* 11:07 am - From the Tribune…
“On Saturday, Senator Kirk checked himself into Lake Forest Hospital, where doctors discovered a carotid artery dissection in the right side of his neck,” his office said in a statement.
“He was transferred to Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, where further tests revealed that he had suffered an ischemic stroke,” it said. “Early this morning, the senator underwent surgery to relieve swelling around his brain stemming from the stroke. The surgery was successful.
“Due to his young age, good health and the nature of the stroke, doctors are very confident in the Senator’s recovery over the weeks ahead.”
* From StrokeCenter.org…
Ischemic stroke is by far the most common kind of stroke, accounting for about 88 percent of all strokes. Stroke can affect people of all ages, including children. Many people with ischemic strokes are older (60 or more years old), and the risk of stroke increases with age. Each year, about 55,000 more women than men have a stroke, and it is more common among African-Americans than members of other ethnic groups.
Let’s all keep the Senator in our thoughts.
* A press conference is planned for 11:30 am.
…Adding… Raw video of the presser…
* Blackberry users click here. Everybody else can just watch and hope for the best…
Comments Off
|
Question of the day
Monday, Jan 23, 2012 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I received this e-mail message from a college professor the other day…
Dear Mr. Miller:
I’m teaching the state politics course at [redacted] this spring, and had two questions for you:
(1) The students will be required to keep up with the (non-subscriber) version of your blog this semester (and will be quizzed on important content). […]
(2) If you have any interest in talking to a class (it meets TTh from noon-1:40), either in person or via Skype, speakerphone, or online chat, we’d love to have you.
Thanks so much for your time and consideration.
I will likely go to the class, but I’m wondering what you think blog readers could do to help these students? Could we have some sort of online chat, using the ScribbleLive program, which allows instant communication back and forth? The students could ask questions, and we could answer them. Or perhaps they could occasionally suggest some Questions of the Day? Something else?
Put on your thinking caps and help me out here.
48 Comments
|
* You’d think that with all the heat on the legislative scholarship program that legislators would want to avoid doing stuff like this…
In state Rep. Robert Rita’s legislative district — which covers a swath of Chicago’s south suburbs and part of the city’s far South Side — just one out of 10 people has a college degree. The daughter of Ald. Anthony Beale (9th) — a friend and political ally of Rita — is being given the chance to buck those odds and earn a degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign tuition-free courtesy of a coveted “legislative scholarship” handed to her by Rita.
That four-year freebie to the state’s flagship state university is valued at nearly $37,000.
It’s the latest in a string of cases in which the children of political insiders have been given one of the two four-year scholarships to a state university that each Illinois legislator gets to award every year to students who live in their district. Legislators also can split the scholarships, giving a partial tuition break to as many as eight students a year.
Beale and Rita (D-Blue Island) have close ties. Beale has endorsed Rita for re-election in the past, calling him a “strong” ally. Beale’s wife works for Rita. Dana Beale is a part-time, $400-a-month legislative aide at Rita’s district office who, until recently, was also making $76,684 a year working for Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White. And Rita has contributed more than $20,000 to the alderman’s election campaigns over the years.
Beale, who makes $110,556 a year as a Chicago alderman, says none of that put his daughter, Taylor Beale, at the head of the line when Rita was deciding which students would get four years of free college tuition.
“She filled out the application, submitted it to the state rep and received the scholarship,” says Beale.
Oy.
* Ms. Beale does have impressive credentials…
[Rep. Rita’s] statement reads in part: “A National Honor Society scholar, a ‘Who’s Who Among High School Students’ member, a city champion on the girls’ varsity tennis team, a community Little League volunteer and a sterling recommendation from her principal at Whitney Young Magnet High School were the reasons that earned Taylor Beale a tuition waiver. Denying such an academically talented and civic-minded student a tuition waiver because of her father’s job would amount to blatant discrimination against a promising African-American student.”
OK, she’s talented and sharp. But the heat this will generate could wind up driving a big nail into this program’s coffin. Ironically enough, maybe Rita just did his colleagues a big favor.
45 Comments
|
* Doug Finke looks at Gov. Pat Quinn’s decision to close Jacksonville Developmental Center…
The closure plan hinges on placing residents in community-based settings. Those are the same organizations that many times wait months and months to get paid for delivering services.
Wouldn’t it be interesting if the plan got derailed because those organizations refused to take any more clients for which they won’t get paid on time?
Good point.
* The AP fact checks Quinn’s announcement…
The administration says the Jacksonville and Tinley Park facilities were the first picked for closure because they scored worst in rankings based on objective criteria like physical condition, difficulties in recruiting staff and economic impact on the surrounding communities.
You’ll have to take Quinn’s word for that, however. He won’t release those rankings, so there’s no way to tell how Jacksonville compared to similar facilities in Anna or Chester, or how Tinley Park matched up against other mental hospitals.
The governor is releasing the final scores for the two facilities, but knowing that Jacksonville was rated a 3 on staff recruitment doesn’t allow for comparisons to other institutions. Quinn isn’t releasing any of the data his staff used to calculate the scores, making it impossible to review the work and check for potential errors.
You gotta wonder why they won’t release those rankings. It doesn’t make much sense to me.
* The Jacksonville Journal-Courier has local react…
“The problem with this administration, and I’m getting very blunt, but you can’t trust them,” [State Rep. Jim Watson] said. “The reason we can’t get anything done in Springfield, the reason the budget is in such a mess, is because you can’t trust them. … No one knows where this is coming from.” […]
Jacksonville Mayor Andy Ezard said he was still feeling numb from hearing about the potential closure form the governor’s office on Thursday. He said with this decision by the state, it appears the writing is on the wall.
“We’ll keep trying to work hard to stop this, but I don’t know if we can,” Ezard said. “I’m heartbroken for the families and the citizens out at JDC and I think our community has done well in cooperating and proving to them this institution is needed. I believe at the end of the day it’s politics as usual, and that’s disappointing.”
While less than optimistic of the outcome, Ezard said he’d already heard from many people throughout the state ready to support keeping JDC open and hoped to mobilize those efforts.
“I would love to start the rhetoric of at least talking to the governor’s office or his team that wants to close this.” Ezard said. “We need to have conversations as soon as possible about what’s going to happen to the building, about possibly not losing the whole thing, keeping some of the buildings open and some of the residents there. Our community is gearing up and ready to help those wanting to go out into Jacksonville, but there are certain residents that we can keep here.”
* Related…
* Erickson: Quinn not around to announce lost jobs
* Praise for Quinn’s JDC plan
* Dripping with red ink: Will anyone fix Illinois’ budget mess?
* Editorial: How they failed you - The tax hikers of 2011 hope you won’t notice the carnage of 2012
* Editorial: Have your voice heard
on tax hikes
* Editorial: Apply pressure on officials to fix pension problem
* Legislators seek ways to cut prison population
* Centralia, Big Muddy, Vandalia Prisons Among Overcrowded in State
* Can the state afford a new crime lab in Belleville? Illinois behind in payments on existing site
35 Comments
|
Unintended consequences
Monday, Jan 23, 2012 - Posted by Rich Miller
* My weekly, syndicated newspaper column…
Back when the reformers demanded that state campaign contributions be capped, they said it would limit the dollars flowing into Illinois political funds.
But contributions have only barely decreased from four years ago, according to a search of the Illinois Board of Elections’ database. That may have as much to do with the economy these days compared with what it was in 2007, when Illinois’ unemployment rate was half what it is now.
The search shows that about $55.6 million was contributed to campaigns during the last six months of 2011, while the amount was about $57.3 million during the same period in 2007.
House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) raised $2.6 million for the three campaign funds he controls during the past three months. Madigan now has a total of $4 million in cash, which puts him far ahead of anybody else. Four years ago (at the same point in our national and state election cycles), Madigan had $1.3 million in cash. There were no contribution caps four years ago.
And a whole bunch of money is avoiding those caps by being spread around to newly formed political action committees and to some local committees that have never before seen much, if any, activity.
For a somewhat extreme example of what appears to be happening in our capped environment, let’s take a look at contributions made during the latest quarter by Ken and Anne Griffin, a wealthy Chicago couple who gave heavily to House Republicans in 2010.
Before I go further, though, I want to make it very clear that nothing the Griffins did was illegal or even unethical. It all appears to be well within the law. I only point this out to show how silly it is to think that we can cap all the money coming into the system. Money always finds a way around caps.
Individuals now are capped at $5,000 when donating directly to a candidate, but they can give up to $10,000 to PACs and political parties and PACs can contribute $50,000 to candidates. You probably can see where this is going.
The Griffins made $305,000 in contributions between Dec. 29 and Jan. 6, with the vast majority confined to the last three days of 2011. A bunch of that cash went to small, downstate Republican Party county committees.
For instance, the Griffins each contributed the maximum $10,000 to the Stark County Republican Central Committee on Dec. 29. The tiny county party reported raising just $5,700 in cash over the past three years until the Griffins came along.
Republican parties in Christian, Jefferson, Douglas, Logan and Richland counties all were showered with similar Griffin beneficence. Such political party committees can contribute unlimited amounts to candidates in a primary election.
But it wasn’t just a bunch of out-of-the-way county parties that benefited from the Griffins. A group called Empowering Children PAC was formed Dec. 6 and got $20,000 from the couple this month. The two officers of the committee are Andy McKenna (former state GOP chairman and gubernatorial candidate) and John Tillman (who runs the Illinois Policy Institute).
Mary Beth Weiss, of Hinsdale, also contributed $10,000 to Empowering Children PAC and gave another $10,000 to Illinois Liberty PAC, which previously was chaired by Tillman but now is chaired by former GOP gubernatorial candidate Dan Proft. The Griffins gave Illinois Liberty PAC their standard $10,000 each on Jan. 3.
The House Republican Leadership Committee was started Nov. 1 and raised $20,000 from, you guessed it, the Griffins. The fund is controlled by House Minority Leader Tom Cross (R-Oswego). Another Cross-controlled group, Citizens to Change Illinois, took in $27,000 in the last quarter, with $20,000 coming from the Griffins.
Got all that? And there’s lots more, but my space is limited.
This stuff was a whole lot easier to track before Illinois was reformed. Nowadays, you need a rapidly updatable scorecard to keep track of all the moves.
Careful what you wish for.
13 Comments
|
Sun-Times won’t make political endorsements
Monday, Jan 23, 2012 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Today’s announcement by the Sun-Times editorial board came as a complete surprise to a whole lot of people…
Seventy-one years ago, Marshall Field III founded this newspaper to create a bully pulpit, on the editorial page, for America’s entry into the war in Europe and for President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s domestic agenda, the New Deal.
Somebody in the Midwest, Field believed, had to stand up and counter the isolationist and anti-Roosevelt fulminations of Col. Robert McCormick and his Chicago Tribune. […]
Those days are gone. Most good newspapers today attempt to appeal to the widest possible readership, including people of every political persuasion, by serving up the best and most unbiased news coverage possible. They want to inform you, not spin you.
With this in mind, the Chicago Sun-Times Editorial Board will approach election coverage in a new way. We will provide clear and accurate information about who the candidates are and where they stand on the issues most important to our city, our state and our country. We will post candidate questionnaires online. We will interview candidates in person and post the videos online. We will present side-by-side comparisons of the candidates’ views on the key issues. We will post assessments made by respected civic and professional groups, such as the Chicago Bar Association’s guide to judicial candidates.
What we will not do is endorse candidates. We have come to doubt the value of candidate endorsements by this newspaper or any newspaper, especially in a day when a multitude of information sources allow even a casual voter to be better informed than ever before.
Research on the matter suggests that editorial endorsements don’t change many votes, especially in higher-profile races. Another school of thought, however — often expressed by readers — is that candidate endorsements, more so than all other views on an editorial page, promote the perception of a hidden bias by a newspaper, from Page One to the sports pages.
In keeping with this effort to go the extra mile to reassure you of our commitment to nonpartisanship, we also have decided to extend to our senior management the journalist code of ethics ban on making contributions to political campaigns.
* As an outside (very low-paid) CS-T columnist, I’m not a member of the editorial board, so I wasn’t consulted. If I had been, I’m not quite sure what I would’ve said. I guess I can see both sides here. You endorse somebody (Rod Blagojevich, for instance) and then you carry the weight of that decision for years to come. On the other hand, might this not strengthen the Tribune’s influence over elections? Then again, newspaper endorsements haven’t meant much for several years now.
I don’t think any other daily newspaper in Illinois has ever made a decision like this. I doubt many will give up the perceived power and influence of their endorsements, but they’re fading anyway.
What do you think of this development?
34 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|