We know that reviving this moribund state is a challenge greater than any Brady, a Bloomington homebuilder and Republican, has surmounted. By the most important measure of the next few years, though, Brady is the candidate for the job: We believe he will say No to the power-clutching elites — House Speaker Michael Madigan, Senate President John Cullerton, that means you and your cronies — whose insider politics doomed this state to its own private tailspin.
Pat Quinn, by contrast, cannot say No to anyone, let alone the power brokers who bully him. He cannot enforce consequences. He can’t even deliver bad news.
Not one mention of Jason Plummer’s name.
* Gov. Pat Quinn was endorsed by the Illinois Federation of Teachers the other day and just reported receiving a $350,000 contribution from the union.
* Brady taking credit where it’s not due? Looks that way…
Did Sen. Bill Brady help “expose the scandal” that led to Rod Blagojevich’s political downfall and criminal indictment?
On Brady’s campaign website, the GOP gubernatorial nominee insists that was the case, but Gov. Quinn, Democrats and even a top legal scholar who has followed Blagojevich’s criminal trial closely say Brady is exaggerating his record when it comes to Illinois’ impeached ex-governor. […]
A Republican lawmaker who voted to impeach Blagojevich chuckled upon reading Brady’s characterization of his role in exposing the Blagojevich scandal.
“I thought the U.S. attorney and the FBI did that,” said the lawmaker, who didn’t want to be named because he supports Brady. “That’s a bit of a stretch.”.
Law professor Richard Kling, who sat in on the Blagojevich trial and teaches at Kent College of Law, similarly minimized Brady’s role. “I don’t remember a shred of paper generated that he was ever instrumental in anything having to do with the governor,” Kling said. “It’s bizarre these guys make these claims that they have no basis for.”
Struggling to build a firewall against a Republican takeover, congressional Democrats are pouring money into roughly two dozen tight races around the country in the campaign’s closing weeks while pulling it back from others where their chances seem slimmer. […]
Democrats said they were focusing on stopping the bleeding where possible, including trying to salvage the seats of several threatened lawmakers who earlier this year looked like safe re-election bets. They include Colorado Rep. John Salazar, Georgia Rep. Sanford Bishop, Illinois Rep. Phil Hare, and Indiana Rep. Joe Donnelly, and Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton of Missouri. […]
The party also is fighting to keep Democratic-held open seats in Arkansas, Washington and Wisconsin, and to claim two now held by the GOP in Illinois and in Miami, Fla.
* Bill Brady on Roeser’s Political Shootout Sunday night
* Hare, Schilling spar over tax bills: He also dismissed the Schilling campaign’s explanation that an accountant failed to file the paperwork. “When is Bobby Schilling going to be accountable for his own actions,” Schlittner said.
* Kirk comments secretly recorded, made public: “For him to insinuate that there is some vote fraud going on in these communities is just an insult to the hundreds and hundreds of people who serve as election judges on elections. I find it disgraceful and insulting,” said Ald. Freddrenna Lyle.
* Can Gov. Quinn manage establishment he built his career assailing?: “To Pat, delegating is like asking someone else to do your homework,” one former aide said. “It’s noble — like Gandhi cleaning the latrines. But Gandhi was not leading a $54 billion enterprise.”… “It’s not that he’s some wild-eyed populist who wants to burn down every factory,” his brother John said. “I think he has to learn how to delegate more. He’s been used to fighting every fight. … He just has to learn that he can pick and choose the battles that he can win.”
- Quinn T. Sential - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 4:26 am:
The Tribune Editorial Board story is not so much about whether they were; or were not influenced by management, but rather if management attempted to influence them in any way. Ms. Lipinski’s comments in the NYT, which she apparently did not directly refute in talking with you, adds to the intrigue of the situation because of what it portends, whether the attempts were successful, or not.
What the original story suggests; is simply REASONABLE DOUBT, with respect to the allegations that BLAGO was attempting to influence the Tribune Editorial Board also, by silencing them. If Blago wanted to silence them to further his own interests; and Zell wanted them to turn up the heat on Blago to further his, then perhaps people (jurors) might think that Blago was justified in his attempts, because he felt like he was being pressured by an extremely powerful outside source in an effort to coerce official action.
If Blago’s resposne is considered extortion, why wouldn’t Zell’s alleged attempts be considered extortionist as well? This can further Blago’s cause with jurors, or prospective jurors, by portraying himself as the victim here.
You can bet that Lipinski will now be subpeonaed by the defense; and perhaps the NYT reporter as well, in the event that she starts to back-track. Would this now place Dold in a position to have to be called as a witness for the prosecution? Where does this place Zell in this mess; do you think he wants to be called as a witness as well?
This seems akin to a claim of sexual harrassment in the workplace by one employee, with another employee suggesting that the employees as a group never gave in to the harrassment. Just because none of the employees gave in, it does not mean that a hostile work enviornment was not present. The fact that one left the paper citing this situation as a contributing factor seems to suppoer the assertion that there was indded a hostile work environment.
This appears to be a significant issue for both the Blago prosecution, and the Blago defense, and appears as though this could impact some of the charges against him.
AL, there is little doubt that Plummer is a liability, which is why they have him off in the edge towns.
- Abraham Lincoln - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 1:41 pm:
Rich, you can paint any picture you want. I have Brady, Plummer, Quinn, Simon, Halvorson, Kinzinger, Kirk, and Alexi on google news feeds. Your selective postings and snarky comments say a lot.
AL, all of those people are also in the news feeds on the right side of the page. It’s all out in the open here, unlike some outlets, which refuse to cover anything but Rahmbomania.
Remove your goofy tinfoil hat, please, and stop insulting the memory of one of the few decent people this state ever produced. Thanks.
- Quinn T. Sential - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 4:26 am:
The Tribune Editorial Board story is not so much about whether they were; or were not influenced by management, but rather if management attempted to influence them in any way. Ms. Lipinski’s comments in the NYT, which she apparently did not directly refute in talking with you, adds to the intrigue of the situation because of what it portends, whether the attempts were successful, or not.
What the original story suggests; is simply REASONABLE DOUBT, with respect to the allegations that BLAGO was attempting to influence the Tribune Editorial Board also, by silencing them. If Blago wanted to silence them to further his own interests; and Zell wanted them to turn up the heat on Blago to further his, then perhaps people (jurors) might think that Blago was justified in his attempts, because he felt like he was being pressured by an extremely powerful outside source in an effort to coerce official action.
If Blago’s resposne is considered extortion, why wouldn’t Zell’s alleged attempts be considered extortionist as well? This can further Blago’s cause with jurors, or prospective jurors, by portraying himself as the victim here.
You can bet that Lipinski will now be subpeonaed by the defense; and perhaps the NYT reporter as well, in the event that she starts to back-track. Would this now place Dold in a position to have to be called as a witness for the prosecution? Where does this place Zell in this mess; do you think he wants to be called as a witness as well?
This seems akin to a claim of sexual harrassment in the workplace by one employee, with another employee suggesting that the employees as a group never gave in to the harrassment. Just because none of the employees gave in, it does not mean that a hostile work enviornment was not present. The fact that one left the paper citing this situation as a contributing factor seems to suppoer the assertion that there was indded a hostile work environment.
This appears to be a significant issue for both the Blago prosecution, and the Blago defense, and appears as though this could impact some of the charges against him.
- wordslinger - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 9:11 am:
If Indiana should be our model, does that mean Brady wants to raise personal and corporate income tax rates to match the Hoosiers?
- just sayin' - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 10:30 am:
What a shock, the Tribune, with its horribly hostile work environment for women, endorses the frat boy who opposes women’s reproductive rights.
- Abraham Lincoln - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 11:23 am:
So, Rich, the Sun-Times didn’t mention Sheila. “Not one mention.” You’re starting to show too much…
- Rich Miller - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 11:24 am:
AL, there is little doubt that Plummer is a liability, which is why they have him off in the edge towns.
- Abraham Lincoln - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 1:41 pm:
Rich, you can paint any picture you want. I have Brady, Plummer, Quinn, Simon, Halvorson, Kinzinger, Kirk, and Alexi on google news feeds. Your selective postings and snarky comments say a lot.
- Rich Miller - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 1:44 pm:
AL, all of those people are also in the news feeds on the right side of the page. It’s all out in the open here, unlike some outlets, which refuse to cover anything but Rahmbomania.
Remove your goofy tinfoil hat, please, and stop insulting the memory of one of the few decent people this state ever produced. Thanks.
- wordslinger - Tuesday, Oct 12, 10 @ 1:47 pm:
Hey Abe, which conspiracy is Rich part of? Hard to keep track of them all without a scorecard.
Modest handle, by the way.