The House and the Senate are coming in tomorrow morning at 9, but it’ll most likely be just a “gavel and go” thing.
The governor, reportedly at Senate President Emil Jones’ request, has backed off his insistence that legislators stay in special session seven days a week. Both chambers will reconvene on Monday after adjourning tomorrow. Jones’ members must be getting restless.
You can check back here later tonight for the audio clips of today’s post-game press bangs, and I’ll keep half an eye on things tomorrow morning, but unless something crazy happens, there will be no blogging and no Capitol Fax until Monday.
Hooray!
Go to Illinoize if you’re not completely burned out…
* OK, one more thing. I totally forgot about this cartoon, which was sent in by a talented reader. The image is also now available on various t-shirts at our charity store. You can click on the image for a larger view. As you know, all profits are going to the Sojourn shelter.
How do you think Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign is progressing so far? Back up your assertions with examples if you can and try to avoid quick little “drive-by” comments. Thanks.
As his proposal for near-universal health insurance languished in Springfield, Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Thursday announced an administrative maneuver designed to control the cost of individual medical premiums.
Using the state insurance code, regulators under Blagojevich will draft a rule that prevents insurers from hiking a customer’s premiums based on the person’s “health status” or medical condition. A second rule change — filed Thursday on an immediate, emergency basis — would require insurance companies to file quarterly financial disclosures about individual policies. A similar requirement will be created for small-group insurers, a spokeswoman said.
Blagojevich outlined the plans during a news conference at a Chicago hospital campus, where he was joined by health-care consumers who say they’ve been hit with skyrocketing insurance premiums. Lombard resident Roy Bocchieri said that after he was diagnosed with a blood disease, his premiums jumped when it came time to renew his individual policy.
* There seems to be some disagreement among critics over how the proposed rule changes would impact insurance polices…
House Insurance Committee Chairman Frank Mautino, a Spring Valley Democrat, said only eight other states have similar programs. Some have seen insurance premiums increase and companies stop writing policies, he said.
“It has the tendency to reduce the amount of coverage available within the market and also to raise the price because the pool within that structure tends to be a sicker pool,” Mautino said.
[I]nsurance companies currently only consider demographics, health care inflation, and the overall financial results of their risk pools when setting their renewal rates, and do NOT rate anyone’s individual policy renewal based on an individually insured’s claims. An Illinoisan with no claims on an individual health insurance policy receives the same increase at renewal that another Illinoisan who has a $1,000,000 claim on an individual policy with the same insurance company.
One major health insurance company, Humana, indicated that the rule the governor announced would not affect it because it “does not currently use an individual’s health status or health information when determining premium rate adjustments.”
…a spokesman for UnitedHealthcare of Illinois Inc. [said] only that the firm does not set premium rates for individuals based on their health status or claims history.
Not all insurers share that philosophy, however. Small-business owner Roy Bocchieri, 44, of Lombard, was paying about $700 a month for family coverage in 1999, he said. Then he got diagnosed with a rare bone-marrow disease that continues to require regular treatment.
Bocchieri’s monthly premiums increased 40 percent the first year after the diagnosis. They continued to increase every year thereafter.
“When they hit the $2,000-a-month range, I said ‘enough is enough,’” said Bocchieri, a father of four.
* But Speaker Madigan’s spokesperson dismissed the entire thing as a diversion…
Madigan spokesman Steve Brown said the governor’s travel schedule this week was curious, given the need for policymakers to be in Springfield.
“When the ADD (attention deficit disorder) kicks in, he flits off to Chicago every couple of days,” Brown said. “Absolutely, it’s diversionary.”
Senate Democrats offered Thursday to retool a major gambling package — that nose-dived in the House — by letting communities throughout the state vie for up to four new casinos.
The plan that narrowly passed the Senate in late May but died in the House specified casinos for Chicago, the south suburbs, Waukegan and a location near O’Hare Airport. But some towns outside those geographic boundaries, such as Country Club Hills and Rockford, complained about being excluded.
“We’re opening it up to every city in the state of Illinois, and I think that’s a good thing,” said Sen. Rickey Hendon (D-Chicago). “You get more people [in the Legislature] maybe to vote for it if they got a chance to participate.”
A multibillion-dollar gambling expansion could help build new schools and roads and provide a major infusion of dollars into the state’s under-funded public education system, its supporters said.
* But Bethany Carson has a good piece that points out the many pitfalls ahead…
But the gaming meeting didn’t advance any new legislation, and there’s a long way to go. For years, a slew of hang-ups have stymied efforts to expand gaming for state revenue. The horseracing industry wants subsidies from the state so it can compete with expansion of other gaming. But there’s debate about the subsidy level and the mechanism — slots at racetracks or an “impact fee” charged on casinos. And there’s a trust issue about whether the state will simply change the law after the first wave of cash flows in, said Rep. Bob Molaro, a Chicago Democrat in the meeting. Other sticking points include the number of new boats and their locations. Lang said in early June that his version of gaming legislation spelled out nine Chicago-area communities in need of economic development that would qualify for one of the new gaming licenses.
Two other complications were raised after the meeting. One was by House Minority Leader Tom Cross of Oswego: “I think for everyone, one of the central questions here is, when would this money become available, assuming you bought into any of these concepts? We’re into July, and to get any of these things up and running, if you bought into that, you’d have to be pretty aggressive [for it] to be in the ’08 fiscal year.”
The other was mentioned by Sen. James DeLeo, another Chicago Democrat in the meeting. The priority of using gaming revenue for road and school construction projects might be more complicated. “We were warned by the budget director that casino revenues, gaming revenues are very hard to sell bonds on,” DeLeo said. “There’s a lot of if, if, ifs in gaming.” […]
- The governor and Jones have said they support four new casinos in the Chicago area, and Jones has said he wants the money to go to education.
- Cross and House Speaker Michael Madigan said their caucuses still support expansion of gaming only at existing casinos, with the money going toward road and school construction projects.
- And Watson said Thursday the Senate GOP Caucus is open and flexible but would prefer the revenue fund a capital program.
One irony is the gambling negotiations were held in the governor’s Capitol office-without the governor, who was holding a press conference in Chicago.
Senate Minority Leader Frank Watson (R-Greenville) said the advantage of working without Blagojevich is that a meeting can be held absent the governor’s nearly automated efforts to stay on his talking points: “Press 4 for this speech, and press 12 for this one.”
In Chicago, Blagojevich said he would “hold my nose” and support gambling revenues as a way to pay for an infusion of funds into education and his proposal for state-supported health care.
* My Sun-Times column this week is ultimately about the governor’s involvement in the House’s gun control debate, but this is how it begins…
Gov. Rod Blagojevich playfully told me in April that he had come up with a theme for his epic battle with Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. At the time, Madigan was blocking the governor’s (now dead) gross receipts tax on business and didn’t seem thrilled with Blagojevich’s desire to spend billions on a universal health insurance plan.
The governor said he had cast himself in the role of Robin Hood. Madigan, of course, was the villainous Sheriff of Nottingham.
“Wonderful,” I thought. “This legislative session will never end.”
And here we are, more than three months later, stuck in a nasty overtime session that has Blagojevich repeatedly slamming Madigan as a “right-wing Republican” and threatening to take him to court over the speaker’s refusal to obey the starting times in the governor’s special session proclamations. Two legislators have publicly called for the governor’s impeachment, a Downstate newspaper has claimed that Blagojevich is “going bonkers,” and one of Blagojevich’s fellow Chicago Democrats told reporters that the governor is a “madman” and “insane.”
And that’s just in the past week.
* Via IlliniPundit, Democratic state Sen. Michael Frerichs had some keen insights into what’s going on in his caucus…
“The Governor put out this big legislative proposal that has next to no legislative support, but he continues to hold on and say, ‘Hey, we can all go home as soon as you vote for my budget,’” Frerichs said. “It’s clear that that’s his tactic: to keep us away from our families and our other jobs, for those who have other jobs, until we’re sick and tired and we’re willing to cave in.” […]
If anyone breaks the budget logjam, Frerichs said, it will have to be Senate President Emil Jones, D-Chicago.
“I think it’s up to the Senate president to say, ‘I’ve hung with you, but it hasn’t gotten us anywhere. My members have these priorities - education funding, proper funding of pensions, property tax relief - and if you’re not willing to get those, then I’ll go work with the speaker and we’ll override your veto.’
“If that happens, then the governor really becomes irrelevant. If you can get those four legislative leaders to get together, it will make the next three years very interesting.”
He said the Senate Democrats have urged Jones to break with Blagojevich, “but the whole caucus has not spoken with any unanimity yet.”
* But Andy Shaw made a good point in a story he filed yesterday…
The irony here is that Blagojevich’s ambitious plans, and his style, go over well with regular people, but not the politicians in Springfield that he needs to get along with the pass a budget. The governor says he is willing to compromise and wait a year to implement his programs if that makes it easier on lawmakers. But a spokesman for Speaker Madigan says that doesn’t make any sense either because the same people still have to cast the same votes.
* The Bloomington Pantagraph published yet another negative editorial on Blagojevich…
He told the Associated Press that the current situation is “totally what I envisioned was going to happen in January, February and March” and things may get more publicly testy “as the days and weeks unfold.”
Weeks? May we remind the governor that the current 30-day budget extension only has about a couple of weeks left?
Oh yeah, we forgot, the governor who “envisioned” as long ago as January that the current situation would exist said he hasn’t “thought that far ahead” when asked if he would go along with another 30-day extension.
Illinois needs and deserves better leadership than it is getting. Lawmakers of both parties must fill the void left by the governor.
* And the AP looks at the pros and cons of the massive legislative meetings that were held at the governor’s mansion the past several days…
Sen. Terry Link, a top lieutenant to Senate President Emil Jones, said House members seem to be learning basic information that senators have already gotten from their leaders.
“It seems over there that these House members have been asking questions that basically I think could be read in newspapers almost,” said Link, D-Vernon Hills. “For a learning curve for them, it’s good.”
Madigan, who along with Republicans have opposed Blagojevich’s spending plans, said Monday he considered the legislator meetings “very productive.”
“They can see that these positions being advanced by the administration are not consistent with reality,” Madigan said.
Blagojevich counters that it gives House Democrats a chance to see the “right-wing Republican” views being advocated by Madigan, who opposes the governor’s call for a major new health care program.
WLS radio is having some political fun this week. A few days ago, House Speaker Michael Madigan appeared on the Don & Roma show. You can download that show here.
And this morning from 9-11, former gubernatorial candidate and state treasurer Judy Baar Topinka will be interviewed by the legendary John “Records” Landecker. Go here to listen.
I’ll be back in a few with more session news. Running late today.
But Gonet said a key legal provision in stalled legislation — one that would basically entitle the FutureGen developers to legal protection from the state — must pass for Illinois to compete with Texas.
Emphasizing the interest in the plant, on Thursday, state Rep. Kurt Granberg, D-Carlyle, announced a $2.5 million grant from the Illinois Clean Coal Review Board to entice the public-private partnership to choose a site in Illinois for FutureGen.
* Phil Kadner: U.S. Rep. Lipinski sleeps in his Washington D.C. office
* Aide, businessman added to Troutman indictment; more here
* Sun-Times Editorial: Overpaid guards show how seriously Cook Co. takes tax dollars
The latest example is the $35,000, 12-day contract awarded to a clout-heavy security firm to make sure workers don’t use 10 fire escape windows at the County Building, which are locked and taped off because of renovations.
Governor Rod R. Blagojevich today announced new rules his administration is filing to address urgent health insurance problems for the growing number of Illinois families without job-based health insurance. The rules will prohibit insurance companies from basing premium increases on health status for individual policies and will require them to disclose to state regulators detailed information on premiums and expenses.
* OK, I’ve held my tongue, but no more. When is this guy ever gonna realize that his “sources” were dead wrong before and are probably at the very least not worth listening to now? I can just imagine what he’d write if Michael Sneed tried to publish a non-retraction retraction like that. Oh, wait.
And on another topic, using two tired gasbags like Geraldo Rivera and Mark Fuhrman to buttress an ongoing diatribe against Eric Zorn doesn’t exactly make the argument look stronger, however much I might agree with it. Eric can defend himself, of course, but that was a bit of a stretch, dude.
* Connecticut governor approves pension bond proposal
US Senator Dick Durbin says he hopes Governor Rod Blagojevich and other Illinois officials exercise leadership to end a state budget impasse that could jeopardize federal transportation funds. […]
Durbin also says he won’t play any role in settling the state budget. He joked that he would rather mediate in Iraq than get in the middle of the Springfield disputes.
* This may have been unintentionally ironic in the AP’s interview of the governor. First, the setup…
Gov. Rod Blagojevich insists he knows what he’s doing as the state budget deadlock drags on and on, even if others have their doubts.
In an interview Wednesday with The Associated Press, he dismissed griping from lawmakers that he is deepening the impasse by, for instance, dragging the contentious issue of gun control into the mix. Some say Blagojevich’s approach seems random.
“It’s not at all. It’s totally what I envisioned was going to happen in January, February and March,” Blagojevich said, adding that the confrontations could grow even more public.
* And, now, the payoff…
Blagojevich would not take a position on whether he would sign another [one-month budget] extension. “I haven’t thought that far ahead,” he said.
[Emphasis added.]
Actually, as I told subscribers this morning, many of his private predictions have, indeed, come true. But that was too funny to pass up.
* More from the Q&A. On why this is “the only chance we have” to pass a health care bill…
“You know better than I do that it becomes more difficult doing those things in an election year. … It only gets harder. It doesn’t get easier. I do believe this is the year of opportunity. I said it when I gave my speech on the seventh of March, that we must seize the moment now. My readings of history tell me that the great accomplishments and the things that really matter happen when people seize the moment.”
Q: Next year is an election year. And the year after that?
A: “The year after that the pension problem gets worse. We dig ourselves even more into a hole and it becomes a lot more difficult. And quite frankly as a Democrat, who knows what the next election is going to hold for Democrats. Why would we risk what we believe in and push it back and find ourselves with fewer of us and not have as many who are willing to be for these things as we have now?
* On his “confrontational approach”…
“Not talking to the press a lot over the last couple of months was an attempt to work quietly behind the scenes and … be more diplomatic and get things done. We thought that might be a good first effort to achieve something. Unfortunately, that didn’t work so now it’s a little more public, and it will be a lot more public as the days and weeks unfold.
* I don’t think I’ve ever seen the Illinois House as united as it was yesterday…
The governor’s call to spend an entire special session on gun control (the eighth special session) backfired Wednesday. One sponsor of the gun control legislation, Chicago Democratic Rep. Harry Osterman, repeated what he’s been saying for the past few days: He will not call the legislation for a vote until it has enough votes for approval. That will take 71, to which Osterman said, “This bill will not get 71 votes … It would be irresponsible of me the sponsor of this legislation to call this bill for a vote, knowing that it’s going to fail.”
In fact, if the bill is amended to need only 60 votes, as Osterman intends to do, the effective date will be June of 2008. “June of 2008,” he repeated on the House floor. “So if passed with 60 votes, it won’t take effect until June. So there is no need to rush a vote today or tomorrow.”
Osterman will have to work to gain the votes on the controversial measure, but, he said, “Today is not that day. We need to be focused on the budget of our state. That is our collective priority.”
House members clapped as he closed his comments.
The governor responded with a letter to House Speaker Michael Madigan that said, “I urge you to convene a Committee of the Whole to limit access to deadly large capacity ammunition clips. Giving the full House an opportunity to hear from law enforcement officials, anti-gun violence advocates and victims’ families will help us move closer to consensus on this important issue.” He said he looked forward to working with the sponsor and the speaker’s office to get the bill approved.
I seriously doubt that Osterman will ask that a Committee of the Whole be convened. Such a move would be far too divisive, and almost the entire House seems focused on keeping the pressure on Gov. Blagojevich to cut a budget deal.
* Rep. Osterman also repeated something yesterday that he had told me earlier this week…
Osterman said he talked about the gun bill with Blagojevich advisers over the weekend, before the governor called the special session.
“I suggested that I didn’t think a special session on this or a Committee of the Whole at this point in time, given that we’re in a budget impasse, would be the most productive thing to get the bill passed,” Osterman said.
He also insisted that Madigan has in no way blocked approval of the measure, noting, “He’s been supportive all the way through.”
The governor has declared that lawmakers must remain in Springfield until they reach a budget deal, calling them each day into special sessions that have dealt with issues mostly linked to fiscal matters.
But his call for passage of the gun-magazine bill in the middle of the budget debate angered lawmakers on both sides of the gun-control debate. They said Blagojevich’s efforts were aimed at splitting House lawmakers over the budget. Democrats and Republicans have stood solidly against the governor’s plans for major increases in spending but are sharply divided over gun control.
The Illinois Republican Party announced Wednesday it will host a straw poll on Aug. 16 at the State Fair in Springfield, an event that may challenge the influence of the Iowa GOP straw poll held five days earlier.
Illinois is one of the new “super Tuesday” Feb. 5 states — having moved the primary from March — and the state party wants to be a player, if for no other reason than to rally the grass roots in a Democratic state.
For presidential contenders, Illinois will also provide a more level playing field than the GOP straw poll in Iowa, the state with the leadoff presidential vote. The GOP presidential campaigns are just getting organized in Illinois, and there is no entrenched front-runner in Illinois.
State GOP party chairman Andy McKenna said with a boost from the straw poll on “Republican Day” at the fair, “Illinois will play a central role in choosing the Republican presidential nominee.”
It’s unclear whether the campaign of Arizona Sen. John McCain, who also is skipping Iowa, will take part. “Straw polls are for those who can stuff the most people in a van or bus and get them there a certain time of the day. Not real scientific,” said Republican state Rep. Jim Durkin of Westchester, who is heading up McCain’s Illinois effort.
McKenna is guaranteed at least one campaign with an Illinois organization will be taking part: former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is in. “It will allow the campaigns that are serious the ability to practice their organization,” said Republican state Sen. Dan Rutherford of downstate Chenoa, who is Romney’s Illinois chief.
If only one candidate competes, does it really mean anything? We’ll see how it progresses, but anything that could spark interest in the State Fair’s Republican Day, which has been almost dormant since George Ryan’s tenure (with the possible exception of last year), would probably be welcomed.
“The local leadership of the campaigns are excited about it,” McKenna said of the straw poll. “They have pretty good organizations in place. They indicate they’re going to work hard to be successful. We’re hoping that it gets competitive and entices one or more of the candidates to speak.
Members of a state task force on global warming are in the late stages of drafting a report to Gov. Rod Blagojevich but so far have avoided a final vote on especially controversial mandates on industry.