Three stories about kids to make you think
Monday, May 23, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Neil Steinberg asks a good question in his column today: What if fixing teachers is the easy part? He references the recent education reform legislation which passed both chambers of the General Assembly and reprints an e-mail he received from a teacher…
I thought you’d enjoy this (or sigh). I’m a high school teacher in the south suburbs, and was making several calls home last week. The semester is ending, and one student in particular is far from passing. I’d called home before and sent grade sheets both with the student and by mail, all with no response from Mom. In fact, this student had my class before and failed it.
As I reviewed all of that, Mom asked what could he do now to make it up. I told her I would put a packet of missing work together he could do for a late grade. The only requirement, I told her, was that it had to be in Friday.
“No, he won’t be able to have it then,” she said. When I asked why, she told me he’d be “out for a week.”
Extended absences like this usually mean a suspension, and I asked if that was the case. It would not have been his first.
“No, no — we’re going to a family reunion. And he’s going! I already paid for the shirt.”
Oy.
* Esther Cepeda worries about this summer…
Pretty soon the sun will be blasting and the humidity will jump on us like a wildcat. Combine that with school letting out, a record high 27.5 percent teen unemployment rate and crippling budget cuts to programs that help keep kids off streets, and it won’t take too long for our children to grow restless and violent.
That’s not an exaggeration. Violence is known to flare up during summer, and children are about to be caught in the crossfire of Chicago’s seemingly unstoppable gun violence and shrinking youth resources.
“I strongly believe this is going to be one of the worst summers ever,” said Hector Escalera, a Cook County juvenile probation officer who covers a police district that includes Little Village. He is worried because grants have dried up for programs that keep kids engaged and safe during the long summer months.
“It’s not even summer yet,” he told me, and Little Village already has seen several murders and “recently a kid got stabbed. We have a lot of issues in the community, and if we don’t provide youth with mental health, education and work opportunities, we are going to lose the battle.”
* And a new study claims preschool saves the state big bucks…
Advocates for early education are rallying against a proposed 5 percent cut to the Early Childhood Block Grant in the FY 2012 budget with a comprehensive 23-year study (PDF) that shows preschool proactively saves the state of Illinois $530 million a year.
The research touts savings from things like special education and criminal justice costs, while also strengthening the tax base with a better-educated workforce. In FY 2010, a 10 percent funding cut to the same grant meant 8,000 fewer children in Illinois were enrolled in state-run preschool programs. If the proposed 5 percent cut is passed in this General Assembly for the upcoming fiscal year, the option of attending a state-funded preschool would be eliminated for another estimated 4,300 young children, the study said.
The cost-savings analysis was commissioned by the Ounce of Prevention Fund, Illinois Action for Children and Voices for Illinois Children. The data dates back to the late 1980s, when Illinois began to funnel money to preschool programs that were meant to prepare young children between the ages of 3 and 5 years-old for success in K-12 education, something the study calls “an investment.”
That investment, according to the study, has resulted in tremendous savings for schools and taxpayers alike. In K-12 savings, it’s estimated $21.9 million to $32.9 million are saved in school spending for special education because preschool can often prevent or remedy potential issues through early intervention for things like speech or language problems. Another $2.5 million to $3.7 million is saved in grade repetition — attributed to school readiness through preschool — alone. Between $172 million to $259 million is also reduced in government spending — some $146.8 million of that is attributed to having fewer youths in the juvenile criminal system.
Thoughts?
60 Comments  
|
Most Illinois Gamblers Prefer Smokefree Casinos
Monday, May 23, 2011 - Posted by Advertising Department
[The following is a paid advertisement.]
Gaming expansion cannot be smoking expansion!
A survey of Illinois’ casino gamblers by the Center for Policy Analysis (CFPA) at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth finds that a large majority of this state’s casino gamblers either prefer casinos where smoking is prohibited on the gaming floor or it does not matter to them.
According to the random sample poll, conducted from April 27 to May 9, 2011, 45% of respondents who had visited a casino in the last twelve months say they are more likely to visit a casino where smoking is prohibited on the gaming floor. 31% say it doesn’t matter. Only 24% say they are less likely to visit a casino where smoking is prohibited.
Like the rest of us, gamblers are cutting back mainly for economic reasons: 40% cite the increased cost of gasoline and 35% cite the increased cost of living, while others blame loss of income (16%), falling behind on bills (15%), job loss (12%), and declining home values(11%).
Will allowing smoking in casinos increase state revenues? Not really! In fact, bringing back smoking could set Illinois’ casinos further behind: 36% of casino gamblers who smoke report that they too either prefer a smoking prohibition on the gaming floor or say it doesn’t matter. Think smoking and gambling go together? Actually, smokers do not constitute a disproportionate percentage of casino gamblers in comparison to the state’s general adult population.
Want a real, politically viable revenue option? Raise the cigarette tax!
For more information please visit www.smokefreeillinois.com.
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Monday, May 23, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
School sales taxes approved by voters would no longer have to be endorsed by county boards as well under a bill passed by the Illinois Senate on Thursday.
“We let the taxpayers decide … and if they vote in favor of it, then obviously they want it,” bill sponsor Sen. James Clayborne, D-Belleville, said.
Sen. Shane Cultra, R-Onarga, himself a former Iroquois County Board chairman, said it is important to keep the county board involved, as a school sales tax would affect an entire county.
However, proponents said voters know better what they want than their representatives at the county level.
The proposal limits the tax increases to a quarter of a point.
* The Question: Should voters be allowed to approve quarter-point school sales tax increases without their county board’s approval? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please. Thanks.
69 Comments
|
Look before you leap
Monday, May 23, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* A couple of editorials have been published recently about the benefits of closing state institutions and transferring residents to group homes. From the SJ-R…
Among those institutions that Quinn rendered closure-proof are eight state facilities — in Dwight, Anna, Centralia, Dixon, Jacksonville, Kankakee, Park Forest and Waukegan — that house people with developmental disabilities. For years, advocates for the developmentally disabled have tried, with very limited success, to persuade the state to move away from reliance on institutions and toward greater use of residential group homes and community programs for those with developmental disabilities.
At the same time, programs that serve the developmentally disabled and their families have suffered through years of steady cuts to their budgets and long delays in payment from the state. These are organizations like Sparc in Springfield, which operates small group homes, runs programs that provide employment for the developmentally disabled and provides important services to families of children with disabilities.
Quinn’s budget proposal for fiscal 2012 proposes to cut $76.3 million from these types of programs while increasing the budgets for state institutions by $30 million. It’s time for the state to realize that both financially and therapeutically, that formula is backward.
Housing an individual in an institution costs about $190,000 a year, or roughly four times the cost of living in a community setting, says Tony Paulauski, executive director of The Arc of Illinois, a consortium of roughly 60 agencies that serve the developmentally disabled and their families. Paulauski points to studies that show Illinois ranks fourth in the nation in the number of people housed in institutions and is 47th in the amount it spends on community services that keep people out of institutions and allow them to lead more productive lives.
* Tribune…
Unfortunately, Gov. Pat Quinn has targeted some of Illinois’ most vulnerable citizens for his least sensible cuts.
Experts in the field calculate that in his proposed budget for 2012, Quinn whacks $76.3 million from community services for the developmentally disabled: That includes people with Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, autism and other challenges. At the same time, Quinn directs $30 million in additional spending to state institutions that serve far fewer residents at much higher costs. His budget similarly favors institutional care for mental health over a community-based approach. Along the way, he would forgo tens of millions in federal matching dollars.
How wrongheaded can you get? For decades now, other states have moved away from institutionalizing the developmentally disabled and mentally ill in government-run facilities — with great success. Care is better, and costs far lower. Indiana recently went in that direction, and the results have been positive.
* But not all is well…
Across Illinois last year, more than 130 cases of abuse and neglect were investigated and confirmed in group homes for adults, a 33 percent increase compared to 2006, according to government documents obtained by The Associated Press. The reports of mistreatment and outright cruelty at the hands of low-wage workers with scant supervision, illustrate a mostly overlooked problem in Illinois.
The numbers reinforce concerns about the treatment of group home residents as the alleged beating death of a disabled man at a home in eastern Illinois has led to proposed legislation that would tighten state oversight and allow the public to more easily see abuse and neglect reports. The bill has passed the Illinois House and is expected to be considered next week in the Senate.
State funded and privately operated, group homes rely heavily on low-paid workers — some moonlighting a second job — to care for an increasing number of adults with autism, mental retardation and other disabling problems. […]
“The minimal wage makes it difficult to screen out some people who are less-than-savory characters,” said Jim Lopresto, executive director of Southern Illinois Community Support Services, an agency that runs group homes. “We kiss a lot of frogs. At the rate of pay we’re offering, that’s what you run into.”
Go read the whole story.
After the horrific alleged murders committed by staff at a Downstate group home, it would be prudent for this state to look before it leaps.
Smaller can usually be better, but these homes have to raise their standards. The state spends $340 million a year on group home care for less than 10,000 residents. That’s still cheaper than institutionalizing them, and the AP story provides no data on abuse at state-run facilities.
Also, those 130 reports of abuse and neglect equal just over 1 percent of all residents in group homes. That’s quite small overall, but the problems at Graywood need to be examined much more closely to make sure this never happens again anywhere else.
39 Comments
|
* As I’ve been telling subscribers for a while now, there’s big trouble with the pension reform bill, and it’s coming from what some might expect is an unlikely corner: The House Republicans. HGOP Leader Tom Cross, of course, has been pushing the pension reform bill for months on end, but some of his members are starting to balk…
Sara Wojcicki, a spokeswoman for Cross, the House Republican leader, declined Friday to answer questions about what kind of trouble the bill faced in Cross’ caucus, what changes members are suggesting and how much more current employees will be expected to pay for their benefits.
“This is a very complicated issue and we are working to finalize the bill,” Wojcicki said. “There are many issues still to be resolved in the next couple of weeks.”
But Rep. Rich Brauer, R-Petersburg, an opponent of charging more for benefits, said the bill faces serious problems among Republican members.
“I think Representative (Raymond) Poe had the best comment on that. He says, ‘If you don’t have any teachers in your district, then go ahead and vote for change,’” Brauer said. “To change somebody’s pension after they’re hired is wrong.”
* Finke’s take…
Maybe things will turn topsy-turvy next week, but right now it doesn’t feel like there are only 10 scheduled days left in the General Assembly’s spring session. There just doesn’t seem to be a sense of urgency around the place.
There’s plenty of stuff lawmakers could still do, from the budget and remaps to gambling expansion, workers’ comp, pension reform, utility rates and on and on. But it’s not hard to find lawmakers who think most of that stuff will be put off until the fall.
Either the next week will be one of the busiest ever for lawmakers, or the whole session will end with a whimper instead of a bang.
He’s right that a whole lot of issues are on the bubble at the moment. But there is lots of urgency behind the scenes as the clock ticks down to May 31st. For instance, gaming expansion…
Republican Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka on Sunday threw her support behind a city casino.
She is urging the general assembly to authorize one before the end of the legislative session on May 31st.
“World-class cities have casinos,” said Topinka. “Having a casino here would help with tourism, with jobs - it would certainly put some money back in the till both for the city as well as the state, but I think you have to be responsible as well.”
Is this the bill? Looks like it…
Illinois Horseman’s Benevolent and Protective Association Executive Director Lanny Brooks has spent days lobbying in Springfield during the spring session on behalf of horse owners, and said an amendment will be added to a bill that could bring on-site gaming to the state’s horse tracks.
“I feel better than I did ever before,” Brooks said.
Brooks said he has spoken with the bill’s sponsor, Gaming Committee Chairman Rep. Lou Lang, D-Skokie, and was told an amendment will be added to the gambling expansion bill, which includes on-track gaming as well as a new casino in downtown Chicago and two new riverboat casinos in the state. The amendment is expected to be formally introduced at 9 a.m. Wednesday before the House Executive Committee.
* And workers’ comp…
If the sudden agreement not to talk about workers compensation reform is any indication, negotiators in Springfield might be getting close to a deal.
It’s a deal that Illinois needs to boost its image as an employer-friendly state. But any deal must also be fair to everyone with a stake in the system.
* I’ve kinda lost track of where the school reform trailer bill is going, but the Tribune editorial board glosses over the real issue at stake…
Chicago Teachers Union officials are pleading with lawmakers to change the provisions in the bill that set a high bar for a teachers strike. The bill says that a strike can be called only if 75 percent of the union members vote to approve it. We won’t get into the arcane details, but the debate now focuses on who would get to vote on a strike authorization. The CTU demands changes in separate legislation that would make it easier to hit the 75 percent threshold and send teachers to the picket lines.
There’s good reason to oppose this effort to dilute the reform bill. Chicago has aggressive new leadership coming to the school system. Those leaders will have significant new tools to improve education, thanks to the reform bill on the governor’s desk. But Chicago schools also face a large deficit, and spending cuts are likely. This is a critical time for Chicago’s children. As the schools navigate through the reforms and the budget, parents need to know that Chicago teachers will be in the classroom to teach their children.
They don’t get into the “arcane details” because that would mean explaining that the CTU wants the 75 percent threshold to apply to members who are eligible to vote. That really doesn’t seem all that unreasonable. Debatable, perhaps, but not unreasonable.
* Related…
* Budget woes threaten preschool programs
* State budget cuts to have little effect on Illinois State Fair
* Voters would have last word on school sales taxes under bill approved by Senate
* Rutherford: State nearing ‘financial disaster’
* Illinois should try to get better sale price for Thomson prison
* Voices weigh in on debate over slots at Arlington Park
* Kadner: Emanuel wants casino; Welch no longer does
21 Comments
|
Monday Remapalooza
Monday, May 23, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Sunday’s extensive remap coverage is here. You’ll also notice that just above the news feeds on the far right side of the page is a new pull-down index of handy remap links. Check ‘em out and provide us more links in comments if you can find them.
* Last night, the Senate Democrats passed three shell bills over to the House which will likely be used as vehicles for the new maps. The Senate Republicans cried foul. From a press release…
Senate Democrats apparently short-circuited the ability of individual senators to offer changes to the once-a-decade redrawing of state and congressional district boundaries on Sunday.
By passing three “shell” bills to the House which contained no content, the Senate likely surrendered the opportunity for members to offer up amendments or changes to the measures.
As the measures were being pushed through during a late Sunday afternoon session, Deputy Senate Republican Leader Dale Righter (R-Mattoon) said the “shells” were being rushed through to make it easier for Democrats to adopt a final map “before anyone has got a chance to catch their breath, and look at the lines and figure out what’s going on.” […]
The three bills passed on party-line votes in the Senate (SB 1177, SB 1178 and SB 1179) contain nothing more than titles. The maneuver allows the House to add all the detail to the legislation and then send it back to the Senate for a single up or down vote with no opportunity for Senators to offer individual amendments.
Senate Republicans will now have to hope that their House counterparts can introduce amendments for them, if that’s even allowed.
* The most interesting story to come out of Sunday’s House remap hearing…
Shortly before the hearing, House Democrats released racial and ethnic data behind the new districts they drew. The map shows 16 districts with a population of voting-age African-Americans ranging from 50.08 percent to 62 percent. It also showed 11 districts in which voting-age Latinos make up 50.4 percent to 78.3 percent of the population.
Combined with Senate districts devoted to minorities in the map, 39 of the General Assembly’s 177 seats would come from boundaries in which a majority of voters were from racial or ethnic groups.
But the United Congress of Community and Religious Organizations said at the hearing that lawmakers could have crafted 57 such “minority-majority” districts. The group noted that under the current boundaries, there were six House districts with 65 percent or more of voting-age Latinos — a figure that would drop to three in the new map.
The rare Sunday hearing highlighted a fissure among groups advocating for greater Latino representation that developed a day earlier during testimony by a state Senate remap panel. Democrats had hoped in the mapmaking process to placate two key constituencies even though Latino population increased in the state while black population dropped significantly, primarily in Chicago.
* My weekly syndicated newspaper column is, of course, also about the remap…
Statehouse paranoia and angst always are at an all-time high every 10 years in Springfield.
Why? The new state legislative district maps are drawn, and that highly political process always involves generous amounts of partisan mischief-making and revenge.
This year is no different. The Democrats control both legislative chambers and the governor’s office, so they can pretty much draw any map they want as long as they follow federal and state voting rights laws which protect minorities and other “communities of interest.”
The Republicans, locked out of power and influence, just knew they were in for a beating, and they got one. In many respects it probably wasn’t as bad as it was 10 years ago, when the Democrats drew a map so solidly partisan that the House and Senate Democratic majorities easily survived one of the biggest Republican landslides in history.
Partisanship aside, though, imagine being told that the only way to keep your job was to sell your house and move your family a few miles, or even a few blocks. That’s what some legislators have to go through every 10 years during remap season, and it’s what quite a few Republicans are facing — again — this time around. Several have been mapped into districts with fellow Republicans. One of those legislators in each of those districts will have to retire, move or suck it up and run in a primary against a fellow GOP legislator.
So, when Republicans like state Sens. Kyle McCarter and Dave Luechtefeld are put in the same district, reporters heard some very angry complaints. Luechtefeld’s house has essentially been pulled out of his old, deep southern Illinois district and put into a new district farther north that is (for the most part) currently represented by Republican Sen. John O. Jones. Jones’ house has been put in what is now Luechtefeld’s district. A big chunk of McCarter’s current district has been shoved at fellow Republican Sen. Sam McCann.
Confused? That’s the whole idea, man.
A new map usually means representing new territory, and that means legislators must get to know thousands, even tens of thousands of voters who have no idea who they are. That can be a dangerous thing in these politically volatile times. But in the case of Luechtefeld and Jones, they have to either familiarize themselves with almost 200,000 new faces or move, or retire.
The Republican pairings are quite numerous. Sens. Tim Bivins and Christine Johnson are in the same district. The Democrats even paired Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno with Sen. Ron Sandack. Sandack likely will run for a House seat.
Over in the House, southern Illinois Republican state Reps. Ron Stephens and John Cavaletto are in the same district, as are central Illinois Reps. Dan Brady and Keith Sommer. Eastern Illinois Reps. Chapin Rose and Bill Mitchell have been put together.
The mischief goes beyond pitting two Republicans against each other. Northwest suburban Republican Rep. Sid Mathias has been placed in the same district as Democratic Rep. Carol Sente. The district clearly favors Sente, so Mathias will either have to move or take a big risk.
Clearly, some of these folks had better hope the housing market improves soon.
And it’s not just the pairings which grate on the minority party’s nerves every ten years. Much of Sen. Dave Syverson’s Rockford-area district was taken from him so the Democrats could create a very favorable district for Marla Wilson, whom the Dems backed against Syverson last year.
I could go on, but I’m pretty sure you get the idea. Keep something in mind here if this all makes you angry. Two constitutional amendment were proposed awhile back to change the way districts were drawn. Backers of both proposals fell far short of the required petition signatures. Some of the same Republicans who are griping now about the way the maps are drawn probably should’ve put a whole lot more effort into one or both of those amendment petition drives.
Many of those Republicans might not have worked on those constitutional amendments because they figured they’d win the governor’s race and that would be enough to block the Democrats from drawing the map without a fight. After all, how could they possibly lose after Rod Blagojevich’s impeachment and during an inept Pat Quinn administration? Oops.
* And we already have a candidacy announcement before anybody knows what the final congressional map will look like…
A Hoffman Estates man who finished a close second in the Democratic primary race for Illinois comptroller in 2010 said Saturday he is eying a run for Congress in 2012.
Raja Krishnamoorthi, 37, said he is forming an exploratory committee Monday to seek the 8th Congressional District seat currently held by Republican and tea party favorite Joe Walsh, who defeated three-term Democrat Melissa Bean of Barrington by 291 votes last November. […]
Krishnamoorthi says he would expect to challenge Walsh in an 8th District that includes the Northwest suburbs. Bean has said she will not seek her old seat, and Krishnamoorthi is the first Democrat to launch an exploratory committee in a congressional race that should draw national interest in 2012.
* Remap roundup…
* Dems on redistricting defensive: Republicans and groups like the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform and Change Illinois said the Democrats are rushing to approve a map and are not being open enough to the public. State Sen. Dale Righter, R-Mattoon, criticized a legislative maneuver referred as a shell bill, which is essentially a placeholder for latebreaking proposals. The map could be placed in a shell bill and fast-tracked to a vote
* State legislative maps released, but may change: “Ten years ago the Democrats put out one map, waited a few days and then they put out another map that had substantial changes to it, including in downstate districts. So everyone, whether they’re involved in the political process or not, needs to take a deep breath and recognize that this thing is very much drawn in pencil now.”
* Remap makes for tough road ahead for some suburban lawmakers
* Remap plan criticized, praised at public forum
* Suburbs Appear Slighted in New Legislative Maps
* Lawmakers anticipate changing boundaries
* New legislative map could split Mendota: Mautino’s district — the 76th — would change slightly. The northern border in Mendota is U.S. 34, which leaves part of the city in the 90th district, represented by Jerry Mitchell (R-Sterling). Mautino’s district also would expand east to include Ottawa and Marseilles; currently, the 76th district includes only part of Ottawa. The 75th district, represented by Pam Roth (R-Morris) would lose part of Kankakee and Iroquois counties, extending north instead into Kendall County.
* VIDEO: Sen. Raoul on redistricting
* VIDEO: Sen. Righter on redistricting
* VIDEO: Rep. Fortner on redistricting
46 Comments
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
|
   
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|
