have survived numerous legal challenges and candidates in both states of both parties have won accepting the public money. For those convinced it is unethical to take public money for campaigns, both states retain a private money system, candidates can choose which system they prefer.

    No set of reforms will completely eliminate corruption, but greater transparency, more accountability and significant campaign finance reform would reduce it. The final ingredients are a vigilent press (largly missing in D.C., but good work lately here in Chicago) and aggressive prosecutors unafraid to ruffle political feathers. Unfortunately, you can’t create those elements via legislation.


  5. - Cassandra - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 10:05 am:

    How about paying salaries to candidates for state legislative (and perhaps other) office if they agree to certain limitaitons on campaign contributions. Most of the Illinois legislators are so appallingly bad that perhaps this would
    draw a better class of candidate. I think this has already been tried somewhere.
    and this might allow new


  6. - "Paddy" Bauler - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 10:41 am:

    SJ-R’s “reforms” (with the exception of “earmarks”)have all been implented by the Illinois General Assembly. Hmmmm.


  7. - Truthful James - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 11:42 am:

    First, an indirect solution to the money fountain required to remain ensconced in Congress and qualify for the almost unnatural pension benefits: Shorten the campaign time by moving all primaries to Labor Day. National Conventions would take place on “Convention Dat” one week later. Pre-primary campaigning would start July 1. No advertising before that.

    Second — no omnibus bills. I would also suggest that the Members be required to initial each page of each bill voted upon, but that would not be possible. Each Member’s earmarks would be a single bill bearing his name.

    Third, the Mandarins are running the Congress. Unelected Member Staff and Committee Staff are writing law, negotiating with other unelected staff and with unelected Executive Office staff. Mandarins move from job to job, from Staff to Staff effortlessly. We keep building Office Buildings to accommodate their growth.
    Cut the Mandarins in half, and there will be an equivalent cut in the number of pages produced for the Federal Register.


  8. - Cal Skinner - Friday, Jan 6, 06 @ 11:47 am:

    I wonder why the State Journal-Register thinks conference committees actually meet.

    Some may, but precious few did during my 16 years in the House. It’s usually a staffer collecting signatures on language the leadership wants.

    In fact, members got to serve on many fewer conference committees in the 1990’s than they did in the 1070’s.

    Just another example of concentration of power, I guess.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Transit fiefdoms ignored 2015 state deadline to streamline fares
* Question of the day
* Today's quotable
* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* It’s just a bill
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller