Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » “Buying the vote”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
“Buying the vote”

Tuesday, Jan 16, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller

Lee Newspapers did a brief series recently entitled “Buying the vote.” Here’s a typical follow-up editorial, entitled “It’s time to return power of vote to the people.”

Last year’s races reinforced the fact that legislative elections come down to who can buy the most votes.

That’s pretty harsh, if you ask me. It basically assumes that voters are corrupt and willing to “sell” their votes. And if that’s the case, no amount of reforms will work. The title of the editorial assumes that campaign money has somehow taken away the “power of the vote” from citizens.

Most of the series’ focus was on the cash that legislative leaders dumped into campaigns.

A bulk of the funding comes from the candidate’s political party. In one local legislative matchup, for example, the Democrat raised $620,000 to support his campaign — $400,000 of that came from accounts controlled by House Speaker Michael Madigan. The Republican candidate in that race received $332,000 of the $452,000 he raised from his party’s leadership.

But the premise is a bit flawed. In many, if not most, cases with hotly contested races, the leaders from each party spent about the same amount of money. And in at least one instance (Mike Boland vs. Steve Haring) the losing leader spent more money than the winning leader.

Back to the editorial for a moment.

In early 2005 Gov. Rod Blagojevich unveiled campaign finance reforms that are similar to the federal regulations. State Sen. Bill Brady, a Republican from Bloomington, also has publicly announced his support for Illinois laws that mirror the federal system.

We think this is the right direction to take. Federal regulations place an approximate $2,000 limit on individual contributions and a $5,000 limit on political action committee contributions. Illinois has no limits.

Well, those federal limits didn’t do much to quell corruption in DC, did they? Conveniently overlooked is that voters told exit pollsters last year that DC corruption was their top issue. DC is probably the last place to look up to as a role model of righteousness and good, and the contention, in my mind at least, completely undermines the point.

Do legislative leaders have too much power? Yep. No doubt about that. But the hyper-cynical attitude that money automatically buys votes ignores all else that happened last year and isn’t gonna move the ball down the field much.

Thoughts?

       

10 Comments
  1. - Greg - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 8:55 am:

    You offer some wise, adult comments.

    We spend more money marketing potato chips in this country than we do on elections.

    If you would like more competitive elections then focus on gerrymandering. Instead members of picking their voters we need voters picking their members. That would go a long way to making things more competitive.

    Dare I say it… I also think making Springfield less fun would improve the quality of government in Springfield. When commentators compare Springfield to a college town or stories of members saying why would we want to leave all of this…this is great… I wonder if we are taking government all that seriously. Henry Hyde, a very serious legislator and man, even couldn’t resist it.


  2. - Slash - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 9:01 am:

    Situation #1
    ————
    So I have a state job. It pays well, and there aren’t many jobs in the town I live in that give benefits & security like the state one.

    If I vote to keep people the same people in power in Springfield, because I am worried about losing my job if ‘change’ occurs, has my vote been ‘bought’?

    Situation #2
    ————
    Similarly, I have a contract with the state to provide a service. I have many employees that depend on that contract for their livelihood.

    Is voting to keep the status quo (i.e. to avoid state budget cuts) ‘buying my vote’? Suppose the service I provide is ‘moral’: health care, support for the poor, homeless, safety for the population…is OK for me to campaign against ‘cutting necessary services’?

    You aren’t going to be able to fix those two situations through campaign finance reform. Lots of people are addicted to public money. Remove it, they go through withdrawal. Fact of life.


  3. - VanillaMan - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 9:15 am:

    It seems to me that the Lee papers are trying to find a villian behind the November elections.

    The only votes bought were the ones voters sold to themselves. Blagojevich, naked as a jay-bird, sold voters an empty sack of promises. Last week, he promised even more goodies to come. Voters believed him, so the votes bought with nothing were their own votes.

    Voters are really not stupid. They really do vote their own interests. They see the bottom falling out of the state. They voted for a soft landing - for themselves. They didn’t want a proactive tough love crowd. They knew the hits were coming, and Blagojevich by promising something for nothing came off as the guy who would hit them the least.

    The Democrats ran as the Mommies and that is what voters wanted. After six years of Daddies fighting a war, and scaring the kids, voters wanted a the soft busom of the Democrats. They know they are denying reality, but wanted to see if they can hide from our problems and let Mommy take care of it for a while.

    Money had little to do with any of this.

    The editorial staff at the Lee papers wanted to believe voters were willing to make patriotic sacrifices, make budgetary sacrifices, and see the long term benefits of tough decisions now. The fact that they were proven wrong is making them look for a scapegoat. Campaign financing will not be effective if it comes from a legislator. Expecting them to do the job right would be like expecting hookers to define virginity.


  4. - He makes Ryan look like a saint!!! - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 10:22 am:

    Was there any race where a candidate had less money and won?


  5. - Justice - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 10:46 am:

    Perhaps it isn’t so much buying the vote as it is spinning the facts. The results are essentially the same. The more sophisticated the voter, the more sophisticated the spin. Buying the vote, through spin, innuendo, and outright dishonesty is in full swing nationally. With enough money a politician can make Mother Teresa look like the devil and make Blogo look like a saint…..and guess who wins!! Our last election resulted in our electing the governor of Illinois with less than 25% of those eligible to vote.(not that the choice was that good) If you can create a lack of interest and turn out your party strong, you win. If you can slant and spin the truth to make it look like your opponent favors a tax on fresh air, you win. Money buys votes through deceptive, and pernicious advertising. The greatest evil is apathy of those eligible to vote. Most eligible voters have no clue of who is running for office, much less for what they stand. True politicians have learned that if you make voting so distasteful to the general public, and you manage a good core of “party faithful”, you win. Unfortunately for all of us, we will ultimately lose as only the greedy and corrupt will win, because there is something in it for them. The general public seems to be saying “Hey, let someone else watch the Constitution….I’m busy shopping for a HD TV, catching the sales on Michigan Avenue, or planning my next trip to Vegas or Cancun. Money, through well directed advertising, buys votes….not always to turn out voters, but in many cases through driving down voter turnout for your opponent. Money equals votes!!


  6. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 11:12 am:

    “Nature abhors a vacuum” said the ancient Greeks. You can argue that Madigan, Jones, Cross and Watson have too much power, but if they didn’t have the power, who would?

    Would it be distributed evenly among all 177 members? Doubtful. Would it leave the Governor and special interests unchecked? Definitely.

    Power is neither good nor evil, and our republican system of government has shown that it does measure out a just reward to those who wield it, even if the wheels of democracy do grind a little slow for some folks liking. Think Nixon, George Ryan, Lee Daniels. Think the last GOP Congress.

    Whenever the last chapter is written of Mike Madigan’s history, he will likely be remembered as one of the most powerful ellected leaders in our state’s history. He’ll also be remembered as a man who used that power to protect the rights of working men and women, to protect future generations from unchecked borrowing and spending, to protect the civil rights of women, minorities and gays and lesbians, and to protect consumers from special interests like Commonwealth Edison.

    Has Madigan made compromises along the way to maintain a Democratic majority? Certainly; but if he hadn’t, the record of Democratic achievement under his stewardship as both Speaker and Democratic Party Chairman would have been brief indeed. Voters can and have judged Madigan and the Democrats based on their records. Partisans see what they want, but independent Illinoisians are rewarding the Democrats with larger pluralities every year.


  7. - Jeff Trigg - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 11:50 am:

    Have any of these editorials pointed out that more than 40% of the GA races were unopposed last year or that more typically 50% of GA races are unopposed? At the same when Illinois has the worst ballot access requirements in the world? Nope. I’d suggest there are bigger fish to fry than shifting funds. Greg mentioned gerrymandering and that is a much, much bigger problem than campaign finaces.


  8. - Lovie's Leather - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 12:40 pm:

    People are still crying about limiting contributions, but it doesn’t mean a thing unless you limit the amount a congressman can spend!


  9. - Squideshi - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 4:56 pm:

    Money may, or may not, buy votes; but it certainly does give the wealthy an advantage. Keep giving the wealthy advantages in our political marketplace; and continue to encourage candidates to pander to wealthy campaign contributors, who represent a small percentage of the population, and you’re already half way down the road to Plutocracy. Elections should be about ideas–a marketplace in which people buy ideas with their votes–not about who is the best fundraiser or who has the wealthiest friends. We need nothing less than full public financing of public elections.


  10. - Squideshi - Tuesday, Jan 16, 07 @ 4:57 pm:

    The link to Plutocracy in my last post should point here.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Madigan trial roundup: Solis leaves the witness stand
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Appellate court grants 35-day stay in Grayson release hearing
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller