SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
In case you want your pension money back…

Thursday, Jan 24, 2013

* Every so often a few public employees will demand in comments to be allowed to withdraw all the money they contributed to their pension funds so they can invest it themselves. Well, if SB40 passes, they might be able to. From the bill’s synopsis

Provides that a person who is a member on the effective date of the amendatory Act may file a written notice of election not to participate in the General Assembly Retirement System within 24 months from the date of becoming a member or 18 months after the effective date of the amendatory Act, whichever is later. Provides that a person who makes that election shall, upon written request, receive a refund of his or her total contributions, without interest.

The bill is sponsored by Republican state Sen. Tim Bivins (R-Dixon).

…Adding… And, yes, the bill as written only applies to GARS. But it’s a step.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


44 Comments
  1. - wizard - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:40 am:

    As someone noted yesterday, anyone who is close to retirement would withdraw it is not doing the math. It would be too late to realize a decent return on the dollars. However, someone just starting out might consider this option. One other thing, is that should an employee opt out, they should be required to set up an alternative plan, not just take the money as some would take the money and spend it. When one is young, he/she often is bullet proof and going to live forever. Retirment is not on the agenda.


  2. - Small Town Liberal - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:45 am:

    Excuse my ignorance, but I don’t get it, doesn’t this only apply to GARS?


  3. - not really - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:46 am:

    This bill only applies to GA pension participants. The rest of us can elect to take the money when we separate service (as a lump sum subject to tax or can roll into an IRA), but there is no way for a current employee to get the money out (either money already paid in or money going in from each check). I have heard of people resigning to get their money out (for a major purchase like a house) and coming right back onto the state roll, but this was years ago.


  4. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:56 am:

    An interesting story that not many are talking about….GARS is currently the worst funded State Retirement System, I believe it is around 25-30%. Which is interesting because it is also the smallest State fund. Due to this political grandstanding of opting out of GARS (mainly talking about those freshman legislators who denied to participate and who are also Tier 2) their actions of not participating in GARS will have a negative effect on the fund, and therefore on the state. Remember, Tier 2 is a great deal for the state. We want as many Tier 2 members as we can get, due to the fact that the benefit is so meager as compared to Tier 1. Tier 2 members also contribute at the same rate as Tier 1 members. Therefore, since these new members are not contributing, this is less assets coming into the fund, so now the difference will have to be made up by the State (GRF money). Another example of a campaign tactic that will have a negative fiscal impact on Illinois taxpayers.

    To SB 40, as far as Tier 1 GARS members opting out and receiving only their employee contributions as a refund, that would have a huge positive impact on the fund. I would like to FOIA that information (who takes such a refund) if this were ever to become law. Either that person is an idiot or is the most patriotic Illinois citizen I have ever met.


  5. - dupage dan - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 8:57 am:

    Without interest? Other than someone wishing to do so at the start of a state career I can’t see many folks partaking.


  6. - foster brooks - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:19 am:

    Tim bivins soon to be the recipient of two pensions. Yes folks 2 pensions.


  7. - Fred's Mustache - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    I stand by my comment yesterday that such a move would be a poor financial decision for state employees. Id like to see what happens when your typical state employee tries to invest their pension contributions. Let me tell you that most are not going to be able to invest in a way that provides income anywhere near the amount they would receive from their pension.


  8. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    Exactly what I was thinking Dan. If they want to pass something like this to provide an option, let’s try to at least be fair to the employee, and give them interest based on the rate of return gotten by the pension systems over the time the payments have been in the fund.

    Also agree with Wizard. I think it’s a dumb move in any case.


  9. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:35 am:

    Besides, if the bill is sponsered by a Republican, I’d say employees beware.


  10. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:36 am:

    Of course the Dem bills are a joke too. LOL, let’s start a new party that puts the middle class first.


