Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - House; Fight; Ads; Open Meetings; Bost; NCSL (Use all caps in password)
Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller Secretary of State Jesse White announced a couple of years ago that he planned to run again in 2010. Since the SoS office has often been used as a successful springboard to higher office (Dixon, Edgar, Ryan, to name a few) and White says he won’t move up, do you think he ought to abandon his ‘10 reelection plans for the “good of the party” or do you think he ought to keep on racking up those crushing wins over his GOP opponents, which might also be considered acting on behalf of the “good of the party”? After all, he carried DuPage County four years ago, breaking a once unheard-of barrier. And, please, anybody who thinks Jesse White is not as sharp mentally as he’s always been has never spent much time with the guy. I have. So I don’t care what you’ve heard, you’re wrong. I don’t want to see any goofy comments about how he’s “losing it.” I’ve been listening to people (mostly Republicans) whisper about this alleged “affliction” for years, and they’ve always been wrong. Stick to the topic at hand, please.
|
Obamarama - Emil Jones lashes out, Edwards sneaks into state
Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller I had a brief bit about this in yesterday’s Capitol Fax and more in the subscriber-only blog, but today Lynn Sweet based her column on the subject so we’ll talk about it here now.
And here’s the Politico.com article that started it all
Back to Sweet:
Good points on all sides. First, many of those very same Hillary supporters have been whispering to their favored DC To be fair, many of Clinton’s top African-American supporters have a long and strong relationship with the Senator and her husband, regardless of patronage. And even if her high-level support is purely patronage-based, Senate President Jones is really in no position to argue. For instance, Jones absolutely hates it whenever people link his campaign finance and other relationships with ComEd to his support for the utility company’s often anti-consumer legislative agenda. Glass houses. Stones. Etc. In the end, this internal struggle with racial identity might turn out to be healthy, but it’s undoubtedly gonna get a whole lot uglier before it’s all over. The funniest take on Jones’ comments was from Matt Stoller over at MyDD, who wrote that the controversy “revealed a generational split among black political leaders between the old patronage model and a newer movement model.” Apparently, he doesn’t know Emil Jones very well. Also, as I told you yesterday, John Edwards was in the Bloomington area this week. Apparently, he was just there for a private fundraiser and didn’t notify the media, so most of them missed the story. A local radio station did manage to get a sound bite, however. Oops. I forgot to mention the party in honor of Obama’s announcement at the Firefighters Lake Club Friday evening. Here are the particulars:
|
Sun-Times, Trib both oppose mandatory cancer vaccine
Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller Both the Sun-Times and the Tribune have recently editorialized against a proposed mandatory cervical cancer vaccine for young girls. Two bills have been introduced in Springfield, both with opt-out clauses.Sun-Times:
Not mentioned is that the manufacturer of the drug, Merck, is pushing legislatures throughout the state (through a legislative group called Women in Government) to make the vaccine mandatory, which could result in billions in profits. Proponents say the vaccine will save lives. Some opponents, who worked against making the drug available in the first place, claim it will somehow encourage promiscuity. Other opponents point to opposition by the American Academy of Pediatrics to mandating the vaccine right away. The Academy wants more research first. The state Senate mandate is here, the House bill is here. Thoughts?
|
Morning Shorts
Tuesday, Feb 6, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson * Tightening up: Drivers who ignore stop signs could be fined $100 and go to court — $1,000 for a 3rd offense * Stroger defends hiring pals:
* 2-Party system got you down? Check out the Suburban caucuses * Supreme Court to decide if felons can be aldermen * IDOTsays make a deal or else: “In a new round of letters dated Jan. 24, the Illinois Department of Transportation informed the property owners that if a sale price cannot be agreed upon, the state will seize the land through condemnation.” * Embattled HDO prepares for $140,000 in legal costs * Bush budget slashes affect Illinois; Guv voices concern * “Votemobile” handles early voting * Washington Post: School hears calls to end Chief’s act * Open meeting violation charged; Republicans say Tumulty is exaggerating * Report assesses health of Illinois children
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |