Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Emanuel uses poll to strengthen inevitability claims
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Emanuel uses poll to strengthen inevitability claims

Monday, Dec 13, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller

*** UPDATE *** From the Tribune

Mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel’s wife will not have to appear to testify at tomorrow’s election board hearing challenging Emanuel’s Chicago residency, a hearing officer said today.

Burt Odelson, the lead attorney in the challenge, has dropped his bid to bring Amy Rule to Chicago, and hearing officer Joseph A. Morris said he had he heard nothing from other objectors that showed Rule had to be called.

[ *** End Of Update *** ]

* Rahm Emanuel’s campaign just released its own poll, which shows that Emanuel may be within sight of avoiding a runoff

43 percent Emanuel
11 percent Carol Moseley Braun
10 percent Danny Davis
9 percent Gery Chico
8 percent Miguel Del Valle
7 percent James Meeks
1 percent Roland Burris
2 percent Other
7 percent Undecided

The poll was conducted December 1-8 of 1,020 likely voters and the MoE is 3.07 percent.

More

Among blacks polled, Emanuel was at 39 percent to 21 percent for Davis, to 14 percent for Meeks, to 13 percent for Moseley Braun, to 3 percent for Chico, 2 percent for Burris and 7 percent at undecided.

Chicago City Clerk Miguel Del Valle is the top candidate of Hispanics surveyed, getting 37 percent of the Hispanic vote to 32 percent for Emanuel, 9 percent for Chico, 5 percent for Moseley Braun and everyone else under 4 percent. […]

From the Greenberg Quinlan memo: Emanuel’s “lead is built upon a very positive profile, with Emanuel by 91 percent of the voters, 54 percent offering warm or positive ratings and just 22 percent cool or negative ratings. Voters are much more mixed in their views of the other well known candidates including Moseley Braun, who garners net negative ratings (34 percent, 39 percent cool, 90 percent name identification), and Chico (25 percent warm, 22 percent cool, 65 percent name identification).”

* Meanwhile, Gery Chico claims his campaign raised $100,000 a day for three days straight

“He’s about as good as anyone I’ve worked with, fund-raising,” said Ken Snyder, senior strategist for the campaign, who has helped with campaigns across the country and locally for Toni Preckwinkle and John Stroger. “He just works his heart out. There’s no easy way to do it. It’s just elbow grease. It can be a humble and humiliating experience even, but candidates have to do it. He works hard at it. He’s on the phone hours and hours and hours every day.”

Chico didn’t do a bad fundraising job when he ran for Senate, but he finished way out of the money when it came to actual votes. However, he’s definitely running the scrappiest campaign of all the others so far.

* Related…

* Q&A with the Rev. James Meeks: I’m going to give the Chicago Teachers Union one year to create a policy of establishing what is an effective teacher, what is an ineffective teacher, and how do we dismiss an ineffective teacher. If they don’t come up with a policy in a year, then I would ask the General Assembly for that policy. I think all teachers get a bum rap because of bad teachers. Teachers don’t want bad teachers either.

       

25 Comments
  1. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:43 pm:

    How on earth can CMB be in 3rd place?


  2. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:43 pm:

    Second place, I mean.


  3. - bdogg - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:48 pm:

    Aren’t polls done by a candidate that show himself or herself in the lead just for their own propaganda purposes? why publish them? to the chicago press- you are being used. why cover Emanuel if he won’t answer your questions?? I wouldn’t show up to anything he does.


  4. - What's in a name? - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:49 pm:

    Rich, do you mean “Chico” instead of Chicago? Probably your auto-correct.


  5. - Rich Miller - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:49 pm:

    ===why cover Emanuel if he won’t answer your questions?? I wouldn’t show up to anything he does. ===

    Do you actually read what you post?


  6. - Rich Miller - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:51 pm:

    ===Probably your auto-correct. ===

    Rented thumbs.


  7. - Disgusted - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:54 pm:

    Rich, that’s Chico, aka Gery Chicago, and he ran for US Senate not Governor.


  8. - Rich Miller - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 3:54 pm:

    Again, rented thumbs.


  9. - Deep South - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:05 pm:

    ===why cover Emanuel if he won’t answer your questions??===

    I’ve been saying the same thing about Sarah Palin.


  10. - Scooby - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:08 pm:

    bdogg, I seriously doubt that Rahm’s team is paying GQR tens of thousands of dollars to do a poll just for the benefit of a “propaganda” memo. If the data from the poll is faulty then the real victim is the campaign, not the Chicago press.


  11. - Rich Miller - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:11 pm:

    You can’t not cover a major candidate for mayor. That’s probably the dumbest idea ever. If he won’t answer questions, then get more forceful. Too often, the questions asked leave huge room for evasion. Follow-up and precision are important. Not always easy to do, but necessary.


  12. - Spliff - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:15 pm:

    The poll is to stop that money flowing to Chico and to a lesser degree Braun, Meeks and whoever else.


  13. - Lee - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:16 pm:

    ==Do you actually read what you post?==

    Rich, I second that. bdogg, how would you even know whether your questions would be answered if you don’t bother to show up.


  14. - Wensicia - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 4:19 pm:

    If Rev. Meeks believes the General Assembly should tackle teacher evaluations, then he should stay there and work on it, rather than running for mayor.


  15. - Boone Logan Square - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 6:26 pm:

    What do you suppose are Rahm’s chances if he gets in a runoff? I’m curious to see how this system will work in a competitive election, although the results probably won’t be as exciting as what happened in the Oakland mayoral race last month.


  16. - wordslinger - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 6:33 pm:

    As of today, I doubt Emanuel can get the 50% plus 1 to avoid a runoff. Name recognition won’t be enough; odds are there will be a Rahm and an anti-Rahm.

    I wouldn’t count out an anti-Rahm at all in a run-off. Money and support will be focused. Is Rahm a heavyweight in a one-on-one citywide election? I don’t see why. What’s his base and where’s the enthusiasm?

    One-on-one softball interviews with swooning columnists and TV personalities still angling for White House holiday party invites will only go so far. At some point, he’ll have to venture into the muck.

    If I were the anti-Rahm, I’d focus on how he sold out Obama. At the beginning of the year, there was a spate of stories in the national press about “If only Obama would listen to that genius Rahm.” Gee, where did those come from?

    Then, of course, he bailed before the election wipeout, even after Obama was quoted as expecting him to stay through the balloting.

    The dude’s a mile wide and an inch deep. Who’s got his back?


  17. - BF - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 6:58 pm:

    If I were Chico and others, I wouldn’t get discouraged by these polls. I’m guessing that people w/cell phones are NOT being polled, as is usually the case. It would seem that Chicago, like most big cities, has a fair percentage of the voting age population that rely on cell phones rather than land lines.

    Chico etc., remember Bill Brady! Polls can be very wrong. The goal here is to make it to a run off, and prevent the Rahmster from getting more than 50 percent. It would be impossible for him to pull that off. He’s not Mayor Daley, yet.


  18. - crg - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 7:24 pm:

    this might be a silly question and not sure if this is the correct place to ask it … but if Rahm is ineligible for the election because he was in DC, even though his permanent residence was in Chicago (albeit rented to someone else), wouldn’t Davis also be ineligible?


  19. - ZC - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 7:49 pm:

    It’s not just TV. Rahm is running advertisements on Youtube. I came across one when looking up Janelle Monae.

    Guy has an organized media outreach.


  20. - Pot calling kettle - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 8:04 pm:

    As a Congressman, Davis has to be a resident (of the State, if not the district). So, he’s fine.


  21. - Logical Thinker - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 9:03 pm:

    Here’s something to consider:

    The city is basically 1/3rd hispanic, black, and white. I know it’s not equal and the percentages are off a bit. If you look at the data, Rahm’s percentage is close to that of the white vote in Chicago. If you add up the black candidates, it’s almost equal to the black vote as well. The interesting thing is Del Valle and Chico only account for 17% of the vote which is about 10% less than the total hispanic vote in the city. If a run-off becomes a reality, it will be interesting to see where the black/hispanic vote goes. I think I’d buy the ability of a hispanic candidate to win vs. that of a black candidate versus Rahm.


  22. - Wumpus - Monday, Dec 13, 10 @ 11:03 pm:

    How the heck is Joe Morris moderating the hearing? I am sure he is the smartest guy in the room, he will let you know. I am just curious.


  23. - Pot calling kettle - Tuesday, Dec 14, 10 @ 12:07 am:

    LT - As the crosstabs above indicate, there is currently not much racial block voting. Rahm is pulling 39% of the black vote and 32% of the Hispanic vote


  24. - irv & ashland - Tuesday, Dec 14, 10 @ 1:00 am:

    LT,

    While I know part of the reason for your post is to reply to someone who seemed not even to recognize that the poll had crosstabs and that Rich had posted them, it’s still worth noting that we’ve seen other high-profile races in which the black vote gravitated to the black candidate relatively late. Rahm might end up with 39% of the black vote in the first round … but I wouldn’t put money on it.


  25. - amalia - Tuesday, Dec 14, 10 @ 9:22 am:

    NBC5 Chicago has the hearings live on their cable channel and there are updates going live on MSNBC.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Let's help these kids! (Updated)
* Once again, a Chicago revenue idea would require state approval
* Lion Electric struggling, but no state subsidies have yet been paid out
* Question of the day
* Madigan trial roundup: Solis faces first day of cross-examination
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller