Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Governing by press release, Part 54,285
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Governing by press release, Part 54,285

Tuesday, Sep 13, 2011 - Posted by Rich Miller

* I have some objections to this Tribune editorial, but it’s generally on the right track

Gov. Pat Quinn slammed down a rubber stamper with a dramatic thud Monday as he followed through on his pledge to veto the so-called smart grid bill, which would upgrade the electricity distribution system in Illinois.

Now what? Apart from talking tough — and stamping tough — the governor has no real Plan B. […]

The bill needs a stronger answer for the prolonged power outages that hit more than a million customers in northern Illinois this summer — they’re still angry. An aggressive program to replace cable, upgrade circuits and bury the most vulnerable lines should be part of the deal. ComEd might win more support if it revived the idea of a fund to ease the impact of future rate hikes on the elderly and poor.

The storm-related service problems have made ComEd an easy target, and opponents of the bill looked like they had fun bashing it on Monday. But as the governor should know, this legislation is not “a nightmare for the consumers of Illinois,” as he described it. It is not “legalized pickpocketing,” or a bet on “unproven smart technology,” as Attorney General Lisa Madigan declared at the press conference.

The General Assembly passed a largely solid framework. High-tech upgrades to the power grid will save consumers money over time and make Illinois more attractive for business. The governor gave his veto stamper a good workout on Monday. Now it’s time to push for a genuine electricity upgrade.

I don’t think the bill’s framework was “largely solid.” What we saw over the summer is that the basic structure of the current “Dumb Grid” isn’t nearly up to par. The company needs to be pushed into upgrading its entire network from the ground up, not just the technological improvements produced by a “Smart Grid.” Yes, that would cost money. Lots of it. But these far too frequent outages are also costing money as well, and they’re hurting our state’s competitiveness. We have an opportunity here to squeeze this company to be the best in a whole lot of aspects. For instance, their customer service is horrible, and not just for individual consumers

For the third year in a row, business customers have placed Commonwealth Edison second-to-last in customer satisfaction among its Midwest peers.

According to a J.D. Power and Associates study — based on interviews with representatives of more than 17,000 U.S. businesses that spend between $500 and $50,000 monthly on electricity — ComEd tied for second-to-last place with the state’s other major utility Ameren Illinois. Both received a score of 607 on a 1,000 point scale.

And guess which company tied for last place in the Midwest? If you said “Ameren,” you’d be correct.

* Gov. Pat Quinn has had months to come up with an alternative plan. Instead, he just issued a veto and walked away, promising to come up with something down the road.

That’s absolutely unacceptable. Yesterday was simply one more in a series of high-profile feel-good media pops for a governor who all too often governs by press release. Vetoing the ComEd bill was easy. Proposing real solutions is difficult. So, it’s no surprise which avenue this governor took.

Maybe one day Pat Quinn will grow up and start to actually lead, but I’m not holding my breath.

…Adding… The SJ-R editorial board is still steaming about Tenaska

If a newspaper editorial page could have a face, ours would be blue from telling the story of Commonwealth Edison’s relentless effort to prevent construction of a clean coal power plant in Taylorville. […]

A group called the STOP Coalition, heavily backed by Exelon, quickly set about sounding the alarm of economic doom if that happened. Using worst-case-scenario predictions, it said the Tenaska deal would lead to massive increases in power rates for nonresidential users, forcing tens of thousands of jobs out of Illinois. ComEd succeeded in stopping Tenaska’s bill in January. Then it asked the Illinois Commerce Commission for its own $396 million rate hike. (Eventually, it was granted $155 million.)

The Tenaska bill limited Tenaska to a 2 percent increase on residential rates spread over 30 years . The bill vetoed by Quinn this week would have meant 9 percent increases on average for ComEd customers.

This episode was a lesson for us. It said ComEd would do anything necessary to protect its bottom line and keep competition away, no matter how much hyperbole and alarmism was necessary.

* Roundup…

* ComEd Customer Service - User Reviews, Ratings and Comments

* Sen. Don Harmon statement on governor’s ComEd veto: “By vetoing this bill, the Governor paves the way for common sense legislation that can allow for electric grid modernization, while providing true safeguards for Illinois’ consumers. I stand with the Governor in his efforts to create jobs, protect the environment and maintain key consumer protections. The lack of adequate protections in these key areas is the reason I voted no on the ‘ComEd bill’ and today support the Governor’s veto. To be effective, any legislation to modernize the electric grid should contain lower profit margins for utility companies, key protections for those who can least afford rate increases, dedicated revenues for storm response measures, environmental safeguards, and clear evidence that ratepayers will realize future savings from smart meters.”

Unless a trailer bill can be passed to address these specific concerns, I urge legislators to support the veto. I look forward to working with the General Assembly to advance these goals.”

* Gov. Quinn vetoes ComEd rate-hike bill, override battle to come: Bob Pierson, business manager of IBEW Local 9 and chairman of the union’s International Executive Council, said he is disappointed and that the IBEW will continue to try to pass the bill in the upcoming veto session. “There are no jobs now,” he told the Sun-Times. “This would have meant at least 1,500 jobs for our members, more jobs for the utility company, more income for the state and given the state an actual, reliable [electrical] system.”

* Quinn vetoes electric rate hike bill: “If they want to try and override the veto, be my guest. Because we’ll, I think, show them as we did 30 years ago that the people of Illinois are mightier than Commonwealth Edison,” said Quinn, who helped form the Citizens Utility Board nearly 30 years ago.

* Quinn vetoes ComEd rate hike: In December 2008, the ICC ordered the state’s two largest utilities — ComEd and Ameren — to participate in a series of workshops with consumer advocates, government officials and other policymakers to discuss issues surrounding smart grid. The idea was to develop a strategic plan to guide deployment of smart grid in Illinois and to recommend policies the commission could adopt. The resulting 356-page report, released in October 2010, was meant to guide utilities as they moved forward with requests for smart-grid technology. But the utilities never came forward with a detailed proposal, said Scott, instead choosing to fight for legislation that would provide a means to pay for the smart grid without clearly defining what consumers would be paying for.

* ‘Smart Grid’ Might Invade Privacy: ComEd released a statement denying that personal data would be collected: “The parties that negotiated the Energy Infrastructure Modernization Act (SB1652) ensured that customer data information protections were embedded in the legislation. The legislation says that electric utilities shall comply with the consumer privacy requirements of the Personal Information Protection Act and it prohibits selling of individual customer-specific data. ”

* Quinn vetoes electricity rate-hike plan: “To be effective, any legislation to modernize the electric grid should contain lower profit margins for utility companies, key protections for those who can least afford rate increases, dedicated revenues for storm response measures, environmental safeguards, and clear evidence that ratepayers will realize future savings from smart meters,” said state Sen. Don Harmon, an Oak Park Democrat.

* Quinn vetoes Ameren rate hike proposal

* Quinn vetoes Ameren $625 million rate hike bill in Illinois

* With Quinn veto, ComEd’s focus on rate hike bill turns to lawmakers

       

17 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 9:32 am:

    After this hot and stormy summer of chronic power outages, whacking ComEd was a no-brainer for any politician.

    ComEd doesn’t do itself any favors with its notoriously unreliable and surly customer service. They have no one but themselves to blame for their terrible brand image.

    Any trailer where ComEd tries to again wriggle out from rate regulation by the ICC is a non-starter.


  2. - sad - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 9:40 am:

    He did propose something, the icc proposal which is hb 14 amendment 3. Com ed has rejected it, which is weird because the bill is supposedly about smart grid, right? So if the bill is not about smart grid, but is really about changing the regulatory process, why would you want a gov to propose a way forward that would roll back regulatory oversight or accept it as a starting point? It is not incumbent on the governor to write com ed’s legislation for them.


  3. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 9:56 am:

    I’ll repeat my question from yesterday - why does the rate regulation regimen for ComEd need to revised before it makes the investment in Smart Grid, etc? It invested billions in nuclear power plants under the same regimen. Why does the Governor need to “come up with an alternative plan”? Why not just say to ComEd - build it and apply to the ICC like you always have in the past.


  4. - Loop Lady - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 9:58 am:

    I also shed no tears yesterday when Pat whacked the bill…start over and negotiate in good faith for once ComEd…


  5. - Loop Lady - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 10:00 am:

    Anonymous: beacause they want someone else (read: ratepayers)besides their shareholders to pay for the smart grid…it’s that simple and cynical…


  6. - One of the 35 - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 10:01 am:

    The Trib is spot on when they state, “An aggressive program to replace cable, upgrade circuits, AND BURY THE MOST VULNERABLE LINES should be part of the deal. Com Ed will never willingly agree to bury the most vulnerable lines even though this would be good public policy. They will deliberately misrepresent the cost to bury lines; overstating the actual cost by 300% or 400% in an effort to discourage you. Burying the most vulnerable lines must be part of this deal!


  7. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 10:04 am:

    ===He did propose something, the icc proposal which is hb 14 amendment 3. ===

    Not really. He asked that the GA “consider” the bill. He could’ve used his AV to rewrite this bill with the ICC proposal and didn’t. Instead, it was all press release, no governing.


  8. - Fed up - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 10:13 am:

    I do not blame Quinn for this veto. It is not a good bill. Start over and don’t give Com Ed regulatory relief this time. Com Ed has itself to blame for poor service and poor relations. It is a corporation that cannot be trusted. This veto is right up Quinn populist alley. I just wish Quinn knew how to get involved and help turn this into a workable bill.


  9. - Lincoln's Penny - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 10:38 am:

    “Not really. He asked that the GA “consider” the bill. He could’ve used his AV to rewrite this bill with the ICC proposal and didn’t.”

    Yeah we have seen how successful AVs have been in the past. You cant AV a bill this big. It only invites a legislative fight with the leaders.

    The problem here is that the ICC proposal allows a “rider” for smart grid investments ONLY. SB1652 applies to ALL the utilities costs. Thats what they want…ALL COSTS (but selling it as smart grid) at a new formula rate.


  10. - Coach - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 11:24 am:

    ComEd gets credit for expert salesmanship: They convinced the Tribune, et al., that this bill is necessary to build Smart Grid. But as noted above, this change in law is NOT necessary to allow Smart Grid; ComEd could just before the ICC, as provided by law, and ask for rate hikes to cover its cost.

    This bill has never been about Smart Grid. It’s always been about formula rate (minimizing ICC regulatory oversight and getting ComEd as close as possible to guaranteed rate hikes, regardless of market factors). I’m appalled so many in the media continue to repeat the Smart Grid shill even as they ignore the facts: 1) The bill isn’t necessary to support Smart Grid, and 2) The bill would provide formula rate (fixed rate hikes, with ICC review after the fact) relative to ALL utility spending - not just Smart Grid spending.


  11. - Lincoln's Penny - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 11:43 am:

    Also, the very deceiving part of this bill and perhaps its only “consumer protection” is the rate cap. Sounds nice right? No consumer will pay over 2.5% a year on rates?

    Except a couple minor details…
    1. the rate cap expires in three years but the spending program goes for 10…huh?
    2. the rate cap applies to the ENTIRE bill. The typical bill which includes 70% for power and 30% for delivery (the delivery side is where 100% of the spending of the bill comes from). So what happens when power prices go down? (as everyone projects they will because of the recession). Well, this bill will allow ComEd to make up the difference in increasing your delivery charges but still be under the cap. In other words, instead of benefiting from 10% lower power costs, the average consumer will see a 2.5% annual increase.

    And by the way, if you are a power company (lets say your name is Exelon) and you own a distribution company (lets just say ComEd) and you see that your power contracts which were set in 2008 (when power prices were much higher) are about to expire (in 2012) then how do you plan on making up for the pending revenue shortfall…

    i dont know…maybe you push a bill that allows your delivery company to jack up its side of the bill…

    this bill sucks people. investments need to be made but not like this…


  12. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 11:50 am:

    Lincoln’s Penny, you make good points. However, from what I’m told Speaker Madigan has privately accused the ICC of misrepresenting both its bill and ComEd’s bill. Madigan has never been a ComEd/Exelon fan. So, perhaps y’all need to make amends. The guy hates to be lied to and does have a little power around the Statehouse. Perhaps he’s wrong. Either way, an explanation is in order because your bill ain’t going anywhere until you deal with this.


  13. - Cincinnatus - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 11:51 am:

    ComEd was smart alright. Under the guise of lower rates, and “green technology” they went for massive rate hikes while ignoring their basic responsibility for routine maintenance. The only answer to these jamokes is competition.


  14. - mokenavince - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 11:58 am:

    Does anybody really think Quinn knows the difference between a SMART GRID and a DUMB GRID?
    I hardly think so. He just got a veto stamp from Staple’s and needed the excerise. He’s been fiddling with the gaming bill forever. And Illinois burns while he fiddles.


  15. - Loop Lady - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 12:10 pm:

    Cincy: I love it when someone else besides me calls someone or something a jamoke-and if the shoe fits…;)


  16. - Lincoln's Penny - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 1:14 pm:

    Rich, I don’t work for the ICC, i just read the bill.

    Rate cap expires in three years (pg 101-102).
    Investment program lasts ten years (pg 72-73).
    Rate cap applies to entire bill (pg 101-102).


  17. - Cincinnatus - Tuesday, Sep 13, 11 @ 1:48 pm:

    LL,

    Are you originally from the “old neighborhood?”


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* The Republican Party's problem in the suburbs summed up by one article
* Caption contest! (Updated x3)
* Millions of Illinois election records were exposed by contractor’s unsecured databases
* Energy Storage Now!
* Today's quotable
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and the fundraiser list
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller