Morning shorts
Tuesday, Feb 14, 2006 - Posted by Rich Miller · The AP has a list of known spending requests in tomorrow’s budget address. · More on “Pay to Lay.” · Topinka has a new TV ad. · Brutal schedule for candidate forums in the 10th CD. · Healthcare debated in the 6th CD. · SJ-R supports Blagojevich pre-school plan. · Community colleges want more money for counseling programs. · More trouble in Chicago Heights. · Acting US Attorney for southern Illinois could be on serious hot seat in Ryan trial. · Forgot to mention this yesterday, but here’s my analysis of the Tribune’s latest poll. · The Inside Dope celebrates one year of blogging. Congrats! Also, I dig the Valentine’s Day color scheme. · Sex Ed plan a hot topic. · Major Blagojevich backer will cost state taxpayers an additional $100 million in next fiscal year’s budget. · Thomson prison could finally open this fall. · Interesting article on learning. · Rep. McKeon to testify as character witness for George Ryan. · I think I’ll be drinking my Pepsi straight up from now on. Yuck. · IL GOP hoped to raise over a million dollars last night.
|
- DOWNSTATE - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 8:29 am:
Does anyone know how much a state can borrow before it hits it’s limit.The past 4 years they said the budget was balanced and then we find out Blago borrowed 21 billion.Once again this claim is being made and I think the question this time is.How much to we need to borrow?
- zatoichi - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 8:54 am:
Love the “cheap show for political purposes” comment about using bricks for a sound barrier on a highway. Of course having bricklayers get a long term job to lay those bricks after a nice contribution is not a cheap show.
- Anon - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 9:02 am:
I see Brady picked up two more downstate legislative endorsements yesterday….Rick Winkel and Dale Righter.
He keeps unveiling these things a couple at a time. I’m beginning to wonder if this isn’t all part of a very well-planned, methodical march.
Interesting that in spite of the Tribune poll, these guys are still willing to go out on a limb for Brady against the sitting State Treasurer.
Maybe they see or know something the rest of us don’t?
- Maroon - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 10:42 am:
I just want to make a comment to Rich Miller…
I really enjoy this recent daily feature of linking the more notable political stories around the state. This is a great service for those of us who don’t have the time to go pouring through all the newspapers every day. Thanks, Rich. Keep it up.
On a random side note, I paid a visit to the Abe Lincoln museum in Springfield on Friday. There was a typo on the visitor’s map that I received with my admission. The governor’s name was misspelled “Blagojovich,” which I found amusing…
- Krenzler - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 11:37 am:
Great news about the ILGOP raising $1 million
- Never Judy - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 11:58 am:
Not on this news clip, maybe not yet known…
Gidwitz has gone negative on Judy on TV… ad ran on channel 7, Chicago metro, at about 8:50 am.
Ad features unflattering still pic of Judy with graphics and voice over: Judy supported higher taxes, more spending, bigger deficit. Ending tag line something like: why vote for more of the same when its time for a change. Ad followed by vote for Gidwitz spot.
- Governor Give Away - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 1:01 pm:
If I did my math correctly if the state sends 200 prisoners to Thomson Prison and we hire 75 people, that is over 2.5 prisoners for each employee. I don’t think that is the ratio in our other prisons, but the other prisons are not opening just before the election. How can we afford to continually make these decisions. I hope the Thomson Prison opens but employee safety is not the concern of the Governor at our other state prisons who do not have a 2.5 to 1 ratio.
- anon - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 1:57 pm:
Rich. I’m drinking my diet pepsi straight up from now on. On the other hand, maybe these places are just very good at cleaning their toilets.
- Skeeter - Tuesday, Feb 14, 06 @ 3:48 pm:
The sex ed comment was interesting.
Again, we have a plan that would reduce unplanned pregnancies and again we have the allegedly pro-life groups opposing it.
What do these people want? Do they really believe that “just say no” is an effective way to prevent teenagers from becoming pregnant?