Election Results Open Thread
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson * 7:55pm
* 7:58pm
* 8:10pm
* 8:31pm
* 8:34pm
* 8:51pm
* 9:25pm
* 10:08pm
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Bo Derek Returns; GRT; Cable; Rates; Conflicts; EPA; Marijuana; Dahl-Gordon; (Use all caps in password)
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
Enter your password to view comments |
Question of the day
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller First, the setup…
Now, the obvious question: Should the state provide this $150 million safety net for the Chicago Olympics? Explain.
|
Covering up for the bosses
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Illinois Press Association has followed through on its promise to highlight every recent story about the local impact of the governor’s proposed gross receipts tax. You can find that page here. The IPA, as you already know, is on record opposing the GRT and has officially encouraged its member newspapers to publish stories about the tax’s potential local impact. So far, not a single columnist or editorial has been published (that I can find) questioning the ethics of the IPA’s actions. And there are also no “straight” news stories yet exploring the potential impact of or motive behind the IPA’s decision. The state’s press corps is always quick to point out potential conficts of interest when it comes to politicians, but so far nobody in that bunch has offered up even a peep about the IPA’s actions. Considering how much sway those newspapers have over their local legislators, that omission is completely inexcusable, no matter where you happen to stand on the GRT. * Meanwhile, here’s the tax and spend roundup, compiled by Paul Richardson…
|
Local elections thoughts and a roundup *** Updated x1 ***
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller * Billy Dennis, the Peoria Pundit, notes that he and another local blogger are being interviewed by the area’s mainstream media about today’s municipal elections…
I’ll add a third reason. Because the mainstream media is focusing less and less on local politics, blogs are some of the only places where you can find any sort of reporting and analysis on those campaigns. (Just take a look at the paltry selection in the roundup below for proof.) So, when crunch-time comes, some bloggers are the best sources for what’s really going on locally. There are exceptions to this. The Daily Herald does a lot of local political coverage, but the reporters assigned to those beats are usually young and inexperienced. Suburban bloggers can fill in the gaps. Dennis, for his part, sent a questionnaire to every local aldermanic candidate and posted the full results on his blog. It was a perfect example of how a local blogger can make a real difference. We need more of that in this state. A lot more. I always encourage local bloggers to keep their focus on their immediate surroundings. We’ve got way more national political bloviators than we need. They’re a dime a dozen. Stay local, stay focused and if you’re any good, success and recognition will follow. Anyway, here’s the roundup, compiled by Paul Richardson…
This is an election day open thread. Polling place observations and predictions, please. *** UPDATE 1 *** Naisy Dolar’s 50th Ward campaign is live blogging their election day efforts. Check it out. One excerpt…
|
Morning Shorts
Tuesday, Apr 17, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson * Report: Abraham Lincoln hotel spending money in violation of loan terms * Lawmakers may license midwives, give parents options
* Audit: State was underpaid for flights * Foreclosures on the rise * Transit chief puts focus on funds * Phil Kadner: Will Illinois allow illegals the chance to drive? * Judge drops federal lawsuit over 2004 state Supreme Court race * To pay or not to pay for interchange
* U.S. Justice Dept. launches civil rights investigation of Cook Co. Jail * Some laid off janitors to be rehired by county * Did Stroger really chop ‘from the top’? * Half the Cook Co. health cuts were doctors and nurses
|
Note to readers: I try to keep this place an oasis from national and international politics as much as possible, which is why there was no mention yesterday of the grotesque tragedy in Virginia. And, frankly, after surfing the blogs, watching the cable nets and listening to talk radio hosts, I got the distinct impression that way too many people were using the horrific events to score one cheap political point after another and take potshots at their perceived “enemies.” I’m in no mood to see that happen here. There are many, many websites where you can express your horror, shock, grief and outrage about yesterday’s tragedy, but let’s try not to let it leak in here for now. Thanks.
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |