House approves handheld cellphone ban
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Daily Herald…
The Illinois House Friday voted to make it illegal to talk on a handheld cellphone while driving.
Supporters argued reducing distractions for drivers could prevent wrecks and deaths behind the wheel. […]
The measure was approved by a 64-46 vote and now moves to the Senate. Using a hands-free device would remain legal.
But state Rep. Dennis Reboletti, an Elmhurst Republican, voted against the plan and protested that talking on a phone would become a primary reason for police to pull over a driver. […]
The issue wasn’t a partisan one. State Rep. David Harris, an Arlington Heights Republican, said despite other distraction, lawmakers should ban the use of handheld phones anyway.
The bill is here…
Expands the prohibition on driving while using an electronic communication device to include uses beyond composing, sending, or reading an electronic message. Expands the exceptions to include the use of hands-free devices, two-way radios, and electronic devices capable of performing multiple functions as long as these devices are not used for a prohibited purpose. Establishes a graduated fine scale for repeat offenses.
This isn’t gonna go over too well with the libertarian types, but I figure, considering the makeup of the Senate, that it could be on its way to the governor’s desk relatively soon. We’ll see.
41 Comments
|
Raw audio of Poshard argument
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told you yesterday about a major public dustup between SIU President Glenn Poshard and former SIU Trustee Chairman Roger Herrin, who was backed by Gov. Pat Quinn, but who then began attacking Poshard. Pres. Poshard eventually engineered Herrin’s ouster with the cooperation of several trustees, and then Quinn tried to replace three of those trustees, only to watch the Senate unanimously reject all three of the governor’s replacements earlier this week.
Anyway, WSIU has posted raw audio of the argument between the two men. Because of today’s session, I haven’t been able to listen to much of the recording, but it may contain profanity, so beware if you’re in an office that discourages such things…
You might need to give it a few seconds to load, and then help us document the exchange in comments. Don’t use profanity, however. That would be wrong. Thanks.
* Coverage roundup…
* SIU Board Fails to Meet
* Southern Illinois University feud cripples trustees
* Tempers Flare at SIU Board of Trustees Meeting
* The gloves come off Poshard: Herrin tangle at SIU board meeting
* SIU president feuds with former board chairman
* SIU dispute comes to Edwardsville campus
* Hightower, Simmons, Hinrichs out on SIU board of trustees
* Legislator wants to split SIU
* Senate Bill Would Rebuild SIU Board
* Press Release: New Haine bill restructures SIU board and ensures balance
12 Comments
|
Question of the day
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* NRA lobbyist Todd Vandermyde testifying at a committee hearing…
* The Question: Caption?
Funniest commenter wins a $20 gift certificate at Springfield’s Grab-A-Java.
But make absolutely sure to keep it clean! Thanks.
* By the way, our previous winner was BentheDem…
In light of our success of Squeezy, I’d like to present Randy the Revenue Rabbit. You’re welcome.
BentheDem should send me an e-mail and we’ll work out the details.
* Also, if you have a business and would like to provide a sweet prize for caption contests, you should definitely contact me.
130 Comments
|
Shot down in flames
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* We’ve already discussed this topic…
Illinois lawmakers rejected a series of proposals Thursday that would have drastically reduced pension benefits for state employees.
But the exercise left little clarity in the overall push to overhaul the state’s under-funded retirement systems. […]
Republicans took no part in the voting, accusing House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, of playing politics with the state’s pension mess.
“Another day of games? This is anything but real,” said House Minority Leader Tom Cross, R-Oswego. “We need to sit down.”
* Let’s get to the explanations from the HDems…
“Well, I don’t know that there were any expectations. But people always talk about that we need to have roll call because we’ve heard that debate, right? We’ve heard people complain about stifling bills, stifling amendments. So we’re trying to offer an alternative this year on several significant issues. That’ll continue,” he said.
And…
“The strategy is to test the gamut of ideas,” Brown said. “Test every idea that’s out there,” Brown said “We’re still trying to find the plan that will have 60 votes here, 30 votes in the Senate and the signature of the governor.”
* Meanwhile, Democratic Rep. Jack Franks wants the House to hold a committee of the whole to discuss the issue. From a press release…
State Rep. Jack Franks (D-Marengo) blasted the ongoing delay of serious deliberation on Illinois’ public sector pension crisis and called for a committee-of-the-whole to hash out a solution that passes constitutional muster and ensures the long-term fiscal stability of the pension systems.
“Addressing our pension crisis is of paramount importance, and for the time being, we must suspend all other business before the House of Representatives until we have solved it,” said Franks. “All sides in the debate have succeeded in little besides prolonging the brinksmanship, and reaping the wrath of bond rating agencies while costing taxpayers $17 million a day in additional debt.”
House GOP Leader Tom Cross agreed. But Madigan’s guy threw cold water on the idea…
“The last thing I think the House of Representatives needs is another hearing. How many hearings have we had? How many bills have we offered? How many times have people withdrawn bills and ducked and bobbed and weaved? So a committee of the whole is really the craziest idea,” said Madigan spokesman Steve Brown.
Thoughts?
33 Comments
|
Trib has some contract details
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Tribune editorial board has some details on the tentative contract agreement between AFSCME and Gov. Pat Quinn…
State retirees would no longer get free health care coverage. About 90 percent of retired state employees, university workers, judges and lawmakers now pay nothing toward their insurance premiums. Instead, the state pays nearly $800 million a year for retiree coverage.
Lawmakers passed a bill last year ending the freebie, but Quinn’s lawyers insisted the issue of how much retirees would pay had to be bargained with AFSCME. Depending on how much retirees end up paying — if, for example, their contributions keep pace with the rising costs of health care — the state could see significant savings going forward. That would be good news.
Also good news: State workers who are not yet retired would pay more toward their current health care costs. Those workers pay roughly $300 a month in premiums for top-notch family coverage, a better deal than what most private-sector workers get.
So what did AFSCME get at the bargaining table? We’re told its members would receive no wage increase the first year. In 2014 and 2015, they would receive 2 percent each year for an average of 1.3 percent each year of the three-year contract.
Sounds like an austerity plan. But there’s a potentially costly catch. Unionized employees work under a “step” system that rewards them with automatic promotions based on years on the job. Not all state workers will be eligible for step increases during the life of the contract. The roughly 40 percent who are eligible would receive step increases, in addition to their wage hikes.
It’s unclear how the Gordon Maag lawsuit over a state law eliminating the 100 percent subsidy for insurance premiums will play into this, but I’ve contact Maag’s attorney and I’ll let you know.
Anyway, discuss.
95 Comments
|
More of the same
Friday, Mar 1, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The House Judiciary Committee debated an assault weapons ban yesterday with predictable results…
A two-hour House Judiciary Committee hearing on guns – its third in a week – produced virtually no common ground between the two sides in the decades-old debate over whether there is any reason for civilians to own semi-automatic guns capable of hosting high-capacity magazines.
“These weapons are designed for war, and these weapons are making their way underground to gangbangers and urban terrorists,” said Rep. Edward Acevedo, a Chicago Democrat sponsoring anti-assault-gun legislation. “Every one of us knows this isn’t going to happen any time soon. Don’t let the dysfunction in D.C. stop us from doing everything we can.”
The hearing produced familiar images, including Chicago Police Department photos of targeted guns. An NRA lobbyist argued “assault weapon” was a fear-mongering buzzword, created in the 1980s. And an FBI agent raised concerns the government would confiscate the assault weapon he uses to hunt deer should a statewide or national ban be approved, although key proposals both nationally and in Illinois would not round up existing weapons.
Republicans from suburban Chicago and suburban St. Louis blamed violence not on the guns, but on cuts in policing and laws too weak to scare law-breakers into compliance.
* More…
Homicides jumped 16 percent in Chicago in 2012, and the violence continued in January. Last year, police confiscated nearly 7,500 guns in Chicago, testified Alfonza Wysinger, the first deputy superintendent. Of those, he said, 277 were assault weapons. He drove home his concerns with more numbers: 45 assault weapons were among the 1,100 guns confiscated this year; since the federal ban was lifted in 2004, the city has seized 2,678 assault weapons. […]
Wysinger told lawmakers that an assault weapons ban “cannot come soon enough,” but he acknowledged that only a fraction of Chicago’s homicides are tied to the military-style, high-powered guns. For example, the 2011 Chicago Murder Analysis prepared by the Police Department reported that 361 of the city’s 433 homicide victims that year were shot, and “nearly all of those shootings involved handguns.”
Gun rights lawmakers countered that no prohibition is needed.
“We’re trying to pass a bill to make us feel good, and it isn’t going to do a thing,” said Republican Rep. Jim Sacia, a former FBI agent from Pecatonica. “I deer hunt with an assault weapon,” Sacia added.
* And…
Instead, the focus should be on upgrading mental health services in the state, said Greg Sullivan, executive director of the Illinois Sheriffs’ Association.
Seventy-three of the state’s 102 county sheriffs agreed in February to oppose the proposed assault weapons ban, Sullivan said.
“Focusing on the inanimate factor versus the human factor in all these shootings and all these attacks doesn’t focus on the mental health issues we’re facing here in Illinois,” Sullivan said.
* Meanwhile…
Rep. Jim Sacia has become an Internet celebrity.
During Tuesday’s long House debate on concealed-carry legislation, the Republican from far northwestern Illinois made an analogy that tied together guns and castration in one fell swoop.
Now, a YouTube video of his floor speech has drawn more than 14,000 views, and one top black lawmaker condemned Sacia’s remarks as the “most offensive statement” he’d heard. […]
“Here’s an analogy folks. I ask you to think of this,” Sacia continued as he bellowed over the noisy House chamber. “You folks in Chicago want me to get castrated because your families are having too many kids. It spells out exactly what is happening here. You want us to get rid of guns.”
A leading black lawmaker Thursday, state Rep. Will Davis (D-Homewood), condemned Sacia’s remarks as “one of the most offensive statements I’ve heard.”
“That epitomizes the view of … the Republicans or some Downstate Democrats, their view of African Americans, minorities or people from the city of Chicago, that all we do is lay around and make babies,” said Davis, joint chairman of the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus.
Many of the comments on the YouTube video are just awful and unprintable. Here are some comments, with redactions where necessary…
* cfrait1968: Good for Jim! I’ve always said that it’s time for the rest of Illinois to secede from Chicago and declare it’s independence as the new free state of South Illinois. Chicago contributes nothing and only takes from the rest of us. I am tired of seeing my hard-earned tax dollars stolen to support black racists, homosexual perverts, crooks, communist/socialist tyrants, and the welfare bums that make up the population of the godless Sodom on the lake called Chicago. Take our freedom back!
* 88mrgoldsmith: *** off chicago and ur people… Ur a *** disgrace to mankind.
* cfrait1968: Yes, it is. It is an evil abomination and I look forward to the day it is wiped out by the wrath of God. I mean that from the bottom of my heart.
* KBay84: They DON’T want to rehab OR work! They want a system that provides for them. We need to neuter/fix welfare moms & dads & gang bangers.
* Eric Terman: More evidence that angry paranoid gun nuts are insecure about their [male appendages].
* Zach C: Ah *** off buddy. The only ones with the [male appendage] problems are all the black males in Chicago leaving a trail of fatherless kids.
Unreal.
Sometimes, I really despise the Internet.
76 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|