An out-of-state education reform group raised a whopping $2.8 million in the days leading up to historic state caps on campaign contributions.
All of the money raised by Stand for Children’s Illinois PAC came in five- or six-figure contributions from some very major Chicago-area business types. Members of the famed billionaire Pritzker family kicked in a total of $250,000 on Dec. 29, two days before the end of the old campaign finance system, which allowed for unlimited contributions to groups like Stand for Children’s PAC.
Ken Griffin, CEO of the Citadel Group, contributed $500,000 on Dec. 15. Griffin gave hundreds of thousands of dollars last year to Illinois House Republicans and GOP gubernatorial nominee Bill Brady’s campaign. Sam Zell, owner of Tribune Co., contributed $100,000 on Dec. 20. Members of the Henry Crown family kicked in $400,000. And Paul Finnegan, co-CEO of Madison Dearborn Partners LLC, contributed $500,000.
The group’s political action committee made history last year with the single largest non-leadership contribution in modern Illinois times — a $175,000 check to Republican state House candidate Ryan Higgins, who ended up losing his race. The PAC contributed a total of $610,000 during the fall campaign to legislative candidates in both parties.
That money did not go unnoticed at the Statehouse. During the post-election legislative session, House Speaker Michael Madigan tried to push through education reforms supported by Stand for Children which were deemed overtly hostile by the teachers unions. Among the reforms was an all-but-total ban on strikes by Chicago teachers. The teachers unions refused to contribute to Madigan and many of his candidates last year after Madigan pushed through public employee pension reforms.
The group’s December fundraising push left it with almost $2.9 million in the bank as of the end of 2010, when contributions to state PACs were capped at $10,000 for individuals and $20,000 for corporations per calendar year. None of the group’s $2.8 million in December contributions would have fallen under those caps.
To put this in perspective, the Illinois State Medical Society, which is one of the most powerful lobbying forces at the Statehouse, had $1.8 million in its political action committee account by the end of the year. The Illinois Hospital Association and the pro-choice juggernaut Personal PAC ended the year with about $1.4 million each. Stand for Children beat them all by a lot.
Jonah Edelman, Stand for Children’s national founder, said last week that the December contributions represented the “significant generosity of Illinoisans.” Edelman refused to say whether the group planned to spend the war chest in the coming campaign or use it as a long-term fund.
He did say his organization was now focused on passing the education reform bill that was backed by Madigan, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, Chicago mayoral candidate Rahm Emanuel and others during the lame-duck session. Emanuel took in hundreds of thousands of dollars from Stand for Children’s contributors.
The group’s legislation ran into a brick wall in the Senate, where Sen. Kimberly Lightford, chairman of the Education Reform Committee, resisted a move to rush through any reforms and insisted that the teachers unions play a role in the negotiations.
Lightford has received high marks from both Stand for Children and the teachers unions for running fair-minded, well-organized meetings. One longtime teachers union lobbyist said this month that Lightford’s meetings were some of the best-run he’s attended during his entire career. Stand for Children’s legislative person comes from the Senate Democratic staff, so she has a long relationship with Lightford and offered up her own high praise. Another Lightford meeting is scheduled for this week.
It’s not that legislators and their leaders slavishly bow deeply to anybody with a fat wallet. But they most certainly take lots of notice when somebody comes out of nowhere and antes up with $2.9 million.
And Stand for Children’s lobbying stable includes some of the biggest contract lobbyists at the Statehouse. They’ve basically run the board, with heavy-hitting lobbyists tied to both parties and the Black and Latino caucuses.
Stand for Children has gone from nowhere to one of the biggest and potentially one of the more successful players in the building within just a few short months, all without attracting significant media attention. It’s truly an amazing story.
- wordslinger - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 11:26 am:
This Edelman has an interesting story and is obviously a big hitter. What made him choose Illinois, anyway?
- amalia - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 11:28 am:
“For a better Chicago” ….. for whom? did HDO have any money left?
- Rich Miller - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:16 pm:
2 comments kinda makes me feel lonesome.
- wordslinger - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 2:20 pm:
LOL, Bad News Bears, Bad News Rahm, no more oxygen.
It’s a heckuva story, though, and there will be plenty more where that came from. Believe me, teachers in this state know they have a battle royale coming, and fewer allies in elected positions to help them defend their positions.
- Pot calling kettle - Monday, Jan 24, 11 @ 10:59 pm:
Nobody wanted to comment for fear Stand for Illinois would target them.
- waitress practicing politics. . - Tuesday, Jan 25, 11 @ 7:19 am:
Stand for Children-a rose by any other name would smell so sweet. Clever name for a PAC
- Teacher/Grandma/forced IEA member - Wednesday, Jan 26, 11 @ 8:17 am:
I wonder if the IEA leadership is still glad it bombarded teachers with emails saying VOTE FOR EVERY DEMOCRAT before the last election. I think it’s wonderful that a group is willing to challenge the education establishment in Illinois. The IEA could work for better education, but they are ONLY concerned with their own agenda–not what might actually improve education for the children of this state.
- Sizemore - Wednesday, Jan 26, 11 @ 12:52 pm:
Will Stand for Children back teacher evaluations created by professional teachers? Weeding out narrow-minded administrators who lack vision and have a personal agendas.is necessary for balance.Will Stand for Children back mentoring programs for new or struggling teachers?