Goring oxen
Thursday, Dec 16, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Whenever a legislature tries to do some sort of budgetary or policy reform, somebody’s ox is gonna get gored. And sometimes, that certain somebody is a powerful interest group. For instance, the Illinois Hospital Association testified this week against lowering the rates paid for doctor visits for workers compensation patients…
Clearly, the 2005 workers compensation reform bill didn’t save the system any money, and, in fact, raised costs. But changing the law will not be easy at all. * More often than not, however, those “somebodies” are political nobodies with little power. From a press release…
* And these sorts of fight are likely to proliferate as the state attempts to solve its budget problems. Illinois isn’t alone…
A few charts… Related…
|
*** UPDATED x2 - Wife won’t be called - Boxes found *** Were Emanuel’s tenant demands for $100K related to residency case?
Thursday, Dec 16, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * The plot thickens…
* And could this $100K gambit by the Halpins been part of the challenge to Emanuel’s candidacy? Maybe…
Hmm. Curiouser and curiouser. * Hearing officer Joe Morris is expected to decide today whether to call Rahm Emanuel’s wife, Amy Rule, to the stand. So far, Emanuel’s lawyers have been able to keep her out of it. But after yesterday’s weirdness, Morris may have no choice…
But…
On Tuesday, Rahm Emanuel testified that he didn’t know whether his wife checked the box for a “permanent” address change on the US Postal Service’s form to forward their mail to DC. That could also be a reason for her testimony. If Morris decides not to call Ms. Rule, then he could wrap everything up today. * Meanwhile, some of the objectors who got all goofy on Tuesday and didn’t seem to understand how to ask a question and that the questions they asked needed to be pertinent to a residency case complained to Morris yesterday about their treatment in the media…
Quite a large number of Tuesday’s objectors appeared to have far higher self-esteem than self-awareness. It was positively painful, which may have been the object of the whole charade. It’s not the media they should be upset with, it’s the people who may have put them up to this scam in the apparent hope that their antics could ruffle Emanuel’s feathers. They failed miserably. And it could’ve even backfired today…
Heh. *** UPDATE 1 *** AP…
No surprise about the objector’s nonsensical reasoning. Sheesh. *** UPDATE 2 *** As if there was ever any doubt…
But, of course, one of the objectors refused to be convinced…
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Dec 16, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * A new school reform proposal working its way through the Illinois House has a section which would severely limit teachers’ right to strike. If there’s an impasse, the state’s Education Labor Relations Board could appoint a fact finding panel which would then come up with a solution. If that’s rejected by both parties, the panel’s proposals are published in local newspapers and the sides then have 10 days to settle. If there is no settlement, the two sides exchange their proposals and then the school boards, by a two-thirds vote, can impose a solution on the unions. If the school boards cannot muster a two-thirds vote, then and only then the union has the right to strike. However, according to an internal analysis I’ve obtained created by the Illinois State Board of Education, it appears that Chicago’s education board could simply impose their own terms on the teachers union and prevent it from striking. And lots of people believe that this bill is designed to prevent a teachers strike when the current contract expires in 2012. The legislation would also prevent teachers from including school-year length in their union contracts. Again, this appears aimed at the city, where the school year is one of the shortest in the nation. * The Question: Should the Chicago Board of Education be allowed to impose its own terms on the teachers union to prevent a strike? Explain. * Related…
|
Buyer beware when dealing with Groupon
Thursday, Dec 16, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * It’s kinda difficult to lay all the blame Groupon for this because apparently somebody didn’t do that math over at Navy Pier…
More…
Well, duh. Groupon claims it is always willing to make a deal with its clients, and that’s what should have been done here to begin with. It’s not really Groupon’s fault that Navy Pier officials didn’t consider that so many tickets could be sold at such a low price. Groupon has been criticized for this before, but every time I’ve seen a story, it’s about a businessperson who was overwhelmed with the response to its offer and ended up losing money. They either figured that coupon holders would buy other items when they were in their shops (which didn’t happen because the shoppers just wanted the steeply discounted stuff) and/or they simply sold too many items at less than the cost of providing them. From Chicagoist…
Groupon users are apparently cheapskates. So, buyer beware. * Speaking of Groupon, they’re helping spark a tech boom in Chicago, according to WBEZ…
|
Meeks: No set asides for white women
Thursday, Dec 16, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Rev. Sen. James Meeks has a well-known mouth problem. The problem is he continually inserts his foot into his mouth, particularly on the subject of race. From Fox Chicago…
Video… React…
Thoughts? * Roundup…
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |