C’mon, governor, pay up already
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Wisconsin columnist Jim Stingl is peeved that Gov. Pat Quinn hasn’t yet paid up on his January NFC Championship bet with Gov. Scott Walker. Quinn was supposed to volunteer at a food pantry wearing a Packers jersey if the Bears lost. Football season is but a distant memory, college basketball is over and baseball season is in full swing, but Quinn is still a no-show…
So is Quinn going to weasel out of this and hope we all forgot about it? Dude, don’t make the bet if you can’t pay the debt.
“No, no, no, absolutely not,” said his spokesman, Grant Klinzman. “He fully intends to live up to the terms of the bet.”
OK, but when? Quinn’s office promised a while back that it will be sometime in the next few months. Klinzman was not able to be more specific than that.
“He’s a very, very busy guy. I think you guys have been pretty busy, as well,” Klinzman said. […]
I asked Walker’s office if they’d like to publicly condemn Quinn for his foot-dragging and perhaps throw him under the Packers team bus. They didn’t seem too upset. “We’ll hold off on that yet,” said press aide Cullen Werwie.
* NBC5 blogger Ted McClelland opines…
The problem is that Quinn didn’t realize Wisconsin’s newly elected governor, Scott Walker, would turn out to be such a … cheesehead. Quinn was scheduled to work a food bank on Feb. 21 but canceled because he didn’t want to step into the turmoil created by Walker’s attempt to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights. Walker might have demanded Quinn return the senators hiding out in McHenry County. Plus, Walker was inviting Illinois businesses to “Escape to Wisconsin” to avoid Quinn’s income tax increase. […]
The governor could just wait a year, until Walker loses a recall election. The only problem with that is, the Packers might win another Super Bowl, which would require Quinn to spend two days at a Wisconsin food bank.
Unfortunately, there’s no way Quinn can propose changing the terms of the bet. As a governor, he’s a public employee, and Walker has made it clear he won’t bargain with public employees. The lesson here is, Democrats shouldn’t make deals with Scott Walker.
Other possible lessons: Pat Quinn has trouble keeping promises and is always late paying bills - just ask any social service provider.
49 Comments
|
A bit much
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Excessive?…
A Champaign man faces up to 30 years in prison after being convicted of spitting on a jail guard.
A jury on Tuesday convicted 25-year-old Emmanuel Chapple of aggravated battery for spitting on officer Craig Wakefield on Jan. 14 as Wakefield walked past Chapple’s cell.
Chapple’s previous drug-related convictions mean he can be sentenced as what’s called a Class X Felon. That requires a mandatory six to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced on May 25.
* This FOIA request may be asking for too much…
The University of Illinois asked for a stay Tuesday on a federal court ruling that it contends would threaten the privacy of student records.
The UI also said a March 9 order by Judge Joan B. Gottschall could result in the loss of millions of dollars in federal funds the UI receives every year. […]
But Gottschall ruled that FERPA does not require that applicants’ names, grade point averages and admissions test scores be withheld.
“The only question presented by this lawsuit is whether FERPA ’specifically prohibits’ the requested disclosure. The court must follow the command of the Illinois Supreme Court to construe the exemptions to FOIA narrowly. FERPA does not specifically prohibit Illinois from doing anything, so the university may not use federal law as authority to withhold the records,” Gottschall wrote. […]
“This basically negates FERPA completely,” said UI lawyer Samuel Skinner, a former Secretary of Transportation. “We’re concerned it erodes all kinds of privacy rights, and leads on a slippery slope” to such consequences as identity theft.
But Don Craven, general counsel to the Illinois Press Association, agreed with the Tribune’s argument that is seeking the records of applicants, not students.
I don’t think I feel all that comfortable with the media having access to student GPAs and admission test scores.
* But keeping all this information secret seems excessive in the other direction…
Tribune lawyers filed court papers asking that the “wholesale filing of pleadings under seal,” stop [in the ongoing Rod Blagojevich trial process].
Attorneys say that since Feb. 22, 16 court filings were made in secret. The attorneys say there was no attempt to keep even portions of those filings in the public. In the filings they cited, Blagojevich’s lawyers filed original pleadings in secret and the government subsequently resigned
“A long line of Supreme Court decisions recognize a presumptive right of public access to the criminal justice system - including specifically pretrial pleadings and hearings, which often are as important as the trial itself,” attorneys for the Chicago Tribune wrote.
* Is this bill really necessary?…
To the chagrin of state regulators, extensive cemetery reforms enacted in the wake of the Burr Oak Cemetery scandal could be erased under a measure pending before the Illinois Senate.
The proposal, sponsored by Sen. Emil Jones III (D-Chicago), would eliminate many of the regulations imposed on cemeteries that were ushered in as part of the Cemetery Oversight Act just last year. If approved, only large, for-profit cemeteries would face the stiffer regulations enacted in the wake of scandal.
Those reforms required a numeric database tracking system for every grave in Illinois. It also required funeral homes to witness burials and required the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation to license cemetery operators.
After Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart announced allegations of widespread grave-reselling and mismanagement at Burr Oak Cemetery in Alsip, Gov. Pat Quinn appointed a Cemetery Oversight Task Force to propose reforms to the burial industry. At the time, Chicago’s south suburbs had the dubious honor of the most complaints of any region in the state. […]
Now that Burr Oak is on track to become a not-for-profit cemetery — should stakeholders vote to confirm its bankruptcy reorganization plan — the historic black cemetery no longer would be subject to regulation, Dart said.
* A House committee apparently believed this idea was unnecessary yesterday…
A plan to remove all the Metra board members from their posts and strip away future members’ salaries, pensions and benefits was rejected by a House committee Monday.
The plan, sponsored by Rep. Jack Franks, was filed in response to the misspending of former Metra CEO Phil Pagano, who committed suicide, as well as expenses made by board members that he called questionable.
“Metra has become a culture of entitlement that lacks accountability,” the Marengo Democrat said.
His fellow lawmakers disagreed with Franks’ methods, rejecting his proposal by a 6-16 vote.
* Related…
* ICC judge recommends 3% ComEd rate hike
* Public records law could see restrictions
* House approves nonbinding referendums for schools
* Blagojevich to make statement today at 5 p.m. in front of his home
* ADDED: Audit finds more financial troubles at Chicago St. U.
* ADDED: House panel OKs curbs on using FOIA for commercial gain
* ADDED: Illinois House passes trans fats ban
11 Comments
|
Note to Quinn agencies: There is no extra money
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* One of the very real problems with the way the House is doing the new state budget is that the five appropriations committees have been allotted the same percentage of total state dollars that their agencies always get. So, unless one approp committee agrees to give up some of its allotment (no chance), then cuts to things like human services cannot be mitigated by deeper cuts elsewhere.
Some who testified to a Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday pleaded with members to avoid cutting more from human services than the governor has already proposed…
Michelle Saddler, secretary of the Department of Human Services, said she hopes an alternative can be found to cutting the budget beyond Quinn’s numbers. “We have some very difficult cuts in the budget as we’re all dealing with this issue of fiscal realities. We know that there’s not enough money. We know that the governor had to make very painful decisions, and we’re seeing that in the introduced budget.” Saddler said more than 13 programs have already been eliminated since the governor’s proposal in February.
In terms of the impact moving forward, she said the worst of the cuts under the governor’s budget are in the divisions of alcoholism and substance abuse, and in the areas of community health and disease prevention. She said those programs lessen future costs for the state and that the governor has expressed to her his openness to alternatives other than the large cuts. “Those are areas where we have relatively small dollar investment but with large payback over time. These are areas where if you invest a dollar now, you prevent, say, $13 or $17 of expenses in the future,” Saddler said. […]
Frank Anselmo, chief executive officer of the Community Behavioral Healthcare Association of Illinois, suggested to lawmakers that they prioritize spending to avoid what he called continued disproportionate cuts to community care. “The governor’s proposed budget for [addiction prevention and treatment programs and mental health programs] is a 43 percent cut within a two year cycle to community care. That’s not shared sacrifice, in fact I’d be happy to share the sacrifice,” Anselmo said, “because we’ve slashed community services to a point where in some communities, we’re not going to have a system at all.” […]
Saddler said her department is already facing bigger cuts under the governor’s budget than some other areas of government, and the legislature should not seek to make those reductions larger. “We should not be looking at any additional cuts to DHS. There’ve been difficult choices, and human services is being cut disproportionately to many other areas.”
Unless they “find” money somehow or move money around from someplace else (and where would that be? Education? Pensions? Public safety?) then this is an extremely difficult situation.
* Nobody is, of course, happy with the coming budget cuts…
Schools across the state may see their school bus money cut in half.
The Illinois State Board of Education asked lawmakers in the state House on Tuesday for more funding, particularly for school transportation.
Gov. Pat Quinn proposed to slash local school budgets by more than $37.5 million for the next fiscal year. The total earmarked for elementary, junior high and high schools still tops $10.7 billion for the 2012 spending plan.
But the proposed cut to school bus budgets went too deep for some.
Less money for buses may mean longer wait times and rides for kids, especially for those in downstate, rural districts, said Rep. David Reis, R-Olney.
“What good is it to have good quality teachers, teaching standards, the best books and the best school rooms, if you won’t even make a commitment to bus the kid to the school,” said Reis, who represents Jasper County, which has the geographically largest school district in the state.
Restoring Quinn’s cuts means finding somewhere else to cut or finding more revenues. Otherwise, the cuts could be even deeper than Quinn proposed, because the House and Senate are both operating under lower spending limits than the governor did.
* This pretty much sums up the situation…
You have to wonder how it is going to end well once the new budget is together for Illinois’ fiscal year that begins July 1. Lawmakers who sit on appropriations committees are not seeing eye-to-eye with the administration.
“Your proposed budget is $7.6 billion,” State Representative Will Davis (D-Homewood) told the Illinois State Board of Education’s chief financial officer, “and I’m told we are working with a dollar figure of 6.8.”
* Related…
* Concerns raised about new health care plan: The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services stated Illinois will save approximately $102 million per year from the new health care contracts. However, Health Alliance representatives are questioning the validity of this figure. “We are concerned about their claims,” said Jocelyn Browning, communications manager for Health Alliance. “We don’t think they have the correct numbers. We are working to try to show what they are claiming is unfounded.”
* Many questions unanswered on state health insurance changes: Poe and Rose both said DHFS might have violated its own bid standards, which required companies that wanted to bid on the HMO contract to have provider networks in place by Jan. 1. “It’s clear they (BlueCross) don’t have it there now,” Poe said.
* Some Illinois Lawmakers Pushing Mandated State Run Health Insurance
* SB 626 Allows One Elementary School District Per High School District
* Emergency dispatchers face money crunch - Emergency service funded by declining number of land telephones
19 Comments
|
* 11:53 am - Sen. Dave Koehler’s bill to allow religious organizations to refuse to offer adoption and foster care services to couple who’ve received civil unions just went down to defeat in the Senate Executive Committee. Stay tuned.
*** UPDATE *** From the Catholic Conference of Illinois…
“Lawmakers are obviously engaged in this issue. We will continue to seek a resolution that allows Catholic Charities to serve thousands of abused and neglected children in Illinois, and we are hopeful that resolution will be supported moving forward,” said Robert Gilligan, Executive Director, Catholic Conference of Illinois.
“This legislation allows Catholic Charities to operate within Church teachings, within the law and always with the best interest of the child at the forefront. Those in civil unions will not be prevented from becoming foster or adoptive parents. From Catholic Charities, they will be referred to DCFS or to one of the approximately 50 other private child welfare agencies throughout the state. Our agencies serve thousands of abused and neglected children in Illinois and are constantly rated a top performer by DCFS in providing permanency, stable foster homes and protection from further harm. We simply want to continue.”
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* We went over this topic yesterday, but here’s a bit of the coverage from earlier today. Tribune…
Gay adoptions emerged Tuesday at the center of a Capitol culture clash as lawmakers pushed a measure to ensure faith-based groups could turn away committed same-sex couples who want to adopt children or provide foster homes.
Opponents say it’s a direct assault on Illinois’ new civil union law, which takes effect June 1. And some fear children will lose opportunities to be placed in loving homes because of discrimination. […]
Sponsoring senators argue religious groups shouldn’t have to go against their beliefs when placing children for adoption. And they say it simply clarifies legally what those groups have been doing for years.
“They have a right of conscience here. They’re not going to place a child with an unmarried couple,” said Sen. William Haine, D-Alton. “It’s either that or they’re driven out of the adoption business, which (would be) a terrible loss to the children of the state.”
* The sponsor speaks…
“During the discussion of the law, I was asked a question about my intent and how the legislation would affect the other activities of religious-based groups,” [Democratic Sen. Dave Koehle] said. “I indicated that it was not my intent to make any group work against its own religious beliefs. I promised to clarify that issue with subsequent legislation. Senate Bill 1123 is that follow-up legislation. Though I know some people will find it objectionable, I feel I must keep my promise.”
Koehler added that the new proposal would require adoption agencies that refuse to serve lesbian and gay couples to provide those couples “with contact information for DCFS, which will direct the couples to agencies that do serve couples in civil unions.”
Longtime LGBT activist Rick Garcia agreed that the bill appears to stem from promises made last fall by senators who supported civil unions to carve out exemptions for religious groups. But Garcia said no one is trying to stop any religious-based or affiliated groups from discriminating if they choose to do so with their own money.
“If they want to do it on their own dime, then I don’t care what they do, but not when they’re taking your tax dollars and taking my tax dollars,” Garcia said. “If this is such a deeply held religious belief, let them pay for it.”
* More groups came out against the bill…
The Illinois Log Cabin Republicans, the largest gay Republican organization in Illinois, has joined the opposition to a Democrat-sponsored amendment that would allow discrimination against couples in civil unions when it comes to adoption and foster care.
Senate Bill 1123 would allow religious institutions the right to refuse couples in a civil unions because of its “deeply held religious beliefs.”
“This amendment reeks of retaliation against supporters of the recently passed Civil Union legislations, which in part protects and strengthens gay and lesbian families,” said Michael Carr of Log Cabin Republicans. “Supporters of this amendment are really just harming Illinois children, and these supporters should be ashamed of themselves.”
27 Comments
|
* An interesting bill…
(T)he House approved legislation to end 72-hour waiting periods to buy a gun for state FOID cardholders who have obtained an interim or plenary order of protection.
“This is going to help people, typically woman, protect themselves when the police can’t be there to protect them,” said Rep. David Harris (R-Arlington Heights), who was the chief House sponsor of the bill that passed 78-34 and now moves to the Senate.
Gun-control advocates disputed that assertion.
“What you are creating is a loophole to our already porous gun-control laws, and I fear we’re not going to provide any additional help to victims of domestic violence,” said Rep. Will Burns (D-Chicago), the 4th Ward alderman-elect.
Thoughts?
19 Comments
|
Intent is where the home is
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Keep in mind when reading this story the lessons we all learned during Rahm Emanuel’s residency battle. Residency is about intent. The question is what was the intent here…
FOX Chicago News has found that Collins is claiming a homeowner’s exemption on a condo in Hyde Park while also claiming that she lives in the district she represents on the West Side. […]
But while Collins lists a rental unit on Warren Boulevard as her home on campaign and voting records, she’s been collecting that homeowner’s exemption on a condo five miles south of her legislative district. The law requires individuals to live in their homes in order to qualify for the tax break. […]
Collins refused to explain why has been claiming a homeowner’s exemption on a property outside of her district. She said she bought the Hyde Park condo before she ran for office in 2000, and is now renting it to her mother and brother. […]
Yet we found legal documents that show she is still receiving mail at the Hyde Park address, including letters from the mortgage company and a debt collection agency. The condo is being foreclosed.
And the Chicago Board of Elections said Collins’ voting status was de-activated in 2010 when a canvass card sent to the West Side address where she said she lives was returned by the post office as “not deliverable.” Collins has since been reinstated.
Former Rep. Pat Bailey was convicted after it was discovered that she didn’t live in her district. The difference is that Bailey was using a phony address as her residence. Nobody had lived in what was apparently an abandoned building and she never rented nor owned the place. And Emanuel also had the problem of returned voter registration canvass cards.
…Adding… This is from the form she’d have to sign…
“As owner of the above property, I hereby apply for the Homeowner Exemption. I affirm by signature that this property was occupied by its current or previous owner as a principal residence as of January 1, 2010. I understand that it is against the law to provide false information on this Homeowner Exemption application.”
Basically, she either might have broken the law by swearing she lived outside her district, or she might have broken the law by swearing she lived in her district. Not great.
30 Comments
|
Photos on LINK cards cause heated debate
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This bill really stirred up a hornet’s nest yesterday…
Photos of consumers on their credit cards may protect them from fraud. If the same method is put in place for food stamp debit cards – could it give Illinois a sense of protection from fraudulent users?
State Rep. Chapin Rose,R-Charleston, said it might.
People across the state are a step closer to being required to have their photos on their Link Cards, which is provided by the state’s Department of Human Services. The official name for the state’s food stamp program is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance.
State Rep. Roger Eddy, R-Hutsonville, said by stopping fraud, the state could provide more service for others who need it the most.
“Your primary concern is fraud and the potential for fraud in the system,” Eddy said. “And you’re looking for a way that individuals who receive these benefits — not because they shouldn’t have the benefits — at the end of the day could allow for more benefits available to go to those individuals who need them and actually, they can have more.”
* Audio clips from the often heated debate…
* More…
Most Democrats were against the plan. State Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, D-Chicago, called the bill “wasteful” of time and money.
“Food stamps are a 100 percent entitlement,” Feigenholtz said. “This bill is going to spend 2 (million) to 4 million dollars and waste a ton of time of the Department of Human Services.”
The state would not see any potential savings through “deterred fraud,” but it would cost the state millions of dollars to implement the change, Sainvilus said.
* More…
The mere effort to launch a study into putting photos on the cards provoked an angry outcry from several Chicago Democrats who viewed Rose’s initiative as a stigmatizing assault on the disadvantaged.
“Are you picking on poor people, representative?” demanded Rep. Ken Dunkin (D-Chicago), who voted against the measure and acknowledged during floor debate that he grew up in a home receiving welfare benefits.
Rose, who denied being insensitive to the poor, later told colleagues that he too grew up in a needy home after his mother was laid off from her job and before she “bootstrapped herself up from the bottom” by going to college.
“I’m not going to allow them to make that accusation, because I’ve been there,” he said.
* And it didn’t end even after the debate…
After the bill passed. Rep. Deb Mell, D-Chicago, accused Rose, whom she described as “bullish” and a “large man,” of trying to physically intimidate Democratic members when he came across the aisle to talk to them.
* It appears that Rep. Rose was using incorrect figures…
During the debate, Rose said the federal government estimates 10.5 percent of welfare spending is consumed by fraud, which he says translates to $750 million annually in Illinois. He also cited stories from police officers, grocery store workers and constituents about Link card recipients trading money on the cards for drugs.
Dan Lesser, director for economic security for the Shriver National Center on Poverty Law, said the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers food stamps, reported last month that such trafficking has been reduced from nearly 4 percent of the program’s costs to 1 percent.
“It’s actually becoming a much smaller problem,” Lesser said.
The bill passed with 64 votes.
76 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
AT&T said it plans on installing 35 new cell sites in the Chicago area to increase network coverage as part of the company’s $19 billion nationwide investment plan.
The company will dedicate $160 million in improvements in metropolitan Chicago.
AT&T said about 500 Chicago area cell sites will have 4G network speed by the end of the year. It also will add mobile capacity, allowing more cellphones to connect through a single cell site.
* The Question: Which mobile phone company do you use and are you satisfied? Explain.
70 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|