Laptops go Green
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson
The environmentally conscious now have another tool to aid in their personal quest to stem the draining our earth’s resources.
Samsung has announced what they are calling the “first ever†hybrid notebook.
The new Hybrid HDD Samsung R55 will cost 1.8M Won ($1923) and will come with:
–Intel Core2Duo T5600 (1.83GHz) CPU
–15.4″ WXGA LCD
–80GB Hybrid HDD (5400rpm + 256Mb OneNAND Flash)
–nVidia GeForce 7400 Graphics card
–Super Multi DL Optical Drive
–Windows Vista Premium OS
Hybrid HDD is a technology that ads a flash RAM chip to the standard HDD. This way most frequently used data can be stored and read from flash memory, reducing the usage (spin) of HDD itself.
According to Samsung, when used for small chunks (up to 10Mb) of data in R55, Hybrid Hard Drive had 26% improvement on data reading and 71% improvement of datawriting speed, 32% lower power consumption and increased HDD longevity by 10%.
More commentary…
Hyrbid laptops have officially arrived, and Samsung’s R55 is the company’s first to feature both an 80GB 5,400rpm drive alongside an additional 256MB flash drive. Samsung claims the hybrid hard drive consumes 32% less power, offers a 26% increase in data reading and boosts data-writing speed by 71%. That kinda talk makes the 15.4-inch notebook worth the $1,923 splurge.
Other hybrid laptops had been around for nearly a year, but they were referred to as “luggable†instead of portable. From Dell in June 2006…
Dell’s new XPS M2010, which starts at $1,999, includes two hard drives with up to 120GB capacity each, a Core Duo processor and 4GB of dual-channel (667MHz) memory.
7 Comments
|
More hyperbole from IFI
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
I’ve been on the Illinois Family Institute’s e-mail list for quite some time now. Usually, I just chuckle at their hyperbolic press releases. I chuckled a little more than usual today, however, and thought I’d share it with you.
First, the bold-faced headline…
IFI E-Alert: Contact Your State Rep. Today About The “Homosexual/Shack-up Teachers Bill” - Ominous legislation will equate shack-up couples and homosexual partners with married spouses.
Now, the lede, which is fairly sedate…
HB 1331, sponsored by State Representative Julie Hamos (D-Evanston), amends the Illinois Pension Code, to allow a designated domestic partner to qualify as a surviving spouse for purposes of survivor and death benefits.
As amended, HB 1331 changes the Downstate Teacher Article of the Illinois Pension Code as well as the Chicago Teacher Article.
Scroll down a bit, however, and you’ll see this…
The assault on traditional American culture continues. This legislation, HB 1331, might as well be called the “Homosexual/Shack-up Teacher Bill”, as it most certainly will attract non-traditionalists and homosexual activists to Chicago classrooms. Make no mistake, this bill will be provide an incentive to draw non-traditional and homosexual activist teachers to come to Illinois schools.
Do you think this stuff works? If so, please explain it to me.
18 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
First, the setup…
Lakemoor village board candidate Gregory L. LaPlante was arrested April 13 and charged with a pair of felonies less than a week before he finished last in a six-way race for three seats, unofficial results showed.
Lake Zurich Unit District 95 school board President Gary W. Robillard died April 15, two days before he won re-election.
The connecting thread? People who voted early in these races did so without being able to factor the developments into their choices. […]
They are real examples of early voting’s potential problems, election analyst Curtis Gans said.
“A large number of citizens (may not) have had that knowledge when they voted,†said Gans, director of the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate, a nonpartisan group based in Washington, D.C., that scrutinizes voting trends. “And that’s a problem.â€
In Illinois, early voting begins 22 days before Election Day and lasts 17 days. For the recent statewide consolidated election, early voting ran from March 26 to April 12.
Now, the question: Do you support early voting despite these problems? Why or why not?
19 Comments
|
* Apparently, Wal-Mart got the message from last week’s city council races…
Despite post-election chest thumping, the first signs of a potential compromise are emerging in the political war between Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and union-led advocates of a big-box minimum wage bill.
Sources on both sides say they’re willing to sit down and talk at length, and they raise the possibility of a deal in which Wal-Mart would get zoning approval needed for more Chicago stores in exchange for agreeing to support a wider minimum wage bill that applies to more than the super-sized retail outlets known as big boxes.
But not everybody is convinced that Wal-Mart wants to talk turkey…
One top labor leader, Ron Powell, president of Local 881 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, says he would “have to think about” such a proposal and carefully examine its details. Mr. Powell says he doubts Wal-Mart is interested in any compromise.
Another union leader, Chicago Federation of Labor President Dennis Gannon, says he needs to talk to his partners in the coalition that pushed the big-box bill. The main thing needed is a willingness to talk, Mr. Gannon adds. “Wal-Mart has made a decision not to have a dialogue,” he says. Mr. Scott denies that.
* My syndicated newspaper column takes a look at some municipal races…
The real electoral surprise last week was not in Chicago, where five tired, old incumbent hack aldermen went down to defeat. The big shocker was the Carbondale mayor’s race, where Sheila Simon — the daughter of the late U.S. Sen. Paul Simon — was trounced by Republican incumbent Brad Cole.
* Kristen McQueary takes a look at last-minute mailers and ads against a local property tax referendum and is not pleased…
The problem with these groups — or perhaps the political genius of them — is that they tango beneath the radar screen until days before the election. Then they surface, blast misleading information from the barracks, and go back into hiding until next time.
Bottom line: Beware of last-minute mailings, especially if they don’t include names and phone numbers of the originators. They’re sent the weekend before an election for a reason.
* Color Carol Marin skeptical…
So when I read what Jackson told Sun-Times City Hall reporter Fran Spielman last week, I had some reservations. ‘’The bullies have left the Council. That pleases me greatly,'’ intoned Jesse Jr.
Really? I don’t think so.
The real bullies aren’t the ones who walk with a swagger stick. The real bullies stroll around like statesmen. They like to run silent and deep, knowing precisely how to kill an ordinance, stall a debate, and stick it to earnest freshmen.
Let’s hear it for the Daley Five.
There’s 14th Ward Ald. Ed Burke, the Machiavellian crown prince of Daley’s kingdom who’s had a near 40-year lock in office. The mayor doesn’t like him or vice versa, but they see the same goal line. Burke has huge power as chairman of the Finance Committee. Huge money, nearly $7 million in his political kitties. And an entourage of six Chicago police plainclothes bodyguards who work in two-man, round-the-clock shifts, solicitously holding his coat and getting his door at taxpayers’ expense.
After Burke, there’s 33rd Ward Ald. Dick Mell, who runs the Rules Committee; 36th Ward Ald. Bill Banks, who controls the powerhouse Zoning Committee; 29th Ward Ald. Isaac Carothers, who’s in charge of Police and Fire. And there’s recently re-elected 50th Ward Ald. Bernie Stone, who may be old but can still kick your knees out in a fight.
* Laura Washington takes a look at a major factor in last week’s elections…
Three actors have turned Chicago politics on its ear: Labor, Junior and the New Black Vote. […]
That brings us to the New Black Vote. Is it my imagination, or have black voters been poorly served by their elected officials? Remember, it was black voters who put the Toddster in charge of Cook County government. We voted him in, and now he’s laying off nearly 500 doctors and nurses who care for the county’s poor. We voted him in, and he’s hiring more relatives and public relations flacks while shutting down the county’s long-term care at Oak Forest Hospital.
This is the beginning of the end of the age-old argument in black politics that “you don’t want to put a brother out of a j-o-b.” Our elected officials have to deliver.
People in Madeline Haithcock’s ward couldn’t get her to respond to the simplest of complaints. People in Dorothy Tillman’s ward knew they paid for the edifice she built in honor of Harold Washington, but it is run by Tillman’s daughter. They live near 47th Street and the L, where they’re afraid to walk in the dark. […]
It is a dangerous time to be a black hack in Chicago.
* And the Tribune looks at the money trail…
Seven of the 12 winning candidates received 50 percent or more of their campaign funding during the runoff period from either organized labor or groups allied with Daley. Campaign spending equated to $50 a vote in some races, with totals more typically seen in campaigns for higher offices.
Elections for aldermen, the most local of public offices, once were intimate face-to-face exercises in retail politics, with candidates spending tens of thousands of dollars in a big race. But under the state’s porous campaign-finance rules, candidates have gorged on contributions, which pay for more sophisticated operations featuring slick mail brochures, automated telephone calls and advertising on radio and television. Some labor-backed council candidates were able to import workers from the East Coast to walk in wards — jobs traditionally taken by volunteers, many with city jobs.
12 Comments
|
Shenanigans decried *** Updated x1 ***
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The analyses and the editorials have begun on Friday’s Senate craziness. Kevin McDermott…
Illinois Sen. Gary Forby last week got the kind of political lesson they don’t teach in social studies classes.
The lesson came courtesy of some procedural sleight of hand in the Senate that could leave thousands of outraged electricity customers without the rate relief they have been demanding since prices soared just after the first of the year.
* Doug Finke…
At one point in the debate, Sen. Mike Jacobs, D-East Moline, said, “The problem isn’t Senator Emil Jones, the problem is Speaker Mike Madigan.”
He’s only partly right. The problem is Madigan and Jones. You can add Gov. Rod Blagojevich to the mix, too, since he hasn’t exactly been Mr. Leadership on electric rates. They don’t talk to each other. There’s no compromise. There’s only maneuvering for political advantage.
* Daily Herald…
(T)he reality of Illinois state politics dictates that the utilities be treated equally if the goals of offering short-term relief and devising long-range answers are to be reached. Moves such as the one Jones made on Friday simply delay needed work and push those goals further from reach.
* Yesterday’s Sun-Times editorial doesn’t mention the ComEd shenanigans, but it does pore over some bad press that Senate President Emil Jones has received lately…
In the case of Jones, his son was recently hired for a $57,360-a-year job as manager of real estate development at the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity. His wife was named head of the mental health division at the Department of Human Services in 2005, getting a salary boost of nearly $80,000 to $186,000 a year.
Critics might wonder if there’s a quid pro quo between Jones and Blagojevich, especially since Jones has emerged as the chief advocate for the governor’s gross receipts tax. No, we don’t think so. Jones has always been a key Blagojevich ally and a strong supporter of funding for education, one of the goals of the governor’s proposed tax. We don’t believe the job for his son or promotion for his wife — or a no-bid contract for his stepson — changed his behavior.
But there are curious aspects to both moves. For instance, his son’s job opening wasn’t advertised. It doesn’t require a college degree and he doesn’t have one, but it’s not a big leap to ask whether someone more qualified might have applied had they known about the position. And the state rescinded its rule that the top mental health chief be a medical doctor to clear the way for the hiring of Lorrie Jones, who is not an M.D. but is a long-practicing psychologist.
* And we’re all still waiting for any meaningful coverage or editorializing from the Chicago Tribune.
Thoughts?
*** UPDATE *** From Dave over at Illinoize…
ICPR has posted a spreadsheet… listing each Senator, how they voted on the Forby amendment, if they were targeted in 2006, when their seat is next on the ballot, and how much they received in 2005-2006 from electric companies (and, if 2006 targets, from leadership.). No one explanation likely covers all 59 Senators. But the answers to most of the votes can likely be found in these factors.
The spreadsheet can be found here. [link is now fixed]
15 Comments
|
* It looks like House Democratic staff might be putting pressure on members who go too far out on a limb on the governor’s gross receipts tax.
Case in point, Rep. Chuck Jefferson (D-Rockford), who told reporter Aaron Chambers a few days ago, “I’m not saying I’m totally supporting GRT… I’m leaning toward GRT, versus 750.”
But then…
The next day, Jefferson’s staff distributed a statement that Jefferson wanted to set the record straight. The statement, attributed to Jefferson, said the article’s description of Jefferson’s “warm view†was wrong.
On Tuesday, I asked Jefferson to isolate a single inaccurate element of the story, and he did not do so.