  11. - langhorne - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:38 am:

    if i am not mistaken,newly elected decatur dem rep sue scherer has opted out of the GARS. she will have to squeak by on her $5,000 per month teacher’s pension, plus her $60,000+ legislator salary. this should allow her plenty of freedom from financial worry, so she can a) keep too much public funding from going to chicago, and b) go thru the budget line by line to straighten things out.


  12. - walkinfool - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:41 am:

    “Dumb move, but looks good politically — I’ll do it.”

    That’s the thinking on too many issues.


  13. - Bluefish - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 9:54 am:

    If a legislator opts out does he/she automatically go into Social Security instead? Seems cheaper for the state to keep underfunding GARS rather than be forced into SS payments for these legislators. The bill is silent on this.


  14. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:00 am:

    The state has done this before, only at that time you had to leave state government if you did it. My ex-wife took advantage of it in 2004 when we decided that should would leave work to stay home with our children. If you weren’t vested you could leave the state and they would double whatever you had contributed to the system. The state could do something like that again and allow people to remain with state government. I think it would create more of an incentive for people to leave the retirement systems and would certainly reduce the liability to those systems.


  15. - Anon - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:15 am:

    Little confused about this SURS members already have the option to invest their funds in a “Self managed plan” SMP as new employees and have had it for sometime. It includes the employer match so why the employees would opt to not take it seems pretty crazy since they won’t receive SSI, which their employer hasn’t paid. Of course if you accept the lump sum now you wouldn’t have accrued any investment growth so no it’s not a good idea to switch mid stream, I think anyway.


  16. - Liberty_First - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:26 am:

    SURS allows you to withdraw your contributions with something like 5% interest…. You are not credited with the state “match” until you apply for your “annuity.” Of course you never really get matching funds except your account shows you the total. When the lawsuits begin it will be interesting to see how the courts interpret use of the terms annuity and annuitant.


  17. - USMCJanitor - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    ===I stand by my comment yesterday that such a move would be a poor financial decision for state employees===

    It probably is a bad move IF they keep paying benefits at the rates today. If we get to a point that they stop paying maybe not.

    If all the money I have put in my 401k and IRA were not “mine”. And I was told… “look over 30 years you have amassed 450k in retirement money, but, uh… you may only get 400 back because we spent “your” money elsewhere” I may then be thinking I want to be in control of MY money.


  18. - USMCJanitor - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    With all these pensions and underfunding, etc, etc I am reminded that anything that cannot go on forever, wont.


  19. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:33 am:

    Liberty_First

    I think you are confused as to how SURS works. When you are talking about “SURS allows you to withdraw contributions with 5% interest”. For 1 am assuming you are talking about their SMP. You don’t get a fixed rate of 5% (for interest) you get the interest in which account actually earned. You are entitled to the employer match once you have reached 5 years regardless of whether or not annuitize. For the SURS traditional DB plan, a member can take a refund of contributions upon terminating service and would receive interest @ 4.5%.


  20. - Robert the Bruce - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:47 am:

    Interesting concept.

    And I could see people taking the money out. Even though it means less money than they are entitled to, it is a bird in the hand.

    You are state employee near retirement age and are counting on your pension from the state, but are understandably scared of pension reform potentially cutting your pension.

    Would you rather have your $200,000 in real money to invest, or would you take your chances that you’ll actually get the full $250,000 that you are entitled to?


  21. - Liberty_First - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 10:50 am:

    Dirt, Defined benefit, 4.5% - the point is anyone can get their money back…. of course in the SMP or Portable plans, you get your money.


  22. - thechampaignlife - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:03 am:

    I’d like to be able to buy additional years worth of service credits in order to retire early. Just tell me the actuarial value and I’ll contribute my portion, the state’s portion, interest, and even a premium above that amount. Since that would be a new “benefit”, they could set the premium to whatever they want to actually help pay down the unfunded liability. It would be an early retirement program.


  23. - Quinn T. Sential - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:05 am:

    {When the lawsuits begin it will be interesting to see how the courts interpret use of the terms annuity and annuitant.}

    Please refer to the Plan Document (contract) for definitions of key terms.


  24. - Nearly Normal - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:35 am:

    I know a teacher who took her money out of TRS back when she was a young mother. She withdrew the first three years worth of her pension. Then after her kids were old enough she went back to work as a teacher. When she retired, she got credit for years of service BUT she did not replace what she had withdrawn. Her pension was cosiderably less than she had expected.

    She griped that TRS had “cheated” her. They did not–she cheated herself.


  25. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 11:37 am:

    Liberty,

    You only get a refund by terminating service. Under SURS, I can’t take the refund and remain in current service.


  26. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:00 pm:

    This is a terrible idea. It destabilizes pension funds and jepordizes the whole system.


  27. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:02 pm:

    Just to clarify things … of the mandated retirement systems, only SURS allows the employee a choice on how to “direct” their retirement “funds/investments”.

    Participants in SERS and TRS don’t have any choice; when they are hired they get the defined benefit plan. Since the 1970 - 1972 timeframe, SERS members have to also participate in Social Security and TRS do not participate in Social Security.


  28. - Wumpus - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 12:43 pm:

    Would this create a “run” on the pension funds? I know it is in the red already, but this could break the system completely, no?


  29. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:10 pm:

    In theory yes it could create a run. However since all the member would be rec’ing is their “employee contributions only without interest” the elimination of the liability that results from the service credit forfeit in exchange for the refund will far out weigh the money that member has received from their refund. However, if they decide to provide a generous interest rate on top of their contributions, that would be a different story. Also, I doubt very few legislators will take this deal.


  30. - Dirt Diver - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:11 pm:

    I meant “I doubt very many legislators will take this deal”.


  31. - Fred's Mustache - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:13 pm:

    === Would you rather have your $200,000 in real money to invest, or would you take your chances that you’ll actually get the full $250,000 that you are entitled to? ===

    What State employee has actually contributed $200,000 in “real money” into the pension system to expect only $250,000 in return. Seriously people, for those that pay into social security, you get 4% taken out of your check. For a person making 50k a year, thats $2k a year. If you work 30 years thats $60k.

    Now take that employee and give them their full pension benefits. Say their pension pays out between $20-$25k a year. (not even factoring in COLAS). Now I understand that there will be investment returns (or losses) and other factors (commissions, fees, etc.) that would affect that amount. Its a considerable difference.

    Now come up with an investment strategy in a 401(k) or IRA that can come close to such a return on your money that your pension would give you. I’m seriously curious as to how this can be done.
    Im not so sure that it can (unless you hit the jackpot on some speculative stock that makes it big).


  32. - Joe M. - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 1:27 pm:

    Even if one could take out THEIR money that they have contributed, to do so would loose any contribution from the State as employer. Someone doing this would have worked their years without the State as employer contributing a single penny towards their retirement.

    McDonalds contributes more towards the retirement of their part-time high school employees (6.2% into Social Security) than the State would have contributed for someone who would withdraw their money.


  33. - cassandra - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:15 pm:

    I’m with Fred’s M. Don’t do it. If you are strongly tempted, read a good book about the stock market first. I recommend the one by the guy who ran the Yale endowment, may still run it. Can’t remember the name, but it’s good.

    Perhaps this bill, if implemented, would give us one tool to measure the financial sophistication of our esteemed legislators though.


  34. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:33 pm:

    To repeat what I wrote yesterday:

    “… And if you quit and withdraw from the system, all you get back is your original contributions … no interest, no match, none of the money the state was supposed to have been putting away for you. And unless you properly roll the money to an regular IRA, you’ll be paying both taxes and early withdrawal penalities. Definitely not a good financial choice if you have very many years in.”


  35. - SIUPROF - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:39 pm:

    The legislature needs to be careful. By forcing new or existing people out of the defined benefit program (tier II or scaring people into accepting an offer of taking out their contributions or converting their contributions into a self managed plan, they just might dry up employee contributions into the defined benefit plan. If that happens, cash flow will suffer. An underfunded plan can continue to operate as long as their is enough cash coming in to pay benefits (kind of like a ponzi scheme). They need to accept the reality that the state has borrowed money from the pension systems and it is time to pay up. Adopting a version of Ralph Marti’s flat payment reorganization plan (perhaps at a bit lower amount over a few more years) makes the most sense. And extend the sales tax to services to help service the debt.


  36. - SIUPROF - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:40 pm:

    there-hate spellcheck


  37. - NoNameNick - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:45 pm:

    Seriously? Who has contributed $200,000 to their retirement system. I’ve been at it for 20 yerars and only had about $36,000 taken out of my pay. This exageration of the amopunts is what drives most of the rank and file crazy about these pension discussions. Like we have these huge pensions lined up. If I retired today my pension would be $1800/month. Any takers for the lifstyle that will afford?


  38. - Robert the Bruce - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 2:52 pm:

    ==And if you quit and withdraw from the system, all you get back is your original contributions … no interest, no match, none of the money the state was supposed to have been putting away for you.==
    I still think that this is an interesting concept - allowing early withdrawals. But it truly seems to be a terrible offer. If it was instead something like 75% of the present value of your earned pension (including what the state’s contribution should have been), then employees would have an interesting choice to make - 75% of a guaranteed pension or the chance that their pension will be fully funded, not reduced, not tampered with in any way. If enough said yes, it’d ultimately reduce the state’s pension obligation, but if too many said yes, the state wouldn’t have the money to pay.


  39. - reformer - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 4:37 pm:

    Do legislators who abstain from GARS have to pay Social Security with the employer match? If so, would legislators who withdraw from GARS have to start paying Social Security?


  40. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 5:49 pm:

    reformer @ 4:37ppm,

    It depends.

    From the 2012 GARS Handbook, page 4:

    ELIGIBILITY

    You automatically become a member of
    GARS unless you file an election with the
    Board of Trustees not to participate. Your
    written decision declining participation must
    be filed within 24 months from becoming a
    member.

    If you choose not to participate in GARS,
    you are subject to mandatory social security
    coverage unless contributing a minimum of
    7.5% of your legislative salary to a qualified
    Deferred Compensation Plan.


  41. - RNUG - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 5:52 pm:

    Should have added to the previous post …

    If that Deferred Comp is a 457 plan, once you leave government employment you can pull the money out of a 457 regardless of age and just pay straight income tax on it.


  42. - Flan - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 6:31 pm:

    I cannot imagine anyone would take their money out of SERS. I think we estimated once that a person with 30 years of funding in there would burn through their own contributions in about 6 years of retirement; after that you’re on the money the GA puts into the retirement system. That’s crazy talk.


  43. - rat - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 6:43 pm:

    Some math to think about

    Assumptions
    45 years old/$85,000 per year/16 years for the state.

    $45,000. Estimated pension with interest

    Retire at age 65 (20 more years)

    $45,000 (Base Amount)

    8% Interest (What the pension system calculates as rate of return)

    $5,100-Annual deposit (6% of salary invested per year) Employees pay 4% State wants 2% more

    You would have $473,708 with your name on it. If you also saved 6% of your own money, you would have $725,711 with your name on it.

    What if you started at 30 years old?

    The state wants to start paying pension when you are 65 and not give cost of living increases. I could live on $725,000 with deferred compensation. Also, this would be a choice therefore constitutional. The state would get rid of future pension liabilities and we could actually plan for our future. Sweet!!!!


  44. - WazUp - Thursday, Jan 24, 13 @ 7:32 pm:

    ==Tim bivins soon to be the recipient of two pensions. Yes folks 2 pensions.==

    He can’t be that dumb to introduce a bill like that and then not opt out can he?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* In which I agree with the governor
* Stuff you may not know about Illinois pensions
* It's just a bill
* Question of the day
* AG Madigan wants expansion of hate crime law
* Déjà vu all over again
* Rauner defends grand bargain parameters
* "We are proud to call him one of our own"
* Springfield holds its collective breath as strike talk mounts, budget impasse continues
* *** LIVE *** House session coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* Casino legislation watch still in effect..
* Rauner, it's time to get confrontational about .....
* State Week: Will AFSCME Strike?..
* Morning Spin: Rauner to meet with Chance the Ra.....
* Morning Spin: Rauner to meet with Chance the Ra.....
* Impasse cost? $2.5 million a day, governor says.....
* Union authorizes strike: University members und.....


* Body recovered from river near downtown Chicago
* Illinois Tollway eliminating buckets that catch coin tolls
* Pediatricians warn against pot use: Not your dad's marijuana
* 2nd murder trial for ex-Illinois prosecutor to begin
* Parking near Wrigley Field about to get more expensive
* Tight budget might mean no sheriff's patrols on Rock River
* Authorities shooting deaths of 2 was murder-suicide
* Authorities shooting deaths of 2 was murder-suicide
* Father of dead Navy SEAL refused to meet Trump at ceremony
* 2 young girls found dead after Chicago house fire

* Sanctuary issue draws dueling demonstrations to Capitol
* Rauner's office: Gov spends 55% of Illinois nights at Mansion
* Report: State senator's law firm dealings under scrutiny
* Durbin wants open look at Russian involvement in election
* Trump puts moderate GOP governors in awkward spot
* Economic stakes high for Springfield in labor showdown
* AFSCME authorizes strike, but still wants to bargain with Rauner
* AFSCME members authorize leaders to call strike
* Madigan forms Illinois House panel to address school funding
* Ex-U.S. Rep. Jackson gets about $138,400 in annual benefits

* Rauner's on a quest for more Medicaid savings
* Chicago investment firm doubles down on litigation
* Like our roundup? Share it around.
* For Chicago museums, it pays to be on public land
* Exelon hunts more state nuke subsidies following Illinois win


* No injuries reported in West Pullman vacant building fire
* Pediatricians warn against pot use: Not your dad’s marijuana
* Backyard buck, perch, people, sturgeon: Notes on Chicago outdoors
* Challenger GT is first muscle coupe with all-wheel drive
* 80-year-old man fatally struck by vehicle in Rosemont
* Police: Woman killed in Tri-State Tollway crash
* Phone scammers pretending to be Will County sheriff’s official
* 28-year-old man dies in DeKalb County crash
* Emma Stone: ‘I was holding my best actress card the whole time’
* Dear Abby: New mom unsure how to find good day care


* Palos Park mom influences retailers to use kids with disabilities in ads
* Employee alleged by prosecutors to bribe Dorothy Brown faces sentencing
* Feds seek life sentence for former Hobos member linked to five killings
* LINDA C. BLACK HOROSCOPES for 2/27/17
* New anti-Islamic State strategy may mean deeper U.S. involvement in Syria
* Here's what happened onstage during the Oscars' mistake
* Police: Mardi Gras crash suspect's alcohol level 3 times legal limit
* Money being raised to restore vandalized Jewish cemetery in Philadelphia
* Oscar night's nutty plot twist
* Emanuel's 'people plazas' program struggling to achieve liftoff


» Chicagoans Rally To Support Trans Rights After Trump Rescinds Student Protections
» Rauner Has Plan To Keep Government Running In Case Of Strike
» Congressman Rush Declares His Offices As Sanctuaries
» Weekend Funerals For Young Victims Of Chicago Violence
» CPS Relents, Returns $15 Million to Poorest Chicago Schools
» Doctors Discuss Alternatives To Opioids For Pain
» State Week: Will AFSCME Strike?
» Illinois Lawmakers: NEIU Student Workers Can Only Keep Jobs If State Passes Budget
» Civil Rights Investigation Into Cicero Schools Not Its First
» Indivisible Illinois Activists Concerned About Bobby Rush's Absence From Congress


* Sanctuary issue draws dueling demonstrations to Capitol
* Angie Muhs: It's time to name another Reader Advisory Board
* Bernard Schoenburg: Duckworth names 'thoughtful' former boss to downstate post
* Statehouse Insider: It's not the money, it's the appearance
* Our View: It's time for penance at the Capitol
* Rauner's office: Gov spends 55% of Illinois nights at Mansion
* Community Foundation: Sister's legacy lives on through scholarship fund
* Report: State senator's law firm dealings under scrutiny
* Durbin wants open look at Russian involvement in election
* Charles Krauthammer: Trump and the ‘Madman Theory’


* Pet Talk: Cracking down on antibiotics
* It's birthday party time at the University of Illinois
* Anti-corruption act in trouble
* Two Relay for Life events are relocating
* Illinois senators oppose EPA chief
* Those Who Served: WWII veteran survived B-17 crash, life as a POW
* A few facts about ACA/Obamacare
* President peddling faulty perspective
* Dick’s Sporting Goods is coming. What else does the metro-east want?
* Davis' tele-town hall was a joke


* Dawn Patrol: 'Moonlight' wins Best Picture. Really.
* Oops La La! Envelope mix-up nearly gives Best Picture Oscar to wrong movie
* IN Forecast
* IN Current Conditions
* 'Titanic' actor Bill Paxton dies at age 61

* US Representative Randy Hultgren visits ne...
* Hultgren criticizes immigration ban, Roska...
* Hultgren to join veterans' forum at Geneva...
* Majority of IL Congressional Delegation Op...
* Group upset with Trump wants Town Hall mee...
* Protesters Demand Town Hall Meetings From ...
* US Congressman tours new Aurora Specialty ...
* US delegation confers with Vice-President ...
* Protesters converge on U.S. Rep. Randy Hul...
* GOP congressman appears to distance himsel...

* Atlantic Track & Turnout hosts staff from ......

* Tammy Duckworth sets Commencement speaker ......

* Rhiannon Giddens, Ron Trent, D.C. blues, and blockchain: music stories from around the Web
* Statehouse 'civil war' to occur this spring on immigration disputes?
* This morning students at Swarthmore College are sitting-in, demanding that the administration divest in fossil fuel.
* Democratic Party suicide?
* Maryville East Coming Down Quickly
* #LibertysPromise
* The Democratic establishment.
* 81% of AFSCME Illinois state workers vote for strike authorization.
* Reading and slave insurrection.
* You’re not welcome here.


* Governor Bruce Rauner Honors Carnegie Hero From Buffalo Grove
* Governor Addresses State Board of Education to Emphasize Importance of Strong Accountability Standards
* Stars and Legends to Perform at 2017 Illinois State Fair - First Round of Grandstand Headliners Announced for Springfield Fair
* Earthquake Education Kiosk Unveiled at University Mall in Carbondale - IEMA, Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium project will help southern Illinois residents reduce damage, injuries from earthquakes
* Governor Takes Bill Action

  
* That surprising Sony Xperia XZ Premium is apparently the first commercial Snapdragon 835 phone
* MWC 2017: Nokia Announces Withings Rebrand and Nokia 3310 Reboot
* Huawei P10 First Impressions at MWC 2017 – Sexy Sleek (Video)
* Facebook digs into mobile infrastructure in Uganda as TIP commits $170M to startups
* Amazon and Netflix Celebrate First Oscar Wins For Streaming Services
* This is probably the Samsung Galaxy S8
* Jolla inks exclusive license to kick-start its Android alternative in China

* Family support helps Gonzalez tune for Classic
* Rodon 'all good' as he eases into spring action
* White Sox motivated to emulate Cubs' success
* Asche gets White Sox started in Quintana's debut
* Collins, Moncada make Sox debuts in Cactus opener
* Fulmer looks to keep learning throughout spring
* Fulmer's strong start highlights Cactus opener


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller