Reader comments closed for the weekend
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * This week went fast. So if you didn’t get enough, head to Illinoize… * And this one is for Hillary Clinton, whose tax returns show that she and her husband reported income of $109 million over seven years…
|
On blogging
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * Illinois Issues magazine has a decent profile on blogs this month, including some flattering things about me. But what appears to be the central thesis is not necessarily accurate…
* There are all sorts of blogs out there. Partisan, ideological and issues-based blogs do often try to influence policy. Others, like mine, are information and opinion sources that don’t have an end in themselves except for that aforementioned core mission. I’m not sure, for instance, whether Illinois Issues’ influence on public policy could actually be measured bill by bill, and the same goes for this site. So, holding this blog to a different standard is not logical because passing or killing bills is not my stated goal. That being said, I know for a fact that several legislators participate in comments here on a regular basis and that many, many more read the posts and the comments. Pretty much everyone at the Statehouse is checking the blog on a regular basis throughout the day. All you have to do is watch how comments decline on afternoons when the GA adjourns for the week to get a good illustration of that phenomenon. But it’s very tough to take a story/discussion here or anywhere else in the media and point to it as the one deciding factor in how a particular piece of legislation fared in the House or Senate, even though there is an example in the II piece about a blog post at this site doing just that. * And this is goofy…
This is an outdated, hackneyed opinion. Good bloggers attract readers. For the most part, bad bloggers, like graffiti “artists,” attract scorn. Frankly, some journalism school-trained columnists I’ve read have far more shallow opinions than quite a few blogs that I frequent. And I’ll put many of my commenters up against a lot of them. Professor Meyer ought to expand his horizons before opening his mouth. Overall, though, I thought the article was extremely well written and provided some very good insights into how political blogs operate in Illinois. Go read the whole thing. …Adding… This guy Meyer really doesn’t like bloggers.
|
Enough with the games already
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Kevin Fanning * There has been a lot of drama the past few days over the Senate democrats’ plan to sweep $530 million from special state funds. Part of this plan includes an expansion of health care programs. In the Senate Executive Committee on Wednesday, where these amendments were introduced, I witnessed President Jones and Minority Leader Watson square off on a Crain’s article regarding the closing of St. Francis Hospital. Watson contended that the main problem with St. Francis was the large number of Medicaid patients it had to accept, and that bringing the threshold of eligibility in the state up to $80,000 for a family of four would further exacerbate the problem. Jones, whose district includes the hospital, countered that the main problem was really the losses the hospital sustains from having to treat patients with no health insurance at all. Personally, I think the problem stems from a combination of the two. The democrats argued yesterday on the Senate floor that the state needs to step up to the plate and do something about health care since there is no leadership from the federal government. True, but then there is this caveat to think about:
So if absurdly late Medicaid payments from the state to hospitals is further adding to the burden, then what difference would expanding Medicaid benefits really have if hospitals that accept them continue to close? Additionally, this state is flat-out broke. Can we afford an expansion? * The sad reality tough is that the entire debate doesn’t even matter. The whole trilogy of sweeps amendments passed by the Senate aren’t going anywhere. They’re D.O.A to the House as Rich has already lamented. I wonder how much longer the constituents of this state are going to put up with the smoke and mirrors. What we currently have in our government is a three-ring-circus that is unresponsive to the dire and urgent needs of this state. Whether it’s health care, a capital plan, education, or a myriad of other issues the theory holds that nothing is getting accomplished, and won’t. It’s absolutely irresponsible to continue this charade. This bill is being passed to aggravate Speaker Madigan, and the recall bill in the House is being passed to scare Governor Blagojevich, knowing full well that it is in turn D.O.A. in the Senate. Enough. Here is an idea? Stop passing legislation that won’t ever effect public policy, and start talking to each other. It would be refreshing for the citizens of Illinois, and might even get us all out of here before November.
|
Question of the day
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * Today, the Tribune continues its crusade to convince the General Assembly to include a recall provision in the state Constitution in order to oust Gov. Blagojevich…
* The Daily Herald plays “Me, too” on its editorial page today, as does the Belleville News-Democrat…
Elliot Spitzer didn’t have the “grace” to resign, he left mostly because he was under threat of almost immediate impeachment and removal from office. * Questions: 1) Should the House reject the recall measure on its merits? Explain. 2) Should the House abandon the recall measure (which won’t even be brought up in the Senate) and move to impeach Blagojevich instead? Illinois has no specific requirement for impeachment other than 60 votes. The Senate then must put the governor on trial and vote on whether to remove him from office. 3) Should the House proceed with the relatively meaningless “feel-good” recall measure regardless of the merits because the governor’s proven behavior has not yet warranted such a serious action as impeachment? Try to stay calm. No screaming. No exclamation points. Debate, don’t yell. Thanks.
|
Picking him apart
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * Stu Levine may be wanting something for his nerves after what happened to him on the stand yesterday…
* The Tribune didn’t go into much detail on the first point, but these two items are what you need to watch from here on out…
The object here is to prove that Levine lied about Rezko’s influence to benefit himself, both with his business associates and then the feds. * Also…
The feds broke up the alleged scams before Rezko got any benefit. Another big point in the defense’s case. * And…
That’s more incentive to tell the feds what they want to hear. * And Levine knew from the very beginning whom the feds were chasing…
You shouldn’t assume from anything I’ve written that I believe Tony Rezko to be innocent. I just don’t believe anything that comes out of Stu Levine’s mouth. What a horrible witness.
|
Priorities, priorities
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * A school with a convicted felon at the helm that has never applied for not-for-profit status and hasn’t paid all its taxes gets a million dollars from the governor “by mistake.” Other schools aren’t so lucky…
* And forget about it if you rely on a conservation district…
* Yesterday, the Senate approved a plan to sweep a record $530 million from special state funds in order to provide some pork for legislators, expand health care programs and patch budget holes. The governor is now turning up the heat on the House by threatening big budget cuts…
* One Democrat unveiled this proposal yesterday…
That isn’t going anywhere.
|
You can’t win if you don’t contribute
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller * Moderate Republicans whine about conservatives who refuse to support the ticket, conservatives whine about “RINOs” controlling the show. The nasty back and forth between the two sides attracts all the attention. But here is a big problem with the Republicans in this state that nobody ever seems to talk about..
Instead of complaining, maybe they should be contributing. Discuss.
|
Morning shorts
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Kevin Fanning * Showdown set over children’s museum
* Carmakers fight fuel rules state by state * Former Rosemont mayor’s name coming off signs
* From boy alderman to ahead-of-his-time Blagojevich foe, Eisendrath reflects on public life * Link Between Shoes And Leadership Potential
* Special Ed. funding bill on governor’s desk * Group plans trip to capitol * Ill. proposes ban on cell phone use while crossing street * Walking and Talking/Texting A Crime? * Yarbrough urges residents to request CeaseFire funding
* Politics: Bill would make Illinois budget available on Web
* GOP names challengers to Link, Ryg * A look at new Illinois Supreme Court opinions * LaHood seeks state GOP post
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax
Friday, Apr 4, 2008 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |