Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Nov 13, 2007 - Posted by Rich Miller

The setup

Proposed rules for the state of Illinois smoking ban call for no smoking within 15 feet of the entrances and exits to enclosed buildings - including the entrances and exits to beer gardens and outdoor patios.

Some bar owners are still unsure of exactly how the rules will affect them when the ban takes effect Jan. 1. […]

Jeannie Boren, bar manager for Boone’s Uptown Grill, 301 W. Edwards St., said Boone’s believes it will have a legal smoking area, but owners aren’t sure how big it will be. […]

Barry Friedman, owner of The Alamo, 115 N. Fifth St., which also has a sizable beer garden, said “stepping a few more steps isn’t going to hurt anyone. If I have to paint a stripe and say you can’t smoke before this line, I’ll do that.”

From the proposed state rules…

A proprietor may designate smoking and non-smoking sections of an outdoor patio only if the smoking section is clearly and conspicuously separated from the non-smoking section and if the smoking area is at least 15 feet away from the entrance, exit, windows that open, and ventilation intakes.

If a proprietor designates an area where smoking is permitted, the proprietor shall not permit tobacco smoke to drift into areas where smoking is prohibited through entrances, windows, ventilation systems, or other means.

Question: Reasonable or not?

       

11 Comments
  1. - VanillaMan - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 10:37 am:

    Yes, it is reasonable to expect that any smoking area is fixed so that the pollution doesn’t waft into the rest of the facility. No smoking within 15 feet of any door to a smoking area. Just making a garden a smoking area doesn’t mean you can have smokers seated by the door in the garden. If establishments wish to cater to smokers they may need to do more than just set up tables outside. No smoking means no smoke pollution or stench in the establishment.

    To smokers, it was reasonable that they just feel bad when their smoke ruins your meal. Smokers don’t care about themselves, so why should they care about others? We consider smoker’s “reasons” the same way they have cared for our reaons over the past 100 years.


  2. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 10:38 am:

    Seems to be a lot of “smoke” over an adult issue and who a bar/restaurant wants to cater to. If my business can go smoke free and be profitable to a level I want, then great for me. If I own the business and I prefer to allow smokers (for whatever reason), then my customers and employees know what they are stepping into. It becomes their choice to be there. If my business fails due to being a smoker or non-smoker place then it fails, just like many other business go under or succeed based on the appeal/lack of appeal to paying customers. Surely some group will talk about the health benefits/insurance costs and how it effects their personal rates. All that is true. But so do overweight people, people in poor health, people with bad genes for some family related disease process, and many other related items. As a non-smoker, this entire items seems to be more a feel good PR, election item. There are several restaurants in our town I simply do not go to becasue of the smoke. My life is not ruined because of it. I really prefer smokers to be away from the entrances to non-recreational buildings. After that, it becomes my choice of where I spend my time and bucks. If the owner wants my business they will accomodate.


  3. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 11:21 am:

    Apparently, the smoking ban issue is no longer a hot topic here. lol.


  4. - steve schnorf - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 11:25 am:

    Bureaucracy compounding stupid. For safety reasons,
    let’s limit the number of angels on the head of a pin. Of course we would need rules on how to count, and how close together pins could be.


  5. - lake county democrat - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 11:30 am:

    So instead of letting consenting adults kill themselves in a bar with cigarette smoke, now it moves outside where it can waft into non-smoker space. Friggin nannystate.


  6. - Justice - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 1:39 pm:

    Yes, I think the rules are very reasonable. I would also ask that smokers change into jump suits to enter the smoking area and leave them there when they re-enter. They also must enter through a special chamber to breathe clean air for two minutes before exhaling in the non-smoking area. If they smoke and have more than five tattoos and or body piercings they must move to Teaneck, New Jersey.


  7. - No Smokes For You! - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 2:17 pm:

    *WHEN* are we going to ban smoking in privates homes, like they are staring to do out in California?

    The health of our children - the ones that can defend themselves the least - is at stake.


  8. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 5:15 pm:

    Smoking bans protect employees, too, not just customers. By the logic of “zatoichi,” we could eliminate regulations of work place safety generally, let each employer decided how safe to make their workplace and if an employee isn’t skilled enough to get a job at a more desirable “safe” workplace and can only get a job at an unsafe workplace, well, it helps thin the gene pool.


  9. - Truthful James - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 5:18 pm:

    Smoking ought to be a matter for consenting adults in the privacy of their home.

    I feel for the small blue collar ethnic bars (used to own one) where people who grew up in the ward came after finishing in their trades jobs even after they had moved out to the suburbs. And also the tiny restaurants where an ethnic dinner was to be had and beer and funny cards was the order of the evening. With a seating area maybe twenty four feet by twelve feet and lino covered tables how in heck are you going to have a no smoking area. Where a plumber or sewerman can go still stinking from the job, having washed his face and hands and changed to dry clothes in the shadow of his truck.

    Those places are gone forever. Get home earlier to hear the wife complain.


  10. - JakeCP - Tuesday, Nov 13, 07 @ 8:26 pm:

    In my opinion:
    I believe that private business owners should have the right to chose to ban smoking in their establishments. This really shouldn’t be an issue because the government has no right to tell a privately owned business to ban smoking. I don’t think any smoking ban compromise is reasonable because if people smoke outside or in a privately owned place then it should be allowed.


  11. - kimsch - Wednesday, Nov 14, 07 @ 8:33 am:

    the proprietor shall not permit tobacco smoke to drift into areas where smoking is prohibited through entrances, windows, ventilation systems, or other means.

    So, the proprietor is responsible for the wind? That’s what would happen if the smoke from the smoking area of the garden reached the non-smoking area of the garden because of a breeze. You are OUTSIDE.

    Also the 15 feet rule may make smokers go out into the middle of the street in a high density area like Chicago. It’d be the only place that was 15 feet from a door.

    I have been smoke free since April 25, 2006 and glad of it, but sometimes the nanny state is too much.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* TFI analysis: Transit's fiscal cliff will be $225 million smaller than expected because of state's online sales tax expansion
* Reform activist calls Harmon 'one of our state’s most prolific abusers of Illinois’ self-funding loophole'
* Comptroller Mendoza won't seek 4th term, leaves door open for mayoral bid (Updated x2)
* Question of the day
* C'mon, man
* SB 328 Puts Illinois’s Economy At Risk
* Your tax dollars at work
* Catching up with the federal candidates (Updated)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller