* Believe it or not, the Senate unanimously passed a common sense drug bill today. From a press release…
“This measure is in response to a case where an individual who was taking drugs with a friend and the friend began to overdose,” Silverstein said. “The friend died because that individual was too afraid to call for emergency assistance because they would go to jail for having drugs.”
Senate Bill 1701 provides immunity from prosecution for an individual found to possess drugs as a result of the individual seeking medical help for an overdose. Immunity depends on the amount of drugs found on the individual and is only granted to first time offenders. These safeguards will ensure that drug dealers cannot use this law to escape prosecution.
“This bill does not let the bad guys go, and immunity does not apply to every individual,” Silverstein continued. “But, we do not want to lose someone we love who made a bad decision that caused them to fear seeking help.”
The immunity only applies to relatively small amounts of drugs. A dealer wouldn’t get the immunity, but an overdosing user would. The first time offenders limitation is a problem, in my opinion, but it ain’t easy passing bills like this, so we have to take what we can get.
26 Comments
|
* State law requires that the Illinois State Board of Education take action when local school districts have been on academic watch lists for more than three years. The state board can remove local school board members, fire staff, etc. But a new Illinois Auditor General’s report found that the state isn’t doing anything…
We noted 411 schools in FY09 and 471 schools and 42 school districts in FY10 had been on academic watch status for over three years by the end of the school year. The Agency had taken some remedial steps during the first three years on academic watch status, but had not taken the action required by statute after three years.
The state board’s response…
The board says it lacks the money to take action. It may ask for a change in the law so that it isn’t required to step in.
So, while state lawmakers are crafting a deal on education reform which mostly focuses on teachers, the State Board of Education wants out of its role in enforcing a significant reform component that focuses on administrators and boards.
Peachy.
*** UPDATE *** From the State Board of Education…
Rich,
Just wanted to touch base with you on an item you had on the blog about the audit finding for schools on the academic watch list. I don’t think that in our response we said that we wanted to amend so that we wouldn’t step in, but rather that we would possibly seek legislative changes, trying to more narrowly define what schools would be eligible for these types of actions.
Currently, about 500 schools are in this status and eventually if NCLB is not reauthorized it’s likely every school in Illinois will be in this status. The type of turnaround activity that is required is expensive and there is no specific line item currently in the ISBE budget for this, which is now made up of more than 90% in GSA and MCATS.
We have received $146 million in school improvement grant funds from the federal government that we are beginning to do this type of work, however, the vast majority of that ($124 million) is stimulus funding. Of that 146 we have awarded $57 million to 10 schools in 5 districts to do this type of work. We expect to make additional awards this summer for the remaining funds, but even so, the total number of schools that will be impacted by this $146 million is going to be about 25 (best guess).
In FY 12 we’re seeking an additional $5 million in funding that would allow us to be able to start doing some of this work for schools that are not eligible for the SIG grants. We’re seeking the funds to allow us to do audits to provide a comprehensive examination to assess the overall structure, curriculum, instruction, finances, program effectiveness, human capital and governance in order to provide foundational information to target strategies and interventions. This funding would also provide on-site leadership and support to schools most in need.
21 Comments
|
* Right after Sen. James Meeks dropped out of the mayor’s race, I began hearing rumors that he would retire from the Senate as well. He missed some session days early on, which only intensified the rumor-mongering. I finally button-holed him in Springfield in late February or early March and asked him point blank if he was stepping down. He said that he needed a break after the mayoral campaign craziness, so he skipped some session days when his attendance wasn’t really required in Springfield. He denied that he was going anywhere.
But now he’s saying that he’s considering retirement…
State Sen. James Meeks, a former candidate for mayor and governor and one of the city’s best-known black public officials, says he is thinking of stepping down from his Far South Side legislative seat when the spring session ends.
“I am giving prayerful consideration to focusing on the church,” Mr. Meeks said. That would be the giant Salem Baptist Church in the Roseland neighborhood, which Mr. Meeks literally built and where he serves as senior pastor.
His congregants “have been very understanding” while he served in Springfield and took time off to campaign for governor and mayor, he said. “It might be time to concentrate on them.”
Mr. Meeks, 54, said he has not made up his mind and he might merely choose not to seek a new term in 2012. But Springfield sources say it looks to them like the 10-year legislative veteran is going soon, and Mr. Meeks conceded, “I have discussed (spring retirement) with a few people.”
* In other news, Mayor Daley said yesterday that he has no interest in a census recount. Ald. Bob Fioretti and 44 of his city council colleagues introduced a resolution yesterday calling for a recount. Chicago lost 200,000 residents in the last census…
“You know, they had a thorough - we had a really outreach program. I mean, we’ve done everything possible. That’s over with,” Daley said.
That’s not what his administration indicated when asked ten days ago about its position…
Outgoing Mayor Richard M. Daley’s government is passing the buck to Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel on this one.
A spokeswoman for the city’s Law Department says that the decision can’t legally be made until June, which is when Mr. Emanuel will be in the big chair.
Daley obviously despises Fioretti, so that may be why he reacted so harshly. But as some of the highly informed comments on our previous post made abundantly clear, Chicago really does need to seek a do-over.
Rahm Emanuel’s transition team is looking into the matter, but hasn’t yet come to a conclusion.
20 Comments
|
The good, the bad and the ugly
Thursday, Apr 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The good…
The beating death of a mentally disabled man living in a group home, and the disclosure that officials knew the home was unsafe, could lead to increased protection of people with disabilities.
The Illinois House voted, 115-0, on Wednesday to toughen oversight of group homes. Abuse allegations would trigger state reviews.
New managers could be brought in to run unsafe homes. Employees would undergo periodic background checks.
More inspection records and abuse reports would be available to the public.
Hopefully, the bill gets to the governor’s desk soon. We can’t have any more murders and torture by state-subsidized group home staff, particularly in group homes where a staffer had already killed somebody else. Ridiculous.
* Even more good…
The federal judge overseeing Tribune Co.’s bankruptcy case should reject both proposals to reorganize the media company’s finances because neither adequately protects Tribune Chairman Sam Zell from lawsuits, Zell’s attorney argued Wednesday.
Attorney David Bradford said such lawsuits threaten not only to injure Zell’s reputation, but also to waste the company’s assets. Bradford also said the reorganization proposals unfairly restrict Zell’s ability to have Tribune pay for his legal expenses if the lawsuits are allowed.
Pardon me if I don’t weep for Sam Zell.
* Long overdue good…
The Illinois House voted on Wednesday to bar legislative scholarships from going to family members of members of the General Assembly.
House Bill 1353, sponsored by Rep. Robert Pritchard, R-Hinkley, forbids relatives – by blood or marriage – of legislators from receiving the scholarships.
“This is a first step – it doesn’t completely address a problem that’s been identified by media across the state where legislators awarded scholarships to employees, friends, contributors and others that weren’t selected because of objective criteria,” Pritchard said.
While he favors abolishing the scholarships completely, measures to do so have been unsuccessful so far, Pritchard said.
* The bad…
Despite public outrage and calls for his resignation, a west suburban school board president tied to a drug dealer and a motorcycle gang member, refused to step down on Wednesday night.
Jeff Pesek, president of Morton High School District 201, which serves thousands of students from Cicero and Berwyn, made a brief statement Wednesday to more than 150 parents, students and school employees, who attended a district board meeting, in which he denied any wrongdoing but refused to answer any questions. […]
“To infer that a grant of immunity raises questions that I did something wrong is simply not the case,” he said.
Pesek’s statement was met with scornful laughter and loud calls from parents and students for him to resign.
Pesek’s brother, who was also involved, is a member of the Republican State Central Committee. We haven’t heard word one from the state party since this story broke. From the IL GOP’s website…
By fighting to reform Illinois, we will regain the trust of the people of this state.
* And the ugly…
Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich criticized prosecutors on Wednesday for trying to bar his lawyers from telling jurors that wiretaps admitted as evidence against him represent only a fraction of secret recordings made on the eve of his 2008 arrest.
Blagojevich faces a second trial next week on corruption charges.
In a five-minute appeal delivered in front of his northside home and carried live on local news, Blagojevich said prosecutors were sabotaging his efforts to defend himself by blocking his attorneys from informing jurors of the hours and hours of FBI tapes not admitted as evidence by the court.
Emphasis added to the ugly part. What the heck were those Chicago TV stations thinking? Sheesh.
* Other stuff…
* Marin: Illinois GOP has new energy for 2012
* Blagojevich pre-trial status hearing set for Thursday
* Anheuser-Busch takes beer battle to Springfield - Proposed bill would allow some craft brewers to self-distribute their products
* Zorn: Anti-abortion proposal in Springfield encourages women to view fetal ultrasounds of their babies
* House panel OKs curbs on using FOIA for commercial gain
* Link looks to consolidate local governments
* Proposed Laws Say Foreclosures Count—and Don’t Count
* Report Details Which Legislative Districts Are Seeing Latino Growth
* Cuts To High-Speed Rail In Federal Budget Deal Hurt Illinois Projects
* State Sen. Kwame Raoul new ‘it guy’ in Springfield
* Average Illinois gasoline price exceeds $4 for first time since ‘08
* VIDEO: Sen. David Koehler on gay adoption ban
* VIDEO: Hiram Grau ISP appointment Q&A
* VIDEO: Susana Mendoza Passes HB2193 Designed to Prevent Acid Attacks
16 Comments
|
Question of the day
Thursday, Apr 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
Illinois restaurants may soon have to find a way to cut artificial trans fats from French fries, onion rings, popcorn shrimp, pies, cakes and fried chicken.
Legislation that passed the Illinois House on Wednesday would ban artery-clogging trans fats in food served in restaurants, movie theaters, cafes and bakeries or sold in school vending machines, starting in 2013. School cafeterias would be affected in 2016. Most prepackaged food would not be covered.
If the Senate approves the bill and Gov. Pat Quinn signs it, Illinois will be only the second state to enact such a ban. The first was California. […]
The National Academy of Sciences says trans fats cannot be safely consumed in any amount.
* The Question: Should trans fats be banned in Illinois? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please. Thanks.
62 Comments
|
Was the bidding system biased?
Thursday, Apr 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* It’s no surprise that when the state announced a major change to the health insurance of over 100,000 state employees, retirees and dependents that lots of folks were upset. People don’t like change, especially when it comes to this stuff. Adding to the sturm und drang is what happened the last time a governor (Rod Blagojevich) attempted to pick a new health insurer. It was done in such a shady manner (changing the bid specs midstream) that even Blagojevich had to back off.
So, I decided to ignore the uproar until I could see whether this new announcement was legit. I didn’t really believe the $100 million annual cost savings projected by the administration because I never totally trust their numbers. But I was troubled by a contract provision requiring insurance providers to have networks in place by last January 1st. The winning bidders Downstate appear to have only “open access provider” plans in place, which critics say is far more expensive for employees. Here’s a chart being distributed at the Statehouse by losing bidder Health Alliance, which currently has the contract. Click the pic for a larger image…
* But, the change could also be lots more expensive for taxpayers…
[Rep. Chapin Rose, R-Mahomet] said he based his projection of $100 million in additional [taxpayer] costs on information in a Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability report that found it will cost taxpayers $1,000 for every person covered by a state health plan who switches from an HMO to one of the lower two tiers of the three-tier open access plans. Health Alliance currently covers nearly 100,000 state employees and retirees in its HMO plan.
Rose contends most of those Health Alliance state members would have to choose those lower-tier open access plans because Health Alliance has exclusive HMO contracts with Carle and several other providers. And the top tier in PersonalCare’s and HealthLink’s open access plans would be unavailable to state members at Carle because they will be HMO plans.
According to Rose, the Quinn administration believes Carle and other providers will just break their exclusive contracts and sign on with the available state health plans, but there’s no incentive for providers to do that when people are likely to migrate to the more expensive open access plan tiers to keep their current doctors.
“I just don’t see the projected savings,” said Sen. Mike Frerichs, D-Champaign.
* And Health Alliance is also objecting to how the bidding was scored…
[Health Alliance spokeswoman Jane Hayes] said Health Alliance officials decided to protest the proposed open access contracts in addition to the HMO contracts after learning Monday that the requests for proposals submitted by insurers were scored differently for HMOs and open access plans.
On HMO plans, she said, 70 percent of the state’s consideration was pricing and 30 percent of the consideration was quality, provider network and other non-pricing factors.
On open access plans, she said, it was the other way around: Just 28 percent of the consideration was pricing and the rest of the consideration went to quality and other factors.
Yet, Hayes said, the two selected open access plans which are structured with three different service level tiers and out-of-pocket costs for each will include HMOs on their first tiers.
To some, this might look like the administration set the bidding specs to favor open access plans and against incumbent HMO providers.
* Humana has now joined Health Alliance’s protest. Humana covers around 15,000 state employees and retirees in an HMO.
Thoughts?
* Other stuff…
* State leaders talk about shifting teacher retirement costs
* Cities ask state for more money
* State Services For The Homeless Face Severe Cuts
57 Comments
|
Caption contest!
Thursday, Apr 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard, Gov. Pat Quinn and Illinois Manufacturers’ Association CEO Greg Baise pose for a photo on Baise’s birthday…
Winner gets a free lunch special with a drink at either Springfield location of Hickory River Smokehouse. The restaurants are owned by our old friend Mike Madigan. No, not that Mike Madigan, the good Mike Madigan.
…Adding… Baise just said he’d pay for the winner’s drinks. Carry on…
119 Comments
|
School reform teed up for Senate passage
Thursday, Apr 14, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* School reform will likely pass the Senate soon, but without any of the hostile craziness which has accompanied similar labor issues in other states. As subscribers knew yesterday morning, an agreement was reached late Tuesday night after months of negotiations, which were chaired by Sen. Kimberly Lighford…
Lightford said they reached two separate sets of regulations regarding school strikes, one for Chicago and another for the suburbs and Downstate. Both would require several steps, including airing out their sides before an arbitrator, before moving forward with a strike, she said.
One key change for Chicago is a requirement that 75 percent of Chicago Teachers Union would have to vote to go on strike, a higher standard necessary because Chicago has so many more children and teachers impacted by a strike, Lightford said. […]
A second major change would loosen the seniority standard that determines who gets laid off and make it easier to dump a teacher based on performance, Lightford said. The move would address the notion that it is tough to dismiss poor-performing teachers because of their seniority, she said. […]
Under the proposal school districts also would be able to set a length of school day or lengthen the school year without having to negotiate those time periods, she said. Unions still would be able to negotiate for more pay or benefits if more time in the classroom is added, she said.
* The legislation can be read by clicking here. The unions met with House Speaker Michael Madigan yesterday to urge him to sign on to the agreement. Madigan made no commitments, but it’s believed most of it will survive…
Through the months, key House members were kept updated on the talks. Rep. Marlow Colvin, a Chicago Democrat on the House Elementary and Secondary Committee, said it was “too early to tell” how the legislation would be accepted in the House.
“But the appetite to get something done on education reform is clear,” Colvin said. “The House hasn’t had a really good look at it, and given the divergent opinions of the larger (House) chamber that’s twice the size (of the Senate), it’s hard to say.”
* The political angle…
The proposal wraps up months of negotiations between self-proclaimed education reformers, such as Stand for Children and Advance Illinois, and interest groups such as the Illinois Federation of Teachers, the Illinois Education Association, the Chicago Teachers Union, groups representing school administrators and boards and lawmakers. The talks have been led by state Sen. Kimberly Lightford, D-Chicago.
Stand for Children became a key player in state legislative races last year when it dumped more than $600,000 into candidates’ campaign funds. Much of that money went to Democrats.
Robin Steans, executive director of Advance Illinois, acknowledged the role Stand for Children’s bank account played in the effort. However, she also cited the federal Race to the Top program, in which states competed for federal money based on their willingness to reform their education laws.
“You bring in a new player with some dollars to put behind education reform, so you have a lot of good and strong conditions and they remain in place,” she said.
* From a Stand for Children press release…
Reforming tenure
* Ensuring tenure decisions will be based on performance evaluations by requiring teachers to earn two proficient or excellent ratings in years two through four of the probationary period, with a proficient or excellent rating in the fourth year. No longer will teachers automatically receive tenure after four years in the classroom regardless of performance.
* Providing fair and efficient dismissals of tenured teachers by streamlining the dismissal process of tenured teachers in situations related to conduct and performance dismissal decisions.
Making performance count, rather than seniority
* Allowing districts across the state to make layoff decisions based on performance before seniority. Allows districts to match teachers’ qualifications to the positions they will hold and ensures that teachers with poor performance evaluations are laid-off prior to more effective teachers.
* Currently seniority is used as the primary criterion for filling new and vacant positions across the state (with the exception of Chicago Public Schools, which already fills positions based on merit and ability). Under SB 7 school districts will now be allowed to fill positions based on certifications, qualifications, performance, merit, ability and relevant experience with seniority only used as a tie-breaker.
* If a teacher receives two unsatisfactory ratings within a seven-year period, the State Superintendent will have the authority to revoke a certificate or require professional development.
Improving Learning Conditions
* A survey of learning conditions will be administered to teachers and students every two years beginning in 2012-2013.
* School board members will be required to complete four hours of training.
* The Tribune praised much of the deal, but got hung up on the strike provision…
One great, big vulnerability in this package: It still allows teachers to walk out of their classrooms and head to the picket line. Teaches perform an essential public service, and when they’re on strike, their students suffer. Emanuel wanted to prohibit strikes by teachers, but he didn’t get it. And that’s a red flag as he moves to bring in aggressive new leadership and address a financial crisis at Chicago Public Schools.
The proposed law does set a higher bar for a job action. Authorization for a strike in Chicago would require approval from 75 percent of active union members, rather than a majority. The legislature should set an even higher bar for job actions by professional educators.
Not mentioned by the Tribune is that the strike clause also requires tons of mediation and public disclosures before a strike could be voted on. And three-quarters of all union members would have to vote to strike, not just three-fourths of those voting. That’s a pretty darned high standard.
* Related…
* Sweeping changes proposed to how IL teachers are hired, fired - Seniority is out, teacher performance is in.
* Sweeping school reform bill targets school day, strikes, bad teachers
* A look at the school reform bill
* Bills on Chicago school vouchers, facilities head for key votes
* Stacking the Odds in Favor of Charter Schools - Charters unload problem students onto neighboring public schools - then reap the benefits.
19 Comments
|
* The governor’s office forwarded me a story yesterday about a site called MoneyRates.com which just rated Illinois as the best state in the nation to make a living…
1. Illinois
At $41,986.51, Illinois had the best adjusted-average income. The unemployment rate in Illinois is not especially low, but the state benefits from relatively high average wages, a low state tax rate, and a below-average cost of living. As an added plus, you can make good use of your money once you earn it in Illinois. Four of the best banks in America, based on a MoneyRates.com analysis of factors like customer service, checking account fees, and savings and money market rates, have operations in Illinois.
* Here’s how the the ratings were devised…
* Average state wages
* State unemployment rate
* State tax rate
* State cost of living
* The rest of the top ten…
2. Washington (state): The cost of living is higher than average, but so is the average wage and the state imposes no income tax. Adjusted average income: $41,456.
3. Texas: Also benefits from no state income tax. Adjusted average income: $41,427
4. Virginia: $41,120
5. Delaware: $39,105
6. Massachusetts: $38,665
7. Georgia: $38,228
8. Tennessee: $38,038
9. Colorado: $38,020
10. Minnesota: $37,721
* The worst…
1. Hawaii: $22,108
2. Maine: $29,159
3. Montana: $29,496
4. California: $29,772
5. Vermont: $29,986
6. Oregon: $30,343
7. Rhode Island: $30,612
8. Mississippi: $30,953
9. West Virginia: 31,357
10. South Carolina: $31,636
* However, if you are looking for work, you might want to avoid Illinois. Juju.com has published its top ten list and Illinois is nowhere to be found. We’re also 40th on the list of Money-Rates.com’s best places for retirement.
* Related…
* McCarter: Workmen’s comp reform will make Illinois competitive again
* Senate passes workers’ comp bill by vote of 59-0
* Overhaul of workers’ comp proves difficult - Interests on different sides of the issue bring competing concerns
* Illinois Legislative Leaders Promise Workers’ Comp Reform
* Reforms needed to state’s workers’ compensation law
* Mount Vernon tire plant gets tax breaks for creating, maintaining jobs
* Wal-Mart planning small store in River North
* ADDED: Illinois tax change could benefit animated filmmakers
9 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
C’mon, governor, pay up already
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Wisconsin columnist Jim Stingl is peeved that Gov. Pat Quinn hasn’t yet paid up on his January NFC Championship bet with Gov. Scott Walker. Quinn was supposed to volunteer at a food pantry wearing a Packers jersey if the Bears lost. Football season is but a distant memory, college basketball is over and baseball season is in full swing, but Quinn is still a no-show…
So is Quinn going to weasel out of this and hope we all forgot about it? Dude, don’t make the bet if you can’t pay the debt.
“No, no, no, absolutely not,” said his spokesman, Grant Klinzman. “He fully intends to live up to the terms of the bet.”
OK, but when? Quinn’s office promised a while back that it will be sometime in the next few months. Klinzman was not able to be more specific than that.
“He’s a very, very busy guy. I think you guys have been pretty busy, as well,” Klinzman said. […]
I asked Walker’s office if they’d like to publicly condemn Quinn for his foot-dragging and perhaps throw him under the Packers team bus. They didn’t seem too upset. “We’ll hold off on that yet,” said press aide Cullen Werwie.
* NBC5 blogger Ted McClelland opines…
The problem is that Quinn didn’t realize Wisconsin’s newly elected governor, Scott Walker, would turn out to be such a … cheesehead. Quinn was scheduled to work a food bank on Feb. 21 but canceled because he didn’t want to step into the turmoil created by Walker’s attempt to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights. Walker might have demanded Quinn return the senators hiding out in McHenry County. Plus, Walker was inviting Illinois businesses to “Escape to Wisconsin” to avoid Quinn’s income tax increase. […]
The governor could just wait a year, until Walker loses a recall election. The only problem with that is, the Packers might win another Super Bowl, which would require Quinn to spend two days at a Wisconsin food bank.
Unfortunately, there’s no way Quinn can propose changing the terms of the bet. As a governor, he’s a public employee, and Walker has made it clear he won’t bargain with public employees. The lesson here is, Democrats shouldn’t make deals with Scott Walker.
Other possible lessons: Pat Quinn has trouble keeping promises and is always late paying bills - just ask any social service provider.
49 Comments
|
A bit much
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Excessive?…
A Champaign man faces up to 30 years in prison after being convicted of spitting on a jail guard.
A jury on Tuesday convicted 25-year-old Emmanuel Chapple of aggravated battery for spitting on officer Craig Wakefield on Jan. 14 as Wakefield walked past Chapple’s cell.
Chapple’s previous drug-related convictions mean he can be sentenced as what’s called a Class X Felon. That requires a mandatory six to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced on May 25.
* This FOIA request may be asking for too much…
The University of Illinois asked for a stay Tuesday on a federal court ruling that it contends would threaten the privacy of student records.
The UI also said a March 9 order by Judge Joan B. Gottschall could result in the loss of millions of dollars in federal funds the UI receives every year. […]
But Gottschall ruled that FERPA does not require that applicants’ names, grade point averages and admissions test scores be withheld.
“The only question presented by this lawsuit is whether FERPA ’specifically prohibits’ the requested disclosure. The court must follow the command of the Illinois Supreme Court to construe the exemptions to FOIA narrowly. FERPA does not specifically prohibit Illinois from doing anything, so the university may not use federal law as authority to withhold the records,” Gottschall wrote. […]
“This basically negates FERPA completely,” said UI lawyer Samuel Skinner, a former Secretary of Transportation. “We’re concerned it erodes all kinds of privacy rights, and leads on a slippery slope” to such consequences as identity theft.
But Don Craven, general counsel to the Illinois Press Association, agreed with the Tribune’s argument that is seeking the records of applicants, not students.
I don’t think I feel all that comfortable with the media having access to student GPAs and admission test scores.
* But keeping all this information secret seems excessive in the other direction…
Tribune lawyers filed court papers asking that the “wholesale filing of pleadings under seal,” stop [in the ongoing Rod Blagojevich trial process].
Attorneys say that since Feb. 22, 16 court filings were made in secret. The attorneys say there was no attempt to keep even portions of those filings in the public. In the filings they cited, Blagojevich’s lawyers filed original pleadings in secret and the government subsequently resigned
“A long line of Supreme Court decisions recognize a presumptive right of public access to the criminal justice system - including specifically pretrial pleadings and hearings, which often are as important as the trial itself,” attorneys for the Chicago Tribune wrote.
* Is this bill really necessary?…
To the chagrin of state regulators, extensive cemetery reforms enacted in the wake of the Burr Oak Cemetery scandal could be erased under a measure pending before the Illinois Senate.
The proposal, sponsored by Sen. Emil Jones III (D-Chicago), would eliminate many of the regulations imposed on cemeteries that were ushered in as part of the Cemetery Oversight Act just last year. If approved, only large, for-profit cemeteries would face the stiffer regulations enacted in the wake of scandal.
Those reforms required a numeric database tracking system for every grave in Illinois. It also required funeral homes to witness burials and required the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation to license cemetery operators.
After Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart announced allegations of widespread grave-reselling and mismanagement at Burr Oak Cemetery in Alsip, Gov. Pat Quinn appointed a Cemetery Oversight Task Force to propose reforms to the burial industry. At the time, Chicago’s south suburbs had the dubious honor of the most complaints of any region in the state. […]
Now that Burr Oak is on track to become a not-for-profit cemetery — should stakeholders vote to confirm its bankruptcy reorganization plan — the historic black cemetery no longer would be subject to regulation, Dart said.
* A House committee apparently believed this idea was unnecessary yesterday…
A plan to remove all the Metra board members from their posts and strip away future members’ salaries, pensions and benefits was rejected by a House committee Monday.
The plan, sponsored by Rep. Jack Franks, was filed in response to the misspending of former Metra CEO Phil Pagano, who committed suicide, as well as expenses made by board members that he called questionable.
“Metra has become a culture of entitlement that lacks accountability,” the Marengo Democrat said.
His fellow lawmakers disagreed with Franks’ methods, rejecting his proposal by a 6-16 vote.
* Related…
* ICC judge recommends 3% ComEd rate hike
* Public records law could see restrictions
* House approves nonbinding referendums for schools
* Blagojevich to make statement today at 5 p.m. in front of his home
* ADDED: Audit finds more financial troubles at Chicago St. U.
* ADDED: House panel OKs curbs on using FOIA for commercial gain
* ADDED: Illinois House passes trans fats ban
11 Comments
|
Note to Quinn agencies: There is no extra money
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* One of the very real problems with the way the House is doing the new state budget is that the five appropriations committees have been allotted the same percentage of total state dollars that their agencies always get. So, unless one approp committee agrees to give up some of its allotment (no chance), then cuts to things like human services cannot be mitigated by deeper cuts elsewhere.
Some who testified to a Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday pleaded with members to avoid cutting more from human services than the governor has already proposed…
Michelle Saddler, secretary of the Department of Human Services, said she hopes an alternative can be found to cutting the budget beyond Quinn’s numbers. “We have some very difficult cuts in the budget as we’re all dealing with this issue of fiscal realities. We know that there’s not enough money. We know that the governor had to make very painful decisions, and we’re seeing that in the introduced budget.” Saddler said more than 13 programs have already been eliminated since the governor’s proposal in February.
In terms of the impact moving forward, she said the worst of the cuts under the governor’s budget are in the divisions of alcoholism and substance abuse, and in the areas of community health and disease prevention. She said those programs lessen future costs for the state and that the governor has expressed to her his openness to alternatives other than the large cuts. “Those are areas where we have relatively small dollar investment but with large payback over time. These are areas where if you invest a dollar now, you prevent, say, $13 or $17 of expenses in the future,” Saddler said. […]
Frank Anselmo, chief executive officer of the Community Behavioral Healthcare Association of Illinois, suggested to lawmakers that they prioritize spending to avoid what he called continued disproportionate cuts to community care. “The governor’s proposed budget for [addiction prevention and treatment programs and mental health programs] is a 43 percent cut within a two year cycle to community care. That’s not shared sacrifice, in fact I’d be happy to share the sacrifice,” Anselmo said, “because we’ve slashed community services to a point where in some communities, we’re not going to have a system at all.” […]
Saddler said her department is already facing bigger cuts under the governor’s budget than some other areas of government, and the legislature should not seek to make those reductions larger. “We should not be looking at any additional cuts to DHS. There’ve been difficult choices, and human services is being cut disproportionately to many other areas.”
Unless they “find” money somehow or move money around from someplace else (and where would that be? Education? Pensions? Public safety?) then this is an extremely difficult situation.
* Nobody is, of course, happy with the coming budget cuts…
Schools across the state may see their school bus money cut in half.
The Illinois State Board of Education asked lawmakers in the state House on Tuesday for more funding, particularly for school transportation.
Gov. Pat Quinn proposed to slash local school budgets by more than $37.5 million for the next fiscal year. The total earmarked for elementary, junior high and high schools still tops $10.7 billion for the 2012 spending plan.
But the proposed cut to school bus budgets went too deep for some.
Less money for buses may mean longer wait times and rides for kids, especially for those in downstate, rural districts, said Rep. David Reis, R-Olney.
“What good is it to have good quality teachers, teaching standards, the best books and the best school rooms, if you won’t even make a commitment to bus the kid to the school,” said Reis, who represents Jasper County, which has the geographically largest school district in the state.
Restoring Quinn’s cuts means finding somewhere else to cut or finding more revenues. Otherwise, the cuts could be even deeper than Quinn proposed, because the House and Senate are both operating under lower spending limits than the governor did.
* This pretty much sums up the situation…
You have to wonder how it is going to end well once the new budget is together for Illinois’ fiscal year that begins July 1. Lawmakers who sit on appropriations committees are not seeing eye-to-eye with the administration.
“Your proposed budget is $7.6 billion,” State Representative Will Davis (D-Homewood) told the Illinois State Board of Education’s chief financial officer, “and I’m told we are working with a dollar figure of 6.8.”
* Related…
* Concerns raised about new health care plan: The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services stated Illinois will save approximately $102 million per year from the new health care contracts. However, Health Alliance representatives are questioning the validity of this figure. “We are concerned about their claims,” said Jocelyn Browning, communications manager for Health Alliance. “We don’t think they have the correct numbers. We are working to try to show what they are claiming is unfounded.”
* Many questions unanswered on state health insurance changes: Poe and Rose both said DHFS might have violated its own bid standards, which required companies that wanted to bid on the HMO contract to have provider networks in place by Jan. 1. “It’s clear they (BlueCross) don’t have it there now,” Poe said.
* Some Illinois Lawmakers Pushing Mandated State Run Health Insurance
* SB 626 Allows One Elementary School District Per High School District
* Emergency dispatchers face money crunch - Emergency service funded by declining number of land telephones
19 Comments
|
* 11:53 am - Sen. Dave Koehler’s bill to allow religious organizations to refuse to offer adoption and foster care services to couple who’ve received civil unions just went down to defeat in the Senate Executive Committee. Stay tuned.
*** UPDATE *** From the Catholic Conference of Illinois…
“Lawmakers are obviously engaged in this issue. We will continue to seek a resolution that allows Catholic Charities to serve thousands of abused and neglected children in Illinois, and we are hopeful that resolution will be supported moving forward,” said Robert Gilligan, Executive Director, Catholic Conference of Illinois.
“This legislation allows Catholic Charities to operate within Church teachings, within the law and always with the best interest of the child at the forefront. Those in civil unions will not be prevented from becoming foster or adoptive parents. From Catholic Charities, they will be referred to DCFS or to one of the approximately 50 other private child welfare agencies throughout the state. Our agencies serve thousands of abused and neglected children in Illinois and are constantly rated a top performer by DCFS in providing permanency, stable foster homes and protection from further harm. We simply want to continue.”
[ *** End Of Update *** ]
* We went over this topic yesterday, but here’s a bit of the coverage from earlier today. Tribune…
Gay adoptions emerged Tuesday at the center of a Capitol culture clash as lawmakers pushed a measure to ensure faith-based groups could turn away committed same-sex couples who want to adopt children or provide foster homes.
Opponents say it’s a direct assault on Illinois’ new civil union law, which takes effect June 1. And some fear children will lose opportunities to be placed in loving homes because of discrimination. […]
Sponsoring senators argue religious groups shouldn’t have to go against their beliefs when placing children for adoption. And they say it simply clarifies legally what those groups have been doing for years.
“They have a right of conscience here. They’re not going to place a child with an unmarried couple,” said Sen. William Haine, D-Alton. “It’s either that or they’re driven out of the adoption business, which (would be) a terrible loss to the children of the state.”
* The sponsor speaks…
“During the discussion of the law, I was asked a question about my intent and how the legislation would affect the other activities of religious-based groups,” [Democratic Sen. Dave Koehle] said. “I indicated that it was not my intent to make any group work against its own religious beliefs. I promised to clarify that issue with subsequent legislation. Senate Bill 1123 is that follow-up legislation. Though I know some people will find it objectionable, I feel I must keep my promise.”
Koehler added that the new proposal would require adoption agencies that refuse to serve lesbian and gay couples to provide those couples “with contact information for DCFS, which will direct the couples to agencies that do serve couples in civil unions.”
Longtime LGBT activist Rick Garcia agreed that the bill appears to stem from promises made last fall by senators who supported civil unions to carve out exemptions for religious groups. But Garcia said no one is trying to stop any religious-based or affiliated groups from discriminating if they choose to do so with their own money.
“If they want to do it on their own dime, then I don’t care what they do, but not when they’re taking your tax dollars and taking my tax dollars,” Garcia said. “If this is such a deeply held religious belief, let them pay for it.”
* More groups came out against the bill…
The Illinois Log Cabin Republicans, the largest gay Republican organization in Illinois, has joined the opposition to a Democrat-sponsored amendment that would allow discrimination against couples in civil unions when it comes to adoption and foster care.
Senate Bill 1123 would allow religious institutions the right to refuse couples in a civil unions because of its “deeply held religious beliefs.”
“This amendment reeks of retaliation against supporters of the recently passed Civil Union legislations, which in part protects and strengthens gay and lesbian families,” said Michael Carr of Log Cabin Republicans. “Supporters of this amendment are really just harming Illinois children, and these supporters should be ashamed of themselves.”
27 Comments
|
* An interesting bill…
(T)he House approved legislation to end 72-hour waiting periods to buy a gun for state FOID cardholders who have obtained an interim or plenary order of protection.
“This is going to help people, typically woman, protect themselves when the police can’t be there to protect them,” said Rep. David Harris (R-Arlington Heights), who was the chief House sponsor of the bill that passed 78-34 and now moves to the Senate.
Gun-control advocates disputed that assertion.
“What you are creating is a loophole to our already porous gun-control laws, and I fear we’re not going to provide any additional help to victims of domestic violence,” said Rep. Will Burns (D-Chicago), the 4th Ward alderman-elect.
Thoughts?
19 Comments
|
Intent is where the home is
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Keep in mind when reading this story the lessons we all learned during Rahm Emanuel’s residency battle. Residency is about intent. The question is what was the intent here…
FOX Chicago News has found that Collins is claiming a homeowner’s exemption on a condo in Hyde Park while also claiming that she lives in the district she represents on the West Side. […]
But while Collins lists a rental unit on Warren Boulevard as her home on campaign and voting records, she’s been collecting that homeowner’s exemption on a condo five miles south of her legislative district. The law requires individuals to live in their homes in order to qualify for the tax break. […]
Collins refused to explain why has been claiming a homeowner’s exemption on a property outside of her district. She said she bought the Hyde Park condo before she ran for office in 2000, and is now renting it to her mother and brother. […]
Yet we found legal documents that show she is still receiving mail at the Hyde Park address, including letters from the mortgage company and a debt collection agency. The condo is being foreclosed.
And the Chicago Board of Elections said Collins’ voting status was de-activated in 2010 when a canvass card sent to the West Side address where she said she lives was returned by the post office as “not deliverable.” Collins has since been reinstated.
Former Rep. Pat Bailey was convicted after it was discovered that she didn’t live in her district. The difference is that Bailey was using a phony address as her residence. Nobody had lived in what was apparently an abandoned building and she never rented nor owned the place. And Emanuel also had the problem of returned voter registration canvass cards.
…Adding… This is from the form she’d have to sign…
“As owner of the above property, I hereby apply for the Homeowner Exemption. I affirm by signature that this property was occupied by its current or previous owner as a principal residence as of January 1, 2010. I understand that it is against the law to provide false information on this Homeowner Exemption application.”
Basically, she either might have broken the law by swearing she lived outside her district, or she might have broken the law by swearing she lived in her district. Not great.
30 Comments
|
Photos on LINK cards cause heated debate
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* This bill really stirred up a hornet’s nest yesterday…
Photos of consumers on their credit cards may protect them from fraud. If the same method is put in place for food stamp debit cards – could it give Illinois a sense of protection from fraudulent users?
State Rep. Chapin Rose,R-Charleston, said it might.
People across the state are a step closer to being required to have their photos on their Link Cards, which is provided by the state’s Department of Human Services. The official name for the state’s food stamp program is Supplemental Nutrition Assistance.
State Rep. Roger Eddy, R-Hutsonville, said by stopping fraud, the state could provide more service for others who need it the most.
“Your primary concern is fraud and the potential for fraud in the system,” Eddy said. “And you’re looking for a way that individuals who receive these benefits — not because they shouldn’t have the benefits — at the end of the day could allow for more benefits available to go to those individuals who need them and actually, they can have more.”
* Audio clips from the often heated debate…
* More…
Most Democrats were against the plan. State Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, D-Chicago, called the bill “wasteful” of time and money.
“Food stamps are a 100 percent entitlement,” Feigenholtz said. “This bill is going to spend 2 (million) to 4 million dollars and waste a ton of time of the Department of Human Services.”
The state would not see any potential savings through “deterred fraud,” but it would cost the state millions of dollars to implement the change, Sainvilus said.
* More…
The mere effort to launch a study into putting photos on the cards provoked an angry outcry from several Chicago Democrats who viewed Rose’s initiative as a stigmatizing assault on the disadvantaged.
“Are you picking on poor people, representative?” demanded Rep. Ken Dunkin (D-Chicago), who voted against the measure and acknowledged during floor debate that he grew up in a home receiving welfare benefits.
Rose, who denied being insensitive to the poor, later told colleagues that he too grew up in a needy home after his mother was laid off from her job and before she “bootstrapped herself up from the bottom” by going to college.
“I’m not going to allow them to make that accusation, because I’ve been there,” he said.
* And it didn’t end even after the debate…
After the bill passed. Rep. Deb Mell, D-Chicago, accused Rose, whom she described as “bullish” and a “large man,” of trying to physically intimidate Democratic members when he came across the aisle to talk to them.
* It appears that Rep. Rose was using incorrect figures…
During the debate, Rose said the federal government estimates 10.5 percent of welfare spending is consumed by fraud, which he says translates to $750 million annually in Illinois. He also cited stories from police officers, grocery store workers and constituents about Link card recipients trading money on the cards for drugs.
Dan Lesser, director for economic security for the Shriver National Center on Poverty Law, said the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers food stamps, reported last month that such trafficking has been reduced from nearly 4 percent of the program’s costs to 1 percent.
“It’s actually becoming a much smaller problem,” Lesser said.
The bill passed with 64 votes.
76 Comments
|
Question of the day
Wednesday, Apr 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
AT&T said it plans on installing 35 new cell sites in the Chicago area to increase network coverage as part of the company’s $19 billion nationwide investment plan.
The company will dedicate $160 million in improvements in metropolitan Chicago.
AT&T said about 500 Chicago area cell sites will have 4G network speed by the end of the year. It also will add mobile capacity, allowing more cellphones to connect through a single cell site.
* The Question: Which mobile phone company do you use and are you satisfied? Explain.
70 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|