He said his staff told him to issue the statement to clarify his view. Business leaders, he said, interpreted the story as an indication of his definitive support for the GRT, and that it was important for him to counter such a perception.
Jefferson’s staff takes its orders from House Speaker Michael Madigan, a Chicago Democrat who appears cool to the GRT.
I asked Jefferson on Tuesday whether he continued to “lean†in favor of the GRT.
“I don’t know if ‘lean’ is a good word for it,†he told me. “I’m still looking at it in a better light than I am 750. ‘Lean’ is not a good word.â€
I also hear that Rep. Mike Boland (D-East Moline) got an earful from Madigan’s staff after he gushed over the GRT during Gov. Blagojevich’s bus tour a couple of weeks ago.
* Meanwhile, business groups and business owners tell the Tribune that they’re not happy at all with the way Gov. Blagojevich is selling the tax…
“To have your own governor declaring war on you with inflammatory language and citing Armageddon, well, it really sticks in my craw,” said Ron Bullock, chief executive of Bison Gear and Engineering Corp. in St. Charles.
* You mean stuff like this?
“You may not have as many corporate lunches as you did last year, or you may not give out bonuses as high as you did before,†[Blagojevich spokeswoman Becky Carroll] said.
* In the same article, Carroll pointed out a passage that I hadn’t seen before…
Blagojevich is hedging his bets, though. His plan, which is pending before the Senate, states that a gross-receipts tax “is a tax on the taxpayer and may not be separately billed or invoiced to another person.â€
“It’s to prevent them from passing this tax on to con-sumers, and if it’s not written as such they can do so,†Carroll said of this provision. “They could itemize the tax and bill it to a customer as is the case with sales or utility taxes.â€
* And the editorials keep coming. Belleville News-Democrat…
The tax would be applied at each step of the process: wholesaler, subcontractor, general contractor, developer and consumer.
A higher sales price means a bigger down payment, higher mortgage payments, and higher property taxes. In other words, more pyramiding.
Now think about all the products and services you buy, and you get a sense of how costly this proposal will be if it’s enacted.
Contact Blagojevich and your lawmakers about their position on the gross receipts tax.
* Decatur Herald & Review…
The appetite for state funds is always larger than what taxpayers can provide. That appetite will turn into a frenzy if the gross receipts tax continues to be a part of the governor’s plan.
* More tax and spend stuff…
* Tribune Editorial: The pitter-patter of progress toward better schools
* Martire: Boost in earned income tax credit the fair thing to do
15 Comments
|
Morning Shorts
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 - Posted by Paul Richardson
* George Bonomo: Horsemen ask for slots or bigger share of revenue
* Editorial: Time is right for civil unions in Illinois
Illinois would be doing nothing radical by adopting civil unions. In fact, it would be odd if lawmakers failed to enact this policy. Sound policy arguments and clear public opinion support this policy change.
* Illinois weighs rules for liability in civil cases
* Cell phone ‘lemon law’ proposed in Springfield
Mendoza has proposed a bill that would allow customers to leave their contracts, without penalty, if their cell phones need to be repaired or replaced three times because of a manufacturing defect.
* Making Illinois a movie magnet
* Illinois House advance Internet safety bill
* Should judges have to live in their own subcircuits?
The state Senate thinks so. It has unanimously passed a bill that would require judges elected from one of the county’s 15 subcircuits to continue living there — and to win retention from the subcircuit’s voters every six years — as long as they want to keep their seats.
* Editorial: Lawmakers respond to reports of towing abuses
* Full day Kindergarten may end up costing you
* Sun-Times Editorial: New CTA chief helps, but it will be an uphill battle
* Toll signs take new direction
* Editorial: Illinois’s “I-Pass” vs. Indiana’s “I-Zoom”
* 3,350 attend wake for Stephens
* Sunshine needed on Cook Co. Board of Review
The board oversees an ethical cesspool in which attorneys make fat political donations to board members and then win big assessment reductions for their clients. The process is hard for citizens to follow — doubtless by design.
* D.C. chief unsure about returning to Chicago
3 Comments
|
The Sun-Times has a series of articles today on yet another relationship between Barack Obama and Tony Rezko…
When Barack Obama took a job at a small Chicago law firm in 1993, the first name on the door of the firm was Allison S. Davis.
Five years later, having left his Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland firm, Davis invested in Antoin “Tony'’ Rezko’s final government-subsidized, low-income housing project, state records show, in a deal handled by Davis’ former law firm.
Davis and Rezko also went into business together, building upscale homes in the booming Kenwood neighborhood where Davis lives. The legal work on those deals was also done by Davis’ former law firm, where Obama was working.
Of course, there’s a Blagojevich connection, too…
Four years ago, Blagojevich appointed Davis to the Illinois State Board of Investment, which controls state pension funds — one of a series of appointments the governor made at Rezko’s request.
* And then there’s this…
For more than five weeks during the brutal winter of 1997, tenants shivered without heat in a government-subsidized apartment building on Chicago’s South Side.
It was just four years after the landlords — Antoin “Tony'’ Rezko and his partner Daniel Mahru — had rehabbed the 31-unit building in Englewood with a loan from Chicago taxpayers.
Rezko and Mahru couldn’t find money to get the heat back on.
But their company, Rezmar Corp., did come up with $1,000 to give to the political campaign fund of Barack Obama, the newly elected state senator whose district included the unheated building.
* But in the same article…
Just what legal work — and how much — Obama did on those deals is unknown. His campaign staff acknowledges he worked on some of them. But the Rezmar-related work amounted to just five hours over the six years it said Obama was affiliated with the law firm, the staff said in an e-mail in February.
* They have an extensive Q&A with Obama’s campaign…
Sun-Times question: Please explain what legal work the senator performed on each of those Rezmar projects. I have a copy of a legal bill showing Sen. Obama worked on the Central Woodlawn project. Please include the number of hours he spent on each Rezmar deal, the dates he worked on those deals, and to whom he reported at the firm, whether that was Allison Davis and/or William Micelli.
Obama campaign answer: Senator Obama worked on several projects in which the firm’s principal client was a not-for-profit corporation. The projects entailed negotiations between the firm’s primary not-for-profit client and the Rezmar-related entity that served as co-general partner or co-venturer of the not-for-profit.
Once the negotiations between the not-for-profit and Rezmar-related entity were completed, the firm represented the combined entity, usually an Illinois limited partnership or Illinois limited-liability company.
The Senator, relatively inexperienced in this kind of work, was assigned to tasks appropriate for a junior lawyer. These tasks would have included reviewing documents, collecting corporate organizational documents, and drafting corporate resolutions. The Senator reported primarily to former partner Allison Davis and occasionally to William Miceli.
Q: At the time of those deals, Tony Rezko was a client of the senator’s firm, a campaign donor to the senator, a personal friend, and a business partner with the senator’s boss, Allison Davis. But Mr. Rezko was also a landlord to many constituents living in the state Senate district that Senator Obama represented at the time. And many of those Rezmar properties had fallen into disrepair, while Rezmar began to fail financially. Did the senator ever talk to Tony Rezko about the deteriorating status of his housing projects?
A: To reiterate: the firm did represent entities in which Tony Rezko had an interest but never Tony Rezko, personally. Senator Obama does not remember having conversations with Tony Rezko about properties that he owned or any specific issues related to those properties.
Q: In this situation, how did the senator decide whose interests took precedence: Mr. Rezko, Mr. Davis, the senator’s constituents?
A: The Senator, then a junior lawyer, did not have the authority, the assignment or the opportunity to make such decisions. But it is important to keep in mind that the whole enterprise of affordable housing is geared toward improving housing stock for those unable to afford market-priced housing. The goals of the firm’s clients were consistent with the needs of communities benefiting from affordable housing initiatives.
Reading through all the questions and answers, it doesn’t look like there’s much there, as long as Obama’s people are being honest.
* Rezmar deals involving Davis Miner law firm
* Troutman dad got rehab deal - Father of indicted alderman received $500K loan to redevelop apartments
* Top recipients of Rezko campaign cash
16 Comments
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|